535
posted ago by jhartz39 ago by jhartz39 +535 / -0

Step 1: Get a lawyer. Find like minded people in your workplace, pool your money and retain a lawyer. Make it know to your employer you have a lawyer on retainer. https://files.catbox.moe/nsdqnu.pdf

Step 2: Ask the person who is coercing you to submit to the vaccine if you have informed consent. It is well known everyone has a right to informed consent. Here is a link explaining your rights as a patient. If they are trying to inject you with a substance, you become the patient and have every right to ask questions before submitting to their demands. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent

Step 3: Ask for the ingredient list for THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE. Tell them you want to know what you are injecting in to my body. Here is the fact sheet and the package insert for the current Pfizer vaccine that has supposedly been FDA approved. There is no ingredients listed here. https://30g7el1b4b1n28kgpr414nuu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-Vaccine-EUA-Fact-Sheet-for-HCP_0.pdf

Step 4: SHOW them THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE is still under EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION and can not be mandated. The vaccine that was FDA approved is called Comirnaty. It is all in the first paragraph of this FDA statement. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

Step 5: Show them the vaccine the FDA approved (Comirnaty) is not available in the USA. I twill not be available until clinical trials are completed(2023). Here is the Biologics License Application (BLA) for Comirnaty from the FDA. Comirnaty vaccine is still under study(clinical trials). The things they are still studying are myocarditis, pericarditis subclinical myocarditis, Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes, immunogenicity. The results of several studies are not due until 2023-2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

Step 6: Show them the international agreement signed by the United States. Nuremburg Code: http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

Nuremburg Code:

Part 1: Talks about coercing: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. (Tell them you are feeling coerced and uninformed without the ingredient list)

Part 6: The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. (Show them the the VAERS data, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data )

Part 10: During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. (Tell the to shut down their experiment)

Step 6: If all this fails to make them reconsider their stance, ask for a termination letter. Do not quit. Take them termination letter with you when you apply for unemployment. Contact your lawyer on retainment and sue the fuck out of them for wrongful termination and violating your informed consent rights.

I may add more to this if anything pops in to my mind.

Stay safe my frens:

WWG!WGA!!!!

Comments (61)
sorted by:
25
Responsible1 25 points ago +25 / -0

How can you have “informed” consent if they won’t tell you what is in it??

12
LRAD 12 points ago +12 / -0

Ding ding!

2
Matterhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't and that's why none of this is ever actually going to be approved.

2
tenthousandspoons 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like the way they pass laws. You have to take it to know what's in it. But unlike shady legislation, jabby juice cannot be merely overturned in the next session.

2
Lyonessrising 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the point actually

1
MAGAsoyboyslayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wondering what to do if they force weekly covid testing. I hear companies doing that now.

4
Lyonessrising 4 points ago +4 / -0

Covid1984 has never been isolated. EVER. So no isolation means theres no test for it either..nor a real vaccine. Isolation of a virus is needed for both. You dont have to submitt to testing either.

1
WakeUpWorld 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they don't force EVERYONE, even vaxxed sheep, then they are DISCRIMINATING against you

1
MAGAsoyboyslayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good point.

17
DigitalWarrior 17 points ago +17 / -0

I dont think it is a good idea to say "I will submit if x terms are met" namely the line about informed consent.

I'm not ever stating I will submit to the vaccine under any conditions because I wont give them the opportunity to meet those conditions.

I dont do vaccines, end of story. Last time I got stuck was in the military, decades ago.

14
Sippilou 14 points ago +14 / -0

Thank you so much for this!!!!!!

11
CorpseLivesMatter 11 points ago +11 / -0

I called Pfizer myself to listen to their automated recording about the vaxx, and it explicitly states on the recording that the Pfizer is the same as comirnaty, and that it has FDA approval

…which begs the question: are we interpreting the documents incorrectly, or is Pfizer straight up lying?

Pfizer #: 1-800-879-3477

13
WinstonO1984 13 points ago +13 / -0

It is a Bait and Switch - BioNTech has the EUA approval -Comirnaty has FDA approval but it is not available in the USA. Pfizer "Says" they are alike, BUT also says they are Different ;) https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFUWmDtm/a-major-law-firm-confirms-that-t/

6
Buildtheadytum 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wonder if anyone has tried to sue the FDA to end the EUA on the basis that there are other treatments. I think Fauci himself authored a study about HCQ being effective for SARS COVID.

