Remember one of the leaders of NXVM was Nancy Salzman. Look up her history on Linguistic programming. It's an incredibly powerful tool that the left is using to manipulate us with. I agree with your statement.
Ultimately, we just cannot win this without taking out or over the media. It's that simple. Either blackout and destroy the satellites or take them all over somehow.
I mean, if a horse dewormer saved the life of a neighbor that would go get murdered at the local hospital by being placed on a vent, of course I'm gonna use it.
The smoke from burning bridges is starting to blot out the sun with the standard points trotted out by the left.. they simply wont work any more.
How can gun-grabbing be on any agenda when china joe is dumping billions of dollars in arms, vehicles and weapons systems on actual terrorist groups? A dead issue. For that matter, how can 'domestic terror' be an accusation leveled at lawful people when literal pallets of cash are being gifted to terrorists by joe?
Accusation of being a conspiracy theorist? All that means is that you believe criminals plan and carry out crime in a coordinated way. How many thousands of examples of this happening can any member here list off the top of their head without even expending effort? Another deceased vector that just wont work any longer.
Dems caught working with chinese spies in their office or shagging them, or taking bribes from then, and not even getting fired from committed and policy groups they are members of? Get the fuck out of here with nonsensical russia and putin hysterics then.
The list goes on and on. As neverending as Joes ability to fuck up anything he is tasked with.
Do you know your critical thinking skills are reduced by lack of vocabulary? Reducing vocabulary reduces the ability to think or construct your argument. Obviously it reduces your ability to verbally construct your case. That's why they restrict actual words.
Ivermectin has also been used in humans for decades with extremely positive results against the most common worm infections (the guy who discovered it earned a nobel iirc). I still really don't buy the MMS thing, though.
They done this for a long time in propaganda its called negative association and they keep repeating it over and over again its a brainwashing technique called the "Illusionary truth effect"
When you brain read a word or phrase many times it becomes easier for you brain to read and because its easier it thinks its the truth.
ThanQ brother! I can hear it now! 'Faancy' (sounds right in my head). Went back and spoke the whole thing aloud. It helped me greatly and confused my family muchly. Seattle 'fancy' is new, I've been in a Welsh phase and it's a culture shock for them I'm sure. Sweet example mate.
As people who deal with these types of things every day, it helps us quickly identify one of the lost, so we can simply end any waste of time with "So, you are radicalized, my condolences. Feel free to return to discuss when you have recovered, until then goodbye."
Then focus your red pilling on less lost targets.
But overall it's complete tyranny and how tyrants turn populations against themselves.
That isn't a word. It's a construct with a built in conclusion.
A phobia is a Neurosis - a mental illness.
Therefore same gender sexual activity is proper mental hygiene.
But if you find it odd, revulsive, or bizarre, you are mentally ill and in need of treatment.
Every religio/philosophical system of morality from the beginning of time to the present condemns the behavior as destructive to the individual and society at large. This includes not only Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, but also the higher Pagan religions, Buddhism, Hinduism, and even the Egyptian Book of the Dead.
So if you agree with the accumulated wisdom of culture and society from the beginning of time to the present, you have a mental illness.
Either that, or this is all being pushed down people's throats by powerful organizations intent on bringing destruction down onto Western Civilization, using means well known and catalogued in scriptural warnings from the beginning of time to the present.
And BTW, don't feel too bad. God is crazy too by their accounting.
Chlorine dioxide literally is bleach, though. I have used it as such when cleaning lab stuff, that exact chemical.
And unless you're taking Ivermectin that was prescribed to you, most people talk about "horse dewormer" because that's where people are trying to get access to Ivermectin without a prescription. Through livestock dewormer. It's the "getting this as a horse paste that was never tested on nor approved for humans" part that people are ridiculing specifically.
We aren't mislabeling these things when people are literally using these products off-label.
