Flu cases from 2012 to 2021😉😉😉
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (71)
sorted by:
ME : Hey, isn't it funny how the flu just up and vanished? IDIOT LEFTARD: Well yea, moron it's because everyone is wearing masks and social distancing. ME: Oh, really? How are there Covid cases then? IDIOT LEFTARD : visible mind explosion
That's what happens when you make them think. The TV never does that
IDIOT LEFTARD: REEEEEEEE! The Unvaxxed! [Gnashes teeth, tears hair out]
Covid is more contagious blah blah blah morons all of them
If you have a test that can't differentiate between flu and COVID, but you get money for COVID that you don't for the flu, of course flu will disappear.
Mmmmm, insurance fraud.
41,502,052 "Covid" cases so far during the plandemic that pretty lines up with the missing "flu" cases. Throw in a PCR test that the CDC admits can't tell the difference between the two and there you go. You've discovered where the missing flu cases went.
☝️Yup
Not to mention the number is high because HEALTHY people are being forced to get tested. Used to people only went to the hospital when they were SICK with the flu. Now, even if you have a tiny trace of the flu, and feel fine, they call it COVID positive. It's disgusting.
I said early on they were using flu as COVID, and inflating death numbers by calling everyone who died COVID positive a COVID death. No clear sign of infection? Run that SOB at 45 cycles and you'll find it.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ dolla dolla bills, ya'll
flu deaths themselves like most other "diseases" itself was basically a hoax because in reality nobody ever died from it since its a just a detox and ur body is too intelligent to kill itself , they always die from a lifetime of toxic food, vaccines and finally medical intervention https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs
Stop.
Stop with this ridiculous anti germ theory nonsense. Influenza is a virus. It's is not something sick cells produce, it's something that creates sick cells. Here are some easy af convincing evidence:
You can not produce influenza from healthy cells by making them sick
You CAN make a healthy cell sick by introducing influenza
None of our cells contain the genetic code that influenza packages inside it and uses for infection. That genetic code can only come from an outside source. Not from 'toxic food' but from a viral infection
When I introduce a tiny amount of influenza into a cell culture, in 48 hours my media is filled with orders of magnitude more viral particles, all themselves infectious. I can take that infectious media, transfer it to healthy cell cultures, and they themselves repeat the same infection process
Taking poor care of your body makes you more susceptible to infection and disease, but it is the infection that kills you. Influenza cripples epithileal lining of your lungs, allowing bacteria access to areas they can grow and overwhelm, dramatically reducing lung capacity until you effectively drown.
Fucking stop. Flu is not a hoax. Covid isn't a hoax. Just their numbers and their fear mongering, and the tyranny they use this BS as excuse for.
You sound reasonably knowledgeable regarding viruses, so I hope you can provide an answer to this question, "Since covid is considered a respiratory virus, what would happen to a healthy human if a very small amount of the covid virus (perhaps a half dozen virus "cells") was injected as a "skin pop" into them?" My thinking is that limiting the virus to a small area of the body with limited circulation would allow the person's immune system to easily attack it before it replicates to a dangerous level, unlike when introduced into the lungs. I hope to read your comments. Thank you.
There are very few viruses that can get past innate and cellular immunity and cause infection from “a half dozen virus “cells”.”
In general, I can only think of a few that are known to be that infectious.
Also, I’m general, viruses do not want to kill their host. Usually the strains that mutate and survive are strains that remain highly infectious but not highly lethal.
Most complications from infection come from the body’s overactive response, things like “cytokine storm.”
I do antiviral drug discovery for a living. But drug discovery is largely tangential to all this.
As for your thinking, there's two things to note: The first is that the immunity that you're looking for is antibody production. But the second thing to note is that the primary way your body fights infection is without antibodies. Unfortunately antibodies require a ton of trial and error for the immune system so you're unlikely to develop any with only minor infection, particularly if it's quickly resolved.
Vaccines work by flooding the body with a shit ton of noninfectious analogs for the immune system to trial itself against, and absent that you won't confer immunity. Vaccines are hard to produce, impossible in many cases even. An HIV vaccine for example, has been a holy grail for decades.
So would a slow, ramping up, series of injections of diluted covid, with a new injection every few days, be a way for a human to eventually develop the antibodies?
The idea of continuous exposure. I don't know, maybe. Or at those dilute levels that aspect of the immune system would never get a chance. That's too far ourside my wheelhouse.
I was pretty much with you until you got to "Covid isn't a hoax".
It's a virus. They may lump flu and other corona viruses into the stats, but an actual gain of function corona viruses was oopsie released from the wuhan labs. Is the response bullshit? Are the numbers a hoax? Sure, but not the virus.
What, you think that rather than just run with an actual virus they made literally EVERYTHING up?
Prove it.
