Too Good To Be True?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
If you look at the track record of our justice system in recent times, then yes, it is too good to be true, and they won't do anything because they are in the same club.
However, I believe the vaccine was the Shot Heard Around the World, and it was a trap that had to be sprung to expose them all.
Unfortunately, many people died while the trap was sprung, but there was no way around it. We will see what happens. I think things are moving along but it certainly is no popcorn-eating party.
I'm surprised revenge killings haven't started. I sure wouldn't be mad about it.
Most people don't realize the jab is the cause of death or refuse to believe it for several reasons.
And stress over climate change. Even the unborn are stressed.
I thought it was the fault of FUCKING WHITE MALES!
straight white males. GET IT RIGHT BIGOT!
This is a great observation. If people become aware someone they loved was killed because of the lies … some folks might go John Wick on the guilty. I am in NO WAY WHAT SO EVER advocating violence or acts of revenge.
Me either, I just wouldn't care. I'm like a typical government employee, NOT MY JOB.
I support revenge. In Minecraft....
Won't be long.
And many more will die. And if death doesn’t occur, hardships and challenges of lost jobs, degraded health, and permanent damage are few of many scenarios. I don’t care about the money, I want everyone involved and complicit to these crimes to hang.
I believe this, too u/Lapstrake. The truth will be revealed about the bioweapons/virus/vaccine and that will be the beginning of the ended for (((them))).
Praying for this to happen SOON. 🙏
My, how breathtaking!
First of all, it’s never been a secret that if fraud can be proven, they don’t have immunity. Secondly, they are the most criminally fined corporation in American history. Not a stretch here. Just hope some can actually prove and then someone actually does something about it.
I want that tweet engraved on his tombstone.
Many Dutch residents got a letter from their GP stating the 'vaccine' was safe and had been tested, both statements proven to be untrue. We may get GPs suing the government and individuals suing their GP.
Well that is probably the best way into this for the rank and file citizen.
Sue your Dr's, since most of them advocated for the clot-shot. Put enough pressure on them and their association that they will look up for help, and when that doesn't come, they will look up to deliver their own lawsuits to protect themselves from the threat below.
Turn the bottom criminals against the next level up criminals, and reap the rewards.
Is this URGENT BREAKING NEWS?
URGENT BREAKING HYPOTHESIS!
And therefore:
IS THIS HYPOTHESIS TOO GOO TO BE TRUE?
By "if fraud is proven", do you mean if a judge rules that it has committed fraud?
Sure, that's fine, so long as you can get a judge to pass that ruling.
If you find that judge, they're probably already gagged, bagged, and in the back of a car in El Paso Texas with two bullet holes to the back of their head.
Sounds like an open and shut case of suicide. Yup, definitely suicide.
I don't see why you'd make big deal about it, everytime I commit suicide I always black bag and double tap myself. Zip tie my hands behind my back, too, if I'm feeling sparky.
You must be clinton staffer. They are super gifted at that.
Particularly the former bodyguards. They have a very short lifespan.
It is true though - there was fraud and big pharma are not indemnified against fraud.
The government will claim to be a victim and say this is the danger of capitalism and then say we need more regulation so they can kill us more efficiently next time.
It's not Pfizer coercing people to take a vaccine. It's not Pfizer locking people in their homes. It's not Pfizer smashing the heads of old ladies into concrete.
Urgent
Breaking
"FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING IT TOUCHES" dates to 1878
Global governments are already shaken to the core. Pedophilia and human trafficking among the malignant shit they pull.
I don't think governments will sue, because they were knowingly part of it! (although they probably have their "plausible deniability" already lined up)
Who would the government sue? Pfizer? For what, dollars?
Bahahaha!
OH PALEEZE! Big Pharma owns Congress. Those weasels are not going to bite the hand that makes them rich.
I'll believe it when I see it
In the US, if you commit a crime, it nullifies immunity. If Phizer knew the vaccine was dangerous, lied about it, and promoted the vaccine, then they're not immune from a lawsuit. Because criminal behavior and intent is bad faith.
If Pfizer pulled the vaccines as soon as they discovered they were unsafe, they would be immune. The Color of Law Act makes it a crime for any state actor or quasi state actor to knowingly deprive people of constitutional rights. CNN was once found liable as a quasi state actor because the incident involved CNN working with a government agency. If a private actor is assisting government interests, then they're public actors and can be sued for censorship and deprivation of rights.
Redditors constantly circulate the myth that private entities are protected from lawsuits if they censor people or violate people's constitutional rights. That is absolutely the arrogant mentality of corporate lawyers and most government actors. But it's incorrect. People don't bother looking up the actual case law.
So corporate owned America media companies have been found liable for deprivation of rights despite being a private entity. Just Google private actors color of law or quasi state actor color of law and there's tons of legal journal articles about the topic. Erwin Chemerinsky has a free Coursera class (or used to) about constitutional law. Highly recommend taking it. It covers how to make a private individual/entity liable for constitutional violations.
So if Pfizer was funding vaccine campaigns knowing it was dangerous, they're not immune. If they censored vaccine victims, they can be held liable since Pfizer's interests were the same as the governments.
Canada has something akin to common law but I'm not familiar enough with their tort law to comment.
Proving fraud ain't easy lately.
Phizer legal team, in the face of insurmountable evidence, just say "no u" in rebuttal and Clinton/Obama appointed judge nods in approval and pens 45 page conclusion on the precedence of the "no u" defense and how this is all Trump's fault.
Chewbacha defence
RIP Viagra
Sauce or gtfo
Who are the governments gonna sue.....themselves.
This was always the case. The problem is Pfizer has countless contingency plans with countless mechanisms, especially black-mail, that they can use to twist the law to blunt any bullseye anyone thinks they can land. They literally had the mRNA gene therapies reclassified as vaccines and redefined what a vaccine is to get away with their crime.
one can call covid mess A perfect trap for big farma big media and social media/ When proven knowingly they did what they did....brace.
GG -good guys distracted them with Trump and elections to set a world wide trap...One can hope at least.
The only reason that "governments are going to sue" is to cover their own ass.
The damage has been done.
The whole “Immunity” thing is bullshit anyway. Our Fake representatives can’t negotiate out rights away. If we had a real justice system a Judge would say so.
Governments won't be suing shit, because they were part of all of this. Police won't arrest anyone because they were part of it. "IF" fraud is proven. "IF". We all know what this means.