Q is not just one person, likely a collection of the best and brightest. Q would never surrender to a film crew like Ron did. He may be part of the plan (u never know) but likely just a computer geek who never really “got” the plan. From what I remember he “gave up” after datefagging the inauguration. Got kicked off of Twitter and we all moved on. No. Way. He. Is. Q
Ive noticed that the fake news media is FALSELY reporting that i am Q.
It is simply not true.
Here are the facts:
I am not Q.
Ive never spoken privately with Q.
I dont know who Q is.
Q is a group of genius level military intelligence with very high security clearances. There is 0 chance Ron is Q or is directly involved with the operation.
Read the Q posts and Trump tweets that simultaneously drop. There's no mistaken Trump is a part of the group of Q. Q is not one person. Q+ is Trump. You have to study the Q drops because there are too many to list. Look for 4 10 20 = DJT or Q+, those are Trump or a member of his staff. Pretty sure Scavino is part of Q too.
https://qalerts.app/
It is strongly implied that Q+ is Donald Trump himself. Check out Ultimate Q Proofs Vol. 1 on Rumble. It took me from being Q-neutral to being bi-Qurious.
Q is not Any 1 person. The movement started back after Lincoln was assassinated. Fewer than 10 know the full plan, of those 9>, 3 are non military. I would not give the documentary much clout. after all, they still refer to us as qanon cult and there are no real contextual takeaways from the documentary. At most it has peaked peoples interest in something that is made up to make us look like a boogeyman.
Never has been even the slightest sign its Ron, and you should take fake-news trying to push this angle as essentially confirmation its false. Not they have any motivation to publish the truth even if they knew it.
Look at all the attacks people like hotwheels aka fred brennan have tried against 8ch over and over, hacking first, then attacks against their registrars and hosting providers, then against the DDOS mitigators like vanwa, and then dropping slander at every venue eager to eat up whatever line of BS fred is pushing. Is a whirlwind of tangled up liars and bullshitters all motivated to hype up fantasy material ever going to get to the truth, even by accident?
So casting shade at Jim & Ron is the latest destroy-8ch gambit.
Q has emphasized from the very beginning that things are handled the way they are because hats the legal path - classified info cant be revealed, but questions can be asked that lead the thoughtful people down paths that are constructive in revealing what must be bought to the light. Bringing in foreign and overseas assets to a military intel counterinsurgency insider team and posture pretty clearly violates the Q premise.
Even if you put forward the premise that Q is lawless and treasonous, and therefore dont care about legalities getting in the way (in a sense a duplicate CIA), why even then bring in IT system people from the far side of the world? What skills does this bring to the table? Rather than say, ex spies, defense contractors, mercenaries with military backgrounds, etc. Wouldn't they pull strings and blackmail/bribe/threaten microsoft, google, IBM, apple, fb insiders etc? Doesn't even make sense.
Definitely not, he was just the geek running the board where Q posted. He was in on it for sure, but only in the form of keeping 8chan, then 8kun up and running.
No - we are accustomed to distraction. If you followed Q from the beginning, you learned in a few short years about the extent of corruption in the USA and beyond.
No school could teach you all that. Q posts were like lessons that we had to research. Ron ran the board for the posts which was no small feat since the board was frequently attacked and needed to move twice.
It's very unlikely to be Ron. Q had regular access to the WH, Ron didn't. Melania would be more likely if you are guessing people outside the IC. Q is likely to be the head of a team, or the PR guy for a team, maybe NSA, MI, Cyber Command, Space Force. The Dems wouldn't have left all the NG in DC for months if Q wasn't still a threat to them.
If Ron is Q... man does he have amazing military connections, intel, predictive capabilities (3 yrs to the day!), and is likely the single most intelligent person known.
Lmao, it cannot be him. Unless he is a shadow emperor and running the entirety of our Republic.
Ron has said multiple times on telegram he is not. I am almost certain by Ron referring to the movement as "qanon" he was trolling. I believe he was the white hat control subject for the doc.
The final line of the last episode was absurd and ruined the whole show. It was a balanced show overall, especially the 1st episode where they let anons freely talk. Its a great show to use to expose people to it, since most need a mainstream source to believe it, just remind them that Q is definately not 100% codemonkeyz like the show randomly concludes lol.
Q is very clearly a team, and if Codemonkeyz is on the team, then he is someone to be taken serious, and not some kooky guy like the show portrayed.
Overall its the best mainstream normie Q show we have; but the whole concept is flawed because the narrator is determined to say Q is one person.
This May sound funny, but I followed CodeMonkey on Twitter before I knew of his Q association. Sidney Powell occasionally retweeted him and so I started reading his Tweets. Working backwards, so to speak, it seems unlikely Ron is Q. His comments and tweets leading up to the inauguration felt like he was an Anon hoping Trump would be successful in overturning the election fraud. Granted that could be intentional and misdirection.
