WATCH: Rand Paul GRILLS Fauci Over China LIE — Our Govt. FUNDED Research That Led To COVID-19!
(en-volve.com)
? DEM PANIC ?
Comments (44)
sorted by:
He tried to deny, then when he was caught in his lie, he stated we have not funded "gain of function" research 'directly'. No they just funneled it through a different agency.
Wow... just wow.
You are so correct ? & it's Chapel Hill , N.C. ,where before it was moved to china, were working on the virus ! You can't make this stuff up
https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research
Here is yet another reminder that Rand the cuck punted on election fraud by allowing the fraudulent EC votes to go through under some bullshit excuse like "preserving state rights." Anything out of his mouth since the 6th has been typical controlled-opposition pageantry, strong words and no action.
Sick and tired of seeing these OMG So BaSeD!! rAnD sTaNdS fOr Us!!1! posts.
Its essential that we keep in mind that Trump had to lose the 2020 election. It is impossible to use that event to determine anything about anyone.
If we assume that Trump had to lose, isn't is possible that he asked (insisted) that after the "insurrection" (which they knew was coming) all of the Senators should give up that particular fight, lose that battle, and allow us advance to the next act? I mean, EVERYONE did exactly that.
The most likely case is that at least some of those that were going to fight chose not to because they were asked not to by Trump.
Remember, this is not about Trump. This was never about Trump. This was never about the winner of the election. This is about the best, quickest path to the Great Awakening.
I think it's key to remember as well, Senator Paul and President Trump never even looked like they had a falling out, unlike, say, Pence. Also, Senator Paul has reminded President Trump on more than one occasion of states' rights issues and the Tenth Amendment. Pres. Trump has consistently followed Sen. Paul's advice, and probably was given the heads up :Sen. Paul would try to send the certifications back to the state legislatures, which he believed to be the constitutional solution. I believe Pres. Trump and Sen. Paul have a mutual respect for each other. Frankly, I am as certain that Senator Paul will be found to be on the side of truth and justice as I am of President Trump.
I am of a similar mind. Of all 100 senators, Sen. Paul is the one person I think is the least likely to be corrupt. Other than the electoral college vote (which as I said, was likely at Trump's behest) I have never seen him do anything other than what appears to be on behalf of We The People.
Of course I trust no one, and am always on the lookout for hidden agenda's for everyone, but everyone gets a free pass on the electoral count from my view. The entire future of humanity was likely at stake there.
Remember at the end of November/beginning of December, 2020... Rand Paul was actually considering SPEARHEADING the motion to contest the state election certifications.
Then he went silent about it for a month...
Then at the beginning of January, still not talking about the States/votes, presented YET ANOTHER BILL to audit the Fed... which struck me as tone-deaf at the time, and I was very confused...
And then on 1/6/21 he stood up for States’ rights to uphold their own election results (Federalism), FREE FROM FEDERAL ENCROACHMENT. It felt like a HUGE let-down at the time.
I was perhaps the most bewildered by his stand on this issue.
But it makes so much sense now in the context of Q and the over -arching plan to restore Federalism. He was defending States propriety in holding their own elections.
He was being careful about not setting a dangerous precedent— I’m guessing because he knew that Q’s plan would take care of DS/Cabal conspiracy.
He knows more than he lets on. There’s a reason why he and Trump became staunch allies (after such a wrecking ball of campaigning during Primaries in 2015-2016). He’s pure Constitutionalist.
We have the best frens, don't we, folks?
For the plan to work, everything Trump and the military do has to be by the book. They have to give DS the opportunity to do the right thing. Otherwise it gives DS defensive leverage. Even at this stage. There is definitely more to all of this though.
I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to with "must be by the book" but NOT protesting the electoral vote is a perfectly legal action, no matter what the reason.
I don't believe he HAD to lose to be a part of a successful awakening, but they knew he would and planned accordingly.
You cannot bust anyone for treason if you told people to not stop the treason....He may have approached them with his damning evidence and let them decide. But I don't believe this works if you interfere with systems designed to stop the fraud. By the book.
And fyi, a person can be put to death(criminal) if they fail to do certain duties while in service to the nation. That is why they have you take an oath.
To be specific for Rand Paul lets look at a couple things he said when the electoral vote was in contest.
Here he is saying the States have the power and it is essential that they retain that power.
He is amplifying that statement of State's rights and giving direction on how to proceed. It just so happens to be exactly the direction we are currently proceeding.
I assert again, this was all part of the plan.
Thought we were talking about legal vs duty? Congress could have sent them back right? Why have them certify the states choices at the federal level at all? Heck, Trump is the President of the red states and Biden the blue if Congress had no power to help conduct a free and fair election for President right?
