427
Too Good To Be True? (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by undine53 ago by undine53 +428 / -1
Comments (53)
sorted by:
72
Lapstrake 72 points ago +72 / -0

If you look at the track record of our justice system in recent times, then yes, it is too good to be true, and they won't do anything because they are in the same club.

However, I believe the vaccine was the Shot Heard Around the World, and it was a trap that had to be sprung to expose them all.

Unfortunately, many people died while the trap was sprung, but there was no way around it. We will see what happens. I think things are moving along but it certainly is no popcorn-eating party.

28
FEARNOT 28 points ago +28 / -0

I'm surprised revenge killings haven't started. I sure wouldn't be mad about it.

27
KickingPugilist 27 points ago +27 / -0

Most people don't realize the jab is the cause of death or refuse to believe it for several reasons.

16
ImBillCurtis 16 points ago +16 / -0

CNN told me myocarditis was a normal response to teenagers being lonely.

12
Riggs99 12 points ago +12 / -0

And stress over climate change. Even the unborn are stressed.

7
Captainzoomer 7 points ago +7 / -0

I thought it was the fault of FUCKING WHITE MALES!

3
MAGA_mandalorian 3 points ago +3 / -0

straight white males. GET IT RIGHT BIGOT!

9
farpointpatriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is a great observation. If people become aware someone they loved was killed because of the lies … some folks might go John Wick on the guilty. I am in NO WAY WHAT SO EVER advocating violence or acts of revenge.

6
FEARNOT 6 points ago +6 / -0

Me either, I just wouldn't care. I'm like a typical government employee, NOT MY JOB.

5
ImBillCurtis 5 points ago +5 / -0

I advocate for acts of justice. In this judicial system or in a common law sense.

1
MAGA_mandalorian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I support revenge. In Minecraft....

8
Datadude 8 points ago +8 / -0

Won't be long.

9
Kaizen 9 points ago +9 / -0

And many more will die. And if death doesn’t occur, hardships and challenges of lost jobs, degraded health, and permanent damage are few of many scenarios. I don’t care about the money, I want everyone involved and complicit to these crimes to hang.

3
Joys1Daughter 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe this, too u/Lapstrake. The truth will be revealed about the bioweapons/virus/vaccine and that will be the beginning of the ended for (((them))).

Praying for this to happen SOON. 🙏

17
doug1956 17 points ago +17 / -0

My, how breathtaking!

First of all, it’s never been a secret that if fraud can be proven, they don’t have immunity. Secondly, they are the most criminally fined corporation in American history. Not a stretch here. Just hope some can actually prove and then someone actually does something about it.

11
InarosPrime 11 points ago +11 / -0

The CEO of Pfizer tweeted, stating the vaccine was 100% effective. Leading people to believe that, when it clearly wasn't 100% effective, is fraud.

6
Jacurutu99 6 points ago +6 / -0

I want that tweet engraved on his tombstone.

4
kula 4 points ago +4 / -0

Many Dutch residents got a letter from their GP stating the 'vaccine' was safe and had been tested, both statements proven to be untrue. We may get GPs suing the government and individuals suing their GP.

2
Euphemism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that is probably the best way into this for the rank and file citizen.

Sue your Dr's, since most of them advocated for the clot-shot. Put enough pressure on them and their association that they will look up for help, and when that doesn't come, they will look up to deliver their own lawsuits to protect themselves from the threat below.

Turn the bottom criminals against the next level up criminals, and reap the rewards.

11
BilleeBeene 11 points ago +12 / -1

Is this URGENT BREAKING NEWS?

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +7 / -1

URGENT BREAKING HYPOTHESIS!

And therefore:

IS THIS HYPOTHESIS TOO GOO TO BE TRUE?

11
sleepydude 11 points ago +11 / -0

By "if fraud is proven", do you mean if a judge rules that it has committed fraud?

Sure, that's fine, so long as you can get a judge to pass that ruling.

If you find that judge, they're probably already gagged, bagged, and in the back of a car in El Paso Texas with two bullet holes to the back of their head.

Sounds like an open and shut case of suicide. Yup, definitely suicide.

10
DwydeShrude 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don't see why you'd make big deal about it, everytime I commit suicide I always black bag and double tap myself. Zip tie my hands behind my back, too, if I'm feeling sparky.

