https://freeatlantis.com/@h53pilot
I love the government in exile theory being discussed by @SLAG. I watched his interview with Patel Patriot last night. Great stuff.
I agree wholeheartedly with most of it. However, I don't think Trump would count on SCOTUS being our last hope. Especially after what it demonstrated from Nov 3rd, 2020 to Jan 20th, 2021.
With that in the rearview mirror, I don't understand how we could roll the dice on them anymore. Not when the fate of the nation is on the line… But government in exile? Yes.
High military involvement? Yes.
The WWII parallels are terrific.
I have (as many know... of course!) proposed an alternative solution that does not rely on ANY element of the corrupted federal government (that we know of publicly, that is).
It completely bypasses the entire thing.
A solution where the SCOTUS has no say whatever. In fact, this solution would, in effect, tell SCOTUS to sit down and shut up…
The solution is the union of states, having been offered, and having accepted an alternative federal authority (the makeup of which could be in many forms), which has left any D.C. authority entirely out of the loop.
In other words, D.C. has been completely neutered. Any legacy government structure the deep state and the CCP depends on no longer has any authority, even though it might appear to…
But that is only long enough for the appointed federal authority to ready the field for legitimate elections and to rid the country of foreign elements that could sabotage the effort before revealing what reality is…
To state plainly, Trump was able to coordinate with state legislatures to gain 75% ratification for the solution he prepared and offered them in the event the system (including SCOTUS) could not rectify the election fraud.
SCOTUS WAS an option before Jan 20th. It was tested before our eyes. It failed the test, in my opinion, when it rejected the Texas case...
The solution Trump could have offered was:
-
an alternative federal authority;
-
draft Constitutional changes to legitimately transfer authorities to the alternative authority Trump prepared;
-
a mechanism by which PORTIONS of state legislatures could be clandestinely briefed on the treason and the prepared solution
-
it was turn-key from the state legislators' point of view.
So... this would require little to no effort on state legislators' part...
Trump did ALL the work and implemented it secretly through a mechanism that he controlled and could withhold any knowledge of except those he chose to inform.
I realize many people might think it would be impossible to get so many legislators to agree, let alone, not spill the beans. I disagree.
I think it would be quite feasible. Especially if Trump did all the legwork and all they had to do was nod their heads in astonishment.
He pulled up in a Maserati and said, "get in..."
Here's why it could have happened (we'll go to the how after that):
Given that Trump knew (likely even before 2016) that the uni-party had been fixing elections for a long time, he had war gamed this out, at a minimum after he won in 2016.
With multiple courses of action (COAs) at the ready, he embarked on draining the swamp.
One of those COAs would have been what I'm talking about...
So, I'm not proposing it was cobbled together after the Democrats stole the House in 2018, or after COVID hit (unplanned event) in late 2019, or after the system failed us post Nov 2020.
I'm saying it was one of many potential COAs developed a long time ago and that, as events occurred, some COAs were winnowed out until this one was the only one left standing...
especially after SCOTUS totally failed us post-2020 election…
I think we would all agree, on this forum at least, that no one would know the legal and Constitutional aspects of all the COAs better than Trump.
And I think the COA of "let the system work it out or fail," was one COA that ran its course.
The People had to see the system fail.
Perhaps Trump even hoped it would work, although this final COA is the solution to end ALL elements of the deep state. For a very long time, at least. There will be nothing left…
In fact, there WOULD be nothing legally left even now except a ghost of itself. Everything we're seeing could fit into this theory.
We wouldn't have to worry about what SCOTUS will do anymore.
The swamp wasn't just drained. It was nuked.
It had to be. SCOTUS plainly demonstrated this…
The "why" is that this solution allows, over the next 3-5 years, the gradual, methodical, and complete build-back of the federal government, under the watchful eye of the union of states - the REAL authority and voice of The People.
No more deep state foot-dragging and sabotage of the effort.