Which strawman is next? Ruby Freeman and kin caught ILEGALY invalidating an election in GA on video was a deep fake? Congress should have rejected this state on that video alone. Sent their envelope back asking for a full forensic audit. Duty.
To my original point. You can't legally tell someone not to do their sworn duty so you can catch someone else not doing their sworn duty.
Now, you can make deals with criminals in custody.....but then if they are now criminals, are they still elected officials with authority to conduct a certification?
All of your examples seem to be attempts at conflating illegal activity with a vote. Do you realize what it means to cast a vote? Do you realize that a person can vote in any way they choose for any reason whatsoever and that the people who founded this country fought and died for exactly and expressly that right?
You keep bringing up other things for why they voted wrong. I am focusing on the act of casting a vote, because THAT is the act in question. Any other action such as a "sworn duty" is something else entirely. No one is "sworn" to vote in any particular way ever, nor for any reason. Certainly no one is sworn to vote as you think they should.
Since I am talking about the legality of a vote, and I thought you were talking about the legality of a vote, this example right here of something completely unrelated to the topic of conversation would be a perfect example of a strawman argument.
Can you provide one single law that even implies that this is true?
Can you provide even one theoretical example of how this could possibly be true?
I suggest you are conflating one action with another. A vote is a vote and is sacred. OTHER actions can be treasonous, but not a vote itself.
There is no law that I am aware of that states abstaining from a vote is illegal, much less punishable by death.
To prove traitorous action would require OTHER actions than a mere abstention.
It may not be good, or moral by your or my standards, but its not illegal. That is an essential distinction that is fundamental to the Bill of Rights.
Abstaining is not interfering. One is inaction, one is action. Those are not the same thing in a legal sense, even though they both have the potential to promote a negative outcome.
I agree that sometimes inaction can be illegal, but I do not believe vote abstention is one of those inactions. If you wish to prove to me otherwise you would have to cite law.
You don't think all government officials involved in the election process have a duty to ensure a free and fair election? What do you call it when you intentionally fail at this duty? What if another country is involved (proven)?
No crimes to see here folks....
You are suggesting that a person can be punished for a vote?
So...
If a person chooses to vote one way, and you think that way is wrong, they should be punished?
That sounds just about as unAmerican to me as a thing can possibly be.
The right to choose how to vote, in ANY vote is one of the most sacred and fundamental rights that our country was founded upon. The reasons for your vote are fundamentally yours and no one has a right to pursue those reasons because that would be a direct violation of our inalienable rights.
If these people are complicit in a crime against the American people, evidence of that act must come from somewhere other than a vote.
The fact that Fauci just keeps saying the same thing over and over in his responses is not because Rand is lying or incorrect. We heard you Fauci. Then Rand says different things and re-explains himself in a different way and you continue to repeat the same exact words.
All Fauci can do is argue semantics at this point because he knows he’s in the wrong. It’s a dodging technique. Focus on a word Rand got wrong instead of the point of the discussion. He doesnt touch Rands point at all that what they’re doing is dangerous and he knew it and they did it anyway.
Traitor.
Also a big part of their propaganda is if they tell a lie over and over it will be believed. MSM perfected the technique. The problem with his stategy in this case is that he isn't talking to the sheeple. lmao He just brought a knife to a gunfight.
Go get him Rand!
Senator Rand Paul, following in his father's footsteps. Leave it to Dr. Paul to give 'Dr.' Fauci the medicine he needs, bad tasting as it is.
Go Rand
Wowwwwwwwwwee! Fauccc is stumbling and stuttering. He was thinking way too hard to formulate a response.
Don't take the bait patriots.
"Covid" was never a danger and there was never a pandemic.
This has been a global takeover attempt masquerading as a pandemic since day-one.
This isn't theory. This is what all of the evidence points to.
Fauci is the epitome of a bold face liar. his fingerprints are all over the smoking gun lying in his lap but he continues to say "I didn't do it".
Dr. Rand Paul
Rand is a cuck
At least Rand is good for his tongue
THANKS DARPA.
Fauci is on 3:1 on betway now for the FIRST ARREST.
The sooner the better
I was surprised to hear they can splice the virus and make it look natural, COVID-19 is modified for sure, with the spike protein
The noose is certainly getting tighter around Fauci.
Why do you think they trying to tank the economy now.
There was a link to this story on yahoo, I think, and I clicked it, and they had an extremely edited version where Fauci saying Rand Paul was wrong was the most noticeable thing; classic leftist media manipulation.
And twatter is trending it as fucky giving the truthful answer....
Is Rand Paul a Mason? I know Fauci is.
Tucker did a piece on this two nights ago! Highly recommend you all watch it as well! The hidden truth regarding Fauci is coming out!
https://youtu.be/ANeFCFkTteQ