Chlorine dioxide doesn't stop being bleach just because you decide that it's medicine and drink it, especially when it's being drunk from a bottle that's packaged and labeled as a cleaning product.
Appropriating products for uses that they're not supposed to be used for and then demanding that everyone else recognize what you believe to be true sounds far more like neurolinguistic programming than does calling a product what it says on the box.
Bleach is a substance that bleaches things (ie, removes stains, usually). There are a few compounds that are legally and scientifically considered "bleach."
I don't think you actually read the study about the chlorine dioxide, because it was an in vitro experiment that basically proves this bleach kills MRSA. In a dish. Not in the body. Note, from your paper:
While this stay is safe enough (being at least 3 orders of magnitude longer than the death time) to inactivate all bacteria in the surface of the body is too short for ClO 2 to penetrate deeper than a few tenths of a millimeter; therefore, it cannot cause any real harm to an organism that is much larger than a bacterium.
They mention that people use it as a medication, but it wasn't what they tested. They demonstrated that bleach kills bacteria in a dish. Which we knew. Which is why we use it as a bleach. This is pretty clearly stated in the paper if you read it. They want you to believe that it might be okay to drink, but their study doesn't even explore that possibility, because again, they did this experiment in vitro, not in vivo.
I don't accept Amazon reviews as scientific proof of anything other than the notion that people sometimes write and post stuff on Amazon.
I am not contesting that Ivermectin could be useful against COVID. I don't know. What I do know is that horse dewormer is a mystery vial that happens to contain Ivermectin.
If you're afraid of what might be in the vaccine, despite it having an ingredients list in which every component has been tested and approved for humans, then I can't understand why you'd rather eat a paste that is absolutely chock full of stuff that was never intended for human consumption nor ever tested on humans.
And I have absolutely no love of Big Pharma. Whatsoever. But being against Big Pharma doesn't mean trusting absolutely any random passerby that isn't Big Pharma. The world is not binary. Knowledge is much bigger than having only two sides.
I don't think you actually read the study about the chlorine dioxide
You looked at one study on the page and then act like it is the only one there because you are a dishonest piece of shit. The study RIGHT NEXT TO IT is one about chlorine dioxide being used internally with no ill effects.
This is why scumbag shill liars should not be allowed on this sub, because you willfully spread misinformation about potential life saving effects of these drugs and everything else.
I have no idea why the mods let you waste everyone's time with your dishonest bullshit here.
This is the first study to try to determine the effectiveness of an aqueous solution of chlorine dioxide in preventing the development of symptoms similar to those of COVID19. We demonstrate 90,4% efficacy in preventing the outbreak of COVID19-like symptoms under the given conditions. The blood test did not reveal any systemic abnormalities after the consumption of CDS. Our results suggest that the correct use of ClO2 as a solution is safe for human consumption in an adequate concentration and dose. Therefore, we consider that the recent findings on chlorine dioxide justify conducting RCTs to assess its efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, this may open up a new field of research on the potential use of new compounds to solve current and future public health problems. Finally, we invite more research groups to consider this solution for future studies.
If you want me to read a specific study, then send me a link to a specific fucking study, dude. I'm not the one wasting time when you throw a bunch of papers at me, some of which are clearly garbage for your argument, and act like I'm the one putting you out by not digging through them. I'm not getting paid for my time talking with you.
It's important to note in this study that they didn't actually test anything. They just talked with people who said they took this particular chemical while having symptoms that were apparently close enough to COVID-19.
The first of all is that it is a retrospective observational study, which means that conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of the CDS cannot be established because we could only use the information available in the medical records of the relatives, and we could not have any control . on the variables. Second, there is a misinformation bias as family members report initial and clinical information. Third, many relatives did not undergo diagnostic or confirmatory tests for SARS-Cov-2 due to the economic situation and the high cost of these in Mexico. Therefore, it was impossible to establish with certainty that family members who reported any symptoms similar to covid19 had COVID19. Fourth, the results of the studies used to compare our results are obtained from different populations and collected under other conditions, so these comparisons should be interpreted with caution. Fifth, the general interpretation of the findings may be restricted due to a lack of additional information (eg, personal care, eating habits, proximity and relationship with patients, etc.). These and other variables must be taken into account in future studies.
