They are saying that Lucifer means light. Then they are saying that Jesus is the light therefore Jesus is Lucifer.
Isa 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.
Luciferase literally means an enzyme that brings light. That's precisely what it does. It's the enzyme that produces bioluminescence. Pull your head out of your pastor's backside long enough to realize this is just a Latin word applied to name something, as is done quite ubiquitously in change. And nowhere in this paper does it suggest that Luciferase is an ingredient in the BT162b2 (Pfizer's Comirnaty) vaccine. Nowhere.
Hell, the Bible even gets Lucifer as a symbol wrong. You're worried about the "adversary" of good. You're worried about the Satan (means "adversary"). Focus on that. Don't get fixated on a name and a symbol that clearly is totally antagonistic to what you think it means.
Back on topic, if you don't understand what this means, you probably shouldn't be opining at all because you don't even understand the objective of the work and the experimental design, let alone the results:
In this study, the GMP-ready formulation containing the amino-lipid ALC-0315 and the PEG-lipid ALC-0159 (in this report referred to as LNP 8 which is the identical composition as used in BNT162) was tested in comparison with a by Acuitas, and an in-house formulation, to characterize the biodistribution of luciferase expressed by LNP-formulated nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA). Activation of the innate immune system, formation of antibodies against luciferase, and T-cell activation were also assessed.
This stuff is highly specialized biochemical research. I've got a Biochemistry degree. I'm quite familiar with luciferase as a molecular marker in experiments, and this still takes some time to pick through and figure out what they're doing. But I can assure you, it's not Satan worship. Stop with the fact-absent nonsense. Down vote away and call me a shill. I've been called worse.
It wasn't his name until the middle ages and there's no resemblance (other than vaguely meaning the same "lightbringer" motif) to the original biblical name of the devil in Hebrew.
If you're going to be strict about names in the Bible you should probably be using the original ones, not the English versions that the editors of the KJV decided to use in the 1600s.
Luciferase + Biometric Luminescence for Experimental Purposes, being injected into any victim, I would say is quite Satanic imo. Tracking / Monitoring / Being Able to Visibly Recognize Order Followers on a Whim...? Not good stuff. Sounds pretty damn evil to me. And extremely coincidental that this substance is being used in such a horrendous manner. Too bad I don't believe in coincidences.
Wow, do you always get so worked up over a throw-away comment or a passing thought or anything else so minor? My comment wasn't any deeper than if I'd said, "check it out, it's raining on my side of the street but not the other, isn't that weird?" And yet you act like I'd said, "you dumb mother fucker, rain comes from cumulus clouds, pull your head out of your ass!". I don't know why I'm even taking the 2 minutes I am taking to respond anyway. What an absolutely absurd freakout over absolutely nothing.
The biodistribution of luciferase expressed by the LNP-formulated modRNA after i.m. injection was assessed by bioluminescence measurements. Mice received a total dose
of 2 µg LNP8, or -formulated modRNA, the control group received
20 µL DPBS only.
Mice were monitored over nine days and Luciferase signal was recorded and
quantified (Figure 1).
Time
6 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 6 d 9 d
Buffer control
modRNA-Luciferase**
Using it monitor biometrics? Wifi signals in the vax?
No, luciferase is just a bioluminescent protein that is widely used in bioresearch. They attach it to an antibody that targets a specific molecule youre looking for, the antibody binds the molecule, and the luciferase lights up under a microscope so you can see where the molecules are located. Same thing they're doing with the green mice you mightve seen pictures of on the internet. Dont get hung up on this stuff, its named luciferase because it gives of light (lucifer is latin for lightbearer). There is plenty of actual fucked up shit with these vaccines to worry about
Perhaps not a great choice of name given how many Christians have a visceral reaction to it, but it literally just means lightbringer in plain old Latin. Medical terms are usually derived from Latin so there it is.
They could have called it illuminase or lightase or something else light related and avoided the blatantly obvious reference if they wanted to. Couldn't they? Then why didn't they? That's the important question.
Scientists like to get cute with naming. There's a species of colorful fly named after RuPaul. It doesn't mean the fly wears a sequinsed dress and high heels. It's just a name.