They're gone completely. The only thing left is the military, whose leadership can be replaced in an instant. ALL other federal authorities are null and void… This solution relegates the military to its proper place... an instrument of The People, not their savior or master.
How could this have been implemented? I'll write more on that tonight or tomorrow.
But think Executive Orders, and one in particular. EO 13848. And its timing.
It enabled the 2-year information collection effort; the results of which Trump could have sitting in the passenger seat of his Maserati.
I have wondered, for sometime, if Trump was ever President at all and whether the transition to the military occurred at Trumps 2016 inauguration. The military stepped in behind Trump at a specific point in the inauguration and that was that. Power transitioned.
Interesting theory. Yep, the military appearing when they did had a specific meaning. But if he wasn’t the Commander-in-Chief, who was running the military those 4 years? Flynn? Who had the plan details that was being executed and who relayed to the military? Who determined when to change course in response to what the deep state did?
Maybe, just maybe, it was a group of fewer than ten people, including three Civilians, who have been in charge this whole time.
Give them a wave, they may just look in here every now and again.
Good job guys!
😁👋
That group of fewer than ten would have had four years, as well as 2020 +1, to gather an airtight case in any type of sting operation, as well as forge a clear path to trying the perpetrators in a military court. Just a theory
I watch that video hundreds of times. What you said makes so much sense!
I believe military stepped in before trump even ran and that Trump’s candidacy and first public term were to prepare for war. Trump was a spook running PR against Obama and then brought on for the plan. They knew how 2012 was rigged and stopped that steal which is why “the experts” were so shocked he won. Because it was rigged. And they unrigged it to prepare for war.
I read both parts. How is the union of states different from restoring the old republic pre 1871? (That's when the US Corporation began, pre-Fed, pre-IRS and a million other things.)
That would allow us to keep the constitution mostly as is, and simply writeoff everything from the corporation as an illegitimate interruption. It also has a smaller number of states (35 I believe), which would reduce the state legislatures that require convincing. Would also govern those ex-states as territories, i.e. martial law and marshal enforcement, until they re-apply. Might be the same theory, but the way you wrote it, it sounds different.
I would prefer to restore the Republic, pre 1870. Since the bankruptcy happened in 1999, I am thinking that the USA, Inc is completely defunct. As we are seeing some States are taking back their power! That is all, we do need to dismantle many of the parts of the Federal Leviathan (Kraken).
We still need a number of the amendments that took place after 1871 though.
Not the 16th, of course, but that goes without saying.
No we do not....
We Do need the Original 13th Amendment, the Titles of Nobility Amendment, which gives teeth to the Titles of Nobility Clause....
As for the current 13 thru 27 we do not need any of them, none at all....
Should women and blacks be taxed without representation? IIRC those were both after 1871.
Everyone should be Taxed equally....
That being said, the ONLY form of Taxation should be in line with the Commerce Clause....
That being said, nobody should be allowed/forced into Contracts with the federation..... i.e. SSN, Drivers License, License plate, Medicare/Medicaid, etc....
All those things should be kept at State Level, and not as Forced Contracts, we are supposed to be a Republic, not a Socialism.....
The 14th Amendment created for the very First time, the Federal Citizen, aka U.S. Citizens....
That aberration should be destroyed, and everyone returned to their Natural Original State Citizen Status.....
With that, we should return to the Original Voting System, where ONLY Land Owners are allowed to Vote....
It is only Right because then it would be only Land Owners Paying the Taxes....
Corporations could not Vote, they are not Natural Persons....
Women and Blacks could still vote, IF they are Land Owners, and yes there are plenty of them who own land....
Come to think of it, neither group was EVER excluded from Voting, as long as they Owned Lands, and there is a plethora of proof that Both Women, and Blacks Owned Lands and Voted....
Those who do not Own Lands are Not Invested, they do not get Taxed, so what do they care if you pay huge Land Taxes?? It doesn't hurt them at all....
