If so, nah. Airplane would not have the mass to cut thru it. No way. Bush brother #3 ran a team that showed up in the middle of the night right after the port authority left & before the next shift came on for months.
They had dark blue vans, were working on the inside of walls, the whole works.
The thick steel columns were on the inside not the outer structure. I'm so tired of the "There were no planes" crowd. It might have been an inside job, but JETS were used to fly into the buildings. That can't be faked to that scale, especially 20 years ago.
Thank You. From your linked 'Wiki' page...
"The perimeter structure was constructed with extensive use of prefabricated modular pieces, which consisted of three columns, three stories tall, connected by spandrel plates. The perimeter columns had a square cross section, 14 inches (36 cm) on a side, and were constructed of welded steel plate."
Furthermore, those prefabricated panels supposed steel beams were approximately 1/4 inch thick. I'm sure those who say the planes could not have cut steel beams forget to mention this fact.
Screw all these "studies." As a for er EOD Sailor, here's all you need to know. 1) Thermite was used. 2) Thermite is ONLY obtainable by the military and bldg demolitions companies that yhave a Federal Explosives License for explosive demolitions work. That's it. That's all you need to know.
Why? Because only one of the Worlds militaries or commercial demolitions companies could've got their hands on it and placed it at WTC. Period. "Who" is responsible is secondary to the fact that multiple thermitic events were witnessed and catalogued at all three sites and at the Pentagon. We ALL know who is capable of this type of madness, and [they] control all parties who could've pulled this off.
Why wouldn't regular thermite be enough to destroy the building? Or even run-of-the-mill demolition explosives? Regular demolitions don't use thermite, after all.
Because under the microscope on the buildings they found it was nano aluminum residue from nano thermite. Only from our government can you get large quantities. Average consumer would be getting visit from FBI.
I'm no expert, but couldn't a high-speed collision between an aircraft made from aluminum and a building create aluminum dust, of varying particle sizes?
Also, if they used nano thermite wouldn't all of it have burned up? It wouldn't leave any residue unless it wasn't mixed correctly, which wouldn't be the case for government-issued stuff. Something just doesn't add up here.
I mean I know people at WTC when this happened and when I say Inside Job they label me as a nut job. They cant comprehend our government would do something like that. Then they take the covid vaccine lol. This is my brother in law.
In 2002, the production of nano-sized aluminum particles required considerable effort, and commercial sources for the material were limited.[2] Current[when?] production levels are now beyond 100 kg/month.[citation needed
Because under the microscope on the buildings they found it was nano aluminum residue from nano thermite. Only from our government can you get large quantities. Average consumer would be getting visit from FBI.
But But, Nano thermite. I mean anytime their BS is called out, they dig deeper into the conspiracy theory. Not planes, but I saw the fucking jets, no that was CGI. WHAT?
More than just Thermetic explosives must have been used. We see on video massive beams and people being shot out of the buildings with tremendous force.
Thermetic explosives don't do that, they're used for cutter charges, not for massive ejections. So it was probably a combination of different kinds of explosives for different parts of the various buildings.
The whole nukes in the basement idea is absurd. Things would have been way worse if there were nukes involved.
Rivers of molten metal is explained with thermetic explosives. The areas that are cut by such charges would result in the surrounding metal turning into that.
Good post. This report is the real deal, absolutely everything the 9/11 commission should have done, they did. It is bulletproof, well documented, and includes the equations and models they used. From the old school, "show your work" sorts of professors that give no fucks and live in Alaska where they still think straight.
"one of the nation's top engineering schools" if you think to 200 or so still counts as a top school. Not saying the paper is bad just don't be a jackass about where it came from
If you look carefully at the collapse of the towers you see the interior part of the building’s collapse first and follows the rest of the tower falling in on itself. The force of the interior falling into itself would cause the the expulsion and jettison of the cladding and blow out the windows as the tower fell. The interior structure was massive steel columns they had to Literally turn to dust for that to happen. The only way was a fission Nike placed below the last sub basement. That type of nuke would have turned the steel and everything else to dust.
