I mean i understand the sentiment of what you're saying but their exaggeration and twisting of words meanings is already leading us to societal hell....should we also contribute to that?
Rules for Radicals #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
"If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)"
This is how you turn into the very thing you hate. How many times does that morality tale have to play out before we learn our lesson? The left's favorite justification for everything they've done is "the right does it too" or "the right is worse". That's all they've got.
Just speculating here...if a dude wanted to buy Rachel Madcow a drink and if the dude then did to her what Lemmon did to this guy, I'm pretty sure the MSM would be coming to her/his/its (Madcow) defense with serious rape charges. BUT I do not condone that response on either side; just hypothetically illustrating what I would imagine the response would be. Terms like rape, racism, assault, etc have been dumbed down by the left to mean whatever is the most politically expedient for them. That's why society has been reduced to needing "safe spaces" for the snowflakes.
I think the sentiment here is 'fight fire with fire.' However, as corrupt as it is currently, if we don't use the law to overcome this threat, if we stoop to the level of the ends justifying the means, then the principles the country was founded on are meaningless and we may as well forget America as we knew it. Doesn't mean we can't be assertive and relentless also, though
Yea, because when I think of how we should conduct ourselves to best attempt to restore society to some level of rationality and sanity the first thing I think of is the book "Rules for Radicals".
If you’re attacked by a criminal on the street, do you defend yourself with the strict rules of amateur boxing or do you use every dirty trick in the book to survive? Do you want your last thoughts to be: “At least I was a nice guy and didn’t do anything mean”?
Who said anything about being a "nice guy" or not doing anything mean? Self-defense using whatever force necessary to stop the threat does not equal following "Rules for Radicals".
In the front lines of the culture war, there are times when using the left's rules against them is not only effective, it nudges them away from fringe leftism. You'll never see a leftist wilt faster than when they are convincingly accused of racism. If you can get their supposed allies and peers to join in, it has the potential to leave them totally disillusioned with politics. I've seen it. So yes, using these rules against them can contribute to restoring rationality to society.
What’s it matter at this point, we’re there. Fuck em for getting us here. No holds barred anymore else they’ll surly shove a needle up your ass and the assess of your kids w/o consent
But if through my falsehood God’s truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? And why not say (as some people slander us by saying that we say), “Let us do evil so that good may come”? Their condemnation is deserved! - Romans 3:7-10
I think LeMon started w the dirty sanchez and eventually got to tape. I haven’t seen the victim, but I’d guess he was a tiny homo. Dunno how big LeMon is, but just like a man overpowering a woman same can be done between men. Don’t rule out forcible rape as an accusation.
Excuse me, this is no defense of the aggressive disgusting faggot traitor Lemon, who should have had his stinking, germ-encrusted fingers torn off and shoved down his jizz-guzzling throat,..but how is this rape
There was no penetration, or any touching involved, except fingers to facial area
We cheapen and devalue the experience of actual rape victims by calling things rape that aren't—thus traumatizing the victims yet again
Stop it - we are the side that uses words to mean things that they have always meant and are supposed to mean, not the side that redefines common words to suit our own agenda or purposes
Remember how a drunk Lemon tried to get his nipple pierced at the live CNN New Years party? Nobody is dumb enough to get drunk while you are at work live on TV except this idiot.
In a normal world, only a faggot buys another known faggot a drink, especially a “lemon drop”. Further, if a faggot rubs his junk and sticks his hand in your face, he gets a barstool tipping kinetic fist to the head in return.
Hice maintains he is looking for closure and peace of mind after what he says is a horrific encounter that included the CNN star allegedly putting his hand down the front of his shorts, “vigorously” rubbing his genitalia, and shoving the same hand into Hice’s mustache area while asking a vulgar question.
Lemon is a sodomitical cunt but title isn't accurate. Sexual assault may be a better allegation rather than rape.
I would consider some guy grabbing his sweaty drunk cock and balls, and then rubbing his grubby fingers in my face while screaming "do you like dick or pussy? DICK OR PUSSY?", violent rape. If it happened to my wife it would be violent rape, so it must be to him.
Ridiculous. Lemon is a classless pig of a person, but "raping" someone in a bar? Not this particular "victim", who is hot to get rich off this lawsuit. So boringly obvious.
You combine a monstrous ego with fame and money and you get a person who is presumptuous about their appeal to others as a potential sex partner. Lemon drank too much and acted like an ass towards this person. Oh well. Maybe change where you hang out and who you associate with if you don't like pushy drunken come ons, eh?
Lol the article says Lemon violently raped him....uh no. Certainly committed assault and deserves to be punished and sued but violent rape it was not.
Screw it, tell everyone he raped him. Time to play nasty like they have.
I mean i understand the sentiment of what you're saying but their exaggeration and twisting of words meanings is already leading us to societal hell....should we also contribute to that?
Use their own tactics against them.
Rules for Radicals #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
"If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)"
Sorry im not abiding by the rules for radicals
And this is why we lose.
No, we're winning. Patriots in control.
This is how you turn into the very thing you hate. How many times does that morality tale have to play out before we learn our lesson? The left's favorite justification for everything they've done is "the right does it too" or "the right is worse". That's all they've got.
General patton “ to beat evil you must be temporarily more evil “ something to h the at effect
I get what youre saying but referring to shoving smelly dick fingers at someone should never be described as violent rape by either side. Sorry.
Just speculating here...if a dude wanted to buy Rachel Madcow a drink and if the dude then did to her what Lemmon did to this guy, I'm pretty sure the MSM would be coming to her/his/its (Madcow) defense with serious rape charges. BUT I do not condone that response on either side; just hypothetically illustrating what I would imagine the response would be. Terms like rape, racism, assault, etc have been dumbed down by the left to mean whatever is the most politically expedient for them. That's why society has been reduced to needing "safe spaces" for the snowflakes.