As for doing the documentary? No publicity is bad publicity. This documentary will wake more people up. It’s like that don’t think of an elephant mind trick. You immediately think of an elephant. People will be curious and research Q. Many will be amazed at the level of thought and discussion on Q forums.
Considering your post history...2 months of Data....more downvotes then upvotes...over a 1/3 of the posts deleted. It would seem there is nothing casual about your interest or your intention...so you don't really get 'it' that much is apparent. It seems you want a nice cut and dry black and white understanding. You have a low information approach to the subject, so do you want to be told what to believe? No I expect not. I think for you it is important for Q to be cast out as a fraud, why? Simple there are 4953 posts detailing the depravity of governments and elected leaders the world over. And if true let's just say it opens a can of worms your too chickenshit to face up too...nope much easier to sit around poke the anons. In the end your belief is not required...nothing stops what's happening....enjoy the show.
Ron and Jim ? Come on man! Q is the best thing that ever happened to them. Just riding coat tails fame and fortune. The Doco just paints a theory of one journalist who sold his Idea to HBO. Watch another Doco = another theory with their proofs to prove their take. Then another and another and another. All MSM theory. Get it?
After watching the whole doc, I agree. The filmmaker catches Ron in multiple lies throughout the doc, accidentally admitting as much.
It was a power grab. The Q account was taken over by Ron (and funded by his dad) in 2018 because it was their #1 cash cow on 8kun. Ron posted, because he had the technical ability and access, and Jim kept the lights on with funding. Anecdotally, in the doc, you can see that Ron is a bad liar and either gets caught in a lie or will twitch/cough/blink and talk around the subject of Q to passively take credit for it.
EDIT: I'm seeing multiple downvotes and now I'm wondering, did any of you actually watch the WHOLE doc? Please tell me how you can watch the final episodes and not come to this conclusion.
Because at first I cast a wide net. Then after a time I applied careful discernment. Every outlet was given the same scrutiny. It didn't take long to narrow down and get directly to the source. When you find the source then you find out what happened on the board. Once that happens you'll understand that rallying and massed gatherings or organizing in that manner for now are impossible.
The guy spent multiple years with the owners of 8chan, it's incredibly revealing access that no one else has ever been able to get (because the owners decline most interviews). Also, if you're a "free thinker", you wouldn't just dismiss it without understanding what it was first.
I already know what it first was. The GME short squeeze? That was sparked by "Q", not kitty or dfv. Don't try and frame my thinking. My discernment led me to truth. You are all going round and around in circles about drops and who is Q but not once have I seen a name mentioned here that shows any of you have actually been paying attention.
The radical left is entirely debunked in one word : “ qanon. “. There simply is NO qanon, there is Q and there is anons. Boom. One gigantic hole in the dipshit media and their contrived ridiculous talking points ! If It’s such a nothing burger, then why spend such massive amounts of money and energy against it ? That alone pretty much tells you everything you need to know!
Really? How can you even comment on the most likely scenario when you freely admit you know nothing about Q? Go do some research, Q is provably working with Trump, it's not even debatable.
Q is not just one person, likely a collection of the best and brightest. Q would never surrender to a film crew like Ron did. He may be part of the plan (u never know) but likely just a computer geek who never really “got” the plan. From what I remember he “gave up” after datefagging the inauguration. Got kicked off of Twitter and we all moved on. No. Way. He. Is. Q
Watch for yellow ties. My latest theory is that anyone that is "close" to President Trump and wears a yellow tie is part of Q.
Is there anything about yellow in the Q drops?
A solid yellow square is the international signal flag for the letter Q.
Ron said on his telegram:
Ive noticed that the fake news media is FALSELY reporting that i am Q.It is simply not true.Here are the facts:I am not Q.Ive never spoken privately with Q.I dont know who Q is.Q is a group of genius level military intelligence with very high security clearances. There is 0 chance Ron is Q or is directly involved with the operation.
Hm prolly more like a distraction. If he is involved with Q it is probably indirectly. One of the cast of characters
Not Ron. Do more research and you will come to the same conclusion. Less than 10 and at least 3 non military. Q+ is Trump
Read the Q posts and Trump tweets that simultaneously drop. There's no mistaken Trump is a part of the group of Q. Q is not one person. Q+ is Trump. You have to study the Q drops because there are too many to list. Look for 4 10 20 = DJT or Q+, those are Trump or a member of his staff. Pretty sure Scavino is part of Q too. https://qalerts.app/
Q+Trump =The Great Awakening What a time to be alive??
