I SERIOUSLY doubt they're doing this research themselves, or even that a majority of the paywalled studies are related to their organization.
They could get funding so easily if they went public with their own data showing cancer treating properties. They don't need to beg standard individuals to get that money, certainly not people who are likely to be cancer victims themselves.
There's a monthly subscription for the medical info
Then it's a scam. Anyone who is genuinely sharing information on this topic and trying to make a difference wouldn't put it behind a paywall. And what a horrible target audience, too. Out of all the people to rip off, they're preying on cancer victims.
That doesn't mean IVM and related drugs don't have cancer benefits, but information such as this wouldn't require a paywall.
yt-dlp has mostly replaced it. It's a superior fork.
You've got an entirely wrong perspective on things. Our bodies regulate our cholesterol levels. Our bodies are an incredibly amazing tool given to us by God. People who have high cholesterol have such because of any number of reasons outside of dietary restrictions.
though I will say that the good bits of biological research (lots of third party research across the world) don't agree, but that also doesn't mean we should just take that as fact.
That's simply not true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7zWNabebxs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVNdpCZWWZE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rui6NC4jnDk
Seems weird that you would, I assume, accept that microplastics can enter our bodies through consumption but not cholesterol.
Entering our bodies != entering our bloodstreams, nor having an impact on us. Microplastics is such a laughably different context that the fact you would even compare the two shows your level of understanding of the human body.
Cholesterol isn't even a, "nutrient" as you suggest.
Both cholesterol are good, nor does dietary cholesterol inherently increase blood level cholesterol made by your body.
Blaming cholesterol for health problems is like blaming your blood when you get a cut. The blood which is forming a scar (healing) isn't to blame, ever for the cut.
It's more related to insulin resistance as a result of eating too many carbs, but you're on the right track. Heart disease is also highly related to the same carb diet.
"Google" isn't your source. Look at the actual laws and see what they say.
https://handgunlaw.us/ is a good source to make it easy to compare states, with direct quotes and references to the statutes themselves.
It did. Alabama was the one that delayed recognition of constitutional rights for no valid reason.
When representatives don't even know the laws that they're referencing it makes us all look stupid.
Bring charges or hold another election.
If you don't do the first, what the fuck do you think is the benefit of the second?
You sit here and lie to my face, then accuse me of being the uncivil one? I presented several questions to you, all of which you ignored. You then proceeded to respond to me by implicitly lying about what I have stated and asked you.
Believing in a flat Earth takes a special kind of stupid. Your video had no point to it, and when I call you out on it, you respond with further lies and manipulation. Don't sit here and act like I'm the one being uncivil for calling you out on your BS.
And about your PM? "You are a bully And that is not a Christian value. Shameful."
I'm not bullying you by calling you out as a liar. If anything, I'd be an asshole for not calling out bullshit when it's presented. Your lies are actively harming positive outcomes from patriots.win and greatawakening.win related forums. Even ignoring other people, they are harmful to yourself. Jesus called out liars, manipulators, cheats, and the like all throughout the New Testament. Don't quote me about values which you clearly don't understand.
...What exactly do you think that video demonstrates? Like, at all? What clip from that video do you mean to point towards?
This video starts with a magician... doing... a magic trick... for comedy. His name is Richard Garriott and even the slightest amount of research would result in that being a very obvious comedy bit. And it uses that as, "evidence." That's the best thing that this video shows, and it's absolutely nothing.
The rest are a mix of demonstrating perfectly normal things occurring and someone with an agenda trying to shoehorn them in. Movies exist, astronaut training facilities exist, misspeaking happens (trying to say, "...is underway here on the ground" and actually saying, "is underground"), a city guy being reminded of a planetarium when he first sees a true night sky is perfectly normal, and video advertisements exist.
It's an impressive amount of stupid to share that video, thinking that it even presents an argument of something, much less evidence.
Cholesterol is not the enemy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7zWNabebxs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVNdpCZWWZE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rui6NC4jnDk
Blaming cholesterol for strokes and other heart related problems is like blaming the blood that you bleed when you get a cut (as opposed to whatever actually made the cut). It doesn't make even a little bit of sense.
I understand that you're not suggesting that cholesterol is inherently the problem here, but anything that reduces cholesterol (such as statins) are usually very bad for one's health. I'm just saying to be careful with the line that you're treading.
Are you stupid? I post in the same vein as u/Vindicator63 and you think I'm a troll? I merely stated that this is likely wishful thinking, as candidates do all the time.
The only real cuck here is you, as you try to divide this group.
If they actually catch them doing such thing with UNDENIABLE PROOFS
So was your memory of 2020 just completely wiped?
I'm sorry but I think that if he actually did that
He doesn't have the capability to do this at a technical level.