I won't call you a conspiracy theorist but the name Lucifer goes back hundreds of years before its use in the Bible and isn't even the original name for the devil. Lucifer was originally the Latin (i.e. Roman) name for Venus, the morning star. It was later used (in the middle ages) as the English representation of the original (similar meaning but very different pronunciation) Hebrew name of the devil, as well as being the root word for things like lucid, elucidate, lucidity, lucite, all of which relate to light.
It was used to describe this glowing protein because that's how you say light maker or light bringer in Latin. Most medical terms derive from Latin.
This does not appear to be on the entire mRNA clot shot, but rather just the luciferase component.
This is what I got:
The luciferase on its own the body treats as an invader and sends T cells to attack. B cells are not activated.
And the study of the long term effects of luciferase in the body is 9 days long and it is on mice. And specifically just looking for weight and organ malfunctions. All their spleens were harvested and measured at the conclusion but I don't seen any results.
I don't see any research on how this formulation was studied with the other components . I guess human trials will eventually let us know how bad it is.
There is no rational why luciferase is needed. It appears to imply the claims it will activate your immune system...well yeah that is what happens when the body is under attack.
You can still see huge increases in ovaries of mice in the study in just 48 hr. Extrapolate that over more time and I wonder if concentration increases perpetually. So our bodies keep making more LPNP post jab. So crazy
My read is, they are testing the effects of Luciferase on mice because they intend to add it as part of the vaccine (as Bill Gates had mentioned long ago) to create a vaccine quantum dot.
Yeh, but has it been encoded in mRNA vaccines to make our body create it? Why would I want my body to create Luciferase regardless of how long its been used in biomedicine?
Rofl. Reading this dudes comments. He thinks that "Luciferase" existed as a word before the concept of Satan. Satan coming from hebrew, meaning adversary, and is literally thousands of years old. But Luciferase is older?
Keep an eye on this one. He's not a good fit for GAW, imo. If you know what I mean.
That debate I won't get into. My only point is that there's no real connection to the devil or Satanism because this word existed long before the concept of Satan.
no real connection to the devil or Satanism because this word existed long before the concept of Satan.
I was not even thinking about that, just he fact that they had talked about using Luciferase for q-dot to track vaccine status. Since you bought it up, the way I see it, its not really whether it is connected to devil or satanism factually, but rather the symbolic meaning it holds to those who believe in such things.
That would be a pretty poor way to do a micro dot since the enzyme itself will rapidly break down and there's no evidence that your body would continue to produce it for very long after the vaccine. There's much more effective ways to permanently embed a marker into a person's tissues, like a small sample of a low grade atomic isotope. They could detect it under the skin and likely even tell when it was injected based on the decay rates.
The objective of this study was to investigate the biodistribution of luciferase expressed
by the LNP-formulated modRNA using bioluminescence measurements in BALB/c
mice, as well as innate immune system activation, formation of antibodies against
luciferase and T-cell activation.
Basically they were using mRNA to encode luciferase so that the body creates it, and testing its effects.
Which politician would like to step up first and read this line by line to us? Then at the end they can mention a specific time frame in which they knew these were negative effects of the jab they were pushing.
Are we still conspiracy theorists for talking about Luciferase and that it glows/bioluminescence?
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_R-20-0072.pdf
They are redacted! Wtf.
It's for national security!
FFS! How the hell does a word of an ingredient in a "vaccine" begin with Lucifer??
They are saying that Lucifer means light. Then they are saying that Jesus is the light therefore Jesus is Lucifer.
Isa 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%205&version=NIV
Jesus did not have nice things to say when he was accused of being possessed by evil spirits either
Luciferase literally means an enzyme that brings light. That's precisely what it does. It's the enzyme that produces bioluminescence. Pull your head out of your pastor's backside long enough to realize this is just a Latin word applied to name something, as is done quite ubiquitously in change. And nowhere in this paper does it suggest that Luciferase is an ingredient in the BT162b2 (Pfizer's Comirnaty) vaccine. Nowhere.
Hell, the Bible even gets Lucifer as a symbol wrong. You're worried about the "adversary" of good. You're worried about the Satan (means "adversary"). Focus on that. Don't get fixated on a name and a symbol that clearly is totally antagonistic to what you think it means.