As someone who has read thousands of scientific papers, that is a LOT of serious limitations for this to be a decisive study. Which is why they don't claim it is a decisive study.
This study proves nothing. It's an exploratory study that is commonly done specifically to create opportunity for actual studies later on down the road. They tested nothing, just made observations after talking to people.
Or was there another study? I'm doing a lot more legwork than this deserves, considering your unnecessary hostility toward me.
You are totally going to get COVID “vaccine” booster shots for the rest of your life, while continuing to whine that your vaccine addiction isn’t eradicating coronavirus because of the unvaccinated, lol
If you say so. I've publicly stated that if you're going to go the Ivermectin route, at least go through a doctor, get the appropriate dose, make sure that you aren't on any meds (like blood thinners) that can interact with the med, and know that the med you're prescribed is actually designed and tested in human beings.
Eating horse paste is like eating garbage off the street. Maybe you'll be okay. But since nobody expected you to eat street trash, nobody exactly knows for sure, because they don't know what's in that street trash nor how any of it will affect you.
Well, they are the people who can get you the version of the medicine you want without risking taking stuff that has never been tested in humans and never intended for human consumption, yeah. I doubt your primary care doctor has much to do with any conspiracy.
There’s a lot of stuff in horse paste that’s not ivermectin.
Also, the methods that are used to composite drugs that are designed for animals are under much different quality standards than the stuff destined for humans.
Chemically identical, but it’s the difference between eating a 30 dollar hamburger and eating a piece of mystery meat labeled “beef.”
Nope, the only active ingredient in the horse paste I have is ivermectin.
If you push a narrative you know isn't true, and someone reading here takes you at your word and misses out on treatment, then you are directly responsible for their death or injury.
Yeah, that's why doctors all across the board have been prescribing therapeutics and other non-EGT methods of fighting "covid" including HQC, QC, D3, Zinc, Ivermectin, etc etc. Oh wait...
Aajonus Vonderplanitz. His diet protocols can reverse all toxicity since every 7 years you cycle all your cells over and it takes 5 generations of this to eliminate all residues of toxicity eventually all vaccine toxins pass out of the body including all other inorganic materials from lifetime of industrial contamination etc eating cooked food. Tribes who ate raw meat lived to be 150 on average so he says the human lifespan is like 200. Rockefeller medical halved the human lifespan then wonder why people die.
How does he know how old "tribe" members are? Do they have extensive written vital records? Anything that can be verified by something other than "she said she was over 180, officer, I swear"?
By what method did he determine that "civilized" people would have an additional 50 years--and how does he reconcile that with the fact that the difference between "civilized" and "tribal" is the very technologies he blames for allegedly halving our lifespans?
How old is his oldest patient?
If someone wants me to change my beliefs about something, he'd better have some solid proofs. So, I hope you can satisfy me on those counts.
Don’t forget:
Hydroxychloroquine = fish tank cleaner
No masks = literally grandma murderer
No clot shot = anti-vaxxer
No lockdowns = terrorist
You left out "insurrectionist"
You’re right.
Patriot protest = insurrectionist BLM riot = peaceful protest
"mostly peaceful insurrection"
Inclusion Equity Diversity
Neuro-linguistic IED.
Equity not equality. They wouldnt know equality if it hit em in the ass.
TY fren.
This is made entirely possible when you have a treasonous media/social media.
These people need to be tried for their crimes.
Remember one of the leaders of NXVM was Nancy Salzman. Look up her history on Linguistic programming. It's an incredibly powerful tool that the left is using to manipulate us with. I agree with your statement.
