I doubt public executions will ever be allowed in America based on the 8th Amendment protection from "cruel and unusual punishment." I understand every last rebuttal anyone could make to that and it still doesn't change my mind as it would most likely require an Amendment to the Constitution.
It's not a good look, optics wise. This would do serious damage to the USA's reputation, to Trump's reputation and Americans would be looked at unfavourably for decades to come, as the history books twist it all up and make it look even worse.
This term, Trump seems to be taking the high road on a lot of issues. That's certainly not to say he's opposed to putting foot to ass when required. Quite the opposite. Those seem to be the optics. Publically getting medieval on them isn't in step with him and the current narrative war.
This would give the cabal shitbirds a colossal pile of ammunition on a silver platter. Trump isn't going to let them punk him or us...If you don't believe that, you're telling us you've never read The Art of the Deal. I'm going to defer to his plan on this and not mine...
Now...that said, let me make myself very clear.
Most of us here emotionally want payback - myself included. I want to see public hangings of these evil bastards in the worst way. Pay per view - the whole nine...I don't want them to just hang, oh nooo...I want them to hang, drop into a chipper and the remains burnt to a crisp before being scattered into the ocean.
There's a reason they're not putting me in charge of justice because generations of stored up livid angst, vitriol, piss and vinegar could be turned into an incredible art form if just given the chance.
So...emotion fueled stuff aside, I hope cooler heads prevail... because I don't want Americans looked at like the world still looks at your average German (knotzees) decades later... Think about it.
What do you guys think about a porta potty diverter that pipes liquid directly to [NO NAME] mcstain's grave? I'm sure some of you have some other brilliant ideas I didn't think of yet!
Optics aside, doing it willy-nilly is unconstitutional based on Supreme Court precedent and previous interpretation of the wording in the 8th Amendment. Trump has been nothing but Constitutional along the way so all signs point to "not happening" ... unless they've already BEEN executed and they put on a show for the sake of public accountability which is where we go into the optics with the what-if. I imagine more people than not would be okay with it to be quite honest given the degenerate moral decay in large population centers across the country. Most people will be against treason and especially, crimes against children. If we know anything about Trump and his Deep State intentions, it's that this can NEVER happen again so public accountability could be on the table with actors and not actual executions. I don't know how it will play out but anything is possible though not probable.
I DO know that I've personally forgiven all known and unknown crimes, no matter how terrible they may be. I pray all involved find Christ and repent before they die. They'll get their adequate judgment from The Judge when they leave this life. We can only hope they've found Christ before then.
I dunno Bobby...It could very well be that there's been executions and GITMO "activities" we don't yet know about... and probably many we won't ever know about.
I always keep that image of JAG & MI from the 2016 inauguration speech filed away for rainy days when I need a reminder...
It stops right here, right now...
We only KNOW what the crumbs point to... and even then, there's plausible deniability...multiple meanings exist... Etc.
If we are watching a movie with great actors, then these actors are playing the roles of those who can't cameo themself. Detained or executed, I too believe there are people in the limelight that have long since been removed from the limelight.
What punishment is cruel and unusual? That it is public? That they are executed? Cruel and unusual would be drawing and quartering, or flaying alive, etc. Injecting someone with a sedative and something that stops the heart is not cruel. Heck, people are increasingly being euthanized, so that can't be cruel and unusual.
If you really do care knowing, your answers can be found by reviewing the details of Furman v. Georgia (1972) and Lockett v. Ohio (1978) for relevant Supreme Court precedent.
Awaiting patiently as we can, your spot on ! We are so ready and Lord help me find a woman in my life that can understand this. Many of us guys are just Rambo on farms hoping society has hope for us and ours.
Or, maybe, he’s signaling another 8-1 Supreme Court decision in his favor? In caps he says EIGHT PROTECT IMMEDIATELY.
Then END, which I’m interpreting means the comm embedded in the post has ended. And, END is embedded in the sentence that mentions the Supreme Court.
I continue to believe POTUS and his core team have extraordinary war gaming tools and can predict moves and countermoves so accurately it appears to be scripted. Or, maybe some key Unlawful Enemy Combatants from the first term have flipped to save their own asses and are now controlled?
Bottom line for me, POTUS will not publicly declare martial law, suspend habeas corpus, or anything else that will have normies declaring, “see I told you he’s a dictator!”
Instead we’re soon going to see some SCOTUS rulings in our favor that will shock the normies. But, because they’ve been brainwashed into believing SCOTUS is truly supreme, the normies will complain until something else grabs onto their short attention spans.
Soon but not yet. He's just injecting the notion like predictive programming to nudge the Overton window. But it won't happen quite yet because it needs to get more outrageous first. It will get worse before it gets better, mark my words. Two moar weeks? Nope.