It has been widely accepted among anons for years that Q+ is Trump. Not taken as established fact, mind you, but accepted as an extreme likelihood.
It is strongly implied that Q+ is Donald Trump himself. Check out Ultimate Q Proofs Vol. 1 on Rumble. It took me from being Q-neutral to being bi-Qurious.
Q is not Any 1 person. The movement started back after Lincoln was assassinated. Fewer than 10 know the full plan, of those 9>, 3 are non military. I would not give the documentary much clout. after all, they still refer to us as qanon cult and there are no real contextual takeaways from the documentary. At most it has peaked peoples interest in something that is made up to make us look like a boogeyman.
Never has been even the slightest sign its Ron, and you should take fake-news trying to push this angle as essentially confirmation its false. Not they have any motivation to publish the truth even if they knew it.
Look at all the attacks people like hotwheels aka fred brennan have tried against 8ch over and over, hacking first, then attacks against their registrars and hosting providers, then against the DDOS mitigators like vanwa, and then dropping slander at every venue eager to eat up whatever line of BS fred is pushing. Is a whirlwind of tangled up liars and bullshitters all motivated to hype up fantasy material ever going to get to the truth, even by accident?
So casting shade at Jim & Ron is the latest destroy-8ch gambit.
Q has emphasized from the very beginning that things are handled the way they are because hats the legal path - classified info cant be revealed, but questions can be asked that lead the thoughtful people down paths that are constructive in revealing what must be bought to the light. Bringing in foreign and overseas assets to a military intel counterinsurgency insider team and posture pretty clearly violates the Q premise.
Even if you put forward the premise that Q is lawless and treasonous, and therefore dont care about legalities getting in the way (in a sense a duplicate CIA), why even then bring in IT system people from the far side of the world? What skills does this bring to the table? Rather than say, ex spies, defense contractors, mercenaries with military backgrounds, etc. Wouldn't they pull strings and blackmail/bribe/threaten microsoft, google, IBM, apple, fb insiders etc? Doesn't even make sense.
Its not Ron...
I doubt Ron has the ability to take photos from inside Marine 1/AF1...
Definitely not, he was just the geek running the board where Q posted. He was in on it for sure, but only in the form of keeping 8chan, then 8kun up and running.
He states pretty clearly he never did though, he just kept the board running.
Man, this question just makes me wonder what did we do to let you down so badly that you even ask this ??
The chances of Q being one person is: 0.
The chances of Ron being one of the members of Q team: 0.000000....1
No - we are accustomed to distraction. If you followed Q from the beginning, you learned in a few short years about the extent of corruption in the USA and beyond. No school could teach you all that. Q posts were like lessons that we had to research. Ron ran the board for the posts which was no small feat since the board was frequently attacked and needed to move twice.
It's very unlikely to be Ron. Q had regular access to the WH, Ron didn't. Melania would be more likely if you are guessing people outside the IC. Q is likely to be the head of a team, or the PR guy for a team, maybe NSA, MI, Cyber Command, Space Force. The Dems wouldn't have left all the NG in DC for months if Q wasn't still a threat to them.
If Ron is Q... man does he have amazing military connections, intel, predictive capabilities (3 yrs to the day!), and is likely the single most intelligent person known.
Lmao, it cannot be him. Unless he is a shadow emperor and running the entirety of our Republic.
Ron has said multiple times on telegram he is not. I am almost certain by Ron referring to the movement as "qanon" he was trolling. I believe he was the white hat control subject for the doc.
The final line of the last episode was absurd and ruined the whole show. It was a balanced show overall, especially the 1st episode where they let anons freely talk. Its a great show to use to expose people to it, since most need a mainstream source to believe it, just remind them that Q is definately not 100% codemonkeyz like the show randomly concludes lol.
Q is very clearly a team, and if Codemonkeyz is on the team, then he is someone to be taken serious, and not some kooky guy like the show portrayed.
Overall its the best mainstream normie Q show we have; but the whole concept is flawed because the narrator is determined to say Q is one person.
Ron Watkins has been a theory tossed around. I think ? Ron and Jim ran 8chan.
It's been a shill narrative tossed around for years and then ran with by the MSM.
Any of the numerous Q proofs with Trump refute it. Unless we think Ron Watkins has direct access to Trump before his speeches.
^^^Agreed.
It's not Ron.
Ron?
they are referring to code monkey Ron Z
Oh, that Ron. Thanks.
Wait what?! That was the hbo doc's conclusion? Ahahahahaha that's retarded on so many different levels!
Not Q
Used by Q? Yes.
Is Q? Definitely not.
Personally I'd consider Watkins to be an "asset" and not a "member."
Does anyone know how I can get a link to the HBO Documentary so that I can watch it in the UK? Not allowing me here.
