3
hairyharry 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's what Grok had to say:

*One plaintiff, Amanda Johnson of Knoxville, Tennessee, said letting her state's waiver take effect would restrict her autistic 19-year-old daughter to only three "safe" foods and beverages - one of which is bottled water - because of a serious eating ​disorder. Johnson said her ​daughter's other six ⁠safe foods, including M&M's and Welch's fruit punch, would be ruled out. *

What could be this persons possible medical condition?

The daughter's primary medical condition matching this description is almost certainly Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), a recognized eating disorder in the DSM-5.

usnews.com

ARFID involves a persistent restriction or avoidance of food intake that leads to nutritional deficiencies, weight issues, dependence on supplements, or interference with daily life — without the body-image distortion or fear of weight gain seen in anorexia nervosa. It is especially common in autistic people (like the 19-year-old daughter here) because of sensory processing differences: certain textures, tastes, smells, colors, temperatures, or even brands can feel intolerable or even painful. Key matching details from the description: A tiny list of “safe” foods (only 9 total, reduced to 3 under the waiver, including plain bottled water). Extreme brand and item specificity: M&M’s (exact candy), Welch’s fruit punch (exact drink), plus 5 others that are presumably just as narrow. These safe foods are often highly processed or specific (candy and sugary drinks), which is classic in ARFID — patients frequently rely on the exact same brands and formulations because even slight changes trigger sensory aversion, anxiety, or gagging. The plaintiff explicitly calls it a “serious eating disorder” tied to her autistic daughter’s needs, not allergies or diabetes (the reasons given by other plaintiffs in the same lawsuit).

Other eating disorders do not fit: Anorexia or bulimia typically revolve around weight/shape concerns and compensatory behaviors, not brand-specific “safe foods.” Food allergies or intolerances are medical/immune issues, not classified as eating disorders. General “picky eating” is too mild; this level of restriction (down to bottled water only) qualifies as a clinical disorder.

In ARFID treatment (often used with autistic patients), therapists literally make “safe food” lists and gradually expand them — exactly the language used in the plaintiff’s statement. The SNAP waiver at issue would eliminate the candy and sugary-drink category, cutting off 6 of her 9 safe items and leaving her with essentially nothing she can reliably consume. So, while the articles only say “serious eating disorder,” the combination of autism + extreme sensory-based food selectivity + reliance on a handful of specific branded items points directly to ARFID as the diagnosis. If more clinical details were available (e.g., from the court complaint), a doctor would likely confirm it with that label or the older term “selective eating disorder” sometimes still used in autism contexts.

2
hairyharry 2 points ago +2 / -0

The office of the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference has released its annual state immigration report revealing that in 2025, illegal migrants committed 2,183 violent offenses, including 41 homicides, 145 sexual offenses, 11 child rapes, and more. Republican State Rep. Dan Howell said he was shocked by the report and called the data “really, really bad.” “These are the criminals liberals want to defend while trying to defund ICE,” he pointed out. “Forty-one Tennesseeans are dead at the hands of illegal immigrants and hundreds raped. This will not be tolerated in this great state and we will do more to keep you safe,” Howell added. (emphasis original) The “2025 Immigration Report” released on January 30 is a required (TN Code § 4-1-425 2024) annual report from the state’s district attorneys general conference. The law directs them to “collect and analyze data from law enforcement agencies on the number of persons not lawfully present in the United States charged or convicted of a criminal offense in this state during the previous year.” The crime statistics in the report come from data collected from the “Public Chapter 1008: Arrestee Citizenship Status – Not Lawfully Present or Unknown” forms created by the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference. Police in Tennessee are required to fill out these forms after arresting a noncitizen. The report found that a total of 21,648 charges were filed against illegal migrants among 11,344 cases between January 1 and December 31 of 2025, averaging nearly 1000 reports per month. However, there are likely even more because one county (Bledsoe) did not submit its data in time for the report to be filed. Migrants representing a total of 119 different countries were cited in the reports where country of origin was obtainable. The categories of crimes revealed a shocking toll suffered by the state’s citizens at the hands of illegal migrants. Among the categories of crime, the report includes: 2,183 violent offenses 41 homicides 1,592 assaults 145 sexual offenses 11 child rapes 40 aggravated kidnappings 2,920 DUIs 5,318 cases of driving without a license or on suspended/or revoked 966 Carjackings 36 Felony firearms offenses 66 Assaults on police or first responders The “2025 Immigration Report” is now the second such report in compliance with the state law. The 2024 report, the first of its kind, collected data from only 73 of the state’s 95 counties and found that 2,719 non-citizens had been charged with crimes.

1
hairyharry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, Kamala did "blow" through over something like 1 trillion dollars in a few months. So never under estimate the Dems ability to spend money!

1
hairyharry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, we're looking more to the eastern part, up in the mountains. Can't handle the insanity of the blue brigade. We currently live in a conservative area of west Florida, looking for a town in the hills where we can grow old in peace.

4
hairyharry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perhaps they could base the refund on your IRS tax history. That would seem more equitable for people with your circumstances.

3
hairyharry 3 points ago +3 / -0

I watched the hearing. The batshit crazy was out of this world. Democrats are loony-toons!

9
hairyharry 9 points ago +9 / -0

I understand your point & perspective. But screw the UN!

We must do what is right for American Citizens.

view more: Next ›