As long as it's not written in stone, there is a reasonable doubt. If there is a reasonable doubt, cognitive dissonance will resolve to "You can go about your business. Move along, move along."
If, on the other hand, there is no reasonable doubt left, then, and only then, will people be forced to do something about it.
The people may not be the same, but the institution (C_A) is still the same. The evidence of it's shadyness is easy to see if a person is motivated to look. What if everyone was given evidence that proves, by their own account, that they killed JFK in conjunction with both MI6 and Mossad? Would everyone be motivated to look at the details of their general fuckery? Would they be motivated to look into their origins? Would people see that the C_A was actually created by the Rockefeller family?
So much is connected to that event. Once you are motivated to connect the dots, the dots paint a very different picture of our world. The JFK stuff is proof of a black swan. You can't unlearn about black swans.
When it goes on the official record that an intelligence agency took out a sitting US President, the next logical step is for said agency to no longer exist. This is why...
I'm not sure if I agree with you that it's that simple. JFK had many enemies for myriad reasons. I think it's reasonable to suspect that this is more complex than simply "The CIA & Lyndon Johnson conspired to murder JFK".
There's a reason that powerful people are still trying to prevent this and consequently, I suspect that there will be some surprises in the data.
Even the partial releases from a few years ago acknowledged that Oswald was a CIA asset. Whether knowingly part of it or a stoolie all along, the agency officially was involved and at this point I think the official story is "well he wasn't working for us ANY MORE and we hid that information for no reason!"
I don't keep up with him, but the few video clips I've seen of him since he was let go from CNN, I've noticed he's changed a lot. Seems to have a bit more common sense and not as much a shill for the left as he once was.
The entire lot of a certain agency needs to be recalled from all the countries, put on a special U.S. plane, from which the pilot ejects, and allow it to nosedive into the ocean. Problem solved.
CIA and Mossad were threatened with exposure by JFK of their dark agenda. And his own vice-president was an evil lying bastard who was happy to help a situation get him installed as president.
JFK did not want, as he said, secrets that would enslave every man, woman and child. He was a thorn in the side of The NWO. And no doubt more reasons why he became "inconvenient". But why, his brother? I don't remember why he was a threat to them
Things still are set up to cover for Israel. It's immoral.
It's been 62 years and everybody working within the CIA back then is dead. Why keep those names secret? We all suspect the CIA killed JFK with LBJs blessing, yet no one is alive who really cares. So what is the reason the lid is still being kept on this secret? Is the current CIA worried about blowback from the uncovering of their hand in the assassination? Why? That was decades ago and hopefully the "new" CIA has changed their ways. Or does the CIA not want a anal exam of all their dealings throughout the decades? Why would they care about that? They are a spy agency with the ability to kill bad guys. What if the CIA is protecting the legacy of JFK? Could JFK have been a commie asset, like Barry? Now if that were true I can see why the current CIA would want to keep a lid on it because they don't want a finger pointing at them for installing Barry as an illegitimate POTUS.
Remember also that when Pres. Trump declassified some files in his first term, some of released files referenced Hitler in South America post WW2. The truth is likely to be wilder than we assume.
I read that. It was a field report that included rumors. Plenty of eyewitness evidence that he died in Berlin. The "Hitler in South America" myth is right up there with the quest for El Dorado.
It’s been 62 years. The whole friggin world can easily guess who was behind it. What at this point are they still so desperate to hide
As long as it's not written in stone, there is a reasonable doubt. If there is a reasonable doubt, cognitive dissonance will resolve to "You can go about your business. Move along, move along."
If, on the other hand, there is no reasonable doubt left, then, and only then, will people be forced to do something about it.
The people may not be the same, but the institution (C_A) is still the same. The evidence of it's shadyness is easy to see if a person is motivated to look. What if everyone was given evidence that proves, by their own account, that they killed JFK in conjunction with both MI6 and Mossad? Would everyone be motivated to look at the details of their general fuckery? Would they be motivated to look into their origins? Would people see that the C_A was actually created by the Rockefeller family?
So much is connected to that event. Once you are motivated to connect the dots, the dots paint a very different picture of our world. The JFK stuff is proof of a black swan. You can't unlearn about black swans.
The genie ain’t out yet, but the bottle is open. In the time it takes for disclosure many agendas will be revealed.
We KNOW that there are coups in other countries.
What is it that makes so many people here so hands-over-ears?
When it goes on the official record that an intelligence agency took out a sitting US President, the next logical step is for said agency to no longer exist. This is why...
I'm not sure if I agree with you that it's that simple. JFK had many enemies for myriad reasons. I think it's reasonable to suspect that this is more complex than simply "The CIA & Lyndon Johnson conspired to murder JFK".
There's a reason that powerful people are still trying to prevent this and consequently, I suspect that there will be some surprises in the data.
Even the partial releases from a few years ago acknowledged that Oswald was a CIA asset. Whether knowingly part of it or a stoolie all along, the agency officially was involved and at this point I think the official story is "well he wasn't working for us ANY MORE and we hid that information for no reason!"
I was thinking the same thing - it's downright scary
I don't keep up with him, but the few video clips I've seen of him since he was let go from CNN, I've noticed he's changed a lot. Seems to have a bit more common sense and not as much a shill for the left as he once was.
We’ve always suspected Tom Cotton was swamp
Republican from Arkansas, went to Harvard. Why is he covering for JFK killers?
$$$$
I hope it’s just that
The entire lot of a certain agency needs to be recalled from all the countries, put on a special U.S. plane, from which the pilot ejects, and allow it to nosedive into the ocean. Problem solved.
And don't tell them. The pilot jumps with the only chute, and the world gets to watch their reactions in a live stream of the passenger compartment.
You guys are sick individuals. I fully support this.
Chris isn’t wrong 🤷🏼♂️
Tom Cotton is probably the most pro-Israel shill in Congress.
CIA and Mossad were threatened with exposure by JFK of their dark agenda. And his own vice-president was an evil lying bastard who was happy to help a situation get him installed as president. JFK did not want, as he said, secrets that would enslave every man, woman and child. He was a thorn in the side of The NWO. And no doubt more reasons why he became "inconvenient". But why, his brother? I don't remember why he was a threat to them Things still are set up to cover for Israel. It's immoral.
RFK would have investigated his brother's death is why.
It's been 62 years and everybody working within the CIA back then is dead. Why keep those names secret? We all suspect the CIA killed JFK with LBJs blessing, yet no one is alive who really cares. So what is the reason the lid is still being kept on this secret? Is the current CIA worried about blowback from the uncovering of their hand in the assassination? Why? That was decades ago and hopefully the "new" CIA has changed their ways. Or does the CIA not want a anal exam of all their dealings throughout the decades? Why would they care about that? They are a spy agency with the ability to kill bad guys. What if the CIA is protecting the legacy of JFK? Could JFK have been a commie asset, like Barry? Now if that were true I can see why the current CIA would want to keep a lid on it because they don't want a finger pointing at them for installing Barry as an illegitimate POTUS.
Remember also that when Pres. Trump declassified some files in his first term, some of released files referenced Hitler in South America post WW2. The truth is likely to be wilder than we assume.
I read that. It was a field report that included rumors. Plenty of eyewitness evidence that he died in Berlin. The "Hitler in South America" myth is right up there with the quest for El Dorado.
Kind of puts Tom Cotton in bad odor, doesn't it?
Could it be that the people who are trying to block the info fear for their lives?