Ultimately, we just cannot win this without taking out or over the media. It's that simple. Either blackout and destroy the satellites or take them all over somehow.
I mean, if a horse dewormer saved the life of a neighbor that would go get murdered at the local hospital by being placed on a vent, of course I'm gonna use it.
AckShwally -
NLP is about using specific impactful words but primarily involves tone, speech rhythms, repetition and so on.
Primary example is Obama during the 2008 campaign. He got his followers whipped up into a lather using NLP.
Trump got his followers whipped into a lather with straight up patriotism.
The smoke from burning bridges is starting to blot out the sun with the standard points trotted out by the left.. they simply wont work any more.
How can gun-grabbing be on any agenda when china joe is dumping billions of dollars in arms, vehicles and weapons systems on actual terrorist groups? A dead issue. For that matter, how can 'domestic terror' be an accusation leveled at lawful people when literal pallets of cash are being gifted to terrorists by joe?
Accusation of being a conspiracy theorist? All that means is that you believe criminals plan and carry out crime in a coordinated way. How many thousands of examples of this happening can any member here list off the top of their head without even expending effort? Another deceased vector that just wont work any longer.
Dems caught working with chinese spies in their office or shagging them, or taking bribes from then, and not even getting fired from committed and policy groups they are members of? Get the fuck out of here with nonsensical russia and putin hysterics then.
The list goes on and on. As neverending as Joes ability to fuck up anything he is tasked with.
Do you know your critical thinking skills are reduced by lack of vocabulary? Reducing vocabulary reduces the ability to think or construct your argument. Obviously it reduces your ability to verbally construct your case. That's why they restrict actual words.
Ivermectin has also been used in humans for decades with extremely positive results against the most common worm infections (the guy who discovered it earned a nobel iirc). I still really don't buy the MMS thing, though.
Theres chlorine in your tap water, and in swimming pools.
They're succeeding in the weak ones among us.
Proverbs 27:17
“Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.”
Also notice how in MSM there is no such thing as "Far Left" it's always "Far Right" extremists?
They done this for a long time in propaganda its called negative association and they keep repeating it over and over again its a brainwashing technique called the "Illusionary truth effect"
When you brain read a word or phrase many times it becomes easier for you brain to read and because its easier it thinks its the truth.
A clever form of manipulation
ThanQ brother! I can hear it now! 'Faancy' (sounds right in my head). Went back and spoke the whole thing aloud. It helped me greatly and confused my family muchly. Seattle 'fancy' is new, I've been in a Welsh phase and it's a culture shock for them I'm sure. Sweet example mate.
In a way it's good.
As people who deal with these types of things every day, it helps us quickly identify one of the lost, so we can simply end any waste of time with "So, you are radicalized, my condolences. Feel free to return to discuss when you have recovered, until then goodbye."
Then focus your red pilling on less lost targets.
But overall it's complete tyranny and how tyrants turn populations against themselves.
How about "homophobia?"
That isn't a word. It's a construct with a built in conclusion.
A phobia is a Neurosis - a mental illness.
Therefore same gender sexual activity is proper mental hygiene.
But if you find it odd, revulsive, or bizarre, you are mentally ill and in need of treatment.
Every religio/philosophical system of morality from the beginning of time to the present condemns the behavior as destructive to the individual and society at large. This includes not only Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, but also the higher Pagan religions, Buddhism, Hinduism, and even the Egyptian Book of the Dead.
So if you agree with the accumulated wisdom of culture and society from the beginning of time to the present, you have a mental illness.
Either that, or this is all being pushed down people's throats by powerful organizations intent on bringing destruction down onto Western Civilization, using means well known and catalogued in scriptural warnings from the beginning of time to the present.
And BTW, don't feel too bad. God is crazy too by their accounting.
vaccine = clot shot.
any gov't official or hollywood type = pedo.
anyone who disagrees or has a different opinion = sheep.
any truth you don't like = fake news.
jordan sather = paytriot.