4
WinstonO1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it is about to Happen!!!

4
Panzershrekt 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah, I thought I remembered there was something about being "distinctly" or "legally" different.

2
WinstonO1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya...THis was done Strictly for the Mandate and Jab Nazi's..Business were already sending mandate e-mails 10 days before the FDA approval of a Jab that may or may NOT be here in Two or Three Years!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
djmarcone 2 points ago +2 / -0

they are the "same" but regardless as others have said the shot is still in EUA, it has not finished trials, all they did was modify the EUA and specify tests they must complete such as the heart inflammation and other things.

It is "approved" - yes - for more testing.

The argument that they are for 2 different things is not totally correct, they do say the two "different" things are the same thing.

9
Themis595 9 points ago +9 / -0

Get the coercion in writing. I read somewhere that if anyone pressures you to get the jab, and they are not a licensed medical professional, they’re practicing medicine without a license, which is a crime in the USA.

9
rednekhipychik 9 points ago +9 / -0

I am a shuttle driver for a prominent auto service company. I caught "covid" at work. It was hellish, I ran fever for 15 days, but I had prepared with hcq from AFLCCC as well as ivermectin, C, D, Zinc, Magnesium, Quercetin, and NAC. 3 weeks later, I'm good. I decided a no- nonsense approach was best for me. I called and told them I had covid, I knew that's what it was since others at work were also getting sick with it at the same time who had tested +. I told them I would not be getting tested since my husband had just gotten tested, +, and they told him to go home and take Tylenol. What's the point? Not playing these games. Told them I would follow guidelines for isolating and return based on symptoms and fever. Told them I would not be masking when I returned and if they couldn't deal with that, then they could cut me loose. They were all good. Went back to everyone wearing masks and I walked in like "NATURAL IMMUNITY!" I don't mask when I'm driving people in the vehicle, I don't mask in the store, I don't mask anywhere. Just stop playing the stupid game that is hurting all of us. Most employers do not want to lose a good employee.

2
MommaChz1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I may have to make a “Natural Immunity” shirt. Lol that would really p.o. some people

7
SpaceForce45 7 points ago +7 / -0

What if they make you do weekly mandatory PCR swab testing for not volunteering to be vaccinated? That’s what the federal government is going to do to their employees soon…

5
Watcher_28 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh it’s already being done for government employees, PSC’s and TPC’s. Un-vaxx’d have to be tested every 72 hours to enter facilities and show proof of negative test if/when asked. Complete bullshit…

1
WakeUpWorld 1 point ago +1 / -0

Discrimination. Can't make you take tests if everyone else does not. There is no law about taking tests or vaccines and business can't discriminate against you to do so. Company policy does not give them the legal right to discriminate against you

1
MAGAsoyboyslayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Wondering same.

6
Blurpy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Outstanding post. TOP Quality.

5
Eph612 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you. So it occurred to me, reading Part 1, that any entities offering “incentives” for people to take the jab are in violation of the Nuremberg Code. That is an international construct, is it not?

5
test_pattern 5 points ago +5 / -0

NOTE: Pfizer admits there is a difference between Comirnaty and the EUA product. it’s on page 14 of the following document:

“a similar vaccine termed BNT162b2 (V8). COMIRNATY and BNT162b2 (V8) have identical amino acid sequences of the encoded antigens but COMIRNATY includes the presence of optimized codons to improve antigen expression.”

FDA Summary Basis for Regulatory Action

https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download

if anyone can figure out what "optimized codons" are, please post.

1
1
test_pattern 1 point ago +1 / -0

thanks, that reminds me that codon optimization is computer modeling. then they make recipe, and inject it. what could possibly go wrong?

here's an interesting discussion https://github.com/berthubert/bnt162b2/blob/master/reverse-engineering-source-code-of-the-biontech-pfizer-vaccine.md

Summarising With this, we now know the exact mRNA contents of the BNT162b2 vaccine, and for most parts we understand why they are there:

•The CAP to make sure the RNA looks like regular mRNA

•A known successful and optimized 5' untranslated region (UTR)

•A codon optimized signal peptide to send the Spike protein to the right place (amino acids copied 100% from the original virus)

•A codon optimized version of the original spike, with two 'Proline' substitutions to make sure the protein appears in the right form

•A known successful and optimized 3' untranslated region

•A poly-A tail with a 'linker' in there

The codon optimization adds a lot of G and C to the mRNA. Meanwhile, using Ψ (1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl) instead of U helps evade our immune system, so the mRNA stays around long enough so we can actually help train the immune system.

