Y'all remember all those "playbook" comms that were being exchanged during the early days of the pandemic?
That was the cabal trying to figure out what the story was gonna be. 🤣🤣🤣
Possibly. My impression on all this is white hats feel they have a checkmate scenario and are letting cabal choose how they go out.
If Mayorkas impeachment was processed normally I'm sure white hats had a response for that as well (or would simply claim the win of revealing the border problem in more detail to the public).
The pseudouridine link is interesting because that was another one of the low key "innovations" of the mRNA products. Earned two jokers a Nobel.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jessicar/p/review-n1-methyl-pseudouridine-m1
From what I can tell, pseudouridine is a sort of mRNA preservative (enhanced stability of mRNA and suppresses immune response to it).
My conclusion is the same, but sometimes I feel like the association are worth sharing if they aren't being discussed in a more plausible context.
The setup of the event still strikes me as wanting to communicate something beyond support for the bodega.
Why is Bragg making the obvious wrong move on both these cases?
Oh well, the reason for the visit is this is the guy who defended himself and was charged by Bragg:
Following a hearing in his NYC hush money trial, former President Trump visits a bodega in Harlem where a worker once lethally defended himself during a confrontation with a customer and was, for a time, charged by D.A. Alvin Bragg.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12579617/Bodega-clerk-sues-Manhattan-DA-Alvin-Bragg.html
They call it the "Blue Moon Bodega" in Harlem in the original article, but the front of the store doesn't indicate anything like that. Strange...
Oh weird, yeah here is an older picture:
https://www.amny.com/police-fire/murder-dropped-bodega-stabbing-case/
It was renamed... Why?
New ownership:
===
TBH I'm leaning towards coincidence on this one because the Q posts pre-dated the bodega attack. But it is a rather mysterious alignment..
Here is one of the video's of Trump's visit. Wonder what he buys/does in the bodega? Any other explanations for this location? Feels highly commsy--reminds me of the Giuliani press conference in front of the lawn services place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH5aJdeA8Qg
The video of the kids describing abuse:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOM9JnsPyiE&feature=youtu.be
Also, Sanaa (the name of the bodega) is the largest city and capitol of Yemen, which was alluded to as one of the trafficking hubs in #1884
The orgs allegedly involved in helping trafficking victims.
Maybe a response to Diddy being dropped from the news this week? Something about Rico Wade maybe?
===
There's also an adult shop across the street. "Romantic Depot"
Anyone got eyes on Trump's visit to the bodega in Harlem?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH5aJdeA8Qg
The address of the Spotlight hairplace is 3420. Drop 3420 references drop 3414 to "Save the Littles".
The address of the bodega next door is 3422.
[New York Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Children]
^ Located just down the street.
Cross street is 139th. Drop #139 references the retirements.
D-priv, Dallas? Could be something here but I suppose Cohen may just need some good people and figures a brute force job posting can't hurt.
Did you see the tinfoil on the moon of the San Francisco NFT at end of last PP Show? Guess we'll know in a few hours if it was any good. 🤣
There are so many headfakes within headfakes there that I just have to step back and laugh.
I guess it would be Barr pretending that Trump is reckless for pretending to be worried about replacing FISA 1.0 with FISA 2.0, and cabal operators aren't sure whether they should be in favor of FISA 1.0 because that's great to use against people like Trump or in favor of FISA 2.0 because it might protect Trump using FISA 1.0 against them in a more covert & broad manner?
My impression here is that white hats operate like they have a checkmate scenario and don't really care which version of FISA is around, and that their broader interest is simply to have the public aware of FISA and how it's used, and the cabal gets to choose how they lose.
Also worth reviewing is Barr's "resignation letter", where the dude doesn't fucking resign, and Trump doesn't even classify it as such in his tweets:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614499981602819
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614514493878273
Dates [start] will become important.
Well in the future I think it'd be worth having the debate. What is a proper oath of office? What does a valid one look like, what makes the Biden administration's invalid in comparison?
It's a good legal question worthy of some debate.
This was brought up earlier but tbh I'm not buying it (for at least the subset of names I researched).
The only statute I could find says there must be a "record" of the oath of office. Doesn't specify what form that record must be.
There are videos of Harris and others being sworn in. Video IMO constitutes a record.
Yeah, strikes me as just the sort of person Q operation was designed to reach.
They've put together a lot of the puzzle and understand some of the game but never became aware that there were others like them.