Are you sure? I use firefox on an android phone (desktop mode) and some time ago noticed that things changed, and I couldn't vote on posts at all (the button was gone). Turning off desktop mode isn't a serious option, and the only way I could get full functionality back was to turn off community styling. Looks the same to me today as it did when I first noticed the change.
I saw people saying "Trump 2.0 is different. MOSSAD compromised him" and all I can think is, why are you even here? Have you forgotten what's been going on for the past decade? This isn't a general republican hangout space.
Who is doing the better investigation? Probably not the one who says the victim spoke to her in a dream.
Kash probably already knows the answer, but it is not the right time to reveal it to the public. Timing is everything.
Q has always been a psyop. That's the point from the start. The military manipulating us to "wake us up" and start thinking in certain ways and looking certain places. The question is whether it was a (significant enough) deception. Not all payops are bad.
Start asking them questions. Have them think about this: How big was Epstein's villainy? Why was he protected for so long? Who all was in on it? What organizations? What systems would have to be compromised? What lengths would such people go to for power and to avoid justice?
Then ask: How would you take them down? Could it be done without the bloodshed of a full-scale war? What qualities would the public face of change have to have? A clean record, a total rejection of Epstein's advances, an immunity to bribery?
How long are you willing to wait? What has she done to earn that patience? What unique insight has she had, not shared by other prominent right-wing voices, that's later been vindicated "future proves past"-style? Particularly post-Charlie Kirk? The fruits of her gossip have been division, chaos, and confusion. Candace knows what to say to enthrall the conspiracy-minded, and how to say it, to make you feel like she has something worthwhile to share. She'll lead you on forever if you let her.
Questioning things is good, but there's a difference between honestly seeking answers in the evidence, and calling for another round of "questioning" on evidence that doesn't fit your desired answer. I've seen liberals and flat earthers do the second one a lot. Sometimes it's necessary in order to solidify things into a "big picture". But it gets out of control when you stop "questioning" the view you've sided with.
"I'm just asking questions" is a lame excuse to spout nonsense, especially when the one saying it often goes beyond into making real accusations and alleging to have "more evidence" that never gets revealed despite promises...
It can be a useful tool for learning. When I'm exploring a new subject on my own, I can ask it things like "Is there a term for _" or "has anyone ever thought of doing _"
The idea is to use it to help me know what to look into when I'm going into something completely blind, to translate to and from jargon, and to help align my thoughts with the "traditions" of the people immersed in the field. It should absolutely not be used as the sole learning resource.
I could see teachers using AI to help create curricula and lesson plans. If you're letting AI take the wheel, you're using it completely wrong in my opinion.
So what do we do, since most of us have never seen Jesus in person? Are we just not allowed to have a mental image of him at all, because nothing we imagine could be accurate?
How would you respond if I were to tell you you couldn't quote the Bible because individual verses could be taken out of context and spun to mean things they really don't? Because that happens a lot. Just look at any Christian denomination whose teachings you disagree with.
Speaking of, "decades" are nothing over the span of the millenia we've had the Church for. Iconoclasm has been considered a heresy for at least 1,200 years, and plenty of art from centuries before that that somehow escaped condemnation (What I'm saying is, this teaching isn't a deviation). There's plenty to read on that if you care so much about preventing people from worshipping Jesus in this way. Or maybe just read Galatians and see what Paul has to say about the old law.
Well it's a good thing that these artists aren't trying to capture Jesus but instead point to him symbolically. No one thinks Jesus is made of stone. No one thinks a statue of Jesus is actually the real Jesus. That's stupid. It's like saying we're not allowed to talk and write about the Bible because nothing we write could ever possibly hope to contain the full Word of God. Was it a sin to make those angel statues on the Ark? Give me a break. This is obviously not against the spirit of the law. Quit straining gnats.
Vocally supporting every terrorist group known to man to an audience of hundreds of thousands is apparently nothing compared to the grave offense that is pet abuse. But I guess if it gets this guy deplatformed, who am I to complain?
Melatonin is the sleepy chemical. Melanin is the pigment. :)