Any anons recall the shocking "manifesto" by one of FB's original cofounders dropped a few yrs back? In it he claimed, among other "outings" re: FB, that he was once Zuckerbergs ghey lover and that Mark's asian "wife" is actually his handler... and that Z couldn't write a single line of code much less have the knowhow to even steal the codes (as claimed)?
If anyone has the link to this manifesto plz drop here, it's an interesting read, thx
I know exactly what you're talking about. I read it multiple times and when I went back to look for it I've never been able to find it since. It was an incredible read.
I listened to an audio book once about Mark or Facebook and the whole thing seemed to be trying to prime the listener into thinking Zuck would make an excellent President when he got older. I think his sister was the reader. Finished it but hated it for it's propaganda.
I remember a roommate from college called Zuck an idiot that couldn't write code or anything. As far as having a "gay" lover...welll, that's a new one on me. The little wifey thing seemed to come up pretty fast as well as the "baby". The guy just gives me the creeps. He looks like a cyborg.
I agree. Totally. But that wasn’t my point. I specifically set the settings to be private in every direction: contacts, email, private info, etc. Then the coworker sent me my first message.
Now it kind of reminds me of Venmo- where each transaction is applauded by everyone in your contact list.
It's true. I was following the Lifelog drama shortly after the Pentagon first started pushing it. People didn't want any part of it because it was developed by government "Big Brother". Then the very day it was announced the Pentagon was scrapping LifeLog Fakebook was introduced. At first I didn't realize it was the same day but I did recognize the similarities in the programs. A few months later I found that the date of cancellation (LL) and release (FB) were the same. When I tried to warn family and friends that they were the exact same programs they said FB was fine because it was privately owned and not part of government. The dumbasses wouldn't listen. I have never downloaded any social media platforms on any device I own and never will.
I have always told people that when they post anything, even in a private manner, that it belongs to facebook and they can do with it as they please. They either dont believe your "conspiracy" or they just pray nothing happens to them. So many sheep, so little time to convince them!!!!
And now they have tons of information that people voluntarily shared. Enough to predict what many will do next. So why are they lying about Q, acting like it's a militia group when it's really an open source research and collating project to open the eyes of the masses? They know what they're saying isn't true. But they must be really worried about the information being dug up and the masses seeing it. Look at all that was kept under wraps about guys like Weinstein and not Cuomo. This didn't happen in a bubble. I'm sure some of the women reported Creepy Cuomo.
A friend told me about this a while ago. Keep in mind it's the exact day "Lifelog" stopped that "Facebook" started. All the information was transferred over that day.
I’ve never looked into it, but I wonder why did they name it FaceBook? Is it because they are keeping a book of faces (literally or of names) of everyone who has an account and put us in categories of who’s friend & who’s foe?
Watch "The Circle" with Tom Spanks. It's worth another look if you saw it way back when it came out. Looks exactly like where Wastebook and Googly-eye took things.
counter point : social media is highly unreliable. people lie. people dont check-in to places. many people dont have fb app on their phone. people only post positive stuff not negative. many people barely post at all. people often post stuff days or weeks late.
Thank you. For ages I have been trying to remember the name of the program to build a profile on every citizen (Lifelog by the Pentagon).
Facebook's value and popularity only makes sense if they were selling people's data to the government, which we know that they were/still are.
It also makes you wonder if the whole founding of Facebook story is just Hollywood bullshit. How did Facebook, Twitter, and these other sites really start?
People used to show actual personalities on MySpace. You could tell a slut from a goth from a super uptight religious person from a gamer, etc. If you knew HTML, multimedia, etc you could have a profile that was cooler than anyone elses! It was like everyone's little webpage, so fun, so wholesome.
You could also just meet random people. Search topic, filter by age, some people were down to chat, some weren't, but it was always fun.
Then Facebook came, first with the exclusivity, "college students only" then "college students and graduates" only, then EVERYONE....but it changed the internet for the worse. Web 2.0 began and the magic of the internet ended. Personality was replaced by white and blue sterility. My online "identity" was worthless now, replaced by First and Last name invasions of privacy that I was not willing to partake in.