On the other hand, FOREIGNERS should pay Income Taxes, Travel Taxes, etc., Would you be ok with your Family Paying Those taxes, or some foreigner instead??
In other words, if a vast swath of the American populace, or even a majority, can't afford to own land, then they are ruled by those fortunate ones who can.
Sounds like a plutoligarchy. Bet you'd have no trouble selling that plan to renters! LOL
Not only that, what about the people who own ten acres instead of one? Or 100? They pay 100 times more in taxes, so they should have 100 votes!
What could possibly go wrong
No that is not at all what I said....
You twisted it all around in your mind, and that is not my position, although it might be ours.....
No, you do not get a Vote per Acre, nor a Vote per Lot, or anything like that.....
It does not matter how much land one owns, one Lot vs 10,000 Acres, bot individuals get only one vote each....
The POINT, both are Invested in the land, it is the Land that makes the State....
And although limited, I still know of certain Lands that can be gained simply by applying for a Land Grant.....
That means it is FREE LAND, but some come with strings, might be in a swampy area, maybe the catch is to plant 100 trees, aka Start an Orchard....
I know of Lands that are being sold an acre for $150.00, with Water, and $100.00 without....
Scarcity is not the problem, the actual Problem is either laziness or lack of self worth....
Lands are still open for settlement, there are still man places unsettled, so the problem is the Public, not the lack of lands.....
As for who gets to "Rule", it is still those who are Elected in OPEN PUBLIC ELECTIONS, no more "Secret Voting", no more Bullshit, 100% transparent, but only by those who are INVESTED, those who are not invested do not need to have a Voice, and this could also be adjusted so that those who Rent on the bottom floor of an apartment building, get to vote, but 2nd story and above, nope....
And no, it is not a Plutarchy, nor is it an Oligarchy, nor a mix of both, mainly because it doesn't matter HOW MUCH land one owns, the only thing is that each Land Owner gets 1 Vote....
If you try to understand the basic Concept first, without prejudice, it makes sense....
The contracts that bound the country to the Deep State expired in 1999. Two dudes figured it out and re-registered the country internationally but the Deep State just kept on truckin' as if they were legitimate.
https://youtu.be/Qv0QG63ORkA
I wonder how 1870 would look in 2021...
I think the jeans are going to be too tight.
We’d trash a lot of worthless legislation! 👏🤣
I know! We could put stress-release rips in the jeans and start a new fashion trend for weight challenged teen-aged girls...
I do not know the particular mechanics. It would require a lot of steps and moves though. Under this concept Trump would have needed to secure the support of many state legislators, and to keep that process concealed - he would have really, really needed to know who to trust.
The beauty of this plan is it places power back into the hands of the state. As @Andre on @freeatlantis.com say's:
"Bannon said Trump was going to shake the structures of the State, in particular the Administrative State, to their very foundations. Well, this move would certainly do that in one giant move."
Perhaps when the Plan reaches fruition it will more resemble the Old Republic than our current corrupted Democratic Republic.
Thanks. I agree. Definitely a good line of thinking.
So, the Sovereign Citizen stuff is more real than we think?
It just might be. While I think the "I'm traveling, not driving" thing is ridiculous and hurts their cause, the concept of being a "free man" means being able to do whatever you want to do as long as it doesn't cause someone harm. Wanna OD on drugs? Go right ahead. Reasonable, responsible people don't drive while drunk or high. I'm not advocating for DWI/DUI laws to be revoked entirely, but they're not necessary for reasonable, responsible people.
Dwi laws are sort of like pre crime. You have a taillight out coupled with a few cocktails earlier and blow .09bac. All of a sudden your life is ruined because you "could have killed someone." Should that person be punished? Maybe a traffic ticket and a fine would be more appropriate than a criminal misdemeanor, suspended license, community service, AA meetings etc. Just my $0.02
And you just opened the door to "Right to Travel" discussion...
And just watch all the Prosecuting Attorneys pop up and proclaim that there is no such thing as a "Right to Travel" without a Drivers License in an Unregistered Automobile.....