If Don Lemon fingers someone's AIDS butthole and sticks his fingers up your nose are you still going to act like it's no big deal?
I think the sentiment here is 'fight fire with fire.' However, as corrupt as it is currently, if we don't use the law to overcome this threat, if we stoop to the level of the ends justifying the means, then the principles the country was founded on are meaningless and we may as well forget America as we knew it. Doesn't mean we can't be assertive and relentless also, though
Sure if letting people's lives get destroyed more and more everyday is your idea of "principles" then yeah I guess that makes sense....
When has "the law" ever stopped the communists from winning?
You might win a round with "the law" but you're losing the war. BADLY.
When the law becomes corrupt, there IS NO LEGAL OPTION.
Go read the Declaration of Independence.
Yea, because when I think of how we should conduct ourselves to best attempt to restore society to some level of rationality and sanity the first thing I think of is the book "Rules for Radicals".
If you’re attacked by a criminal on the street, do you defend yourself with the strict rules of amateur boxing or do you use every dirty trick in the book to survive? Do you want your last thoughts to be: “At least I was a nice guy and didn’t do anything mean”?
Who said anything about being a "nice guy" or not doing anything mean? Self-defense using whatever force necessary to stop the threat does not equal following "Rules for Radicals".
He's saying use their playbook against them as a defense
In the front lines of the culture war, there are times when using the left's rules against them is not only effective, it nudges them away from fringe leftism. You'll never see a leftist wilt faster than when they are convincingly accused of racism. If you can get their supposed allies and peers to join in, it has the potential to leave them totally disillusioned with politics. I've seen it. So yes, using these rules against them can contribute to restoring rationality to society.
Yeah how's it been following the rules so far?
Very good, Patriots in control.
What’s it matter at this point, we’re there. Fuck em for getting us here. No holds barred anymore else they’ll surly shove a needle up your ass and the assess of your kids w/o consent
If they have to disprove any exaggeration it makes them WORK. Something they suck at 😉
I think LeMon started w the dirty sanchez and eventually got to tape. I haven’t seen the victim, but I’d guess he was a tiny homo. Dunno how big LeMon is, but just like a man overpowering a woman same can be done between men. Don’t rule out forcible rape as an accusation.
Violent rape was the term used. Not a violent rape. And he was a straight guy
Damn.
Excuse me, this is no defense of the aggressive disgusting faggot traitor Lemon, who should have had his stinking, germ-encrusted fingers torn off and shoved down his jizz-guzzling throat,..but how is this rape
There was no penetration, or any touching involved, except fingers to facial area
We cheapen and devalue the experience of actual rape victims by calling things rape that aren't—thus traumatizing the victims yet again
Stop it - we are the side that uses words to mean things that they have always meant and are supposed to mean, not the side that redefines common words to suit our own agenda or purposes
The fact is most “rape victims” are making it up. There is no cheapening here.
Sodomite.
Don’t celebrate yet. He might have Kevin Spacey’s “luck.”
Remember how a drunk Lemon tried to get his nipple pierced at the live CNN New Years party? Nobody is dumb enough to get drunk while you are at work live on TV except this idiot.
Love seeing these rats go down.
No, it wasn't any kind of rape. Period.
The headline on en-volve is sensationalist bullshit.
He though 'no' meant 'yes'
In a normal world, only a faggot buys another known faggot a drink, especially a “lemon drop”. Further, if a faggot rubs his junk and sticks his hand in your face, he gets a barstool tipping kinetic fist to the head in return.
Lemon is a sodomitical cunt but title isn't accurate. Sexual assault may be a better allegation rather than rape.
Just FYI Lemon did that to his own genitalia, not Hice’s. Hice got Lemon’s fingers at his nose and some lewd talk from Lemon.
Title does.
Watching so many pervs go down in flames 🔥 gives me wood. Hhmmm…I mean…the thing.
Was it also Don Lemon that was found to have raped a dead boys body in a hotel or something? Or was that another satanist sodomite?
PENCIL NECK!!
Which one was that again? There's so many soy pencil neck sodomites it's hard to narrow it down.
Liddle Adam Schiff
Bugeyed Congressman Trump calls him pencil neck need more clues he ran the Impeachment and pushed Russia Russia Russia
Envolve is getting very click baity and misleading in their titles. Turning me off to them.
Faggots gonna fag.
Somebody bout to get Seth Rich’d
like everyone else nothing will happen to him
Remember when he said he wouldn't mind a boyfriend?
I would consider some guy grabbing his sweaty drunk cock and balls, and then rubbing his grubby fingers in my face while screaming "do you like dick or pussy? DICK OR PUSSY?", violent rape. If it happened to my wife it would be violent rape, so it must be to him.
Violently raped him at a bar???
The guy will die in a mysterious accident.
I love how nobody even cares or is surprised by Lemons actions its like expected
Abusers... They always make others around them feel small.
That was my take away anytime I watched him. He is trying to make people feel small. "The greater good!"
Bout time somebody extorted this guy, he’s been selling soccer moms the outrage routine for how long, if anyone has earned this treatment it’s him
I'd say sue the pants off him, but I think we all prefer Lemon keeps his pants ON.
Ridiculous. Lemon is a classless pig of a person, but "raping" someone in a bar? Not this particular "victim", who is hot to get rich off this lawsuit. So boringly obvious. You combine a monstrous ego with fame and money and you get a person who is presumptuous about their appeal to others as a potential sex partner. Lemon drank too much and acted like an ass towards this person. Oh well. Maybe change where you hang out and who you associate with if you don't like pushy drunken come ons, eh?
Sounds like he could have gotten a settlement 3 different times so far.