But... But... Doctors would say something if the vax was dangerous!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (76)
sorted by:
They say whatever their commie puppet master tells them to
Rush B. Cyka blyat.
The administration of an experimental vaccine on unsuspecting pregnant women is one of the greatest crimes of humanity ever openly seen. It doesn’t take a medical degree to know this should never happen, but for people to go extensively to school and do this without a thought is reprehensible beyond any rationalization.
If the doctor knows something is bad, you don’t do it. You get fired. You lose your malpractice. You lose your license, your paycheck, your lifestyle, etc. It doesn’t matter. It’s not worth your soul.
This observation of the medical profession has been one of the most difficult parts for me of the Great Awakening. Had no clue of the extent of the evil openly exhibited. It still boggles the mind.
I’m with you. The realization that our medical system is not to be trusted was the last piece of my awakening during this plandemic. And it has broken my heart. I briefly went to nursing school and got a taste of how useless my instructors were, and that settled it. I realized back then that any old idiot off the street could be a nurse...and that there aren’t enough truly intelligent and compassionate ones to make up for the rigged system.
I have family there, including a relative who was pregnant. They pushed her to get the shot. Thankfully her child was delivered healthy, but why on earth would anyone risk this?
I would think every administrator got a bonus. And any doc who hit his or her vaccination quotas. Every single physician I know, save one, is brainwashed in this manner. I don’t understand it. No one is looking at the other research out there. Just letting their admins tell them how to practice
I’ve heard a lot of anecdotes but haven’t seen a ton of solid data. 82% chance of miscarriage seems excessively high. As in, even the mockingbirds couldn’t hide that level. I think the rate is something like 10 or 15%, if the mother knows about it.
So evil
I had that thought during the opioid crisis.
Doctors care about one thing and one thing only…$$$$$$$. This fake ‘vaccine’ nonsense proves it.
Plus they can write their own RX and vaccine card so they are the most exempt group in the world. Patient: "Got your vax yet Dr. Smith?" Dr. Smith: "Why yes, want to see the CDC vaccine card I just filled out for myself? Now roll up that sleeve and let us get you vaxxed too so everything can go back to normal. See you in 3 months for your booster..."
Insurance companies give monetary incentives based on the percentage of patients a Dr. has under their care that are vaccinated - fact!
Not all doctors only care about money, but most won't jeopardize their medical license, which usually took them many years of blood, sweat, and tears to earn. Even those who are ethical might think, "Well, I can't do any good at all if I can't practice. I might not be able to fully express my medical opinion, but at least I can take other steps to help my patients."
The doctors that comply with this are harming their patients by ignoring effective treatments and continuing with this dystopian experiment. Their career that they poured years of blood, sweat and tears is now an illusion, a comfortable lie. They actually could be helping people but instead choose self preservation at others expense.
The medical-pharmaceutical-industrial complex is not about health and hasn't been since Rockefeller took control of the whole process in the early 1900s.
They say don't spread misinformation or falsehoods but who decides what those may be?
In other words, Doctors must comply with the narrative or be punished. Even if the narrative is misinformation itself.
this is the exact opposite of 'the scientific method'
don't forget, there is science and there is Fauchi science.
Disagree with Fauchi science and you face the cancel culture.
science fiction
https://i.redd.it/vj64m1oq60211.jpg
https://youtu.be/9HQfauGJaTs?t=8s
This statement is referring to doctors just talking. "Providing misinformation."
That's a far cry from what you and I have discussed, which are the ability of scientists and doctors to conduct properly-controlled scientific studies which are then subject to peer review and publication. That is not what is being contested here.
If a doctor says, "The vaccine is a poison that is going to kill you", then they need to back up their statements with actual studies that can prove that. Otherwise, it's considered misinformation. The fact that this information comes from a doctor does not in itself automatically make it credible.
Scientists recognize that VAERS data is not that proof. Anecdotes are not that proof.
But if a doctor wants to run a study and provide actual data for other doctors to review, this statement doesn't appear to suggest they will be disciplined.
Such a study has not been provided to date, to my knowledge.
It's a subtle difference from the outside, but it's a pretty stark distinction to scientists.
