4
r_u_srs_srsly 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem is the bullshit regulations put on “cybersecurity” that do nothing to stop China anyway

These 1400 people are probably swamped maintaining, monitoring, patching, responding to bullshit

This dude makes it seem like government is like AT&T where provisioning is an hour long process and done for 3 years.

Fix the bullshit government regulations that make no sense

Then fix the government bullshit they impose on private sector

6
r_u_srs_srsly 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s not what it says at all, wtf reading comprehension?

They said CDC lists myocarditis as a RARE (lol that word) side effect

if (only if) you get that condition

Then the survival rate is 50% 5 years later.

Article is implying everyone will get myocarditis, but the article, Cleveland clinics, nor cdc have any good numbers of how many people are getting myocarditis attributed to clot shot

3
r_u_srs_srsly 3 points ago +3 / -0

Upsets me more that now that they’ve earned a reputation as a foreign degree mill, HR departments still will treat them like royalty.

If a university wats to trash their reputation, ok.

If the rest of the world ignores it and continues to believe what they used to be, that’s a problem.

10
r_u_srs_srsly 10 points ago +10 / -0

It’s ok, they’re just pivoting from little underdog into next big bad man phase.

And zero people with flags in their bio for years will admit it

1
r_u_srs_srsly 1 point ago +2 / -1

There’s a meme post about how women and low testosterone men form opinions based on social safety rather than fact.

They probably are thinking critically about the consequences of wrong think and how other people would react to holding a certain belief

Then they choose the one that provides the most social safety

This happens on both sides. Do you think EVERY conservative woman bases their belief entirely on fact, or do they just correctly see one form of safety over another?

Might be more about your ability to not care about factual truth than you do care about what other people think of your opinion.

15
r_u_srs_srsly 15 points ago +15 / -0

I deeply distrust digitization

We know Disney is making selective edits to old stuff placed on D+

Once it’s digital, they can just modify the record then modify the records of the record.

At least with paper, the difficulty in maliciously altering documents is astronomically higher

7
r_u_srs_srsly 7 points ago +7 / -0

Most of me is good with this

Anything digital seems to be corrupted and easily manipulated.

Everything essential should go back to paper processing

Too easy to abuse a computer

4
r_u_srs_srsly 4 points ago +4 / -0

The question is what department were they in?

The rot goes deep

So deep you’ve got managers getting “high performing” records for DEI no-show jobs.

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

The choice of phrasing is hilarious

Trump promised to drain the swamp and reform the American government

This is politico just confirming he is making good on a campaign promise, but phrasing it as a bad thing, from a foreign country perspective

3
r_u_srs_srsly 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember the wrap up smear

The media publishes an unsourced bullshit lie

Law enforcement and congress and everyone just points at the media publication and says “what is that?”

If there is a direct financial link between USAID and specific wrap up smears, holy shit the entire media complex is going to change during this administration

8
r_u_srs_srsly 8 points ago +8 / -0

That argument doesn’t work on them

They think the bureaucrats are a 4th coequal branch of government.

In fact they think the bureaucrats are more equal than the chief executive

7
r_u_srs_srsly 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’d love to see DOGE report one good investment made by USAID.

What percentage of the money actually worked?

As in when the money stopped, people loved America more than before the money started?

Or has it always only been a bribe system for favored people?

10
r_u_srs_srsly 10 points ago +10 / -0

There’s a big fucking difference between the lightly autistic savant style and the completely dependent on care for life autist.

I have a feeling that the savant version may be naturally occurring whereas the completely dependent is the induced version

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

The epa exists (not exclusively) because Ohio was so corrupt and stupid they put so much shit in a river it literally caught on fire.

Think India levels of bad

The epa had a purpose, to not let every idiot just assume the environment was someone else’s problem

But they’ve long since stopped being that

10
r_u_srs_srsly 10 points ago +10 / -0

Anytime anyone gives a low information hot take like that, you know they’re retarded

Same when they say military is a huge cost burden. It’s not exactly cheap, and yes they failed a bunch of audits, but as DOGE is finding, you’ll find equal money going to far left NGO with zero oversight no one wants to mention

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Up until covid, ivermectin was published and accepted as a cure for parasites which caused a ton of ailments. It may not have been a first line treatment at your local physician, but the WHO had it.

Something about covid time flipped the switch

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know how I know this is premeditated murder

The crash fell in the river

These shit fucks were authorized to murder people on the plane but not to murder anyone on the ground or allow collateral damage to property.

I bet there’s a memo somewhere saying 100 people is the limit

Holy fuck trump cant drain this swamp fast enough. Just remove everyone

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of this is poking at how serious trumps executive order on free speech is

They’re seeing if yelling fire in a crowd is protected speech.

the EO was clear on the subject and the liberals are pushing it to check.

2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep in mind, all they had to do was sit in their healthcare community and do healthcare.

They waded into politics.

Tedros stood in front of a camera and fucking lied repeatedly.

They burned their own trust.

view more: Next ›