I've been calling all these leftist stooges retards. Really seems to grind their gears.
"Vaccine hesitant"
Oh I'm just hesitating, give me a minute.
nlp is nonsense
Chlorine dioxide literally is bleach, though. I have used it as such when cleaning lab stuff, that exact chemical.
And unless you're taking Ivermectin that was prescribed to you, most people talk about "horse dewormer" because that's where people are trying to get access to Ivermectin without a prescription. Through livestock dewormer. It's the "getting this as a horse paste that was never tested on nor approved for humans" part that people are ridiculing specifically.
We aren't mislabeling these things when people are literally using these products off-label.
Chlorine dioxide doesn't stop being bleach just because you decide that it's medicine and drink it, especially when it's being drunk from a bottle that's packaged and labeled as a cleaning product.
Appropriating products for uses that they're not supposed to be used for and then demanding that everyone else recognize what you believe to be true sounds far more like neurolinguistic programming than does calling a product what it says on the box.
Why are you here shilling for big pharma?
Clinical studies with chlorine dioxide. Bleach is sodium hypochlorite.
Here's a review of ivermectin on amazon from someone who treated themselves., many such cases.
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives — But Doctors Were Told Not to Use It
Bleach is a substance that bleaches things (ie, removes stains, usually). There are a few compounds that are legally and scientifically considered "bleach."
I don't think you actually read the study about the chlorine dioxide, because it was an in vitro experiment that basically proves this bleach kills MRSA. In a dish. Not in the body. Note, from your paper:
They mention that people use it as a medication, but it wasn't what they tested. They demonstrated that bleach kills bacteria in a dish. Which we knew. Which is why we use it as a bleach. This is pretty clearly stated in the paper if you read it. They want you to believe that it might be okay to drink, but their study doesn't even explore that possibility, because again, they did this experiment in vitro, not in vivo.
I don't accept Amazon reviews as scientific proof of anything other than the notion that people sometimes write and post stuff on Amazon.
I am not contesting that Ivermectin could be useful against COVID. I don't know. What I do know is that horse dewormer is a mystery vial that happens to contain Ivermectin.
If you're afraid of what might be in the vaccine, despite it having an ingredients list in which every component has been tested and approved for humans, then I can't understand why you'd rather eat a paste that is absolutely chock full of stuff that was never intended for human consumption nor ever tested on humans.
And I have absolutely no love of Big Pharma. Whatsoever. But being against Big Pharma doesn't mean trusting absolutely any random passerby that isn't Big Pharma. The world is not binary. Knowledge is much bigger than having only two sides.
You looked at one study on the page and then act like it is the only one there because you are a dishonest piece of shit. The study RIGHT NEXT TO IT is one about chlorine dioxide being used internally with no ill effects.
This is why scumbag shill liars should not be allowed on this sub, because you willfully spread misinformation about potential life saving effects of these drugs and everything else.
I have no idea why the mods let you waste everyone's time with your dishonest bullshit here.
From the study, one of many at the link:
If you want me to read a specific study, then send me a link to a specific fucking study, dude. I'm not the one wasting time when you throw a bunch of papers at me, some of which are clearly garbage for your argument, and act like I'm the one putting you out by not digging through them. I'm not getting paid for my time talking with you.
Are you talking about this one?
https://andreaskalcker.com/en/coronavirus/clinical-study-with-chlorine-dioxide/a-retrospective-observational-study-on-the-efficacy-of-chlorine-dioxide-for-the-prophylaxis-of-symptoms-similar-to-those-of-covid19-in-relatives-living-with-patients-with-this-disease.html
It's important to note in this study that they didn't actually test anything. They just talked with people who said they took this particular chemical while having symptoms that were apparently close enough to COVID-19.
As someone who has read thousands of scientific papers, that is a LOT of serious limitations for this to be a decisive study. Which is why they don't claim it is a decisive study.