I understand the point you're making. I just don't agree with it.
Normal doctors are busy treating patients and aren't set up to perform studies. Anecdotal evidence isn't proof, but it can provide evidence powerful enough to change the way you do things. Also, biased, massaged, and misleading scientific studies aren't proof, either. They're propaganda disguised as proof.
nobody in the history of the the world has ever successfully used a "study" to find any long term problem with any vaccine.
therefore, any time a "scientist" claims they "can't find the evidence" that vaccines cause X,
i simply ask them to demonstrate their proficiency in using a study to find any vaccine problem, and invariably they fail to demonstrate proficiency and/or competence.
one "anecdotal" white buffalo is all it takes to debunk 10,000 "scientific studies" that "can't find the evidence" that white buffalo exist.
"anecdotes" are considered "proof" all of the time, in a court of law.
yes, your honor, i "anecdotally" eye-witnessed the defendant commit the crime.
what "isn't" proof, is a scientific study, because we all know that scientists can put whatever data they want into their study, or omit any data they want, to get the pre-determined results they want.
and besides, every atheist knows you can't "prove a negative"
therefore you can't actually prove "vaccines DO NOT cause X".
why does Frank DeStefano still have a job, after publishing this FRAUD?
http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14754936/
~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower
https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png
Not to mention, studies rarely (if ever) receive funding to disprove left wing narratives.
Is is possible for someone to interrupt an alternative point of view as "providing misinformation?"
The problem with your argument is that many Doctors have provided case evidence that would make the need for the shot unnecessary. They have verified and peer reviewed treatment plans using HCQ, Ivermectin, and other natural vitamins that work to eliminate the short term and long term risk of the viral infection.
The track record of those doctors ability to treat and cure the infection is evidence that the world does not need the shots. Natural immune response provides significantly longer lasting results than any of the current shots. Ironically, calling these a vaccine is such a joke as they do not provide immunity. If they did, would not need additional shots?
Think logically, if the shot gave anyone immunity, would you need a third dose or a fourth, etc...
You are waiting for a study to be provided to you by they people that have 0 to gain and thus 0 interest in producing that study.
Yes, it is possible that an alternate point of view can be mislabeled as "providing misinformation."
What you overestimate is the number of scientists that would have a vested interest in lying about this.
The vast majority of scientists do not work for Pfizer. Or Moderna. Or J&J. Or NASA. Or the CDC. Or any of the other scientific institutions that you are concerned with.
Many, many scientists work independently on tenure through university. Tenure prevents people from being fired purely for their academic study interests. On purpose, to prevent exactly this sort of problem from occurring.
Science is FAR more competitive than people here give credit for.
I'm a broken record, but don't forget that the only reason Einstein is famous is because he toppled the existing paradigm set by the world's most famous scientist, Newton.
Almost all scientists, from climate scientists to medical scientists to biologists to random grad students are looking for the evidence that can topple the system. They all want to publish that paper. They want to be the next Einstein and show they were smarter than everyone else in the field.
Which is why scientific consensus is so powerful. If everyone who wants to "win" science agrees on some idea, then we don't have a stronger idea. Because if we did, someone is going to publish it. And it's going to be a big deal.
Just because a study exists doesn't mean it's powerful enough to topple the best existing evidence.
Perhaps one day HCQ and ivermectin will reach that status. But it hasn't happened yet.
Skeptics don't just exist here. There are MANY skeptical scientists. Science is an attractive field for skeptics, and that's an unadulterated truth.
Have you ever heard of the Dead Scientists List?
How have you ruled out the possibility that there are good reasons that highly-educated people tend to lean liberal for reasons other than brainwashing?
I don’t know what that means.
Suppose that somebody with a PhD who has been studying a subject for over a decade as a full time job actually does understand the climate better than you do. Just imagine it for the sake of this example.
And imagine that a better understanding of the climate, based on eight hours a day for a decade of studying the climate, actually did tend to lead them to a liberal conclusion on how to address climate change.