With this social media went from something that could help a loner or someone struggling to something very condemning and filled with peer pressure. "You don't have enough friends" "No one liked your picture" "You're not attractive enough"
Web 1.0 was magical, I have some stories if anyone ever wanted to hear them. I spent my youth on USENET, IRC, then AOL/ICQ, then MySpace and other forum/message boards. The amount of not just chat and banter, but research, brainstorming, and creativity happening on the internet back then was nothing short of life changing
Farmville was pretty harmless for some, but all the "surveys" and "who is like a potato games were just data gathering by blowing smoke up peoples butt and friends dragged friends into it-never did but one.. and I saw thousands...
As to DARPA /FB, I saw this info 2-3 years ago and it totally made sense...
It seems from my short few years on FB that it was primarily women/girls/females that were on there. Some men/boys/guys, but it seemed more women. I got tired of the "food postings" and the general nastiness re: politics so I just left. Decided I was still working and didn't need any more crap in my life.
Pretty sure the two above were being extremely sarcastic. No one here condones "re-education" camps. Freedom of choice, thought and deed is what brought us all here. As long as you aren't harming or violating the rights of others, I don't care what you think, say or do.
Any anons recall the shocking "manifesto" by one of FB's original cofounders dropped a few yrs back? In it he claimed, among other "outings" re: FB, that he was once Zuckerbergs ghey lover and that Mark's asian "wife" is actually his handler... and that Z couldn't write a single line of code much less have the knowhow to even steal the codes (as claimed)?
If anyone has the link to this manifesto plz drop here, it's an interesting read, thx
didnt some anons do a dig and found he is a rothschild?
I've never heard of this. I would like to see it. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Zuckerberg was some deep state stooge selected to "run" Facebook.
I know exactly what you're talking about. I read it multiple times and when I went back to look for it I've never been able to find it since. It was an incredible read.
I listened to an audio book once about Mark or Facebook and the whole thing seemed to be trying to prime the listener into thinking Zuck would make an excellent President when he got older. I think his sister was the reader. Finished it but hated it for it's propaganda.
Yep, appears to have been scrubbed....can't find it either
I remember a roommate from college called Zuck an idiot that couldn't write code or anything. As far as having a "gay" lover...welll, that's a new one on me. The little wifey thing seemed to come up pretty fast as well as the "baby". The guy just gives me the creeps. He looks like a cyborg.
Wish I had known this long ago. So crazy.
I got rid of all social media last year. Then managed to get on Gab, Telegram, and here... I'm a lot less giving of my information now though.
I got on telegram a few years back on my phone. Took specific care to make everything private and not published.
First thing I got was a message from a coworker, who was in my phone contact list, saying “Hey!!!!! So and So..... so glad to see you here.”
I never replied and deleted everything.
Was not happy.
Yeah, I got a few messages from friends. I ignored them.
That's what texting or calling is for.
I agree. Totally. But that wasn’t my point. I specifically set the settings to be private in every direction: contacts, email, private info, etc. Then the coworker sent me my first message.
Now it kind of reminds me of Venmo- where each transaction is applauded by everyone in your contact list.
Thanks, but no.
I think over the years of social media, many of us have learned to be more "cautious" of giving out information.
Looks like he was running on NO SLEEP that day...
Isn't that its alien/lizard look that it has everyday??
Eyes a redder than usual.
Zuckerberg looks evil. Night and day difference between him and buddy who owns Gab.
if true, anyone at all surprised??!!
It's true. I was following the Lifelog drama shortly after the Pentagon first started pushing it. People didn't want any part of it because it was developed by government "Big Brother". Then the very day it was announced the Pentagon was scrapping LifeLog Fakebook was introduced. At first I didn't realize it was the same day but I did recognize the similarities in the programs. A few months later I found that the date of cancellation (LL) and release (FB) were the same. When I tried to warn family and friends that they were the exact same programs they said FB was fine because it was privately owned and not part of government. The dumbasses wouldn't listen. I have never downloaded any social media platforms on any device I own and never will.
I have always told people that when they post anything, even in a private manner, that it belongs to facebook and they can do with it as they please. They either dont believe your "conspiracy" or they just pray nothing happens to them. So many sheep, so little time to convince them!!!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/U4dJHCdbJTpS/
They dont plan on saving humanity
Keanu Reeves: woah
I have this as my abandoned FB picture.
And now they have tons of information that people voluntarily shared. Enough to predict what many will do next. So why are they lying about Q, acting like it's a militia group when it's really an open source research and collating project to open the eyes of the masses? They know what they're saying isn't true. But they must be really worried about the information being dug up and the masses seeing it. Look at all that was kept under wraps about guys like Weinstein and not Cuomo. This didn't happen in a bubble. I'm sure some of the women reported Creepy Cuomo.