6
Khakiclay 6 points ago +6 / -0

You must be clinton staffer. They are super gifted at that.

3
WeAreThePlan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Particularly the former bodyguards. They have a very short lifespan.

7
RealCleanUpPhilly 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is true though - there was fraud and big pharma are not indemnified against fraud.

7
ATLAS_ONE 7 points ago +7 / -0

The government will claim to be a victim and say this is the danger of capitalism and then say we need more regulation so they can kill us more efficiently next time.

It's not Pfizer coercing people to take a vaccine. It's not Pfizer locking people in their homes. It's not Pfizer smashing the heads of old ladies into concrete.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

Urgent

Breaking

"FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING IT TOUCHES" dates to 1878

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Global governments are already shaken to the core. Pedophilia and human trafficking among the malignant shit they pull.

4
PhDinNY 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think governments will sue, because they were knowingly part of it! (although they probably have their "plausible deniability" already lined up)

2
Space_Monkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who would the government sue? Pfizer? For what, dollars?

Bahahaha!

4
BigDaddy1reboot 4 points ago +4 / -0

OH PALEEZE! Big Pharma owns Congress. Those weasels are not going to bite the hand that makes them rich.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
pedewithweed 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
livenotbylies 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the US, if you commit a crime, it nullifies immunity. If Phizer knew the vaccine was dangerous, lied about it, and promoted the vaccine, then they're not immune from a lawsuit. Because criminal behavior and intent is bad faith.

If Pfizer pulled the vaccines as soon as they discovered they were unsafe, they would be immune. The Color of Law Act makes it a crime for any state actor or quasi state actor to knowingly deprive people of constitutional rights. CNN was once found liable as a quasi state actor because the incident involved CNN working with a government agency. If a private actor is assisting government interests, then they're public actors and can be sued for censorship and deprivation of rights.

Redditors constantly circulate the myth that private entities are protected from lawsuits if they censor people or violate people's constitutional rights. That is absolutely the arrogant mentality of corporate lawyers and most government actors. But it's incorrect. People don't bother looking up the actual case law.

So corporate owned America media companies have been found liable for deprivation of rights despite being a private entity. Just Google private actors color of law or quasi state actor color of law and there's tons of legal journal articles about the topic. Erwin Chemerinsky has a free Coursera class (or used to) about constitutional law. Highly recommend taking it. It covers how to make a private individual/entity liable for constitutional violations.

So if Pfizer was funding vaccine campaigns knowing it was dangerous, they're not immune. If they censored vaccine victims, they can be held liable since Pfizer's interests were the same as the governments.

Canada has something akin to common law but I'm not familiar enough with their tort law to comment.

2
cryofreeze 2 points ago +2 / -0

Proving fraud ain't easy lately.

2
DwydeShrude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Phizer legal team, in the face of insurmountable evidence, just say "no u" in rebuttal and Clinton/Obama appointed judge nods in approval and pens 45 page conclusion on the precedence of the "no u" defense and how this is all Trump's fault.

0
SeeAreJay 0 points ago +1 / -1

Chewbacha defence

2
PolishBaldEagle 2 points ago +2 / -0

RIP Viagra

2
InABlinkOfAnEye 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who are the governments gonna sue.....themselves.

2
Skankblunt42 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was always the case. The problem is Pfizer has countless contingency plans with countless mechanisms, especially black-mail, that they can use to twist the law to blunt any bullseye anyone thinks they can land. They literally had the mRNA gene therapies reclassified as vaccines and redefined what a vaccine is to get away with their crime.

2
freeDacian 2 points ago +2 / -0

one can call covid mess A perfect trap for big farma big media and social media/ When proven knowingly they did what they did....brace.

GG -good guys distracted them with Trump and elections to set a world wide trap...One can hope at least.

2
Daveyboy58 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only reason that "governments are going to sue" is to cover their own ass.

2
DiveAndBait 2 points ago +2 / -0

The damage has been done.

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sauce or gtfo

1
Honor+Duty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole “Immunity” thing is bullshit anyway. Our Fake representatives can’t negotiate out rights away. If we had a real justice system a Judge would say so.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
pawzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Governments won't be suing shit, because they were part of all of this. Police won't arrest anyone because they were part of it. "IF" fraud is proven. "IF". We all know what this means.

1
Likeitirish1 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they’ll ignore the fraud.