1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Traitors πŸ‘ to πŸ‘ the πŸ‘ Republic πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

39
BeerMan 39 points ago +39 / -0

Here's a thought:

Abolish the TSA. Make airports liable for any terrorist that gets through their checkpoint. Now all of these TSA agents can get new jobs for the private sector, and we don't have to yield our 4th amendment rights to government agents to fly.

4
BeerMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

1984

12
BeerMan 12 points ago +12 / -0

More patriots need to volunteer to serve as poll workers. That's one thing we can actually do to directly improve our elections. We shouldn't be waiting for Trump or the military to come save us.

12
BeerMan 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't remember. I don't recall.

Calling it now: every response will be some variation of this πŸ‘†

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you clean the corrupt legislature

You need a good, knowledgeable, and engaged population to vote in the good legislators.

The core issue is that society is corrupt (and immoral, and unintelligent, and disengaged) for the most part, so they vote for legislators that match their poor values.

So maybe the church can help fix the population to fix the legislature?

But a faster process could be military justice. Or American Revolution 2.0 πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

3
BeerMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Judges are appointed by the executive and confirmed by the legislature in most jurisdictions. At the federal level, the executive is the President and the Senate does the confirmation. (Some jurisdictions elect judges, but as you'll see below that's a perversion of the original intent.)

If a judge is not appropriately fulfilling their duties, they can be impeached by the legislature and removed from office that way.

This arrangement is designed so that judges could be mostly free from the influence of changing political whims. That is changes in the executive and the legislature typically do not threaten a judge's job.

Now when you have corrupt executives and corrupt legislatures, there's not much you can do in those circumstances πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

This is what Trump is up against.

6
BeerMan 6 points ago +6 / -0

1917 land sales between Denmark and the USA

This includes the now-called US Virgin Islands where Epstein Island (Little Saint James) is located.

4
BeerMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

How about all of the photos with thumbs up πŸ‘πŸ‘

5
BeerMan 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Trump said, "Air is good to breathe," the left would suffocate themselves. They will take any position to oppose Trump. OrAnGe MaN bAd

4
BeerMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your bank or credit union could probably do a "billpay" payment. At no expense to you, they will cut a check and mail it on your behalf.

19
BeerMan 19 points ago +19 / -0

Nothing Burger

This has been a thing for at least 10 years, and you can see articles going back that far about it for timely local tax payments sent by mail.

The "postmark" exists to cancel postage (that is, to mark the stamp so it's no longer usable). In the modern postal service, that gets done by the automated sorting machines. So the postal worker collects the mail for the day, and then ships it off to the sort facility. It may get a postmark applied that same day, or it could take 1 or 2 business days before your mail gets into the sort machine, and then you'll get a postmark that's a few days later.

If the postmark date really matters to you, like for timely tax payments and mail-in ballots, the procedure is to go see a clerk at the post office and ask for them to apply a postmark right then. You'll see it physically applied and with the current date. So any recipient will know your exact date of mailing.

Even with the manually-applied postmark, the machine may apply an additional one as well with a later date. But recipients should look at whichever date is earlier.

This is an efficiency thing and has been in place for at least 10 years if not longer. To actually ensure every piece of mail gets a postmark on the day it was collected increases manpower and costs, for something that usually doesn't matter for 99% of mail.

25
BeerMan 25 points ago +25 / -0

Bold Move

The President declaring someone guilty before they've been tried & convicted can be grounds for a mistrial.

I think this is more evidence that we're watching a movie. Trump wouldn't make such a grave "error" on live television unless NCSWIC

view more: Next ›