'HBO NOW Not in service area. HBO NOW is only supported in the U.S. and certain U.S. territories.'
This May sound funny, but I followed CodeMonkey on Twitter before I knew of his Q association. Sidney Powell occasionally retweeted him and so I started reading his Tweets. Working backwards, so to speak, it seems unlikely Ron is Q. His comments and tweets leading up to the inauguration felt like he was an Anon hoping Trump would be successful in overturning the election fraud. Granted that could be intentional and misdirection.
As for doing the documentary? No publicity is bad publicity. This documentary will wake more people up. It’s like that don’t think of an elephant mind trick. You immediately think of an elephant. People will be curious and research Q. Many will be amazed at the level of thought and discussion on Q forums.
HBO = full of crap NWO
Ok so explain the 0 deltas with similar subject matter / phrasing with Qposts and Trump tweets
/debunked
Considering your post history...2 months of Data....more downvotes then upvotes...over a 1/3 of the posts deleted. It would seem there is nothing casual about your interest or your intention...so you don't really get 'it' that much is apparent. It seems you want a nice cut and dry black and white understanding. You have a low information approach to the subject, so do you want to be told what to believe? No I expect not. I think for you it is important for Q to be cast out as a fraud, why? Simple there are 4953 posts detailing the depravity of governments and elected leaders the world over. And if true let's just say it opens a can of worms your too chickenshit to face up too...nope much easier to sit around poke the anons. In the end your belief is not required...nothing stops what's happening....enjoy the show.
https://qagg.news/
Start reading...we aren't here to make it easy for you.
It is not one person.
Ron and Jim ? Come on man! Q is the best thing that ever happened to them. Just riding coat tails fame and fortune. The Doco just paints a theory of one journalist who sold his Idea to HBO. Watch another Doco = another theory with their proofs to prove their take. Then another and another and another. All MSM theory. Get it?
It is beginning to look that way to me.
After watching the whole doc, I agree. The filmmaker catches Ron in multiple lies throughout the doc, accidentally admitting as much.
It was a power grab. The Q account was taken over by Ron (and funded by his dad) in 2018 because it was their #1 cash cow on 8kun. Ron posted, because he had the technical ability and access, and Jim kept the lights on with funding. Anecdotally, in the doc, you can see that Ron is a bad liar and either gets caught in a lie or will twitch/cough/blink and talk around the subject of Q to passively take credit for it.
EDIT: I'm seeing multiple downvotes and now I'm wondering, did any of you actually watch the WHOLE doc? Please tell me how you can watch the final episodes and not come to this conclusion.
The board was infiltrated by DIA, DOD.
Because at first I cast a wide net. Then after a time I applied careful discernment. Every outlet was given the same scrutiny. It didn't take long to narrow down and get directly to the source. When you find the source then you find out what happened on the board. Once that happens you'll understand that rallying and massed gatherings or organizing in that manner for now are impossible.
Cool, did you watch the doc? Please tell me how you arrived at that conclusion.
Why would I waste my time on some normie propaganda?
The guy spent multiple years with the owners of 8chan, it's incredibly revealing access that no one else has ever been able to get (because the owners decline most interviews). Also, if you're a "free thinker", you wouldn't just dismiss it without understanding what it was first.
I already know what it first was. The GME short squeeze? That was sparked by "Q", not kitty or dfv. Don't try and frame my thinking. My discernment led me to truth. You are all going round and around in circles about drops and who is Q but not once have I seen a name mentioned here that shows any of you have actually been paying attention.
Notice the two generic account names trying to form a concensus.
Seems as good a time as any to remind folks the importance of understanding Cointelpro tactics.
This whole thread reeks of it.
How about your strawman argument? Did you even watch the doc?
If you can somehow counter the video footage of Ron lying over and over again, I'd be willing to listen.
The radical left is entirely debunked in one word : “ qanon. “. There simply is NO qanon, there is Q and there is anons. Boom. One gigantic hole in the dipshit media and their contrived ridiculous talking points ! If It’s such a nothing burger, then why spend such massive amounts of money and energy against it ? That alone pretty much tells you everything you need to know!
Lurk more, speak less. Dig into the drops for yourself instead of letting major media companies tell you what to think.
I see you.
Really? How can you even comment on the most likely scenario when you freely admit you know nothing about Q? Go do some research, Q is provably working with Trump, it's not even debatable.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHcg3CYHLGoR/
So you have zero basis for any opinions at all, good to know.
You were surprised that Q is Trump. It takes only a single day to discover this. Do some research yourself and stop depending on others.
You don't think much at all, that's kind of my point. It's not even debatable. Go watch that video and stop being a lazy tool.