Be careful about what people will tell you about The Bible, God's plans, Christianity, End Times Prophecy, etc, around here.
If it can't be backed up from God's Word, it shouldn't be trusted. You will find some truly wacky beliefs regarding Christian Faith around here. You'll also find people who are genuine and follow Christ.
I warn you to err on the side of caution as a seemingly new Christian. Christ and God's Word comes first. I repeat: If it can't be readily backed up from God's Word, do not listen to them. My goal isn't to divide you, this group, or anyone from Christ. I'm just stressing caution with your new faith, and to remind/encourage you to only focus on what matters (Christ).
God bless you.
I think you may have misread his comment.
Are they wrong to believe that given the past 2 years?
anti-diabetes, anti-obesity
I don't think you're going to find a drug which fundamentally changes the biochemistry and biology of humans like that.
These things are curable (not type 1, but type 1 is highly manageable) already with a proper diet.
First of all, you're the only one slandering anyone...
But regardless, yes, it very much so does. But again, keep showing how little you understand about what Jesus instructed us to do.
You are complete insane if you think sending me a wall of text in every response is an effective way to get me to agree with your heresy.
I didn't even hit the word count. If you truly cared about the topic, you'd find that you could at least read through it in 5-10 minutes, TOPS. It didn't take me more to write it, so it shouldn't take you that long to read it.
But you refuse because you seemingly aren't capable of defending your viewpoints. That's time for some self reflection on your part.
How about we work it out in heaven?
Right, because that's what Jesus commanded us to do... /s
First of all, glad that we can have a discussion about this. I don't see that very often these days, even in these .win communities.
I just don't think that evolution is keeping people from God. I like my sin is keeping them from God, and evolution is just an excuse. There will always be something that "keeps people" from God. I think when God draws us in, many times there's things not right in us or that we don't understand.
Sure, if you're looking at it with that hard definition in mind, the only thing that keeps us from God is our rejection of Christ. Someone who believes in evolution but also puts his faith in Christ (and all the details of which this entails) will receive salvation.
But there's a different meaning that people are discussing here, I'll get back to it below. It's a semantics difference I guess.
For example, if "evolution" is keeping people from God, then why is the virgin birth not? Creation and a virgin birth are both "impossible" to those who believe in evolution.
I think evolution is more of the enemy's tactic of perverting what is true. But that's the case with everything the deep state does and the enemy has done since the beginning of time. I absolutely don't agree with any facet of evolution, but I think there's more important hills to "die on" than that one.
So just as I said above, I think it's fully possible to believe that Mary wasn't a virgin and yet have faith in Christ, however I doubt in a practical sense that this faith would often be genuine. There's two important distinctions to be made here:
- Evolution can be shoved into The Bible if you extrapolate out of your mind in what each, "day" is in Genesis - aka one could believe that each day represents time periods of Earth as God used evolution to create Earth as we know it. It's not inherently rejecting The Bible's teaching (though I would say that a more in depth study would show that it is rejecting God's Word on the issue - getting into a tangent at this point but you see the nuance I'm adding hopefully). Mary's virgin birth however is explicitly stated in God's Word, and refusing to believe that is explicitly and inherently rejecting God's Word. So, it's a bit of a different context there. Ultimately you could argue salvation still comes from Christ's sacrifice and our acceptance of Him, but the difference is at least notable.
- Mary's virgin birth is a doctrine requirement for Christ's perfect life and therefore his payment for our sin. Christ was born without the seed of man, and therefore lacked the sin nature that was inherent in man. There's more to this point but it's again it's own topic.
So, for these reasons, I don't think evolution is quite an accurate comparison to the virgin birth, but I also think salvation is through faith in Christ alone. It's not our works or our detailed understanding of His Word that save us, ultimately. It's just the belief in Christ, acceptance of His gift through faith, that provides salvation.
Please don't misunderstand what I'm saying – I completely agree and stand with what people and organizations like AIG are doing.
Of course, there's great value in true discussion! We'd never learn anything if we were unable to discuss and defend viewpoints, and this applies to most every aspect of life.
So going back to what I referenced earlier, I believe it's a semantics problem. Believing in evolution doesn't prevent someone from believing in Christ if they have a desire to do so. It does however often make people doubt The Bible as truth.
I've met many people in person who reject The Bible and Christ because they were taught evolution. They just accept the theory of evolution as hard fact, and as a result, they think The Bible must be fiction. They refuse to believe, "those old fantasy stories" because they believe that, "muh modern science" contradicts it and proves it to be false. This is what I interpreted the above statements to mean, and I would imagine that this is how others view, "evolution keeps people from God." It keeps them from being willing to come to God.
Truthfully, I need to strengthen my knowledge of evolution and Genesis, as it's an important first step for many in approaching God.
The heck are you running and why is it connected to the internet?