Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your definitions there they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge or petty theft charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
Obviously BLM riots are not "rightwing" and you are incorrect. Even if you are justified and are responding to an attack, you are not right wing. The Right chiefly refers a specific ideology, not the things you are making up.
What you are proposing prevents me from looking at the Crusades as a cool thing that the religious right needs to do again, because it involved disrespectful "force" which you say is "leftist".
You are wrong, of course. Sometimes force is necessary. The founding fathers used force, Hitler used force, and the Crusades used force. It has nothing to do with "forced destruction" being an inherent property of leftism. This is your personal loony invention.
Lots of people here who hate the lgbt happily use government benefit programs. Socialism is not a deal breaker. Our farmers take farming subsidies. Right v. Left is not primarily about socialsim. It is primarily traditionalism vs. degeneracy, or religious values vs. anti-religious values.
Hitler was very traditional in his values, and Germany was a Christian nation. They were obviously on the Right as we primarily define it today. We don't define Right as a specific system of government, but an ideology with ideological values.
Regarding the elite and the Rothschilds, many people believe that they are using the Left as a tool of destruction and degeneracy, not necessarily because they firmly believe in Leftist values. They are the puppeteers, not the puppets.
I think the left were actually correct when they said that far-right was Nazis committing genocide against Jews, the gays, and undesirables. Far right is when the right uses force to integrate their agenda, the Crusades being another example. I'm rooting for another Hitler and another Crusade at this point, TBH.
The major factories and industries were bombed in WWII and America became the world's factory after the War since it was untouched. This is the reason life was good and prosperous in the 50's.
That situation has changed, however. It was only a temporary situation while the countries rebuilt themselves. America couldn't be that prosperous forever. That sort of prosperity wasn't sustainable. Nothing like that will happen again barring another world-wide calamity that forces the matter.
Apparently she was of royal lineage, and an argument can be made that she had more royal blood than Prince Charles or The Queen -
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/princess-diana-prince-charles-royal-27821844
"So even though Prince Charles is a descendant of many years of royalty, Diana, Princess of Wales had more English royal blood in her veins than that of her former husband or The Queen."
This would have to be a new way to measure who is the true ruler, but an argument can be made. This kind of argument is something a contender would have tried to use to crown himself ruler after the death of a sovereign.
The only reason I would listen to talk radio like Rush and Art Bell is because I had to commute to work or drive out of town to visit a girlfriend and that was the most interesting thing I could find. As long as people are driving and bored talk radio has a place.
Per the nature of the Earth, just look at the Moon. The illuminated portion isn't even pointing towards the Sun. This is a dead give away that nature is not as claimed - https://wiki.tfes.org/Moon_Tilt_Illusion
That article proves that the drama is actually about people wanting to advertise Christianity, not about practicing Christianity:
According to Zhang Wei* a local contact for Open Doors: “At times of major events like this, ministers are warned to ‘behave’, ‘be quiet’ and ‘remain invisible in the public domain’.” Pastors who are suspected of conducting church activities other than low-profile regular Sunday services can be forced to have what are known as ‘tea meetings’ with local party officials – these contain rather more threats and interrogation than actual tea.
People in China have the right to avoid religion, so you need to keep it lowkey and private. The pastors are allowed to perform the regular services, but beyond that, which it doesn't specify, but really refers to advertising and spreading the teachings to a mass audience, is forbidden. And China does have a point. People should have a right to avoid religion. If they are interested in learning about it they will seek it out. China expertly balances the situation.
It says the information comes from the Associated Press, the biggest offender in liberal fake news media, so we can take those claims with a grain of salt.
China does regulate religion, like it regulates guys, however. You are allowed to practice religion, and you are allowed to be gay. You just can't advertise it or push your ideology onto others. Religious activities need to stay at home or in the church. In China you have a right to avoid religion and you have a right to avoid homosexual propaganda. This can be at odds with the Christian need to save others and "spread the word", which is what some of the misrepresented drama is about in those articles. The truth in China is that there is no problem if you keep your ideology to yourself.
Again, your info comes from the liberal media talking crap about a country it hates. Of course what you read is misrepresented and a lie.
Your hate for China and love for Tiawan comes from the liberal media and the school system. In reality China is a very conservative country which bans gay propaganda in media, and Taiwan is the liberal panacea where Chinese gays go to live among other gays. China is hated because it has traditional values and does not tolerate degeneracy. This is also why Russia is hated. The two biggest conservative powers are the most hated in the media. You should think carefully about whether you were lied to.
Did I say that no one died? I said that it is stupid to believe that a military parade would randomly decide to shoot people for no reason.
The media and educational system portrays this as a naked act of aggression by a military parade, like they portray Hitler's actions as naked acts of aggression. You are sadly deluded if you think this is what happened and there isn't more to this.