I wonder if the members of the Supreme Court are all under control of the military and are told how to vote on certain cases. They vote up or down to save their own necks, yet at the same time their votes make them look like they are not controlled. Have we seen the phrase "the military is in control" in any of Qs posts? The SC will walk away from this unscathed if they play the game. If not, a tribunals is waiting for them along with a good neck stretching.
The only reason for this not to have been done already is political. People are suffering outrageously at the hands of a seriously corrupt judiciary. We didn't vote for this. We voted to stop this. Take these treasonous vermin down...permanently.
I don't see the cause for exultation. The only "drastic measure" (not Trump's words) is implied to be an immediate cease and desist order from the Supreme Court. Frankly, I am not holding my breath. There is no hint of anything else, even military tribunals...which the errant judges would also rule against.
This is just another "Oh! Something's going to happen!" piece of hopium.
This will be one wildly hot summer.
Make military tibunals great again!
Make public hangings the norm again!
Kim Clement - " Stange July, Strange July "
https://youtu.be/38E5ztgaK9Y?si=xfdYhRHZSzEpAyy2
YES!!
July 4 hangings or Guantanamo or Alcatraz.
All of them. We're so hungry for all of them
Make it so…Picard hand gesture…
u/#q3529
I doubt public executions will ever be allowed in America based on the 8th Amendment protection from "cruel and unusual punishment." I understand every last rebuttal anyone could make to that and it still doesn't change my mind as it would most likely require an Amendment to the Constitution.
Public executions were the norm until relatively recently...
...right up until Supreme Court precedent and interpretation of the law under the 8th Amendment made it go away. Which brings us full circle:
It will require a Constitutional Amendment to change that.
I appreciate your input however it changed nothing.
I doubt it as well.
Here's why:
It's not a good look, optics wise. This would do serious damage to the USA's reputation, to Trump's reputation and Americans would be looked at unfavourably for decades to come, as the history books twist it all up and make it look even worse.
This term, Trump seems to be taking the high road on a lot of issues. That's certainly not to say he's opposed to putting foot to ass when required. Quite the opposite. Those seem to be the optics. Publically getting medieval on them isn't in step with him and the current narrative war.
This would give the cabal shitbirds a colossal pile of ammunition on a silver platter. Trump isn't going to let them punk him or us...If you don't believe that, you're telling us you've never read The Art of the Deal. I'm going to defer to his plan on this and not mine...
Now...that said, let me make myself very clear.
Most of us here emotionally want payback - myself included. I want to see public hangings of these evil bastards in the worst way. Pay per view - the whole nine...I don't want them to just hang, oh nooo...I want them to hang, drop into a chipper and the remains burnt to a crisp before being scattered into the ocean.
There's a reason they're not putting me in charge of justice because generations of stored up livid angst, vitriol, piss and vinegar could be turned into an incredible art form if just given the chance.
So...emotion fueled stuff aside, I hope cooler heads prevail... because I don't want Americans looked at like the world still looks at your average German (knotzees) decades later... Think about it.
What do you guys think about a porta potty diverter that pipes liquid directly to [NO NAME] mcstain's grave? I'm sure some of you have some other brilliant ideas I didn't think of yet!
u/#trumpflag
Optics aside, doing it willy-nilly is unconstitutional based on Supreme Court precedent and previous interpretation of the wording in the 8th Amendment. Trump has been nothing but Constitutional along the way so all signs point to "not happening" ... unless they've already BEEN executed and they put on a show for the sake of public accountability which is where we go into the optics with the what-if. I imagine more people than not would be okay with it to be quite honest given the degenerate moral decay in large population centers across the country. Most people will be against treason and especially, crimes against children. If we know anything about Trump and his Deep State intentions, it's that this can NEVER happen again so public accountability could be on the table with actors and not actual executions. I don't know how it will play out but anything is possible though not probable.
I DO know that I've personally forgiven all known and unknown crimes, no matter how terrible they may be. I pray all involved find Christ and repent before they die. They'll get their adequate judgment from The Judge when they leave this life. We can only hope they've found Christ before then.
I dunno Bobby...It could very well be that there's been executions and GITMO "activities" we don't yet know about... and probably many we won't ever know about.
I always keep that image of JAG & MI from the 2016 inauguration speech filed away for rainy days when I need a reminder...
We only KNOW what the crumbs point to... and even then, there's plausible deniability...multiple meanings exist... Etc.
If we are watching a movie with great actors, then these actors are playing the roles of those who can't cameo themself. Detained or executed, I too believe there are people in the limelight that have long since been removed from the limelight.