I’ll post a picture of a Russian study that has since disappeared from the internet.
I have a picture on my phone but don’t know how to get it on this board.
I find flaw with the simulation used to make the determination. The construction methods used do not allow for the intact lateral movement with extreme tilting.
Is there a similar analysis of the pentagon hit? I've been reading comments on it, which if just a few are true, totally destroys the "official" narrative, but I would like to see a reliable analysis.
Its very easy to see just by looking that every column failed at once. To my knowledge the only way for that to happen is controlled demo. Is their any other way for the columns to fail. Especially all at once? There wasn't even "MUh JeT FUeL"
If you want to go direct to the source :
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
If you're a skip-the-foreplay kind of person, direct download of their Final Report.
I recommend setting some time aside to go over it.
Quality post. Thank you.
Basically the columns were sabotaged ahead of time.
9-11 inside job by Bushes. Nano thermite was only made by our our government at the time.
Did the first etc bomb get used so during g the repairs tjey could wire the buildings for the future.
Bush = Scherff
Airplane?
If so, nah. Airplane would not have the mass to cut thru it. No way. Bush brother #3 ran a team that showed up in the middle of the night right after the port authority left & before the next shift came on for months.
They had dark blue vans, were working on the inside of walls, the whole works.
The thick steel columns were on the inside not the outer structure. I'm so tired of the "There were no planes" crowd. It might have been an inside job, but JETS were used to fly into the buildings. That can't be faked to that scale, especially 20 years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SQnnlzz8lk - Why does the wing disappear behind the building?
It doesn't. The building is in the foreground. https://youtu.be/7YLm3pkAiJQ?t=334
No it's not.
You literally just re-sent the same video I sent you and the wing disappears behind the building that is not in the foreground.
Thank You. From your linked 'Wiki' page... "The perimeter structure was constructed with extensive use of prefabricated modular pieces, which consisted of three columns, three stories tall, connected by spandrel plates. The perimeter columns had a square cross section, 14 inches (36 cm) on a side, and were constructed of welded steel plate."
Furthermore, those prefabricated panels supposed steel beams were approximately 1/4 inch thick. I'm sure those who say the planes could not have cut steel beams forget to mention this fact.
Screw all these "studies." As a for er EOD Sailor, here's all you need to know. 1) Thermite was used. 2) Thermite is ONLY obtainable by the military and bldg demolitions companies that yhave a Federal Explosives License for explosive demolitions work. That's it. That's all you need to know.
Why? Because only one of the Worlds militaries or commercial demolitions companies could've got their hands on it and placed it at WTC. Period. "Who" is responsible is secondary to the fact that multiple thermitic events were witnessed and catalogued at all three sites and at the Pentagon. We ALL know who is capable of this type of madness, and [they] control all parties who could've pulled this off.
Does anyone want to tell this guy how easy thermite actually is to make
Now do NANO thermite
I'm sure some YouTuber can make it in their toilet using a safety razor and a shoelace at this point
Im sure at least one has at this point
Nope
Why wouldn't regular thermite be enough to destroy the building? Or even run-of-the-mill demolition explosives? Regular demolitions don't use thermite, after all.
Because under the microscope on the buildings they found it was nano aluminum residue from nano thermite. Only from our government can you get large quantities. Average consumer would be getting visit from FBI.
I'm no expert, but couldn't a high-speed collision between an aircraft made from aluminum and a building create aluminum dust, of varying particle sizes?
Also, if they used nano thermite wouldn't all of it have burned up? It wouldn't leave any residue unless it wasn't mixed correctly, which wouldn't be the case for government-issued stuff. Something just doesn't add up here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=9lGQL0dPnmc
Because they wanted it to look like something else.
Exactly has to be made with specific equipment. Shills out in force trying to obfuscate tonight.
Not shills, just people trying to figure shit out.
I mean I know people at WTC when this happened and when I say Inside Job they label me as a nut job. They cant comprehend our government would do something like that. Then they take the covid vaccine lol. This is my brother in law.
Amusing how retarded you have to be to call other people shills.