5
NCPatriot34_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

My son was already coerced off of his football team (ACC school) so too late to apply to his situation but this is helpful insight regardless. May need to get other players who left the team to team up and fight back!

4
KickingPugilist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Saved! Could come in handy, thanks fren!

2
fastwalker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you! Tagged for later

2
Jabron661 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, gathering materials now, never know when its going to come.

2
Followd 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is great!

2
MisprisionIsEvil 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you can't tell them why do you think you can show them? The problem is NOT lack of information. The problem is a hard heart, stuff neck and LOVE of darkness. Anything you show them will be explained away just like anything you tell them.

The only SHOW that has any chance is showing them the evidence while their hero cowers in the doc. Then hangs.

2
Pbman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell them you will take the comirnaty,when it's avalible. They can't argue with that much,dont tell them it's 2023

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice

2
OhhFuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aren't the ingredients listed on page 25/29 under "13 DESCRIPTION"?

Each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine also includes the following ingredients: lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)a zanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]- N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-s n -glycero-3-phosphocholine , and 0.2 mg cholesterol), 0.01 mg potassium chloride, 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.36 mg sodium chloride, 0.07 mg
dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose. The diluent (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP ) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.

2
TheWestDeclines 2 points ago +3 / -1

Thanks for all this. But, the ingredients are listed in Section 13, on page 25, correct?

2
BeatButStillStanding 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very well done. I already have 3 phases of attack ready. This entire list as it stands is phase 1. Phase 2 is the racial equality because black people have the lowest vaccination rate so they should get it first and my state/employer is all about muh racisms. Phase 3 is religious exemption. Then final stand is forced termination followed by a lawsuit.

2
SpoonySmalls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you

2
7Nick9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fantastic post !

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MommaChz1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ty fren!!

1
Mah_Selectah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for that

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy should always be mentioned when talking about the Nuremberg Code.

I'd be terrified if he was yelling at me about that, if I was one of those anointed few.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm6iAa6tki0

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TrumpyCat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you

1
Azorca 1 point ago +1 / -0

My son is being coerced and is wavering. I want to ask him who his supervisor is and send him the following note. I'm 73 years old, and have a mental condition. I think that I am an American. And I am pissed off. What do you think??

Dear Asshole, (not his real name) My son informs me that you are attempting to coerce him into doing something he really really doesn’t want to do. Namely, submitting to getting the supposed “vaccine”. He is in fear of losing his job and his livelihood and considering getting the jab based solely on your pressure which you are putting on him. I want you to know that, as his father, I have advised him not to do this as it is, in my opinion, un-American to force someone, with this kind of pressure, to submit to an experimental medical procedure. That said, I want you to know that if he submits and there is any serious outcome or something worse from this procedure, I will hold you personally responsible. Not lawsuit, finger pointing, doxing or whatever responsible, but personally responsible for his sickness, poor bodily condition or demise. This means, Mr. Asshole that if I lose my son or he becomes sick or disabled in any way after receiving this treatment even though you were “following orders” I will blame you, personally. Have a nice day, Signed Me.

1
FreedomLover21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perhaps use some of this language from an attorney in your letter. Also, if your son is an adult, the letter needs to come from him and not you.

https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/689810/vaccine-mandate-employee-letter-example

Best to you and your son, fren.

Edit: also check here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/

2
Azorca 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you Free, I will forward this to him. Stay frosty, as opposed to me!!

1
Wizsdumb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you so much for this

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Much better thread than hearsay Yesterday J

1
HairyWBush 1 point ago +1 / -0

PERFECT thanks PAL!

1
MommaChz1 1 point ago +1 / -0

So yesterday my job which is federal sent out a letter saying they want everyone to complete your vaccination attestation. I have contacted my union rep and let her know this morning that I will not be filling that out that I have my religious exemption and that I have the right to refuse the vaccination. They are supposed to have a briefing today in the union to figure out what they’re trying to dictate and she’s going to get back to me and let me know what they say.

1
Mustang289hipo 1 point ago +1 / -0

And there are other proven Therapeutics available Ivermectin HCQ which TRUMP any Vax mandate.

1
MommaChz1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also I have saved all these links and all the information just in case I need to take all this further. They will have to fire me and I will get a lawyer! Just burns me up, I hate they are trying to force people.