They need to pass the CR to fund the government through September. The fiscal year 2026 budget will include all of the DOGE cuts, Trump's tax cuts and whatever and will be done through reconciliation. It's the best opportunity to shrink size of the federal government for the first time in 50 years. The democrats want to avoid that and apparently Massie does also.
Lol, imagine saying somebody who sends rockets to space and then catches them isn't a serious person.
Blue Sky is the X knock off that all the leftists fled to. Word is it's a giant echo chamber with heavy censorship.
It came back for a bit a half hour ago and went down again.
I'm guessing USAID funds their identity politics.
Once elected they remade her image into the black AOC. It's all marketing to reach certain demographics in their base. Look at how much media attention she's suddenly getting.
I know people don't like Ariel, but he has a detailed breakdown of how she got her money...
Lol, I clicked on one and some girl was babbling incoherently, it sounded like she was training to be an auctioneer.
It’s against the law for anyone on temporary status to support known terrorist organizations.
Thanks for clarifying.
They're leaderless and directionless. The only resistance to Trump has come from the media and activist judges.
Shipwreckedcrew's thoughts are worth reading on this.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1897329816053146054
and his follow up post
As usual, there's a lot more nuance to this SC decision in terms of what was brought before them and what they ruled on.
Shipwreckedcrew breaks it down...
Sounds like a good excuse to audit the spending and pay or don't pay accordingly.
Despite the absurdity of it, it's not a wide ranging decision. It focuses on payments for work already performed.
Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in their dissent...
"Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic “No,” but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned."
She actually says yes when Trump asks if they want the war to continue for 5 more years.
She’s on the warpath!
Great way to put it - political marketing. He's an actor playing his part in the marketed war.
? This is from 8 days ago.
Was just going to post it…
Was he the one who tried recruiting people to go fight in Ukraine or is Macgregor talking about something else?
He says the UK are prepared to back a new plan for Ukraine that includes boots on the ground and planes in the air.
It's cute that they think they can turn the tables and put Trump in a corner when he's holding all the cards.
I think it was an all out effort to deny Trump this mineral rights deal before his Congressional Address on Tuesday. The deal would be a major step towards ending the war and they want to deny him the win.
Money and he seems to expect US troops.
The judge doesn't have jurisdiction anyway because the defendant was immediately moved to Louisiana. The judge's filing is against the head of ICE's New York Office.