I have to admit I have not delved too deeply into the Sovereign Citizen concept because I like the idea of organized governance and it appeared to me they want to do away with that almost entirely.
I like the idea of smaller, elected, localized governance working under term limits with delegates overseeing elements of national interest, such as a standing army etc.
I do believe we're still under a British-style court system, not necessarily controlled by them.
We have a "judge" that has far too much power, "holding court" like the nobles of old. They have the power to dismiss a lot of things, like evidence or whole cases. They use "contempt of court" as a hammer to keep people in submission and in obedience to their dictates.
You "rise" now, instead of kneeling.
I firmly believe that 1) we're currently living under British Common Law, 2) "judges" are tyrants in black robes, and 3) "judges" are lower nobility, "holding court" just like their noble forebears.
Like the Constitution says not to have?
Are you are giving us some hint that there's a lil' Libertarian hiding under your MAGA exterior Kat?
Well, maybe. It's just that that's how I thought it would go down, to keep the constitution. If you don't keep the constitution, there's no point in doing things by the book and following rules: it might as well be a military coup. Starting fresh invites a lot of problems, including an articles of confederation style government for a long time, and writing a new constitution. So that's how I backed into that idea. But a rollback is not totally clean either, because if all govt was illegitimate since then, how is Trump legitimate? Unless there was also a secret congress in the background. It gets complicated no matter how you look at it. But the thought of doing things by the book, legally, and keeping the constitution, is how I got to that conclusion. This theory may be a way to do the same thing without a rollback, which is why I asked.
Hugs Constitution so hard it squirms cuz 'Love'
Astronaut meme time.
Joe Public has a limited interest in what his local school board is doing and that has been the issue we see Q and his supporters addressing. Trying to educate the public about the U.S.Corporation's historical roll in America's fall adds layers upon layers of difficulty. 90% of us are products of failed educational systems and we've never received the 1,ooo foot view so you can forget about dumping the 40,000 foot view in our collective laps ant time soon.
The one thing that draws people to forums like this is a keen interest in the affairs of the world. Hopefully we can reignite the passion.
I suppose PAIN is in store for all of us. There's a steep learning curve on America's horizon.
True, except if it's written in the style of children's books. Using that method, tons and tons of intensely complicated material can be simplified and presented in an easy-to-read way that is accessible and understandable to the majority of people, very quickly. Those so inclined can always dig deeper.
How do you eat an elephant?
One bite at a time.
Ha, hah! When you put it that way ... One reason I liked the rollback idea is because it kept things simple: "here's the deal- our country was hijacked a long time ago, so we're erasing all laws from that point onwards." Once you erase the Fed, the IRS, and debt, people won't care about the details. The only gripe will be about the 14th amendment.
Every once in a while I've tried to explain why the electoral college is important (checks and balances, minority protection, a big reason why rural states agreed to the constitution, etc), and they mostly just end up with "you're right, but muh CNN says it's old and dumb." We need serious overhauls in the civics department.
You'd need to restore the Republic to Pre-14th Amendment.... It was the catalyst for the creation of the U.S. Inc.... There are people who read the 14th in a lackadaisical way, so it sounds like it means something special and benevolent, whereas if one takes the time and breaks it down into small easy to process LEGAL Terms, it comes out as being not so benevolent, and it actually lays Claim of Ownership upon State Citizens, therefore robbing the States of their Peoples, then makes those People into corporations, aka "citizens" or "persons", directly under the U.S. Congress...
The 15th Amendment is not much better, and the 17th is pure evil....
The current 13th, simply makes Slavery into a punishment under the Govts direction....
BUT.... The Original 13th Amendment, which was fully validated, has been slowly removed from the books, mainly because IT would have put Lawyers OUT of Govt offices, and it gave Teeth to the Titles of Nobility Clause.....