A friend told me about this a while ago. Keep in mind it's the exact day "Lifelog" stopped that "Facebook" started. All the information was transferred over that day.
In-Q-Tel money is what started Facebook.
Facebook was just a ripoff of MySpace
I swear that guy is an alien, look at his hideous face ?
Mark Zuckerdick is not a real human. Look at the eyes! Clone eyes
I’ve never looked into it, but I wonder why did they name it FaceBook? Is it because they are keeping a book of faces (literally or of names) of everyone who has an account and put us in categories of who’s friend & who’s foe?
Wow, that’s crazy! I didn’t know about the guy they made an account for.
Tons of them.sometimes they have a little note saying that facebook made it.
Old news, this was talked about months if not years ago
This was something Q "dropped" early on in the drops.
If you ever felt like someone had their thumb on the scale of your life now you know why.
Yup, sounds about right.
soooooooooooooooo sharing this....thanks for posting fren
Voluntarily!
Watch "The Circle" with Tom Spanks. It's worth another look if you saw it way back when it came out. Looks exactly like where Wastebook and Googly-eye took things.
counter point : social media is highly unreliable. people lie. people dont check-in to places. many people dont have fb app on their phone. people only post positive stuff not negative. many people barely post at all. people often post stuff days or weeks late.
I get pissed-off just viewing IT’s slimy face.
Just look at Zuck: isn't it obvious that he is NOT any kind of genius or a wunderkind? That he couldn't have invented shit?
Woodchipper or the cage in Florence Supermax.
A good video exposing this is my favourite talking cat! The Truth Factory:-
'Google and Facebook Were Created by the CIA' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IARczUg4JwI (it was 2017)
Amazing polly did an excellent research video about this, and if you search facebook darpa on BitChute 20 videos come up about it.
Thank you. For ages I have been trying to remember the name of the program to build a profile on every citizen (Lifelog by the Pentagon).
Facebook's value and popularity only makes sense if they were selling people's data to the government, which we know that they were/still are.
It also makes you wonder if the whole founding of Facebook story is just Hollywood bullshit. How did Facebook, Twitter, and these other sites really start?
People used to show actual personalities on MySpace. You could tell a slut from a goth from a super uptight religious person from a gamer, etc. If you knew HTML, multimedia, etc you could have a profile that was cooler than anyone elses! It was like everyone's little webpage, so fun, so wholesome.
You could also just meet random people. Search topic, filter by age, some people were down to chat, some weren't, but it was always fun.
Then Facebook came, first with the exclusivity, "college students only" then "college students and graduates" only, then EVERYONE....but it changed the internet for the worse. Web 2.0 began and the magic of the internet ended. Personality was replaced by white and blue sterility. My online "identity" was worthless now, replaced by First and Last name invasions of privacy that I was not willing to partake in.
With this social media went from something that could help a loner or someone struggling to something very condemning and filled with peer pressure. "You don't have enough friends" "No one liked your picture" "You're not attractive enough"
Web 1.0 was magical, I have some stories if anyone ever wanted to hear them. I spent my youth on USENET, IRC, then AOL/ICQ, then MySpace and other forum/message boards. The amount of not just chat and banter, but research, brainstorming, and creativity happening on the internet back then was nothing short of life changing
Who really bothers to read the "ads" or "promo's" or "trends" on social media? Really, I just scrolled past them and never bother with them.
Farmville had me for a while
Farmville was pretty harmless for some, but all the "surveys" and "who is like a potato games were just data gathering by blowing smoke up peoples butt and friends dragged friends into it-never did but one.. and I saw thousands...
As to DARPA /FB, I saw this info 2-3 years ago and it totally made sense...
we need to build re education camps for those who are brainwashed.
completely voluntary of course.
There's so many though, we'd probably have to load them into freight trains to get them there efficiently.
can i bee camp counsler
I second your drama tech, all in favor
It seems from my short few years on FB that it was primarily women/girls/females that were on there. Some men/boys/guys, but it seemed more women. I got tired of the "food postings" and the general nastiness re: politics so I just left. Decided I was still working and didn't need any more crap in my life.
Pretty sure the two above were being extremely sarcastic. No one here condones "re-education" camps. Freedom of choice, thought and deed is what brought us all here. As long as you aren't harming or violating the rights of others, I don't care what you think, say or do.