How would you ever know if you hadn’t also spent that much time studying the climate? How could you conclude that they’re brainwashed for CERTAIN, and that it wasn’t you who was lacking the information to come to the correct solution for the problem?
u/#Ummwhat
Just canceled my Dr. appointment for next week (specialist). He pushed the jab during my last visit.
My primary care Dr. also pushed the jab and refused my request for Ivermectin. I explained that I was either going to get a prescription from him or I was getting the vet version. He muttered that I should get the vet version because he couldn't prescribe it. Both are part of a huge medical group.
I've lost all respect for them both and have no faith in their dedication to my health. They are obviously controlled and more interested in keeping their $$$.
We need a way to find based doctors.
We need to move back to a more holistic society. Many drs will follow
I've learned that the Medical industry is just as corrupt as the Social Media, Fake News, and Political industries.
Isn't it disgusting? Thanks, Rockefellers, for being traitors to your entire species. What a legacy to take to the afterlife, eh? Well, modern medicine has helped a lot of us, for sure, but now I avoid it whenever I can. Also, I always liked to look up any maladies I had online before I went to the MD. And the MD was pretty much wrong every time. They're not the great geniuses that the media makes them out to be.
"Misinformation" is a weaponized, all-encompassing term used to discredit anything that doesn't match-up with the lockstep narrative.
If it truly was misinfo, the mainstream would relish in open debates and widespread, highly publicized debunks.
Every time you see the word you know the truth is being censored because the deception can't be legitimately defended.
Medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death every year, but this is what they address
Kick backs by Big Pharma-funding, lunches/dinners, medical book, free samples, etc; hospitals threaten privileges if they don’t tow the line; medical boards threaten license if not following the mantra. There are a few good doctors, but very few. Wouldn’t you think when patient after patient dies from remdesevir, ventilators, pulmonary edema from not being given lasix, and vancomycin causes a shut down of all organs, the doctors collectively would say, “this isn’t working”? But no, the plod along following what the CDC tells them to do, thereby killing people instead of helping them.
My doctor grew up with mom, I know him well. He said to me that he is not going near the 'vax' with a 10 foot poll. But he tows the AMA line with others I would bet.
Ove got the AMA propaganda training booklet
Yes the same medical/pharmaceutical industry that brought you DDT, radium in everything, cigarettes, cocaine for you and your child's toothache, herion and countless prescription drugs that have class action lawsuits were prompted to join daily via ad. Yeah those people surely wouldn't fuck you.
Except that there was nothing wrong with DDT. It was banned for political reasons, not for cause of safety. The eggshell studies were with birds who were provided a diet lacking in calcium and phosphorus, necessary for the formation of shells (my recollection of reading long ago). By banning it, millions of people were doomed to die of malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases (most of them black). No skin off someone's back...
Dear Dr Fauci,
Question: Who is it that decides what is misinformation? That's the big enchilada. Tell me who is in charge of truth. Should be Jesus.
Our doctor did say something. He won't give the vax in his office and has told me that no one in his family will get it. He even sent a letter to LSU telling them that mandatory vaccines are insane and that vaccinated people are spreading the virus.
Delta deaths are actually vax deaths. If you go to hospital with a broken leg and a positive PCR test you will be killed in the hospital on a ventilator. Ivermectin and HCQ are banned and the doctors are controlled. https://rumble.com/vm936v-whistleblower-nurse-destroys-delta-narrative-vaccinated-patients-fill-hospt.html?
Australian doctors are silenced and must conform to the government's position on the covid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut2yHSc5rWc
Fucking hell do I hate this... All my liberal acquaintances are like "If the science didn't support the vaccines, we'd know it... If the science supported Ivermectin, we'd know it. Doctors would tell you what was best for you"
None of that would happen. No scientist or medical professional is going to risk their entire career to do research that supports anything besides The Narrative. The Party has said that the only treatment for COVID is the jab. Therefore no science should try to question The Narrative on COVID.
It's not that hard to figure out. The only reason "the science" and "medical professionals" overwhelmingly support the official statements of the government is because they have to.
BuT wE wOuLd'Ve HeArD aBoUt It On ThE nEwS.
Mfker, can't yell loud enough if you're deaf, dumb, and bIind.