What punishment is cruel and unusual? That it is public? That they are executed? Cruel and unusual would be drawing and quartering, or flaying alive, etc. Injecting someone with a sedative and something that stops the heart is not cruel. Heck, people are increasingly being euthanized, so that can't be cruel and unusual.
If you really do care knowing, your answers can be found by reviewing the details of Furman v. Georgia (1972) and Lockett v. Ohio (1978) for relevant Supreme Court precedent.
I suspect you're right, Joys1Daughter. Some things can be done gently; some things can't.
I believe we are building our way to this also.
Most people have no idea this is even happening. Normies gonna norm.
Awaiting patiently as we can, your spot on ! We are so ready and Lord help me find a woman in my life that can understand this. Many of us guys are just Rambo on farms hoping society has hope for us and ours.
She is out there somewhere. Have faith and pray.
Yes...pray for God to send you the mate he wants you to have. God's timing is Perfect! ✨
I'm praying for you Patriot men to find Patriot women! 🙏
Oh hell yeah! That's a prayer I could use.
Prayers for you, too fren! 🙏🤍
Or, maybe, he’s signaling another 8-1 Supreme Court decision in his favor? In caps he says EIGHT PROTECT IMMEDIATELY.
Then END, which I’m interpreting means the comm embedded in the post has ended. And, END is embedded in the sentence that mentions the Supreme Court.
I continue to believe POTUS and his core team have extraordinary war gaming tools and can predict moves and countermoves so accurately it appears to be scripted. Or, maybe some key Unlawful Enemy Combatants from the first term have flipped to save their own asses and are now controlled?
Bottom line for me, POTUS will not publicly declare martial law, suspend habeas corpus, or anything else that will have normies declaring, “see I told you he’s a dictator!”
Instead we’re soon going to see some SCOTUS rulings in our favor that will shock the normies. But, because they’ve been brainwashed into believing SCOTUS is truly supreme, the normies will complain until something else grabs onto their short attention spans.
We are at WAR [@].
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN.
That's why POTUS quoted Napoleon:
"He who saves his country breaks no law."
[37] on the Clock.
u/#q521
[37] on the Clock = June 5
LEARN TO READ & USE THE Q CLOCK HERE:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxUgW2y2/probably-the-best-qclock-post-ev/
Absolutely John!
We are at WAR[@].
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN.
This is critical to remember...
Soon but not yet. He's just injecting the notion like predictive programming to nudge the Overton window. But it won't happen quite yet because it needs to get more outrageous first. It will get worse before it gets better, mark my words. Two moar weeks? Nope.
Just do it. They didn't have a lot of sympathy for J6'ers who were neither criminals nor illegally here
https://nitter.poast.org/RealAF_Patriot/status/1925663200504103198
I wonder if the members of the Supreme Court are all under control of the military and are told how to vote on certain cases. They vote up or down to save their own necks, yet at the same time their votes make them look like they are not controlled. Have we seen the phrase "the military is in control" in any of Qs posts? The SC will walk away from this unscathed if they play the game. If not, a tribunals is waiting for them along with a good neck stretching.
Great question! They could already be under orders in this movie .
The only reason for this not to have been done already is political. People are suffering outrageously at the hands of a seriously corrupt judiciary. We didn't vote for this. We voted to stop this. Take these treasonous vermin down...permanently.
Great header Joys1Daughter
👊 👍 🐸 🐸 🐸
Thanks fren!
Habeas Corpus is up to bat!
I agree, totally, with the above comment. It is time to start taking drastic measures.
This is the Left’s clear goal: make Trump act like a dictator so they can say I told you so and use their media to cause chaos in the streets.
We Love you Mr President!!! ♥️♥️♥️
We, the People, and your supporters for the past decade - Stand behind you in support 100%.
May God continue to guide you and protect you as you execute your plan to Make America Great Again!!!
u/#trumpflag
Well said my fren! 👏🇺🇸♥️
He was "forced"? By whom? And if they can force him to do this, what else are they going to force him to do? Is this comms?
Do you even understand what was said?
yes. and my president doesnt get forced. he does what he wants. so if he tweets that he is forced, then he is sending comms. think mirror.
ncswic
Excellent.
I don't see the cause for exultation. The only "drastic measure" (not Trump's words) is implied to be an immediate cease and desist order from the Supreme Court. Frankly, I am not holding my breath. There is no hint of anything else, even military tribunals...which the errant judges would also rule against.
This is just another "Oh! Something's going to happen!" piece of hopium.
I can’t see where did he say “… or he will be forced to do what must be done”.
Instead he said he hopes the Supreme Court will take a stance.