This study proves nothing. It's an exploratory study that is commonly done specifically to create opportunity for actual studies later on down the road. They tested nothing, just made observations after talking to people.
Or was there another study? I'm doing a lot more legwork than this deserves, considering your unnecessary hostility toward me.
You can put lemon juice in your hair, and the sun will bleach it. By your definition, putting lemon in your tea is drinking bleach.
Technically, yes. Decent counter.
You're posting the horse paste submissions, aren't you?
btw... IT'S THE FLU and a worldwide propaganda campaign.
Nobody here is drinking bleach, retard.
I am not posting anything, no.
You are totally going to get COVID “vaccine” booster shots for the rest of your life, while continuing to whine that your vaccine addiction isn’t eradicating coronavirus because of the unvaccinated, lol
No, they are also calling ivermectin prescriptions risky because it is a horse dewormer
And bleach is understood by most to be a cleaner not formulated purely
so calling it bleach is inaccurate
Chlorine dioxide is the active ingredient in bleach
but bleach is not necessarily a pure formulation of chlorine dioxide
If you say so. I've publicly stated that if you're going to go the Ivermectin route, at least go through a doctor, get the appropriate dose, make sure that you aren't on any meds (like blood thinners) that can interact with the med, and know that the med you're prescribed is actually designed and tested in human beings.
Eating horse paste is like eating garbage off the street. Maybe you'll be okay. But since nobody expected you to eat street trash, nobody exactly knows for sure, because they don't know what's in that street trash nor how any of it will affect you.
I don't like eating mysteries, personally.
Ah yes, the ol' "asking the people who caused the problem to fix the problem" routine.
Well, they are the people who can get you the version of the medicine you want without risking taking stuff that has never been tested in humans and never intended for human consumption, yeah. I doubt your primary care doctor has much to do with any conspiracy.
What was never tested in humans? Isn't Ivermectin used in humans for scabies? HCQ for malaria and rheumatoid arthritis?
They are very well tested and very well tolerated.
You're either not well versed in these drugs or you are misdirecting.
There’s a lot of stuff in horse paste that’s not ivermectin.
Also, the methods that are used to composite drugs that are designed for animals are under much different quality standards than the stuff destined for humans.
Chemically identical, but it’s the difference between eating a 30 dollar hamburger and eating a piece of mystery meat labeled “beef.”
Nope, the only active ingredient in the horse paste I have is ivermectin.
If you push a narrative you know isn't true, and someone reading here takes you at your word and misses out on treatment, then you are directly responsible for their death or injury.
Just stop it, it isn't worth the money
Yeah, that's why doctors all across the board have been prescribing therapeutics and other non-EGT methods of fighting "covid" including HQC, QC, D3, Zinc, Ivermectin, etc etc. Oh wait...
If it was an option to get it through doctors we wouldn’t be using the animal version you fucking idiot
Rude.
Also, isn’t American Frontline Doctors supposed to be a resource for those of you who don’t trust the established medical system?
Why are you here shilling for big pharma?
Clinical studies with chlorine dioxide. Bleach is sodium hypochlorite.
Here's a review of ivermectin on amazon from someone who treated themselves., many such cases.
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives — But Doctors Were Told Not to Use It
So, what are you proposing instead?
Dont interact with obvious shills beyond a fuck off maybe. Just neg and deport.
Aajonus Vonderplanitz. His diet protocols can reverse all toxicity since every 7 years you cycle all your cells over and it takes 5 generations of this to eliminate all residues of toxicity eventually all vaccine toxins pass out of the body including all other inorganic materials from lifetime of industrial contamination etc eating cooked food. Tribes who ate raw meat lived to be 150 on average so he says the human lifespan is like 200. Rockefeller medical halved the human lifespan then wonder why people die.
If someone wants me to change my beliefs about something, he'd better have some solid proofs. So, I hope you can satisfy me on those counts.