Shills typically bring insults rather than debate. Just saying.
And I have three times as much karma; hard to be a shill when that happens.
No, I'm just tired of fucking retards who screech shill at everything and everyone like some unintelligible leftist.
Amusing how retarded you have to be to be a shill
Which only the government can get large quantities.
Independent researchers at the time said it was the highest grade thermite they had ever seen
In 2002, the production of nano-sized aluminum particles required considerable effort, and commercial sources for the material were limited.[2] Current[when?] production levels are now beyond 100 kg/month.[citation needed
If u can believe WHAT they print. Tjey could easy have secretly made all the extra shit they wanted and we would never know.
Yep.
"Thermite is ONLY obtainable by the military"
Yeah that's a hard wrong right there bro
Firstly it's been in use since 1895
second the formulas for making it are all online and can be made at home
Thirdly:
https://www.skylighter.com/products/thermite-kit-makes-4-lbs
Nano themite
Because under the microscope on the buildings they found it was nano aluminum residue from nano thermite. Only from our government can you get large quantities. Average consumer would be getting visit from FBI.
But But, Nano thermite. I mean anytime their BS is called out, they dig deeper into the conspiracy theory. Not planes, but I saw the fucking jets, no that was CGI. WHAT?
https://www.skylighter.com/blogs/how-to-make-fireworks/thermite
More than just Thermetic explosives must have been used. We see on video massive beams and people being shot out of the buildings with tremendous force.
Thermetic explosives don't do that, they're used for cutter charges, not for massive ejections. So it was probably a combination of different kinds of explosives for different parts of the various buildings.
And nukes in the basement. There were rivers of molten metal that firefighters talked about.
The whole nukes in the basement idea is absurd. Things would have been way worse if there were nukes involved.
Rivers of molten metal is explained with thermetic explosives. The areas that are cut by such charges would result in the surrounding metal turning into that.
The bedrock was melted. You sayin' thermite does that?
I'm not an expert on thermite, but I've heard from others it can do that if it's there for a prolonged period.
And yet us humble welders just put it into the mold and light it at the railroad
Well this make sense..........🤔🤯
Good post. This report is the real deal, absolutely everything the 9/11 commission should have done, they did. It is bulletproof, well documented, and includes the equations and models they used. From the old school, "show your work" sorts of professors that give no fucks and live in Alaska where they still think straight.
I wouldn’t go that far.
Which part?
Thinking straight.
Lin Wood shared this on the 10th. 32-year veteran of the FDNY
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KQrmkOWhH48
"one of the nation's top engineering schools" if you think to 200 or so still counts as a top school. Not saying the paper is bad just don't be a jackass about where it came from
That guy has entered the chat
Those smug faggots are paid shills and AI bots. True Commies are too fucking lazy to come here on their free time just to insult us.
If you look carefully at the collapse of the towers you see the interior part of the building’s collapse first and follows the rest of the tower falling in on itself. The force of the interior falling into itself would cause the the expulsion and jettison of the cladding and blow out the windows as the tower fell. The interior structure was massive steel columns they had to Literally turn to dust for that to happen. The only way was a fission Nike placed below the last sub basement. That type of nuke would have turned the steel and everything else to dust. I’ll post a picture of a Russian study that has since disappeared from the internet. I have a picture on my phone but don’t know how to get it on this board.
Awesome post and the educational commentary is much appreciated as always. I’m not sure if I’m worthy to use this word, but thanks frens.
It has taken me 20 years, but I now believe the twin towers and building 7 were all taken down by controlled demolition. Pre planned; sickening.
I find flaw with the simulation used to make the determination. The construction methods used do not allow for the intact lateral movement with extreme tilting.
Is there a similar analysis of the pentagon hit? I've been reading comments on it, which if just a few are true, totally destroys the "official" narrative, but I would like to see a reliable analysis.
Thousands of engineers are waking g up.
Its very easy to see just by looking that every column failed at once. To my knowledge the only way for that to happen is controlled demo. Is their any other way for the columns to fail. Especially all at once? There wasn't even "MUh JeT FUeL"