BAHAHA HA HBHAHAHA HA BHAHAHAHA HAHBAHAHAHAHAHAH
That interview really solidified what I've been learning. I've been going deep into this for a few weeks now. I'm a big history buff because if I can learn how something originated, it really clears everything up. So I'm reading Bechamp or Pasteur.
Here's a great link to a compilation of doctors and experts throughout history on this topic: https://www.facebook.com/notes/988519888321704/
It's so easy to trick people into thinking symptoms of detox are the bad things to be prevented and, as such, we must wipe out the bacteria or virus causing it.
Source? ....or is it satire?
Might be, I just don't want to share that table unless I know where it came from and if the data are correct. I share things widely with my contacts, but I also won't send things out unless I know the source or that it's true. Thus the request for a source.
There’s technically right and conceptually right, and this is the game Trump plays.
Say these numbers are technically wrong, good go and prove him wrong that it was actually 500,000 flu cases instead of 2000. Huge number difference. But the concept behind the argument stays the same. The drop in flu cases from any other year is astronomical and something is going on.
The media does this the opposite way, where small ‘errors’ completely changes the argument.
I fully understand that, but I'm seeking the source. I deal in absolutes and factual information, not generalities and approximations of truth. Bottom line, I won't be sharing this image. Since no one here can back up the image, I can't use it.
Good approach. I get that if you can’t find the source of the data you wouldn’t want to use it, I wouldn’t either without knowing whrere it came from. I mean that’s exactly what the MSM does when they say “sources familiar with the matter” and “anonymous sources”.
So true, thanks.
Don’t you think it’s a little disingenuous to share the wrong information to promote an idea? If the data itself makes your point, why not share the actual data?
If the info is accurate, and damming, then lefties will bury it. If it’s even slightly incorrect they’ll share the shit out of it, which is the desired outcome.
When Trump wanted a Twitter message to reach as many people as possible he would misspell a word. The media would broadcast it far and wide, laughing about how he’s so ignorant that he can’t even spell. His message then reached WAY more people than it otherwise would have. Checkmate.
That’s fine and all but don’t most people now gather the reputation that the info being shared by that source is sloppy/incorrect?
Maybe more people see it, but do those people also take it seriously or are more people just making fun of it for being wrong?
It tricks them to actually look into it. First reaction is they're happy because they proved the meme wrong... but then they realize that it's only wrong by a small percentage, and the underlying sentiment remains (in this case that flu numbers fell off a cliff). People who get all their "info" from corrupt MSM probably never knew this, now they do.
Damn I wish I had my computer, I feel motivated to make this with the real figures just so I can share it.
Too bad my computer is like this pandemic, non-existent.
Not at all. Data is a snapshot, it is not the “truth”. It is a simplification of what is actually happening so we can understand connections easier.
I wouldn’t be arguing a math problem, I would be arguing an idea, which is that health departments are manipulating numbers to count flu as covid. Those flu numbers themselves are wrong, there is no way of knowing how many people actually caught the flu.
Or are you even wrong if you say 38,000,000 vs 38,347,217? How about 2.10673 vs 2.11 vs 2? It depends on what is actually happening, and like I mentioned, numbers are just a simplification of the truth.
Data can be right or wrong though. If the snapshot you provide is incorrect and verifiably so then I don’t see how it helps.
Sauce:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2783644
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
Bless you for posting that!!
But but but but it shows masks work 😜. That's the idiotic explanation I get from the fertadas.
Yeah that's what my daughter said, I then asked why the masks didn't prevent covid if the masks worked.
And her response waaaaaaas?
While it would be reasonable that flu cases might reduce due to the complete germophobic level of handwashing and quarantining when sick that has been adopted due to covid, the flu isn't going to virtually disappear like it apparently has.
Just common sense, how did we lose common sense?
Ha lol anything that’s against the Libtradians agenda ...
I also believe handwashing, and people actually staying home when they are sick is a good thing before 2020 so many people in our office would come into work sick with 102 temp, coughing, sneezing I’m all for natural immunity but please people be smarter than that. These of course are “college educated” people with no sense.
College education != sense. I find just the opposite to be true!
Man o ma. I sure would like to see someone post something like this - except way more official looking and backed up by legit sources instead of just on notepad. This is the type of info above all that should stir people put of their slumber a tad.
Sauce:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2783644
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
Love it. Most epic casualty of cov is the flu.
A cold or the flu?
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/coldflu.htm
Definitely flu.
it would help to have deaths from the flu also. but you would have to subtract the deaths for Covid by elderly people who died at the hands of democratic governors
That's literally a statistical impossibility
Right there should be a big wake up for anyone with at least a half a brain!
Plus 40,000,000 and then it is correct for 2020-21.
The memes are gaining traction, keep em coming !
Where are the numbers from? I thought CDC stopped cataloging flu cases during the pandemic
Sauce:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2783644
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html
👍
Amazing. That flu virus did just that.