We know Trump planned to run as early as 2013 because he patented the slogan MAGA on Jan 1 2013. Of course, he talked about it in 1999 and decided not to run then, why, I don't know, not part of the plan maybe.
I didn’t know that. Thanks!
No way elements of state legislators got briefed on any of the plan to restore the Republic. Too many rinos and people that would leak this info.
Why couldn't White Hats exercise a just leverage against the Supreme Court at some point here and get something done right? What just happened to BBB?
You had me at Maserati
I have a limo
My only question is do we have 3 to 5 years of repeats now or is year one enough to entrap the remaining links in the cabal, and 4 years of court cases (in tribunal form hopefully) to watch?
Link to part two:
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vQvwWOX/-h53pilots-case-for-a-union-of/
I don’t understand how he was able to get all of those legislators to agree to the switch and keep quiet about it. If one democrat got wind of it, he or she would run screaming that trump was attempting a coup to become a dictator.
It would be like bringing two by two animals of each kind to board a newly completed ark.
You would sure see the hand of God in such an endeavor.
Or to the People: Popular Sovereignty and the Power to Choose a Government http://cardozolawreview.com/popular-sovereignty-tenth-amendment-reese/
There is a set of powers relating to the federal government, but not delegated to it, that states cannot have reserved because they lack prior ownership. Those powers must belong to the people. In addition to the two sovereign governments is the non-government sovereign that is the original source of all governmental powers, and that keeps government sovereigns legitimate by connecting them directly to the will and consent of the people. It is the people who retain ultimate supreme sovereign authority over both state and federal governments.185 And indeed the people must have a separate voice—be a separate sovereign—in order to truly give legitimacy to either government. A people who could not disagree with and, if necessary, withdraw their consent from their government is a captured people whose government is certainly not a democracy (and it is not far-fetched to call it a kind of tyranny). In the Tenth Amendment is skepticism of expanding governmental power, both federal and state.
http://cardozolawreview.com/popular-sovereignty-tenth-amendment-reese/
(just a self reminder to come back after work and read this)
I cannot find the referenced interview between Patel Patriot and Slag53. Anyone have a link?
Find the link to the video here 👇
https://rumble.com/vr4s3b-patel-patrio
Thanks fren!
Remember; Chris Miller addressed Pence in that speech (1st Anniversary of the US Space Force). https://youtu.be/MF3sSet7_SA?t=1172 'Gone through some of the most complex military operations this country has ever conducted.'
Now we know Pence was overseeing much of this military (Devolution) with Chris Miller, Pence's Chief of Staff-Gen Kellogg and others.
What I don't understand is why Pence did not send the questionable Electoral College votes back to the states for re-certification even though many states had two sets of votes; One for a Biden win and one for a Trump win. And we know Pence knew about all the data that was collected from US Space Force on all the election fraud.
What will Trump do if he is reinstated as President between now and 2024 and has to keep Pence as the VP? This would be weird and awkward after Trump has stated publicly on numerous occasions since Jan 6, 2020 that he is/was very disappointed in Pence's decision.
It seems this whole decertification/election fraud process will not be solved for the 2022 mid-terms and will continue well into 2023 when Trump will be actively campaigning for the 2024 term.
IMO, Trump will allow this to play out until he has to name a new running mate for VP. Recall; Trump came down the escalator in Spring of 2015 to announce his run for 2016 presidential term. This was 1.5 years of campaigning. If Trump is going to run again, he will announce his run for the 2024 term in Spring of 2022.
I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT TRUMP WILL NOT SELECT PENCE AS HIS RUNNING MATE!
So, where does this lead? No reinstatement to the presidency, no VP Pence, and a 2022 presidential run for the 2024 term with a new running mate.
Hmmm..Hmm.. OK What about the soldiers exiting and depleting our armed forces, due the mandatory vax ?
Wonder where they're going?
I'm going to have to start writing fan fiction as well. I feel like I'm missing out.
353 days here wasted.
He didn't learn a thing.