Back on topic, if you don't understand what this means, you probably shouldn't be opining at all because you don't even understand the objective of the work and the experimental design, let alone the results:
This stuff is highly specialized biochemical research. I've got a Biochemistry degree. I'm quite familiar with luciferase as a molecular marker in experiments, and this still takes some time to pick through and figure out what they're doing. But I can assure you, it's not Satan worship. Stop with the fact-absent nonsense. Down vote away and call me a shill. I've been called worse.
Lucifer is ACTUALLY HIS NAME! No amount words, paragraphs, raging or shilling (yeah I went there) will ever change that fact. "."
Isaiah 14:12-14
It wasn't his name until the middle ages and there's no resemblance (other than vaguely meaning the same "lightbringer" motif) to the original biblical name of the devil in Hebrew.
If you're going to be strict about names in the Bible you should probably be using the original ones, not the English versions that the editors of the KJV decided to use in the 1600s.
Found the occultist ^
You literally just said “what the Bible gets wrong”….
The Bible gets nothing wrong my friend. Recognize that before it’s too late for you.
Luciferase + Biometric Luminescence for Experimental Purposes, being injected into any victim, I would say is quite Satanic imo. Tracking / Monitoring / Being Able to Visibly Recognize Order Followers on a Whim...? Not good stuff. Sounds pretty damn evil to me. And extremely coincidental that this substance is being used in such a horrendous manner. Too bad I don't believe in coincidences.
u/#lightning
Jesus Christ.
Wow, do you always get so worked up over a throw-away comment or a passing thought or anything else so minor? My comment wasn't any deeper than if I'd said, "check it out, it's raining on my side of the street but not the other, isn't that weird?" And yet you act like I'd said, "you dumb mother fucker, rain comes from cumulus clouds, pull your head out of your ass!". I don't know why I'm even taking the 2 minutes I am taking to respond anyway. What an absolutely absurd freakout over absolutely nothing.
Liberal logic, yes. Let’s Hide everything due to “national security” 😂
I wish there was a program that would unredact things that are redacted.
5.1 Bioluminescence Measurements
The biodistribution of luciferase expressed by the LNP-formulated modRNA after i.m. injection was assessed by bioluminescence measurements. Mice received a total dose of 2 µg LNP8, or -formulated modRNA, the control group received 20 µL DPBS only.
Mice were monitored over nine days and Luciferase signal was recorded and quantified (Figure 1). Time 6 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 6 d 9 d Buffer control modRNA-Luciferase**
Using it monitor biometrics? Wifi signals in the vax?
No, luciferase is just a bioluminescent protein that is widely used in bioresearch. They attach it to an antibody that targets a specific molecule youre looking for, the antibody binds the molecule, and the luciferase lights up under a microscope so you can see where the molecules are located. Same thing they're doing with the green mice you mightve seen pictures of on the internet. Dont get hung up on this stuff, its named luciferase because it gives of light (lucifer is latin for lightbearer). There is plenty of actual fucked up shit with these vaccines to worry about
I somewhat agree; however, words are VERY important. The way we use them can and does affect the spiritual realm. Hence the Word of God.
Perhaps not a great choice of name given how many Christians have a visceral reaction to it, but it literally just means lightbringer in plain old Latin. Medical terms are usually derived from Latin so there it is.
They use that word on purpose. It has meaning.
There seems to be a lot of DESPARATE posts to counter this simple fact.
It must be important for normies to hear, otherwise they would not scream so loudly.
Naive.
They could have called it illuminase or lightase or something else light related and avoided the blatantly obvious reference if they wanted to. Couldn't they? Then why didn't they? That's the important question.
Symbolism will be their downfall.
And for what it's worth, the term Luciferase was coined over 150 years ago.
Illuminase as in Illuminati? Might as well just call it Deepstatase. It's just a name.
Scientists like to get cute with naming. There's a species of colorful fly named after RuPaul. It doesn't mean the fly wears a sequinsed dress and high heels. It's just a name.
4.4 Materials
Luciferin Substrate for in vivo luciferase imaging 122799-10 150 mg/kg Perkin-Elmer
QuantiLum recombinant luciferase Positive control E1701 100 ng/µL Promega ** volumetric, 0.1 M HCl 2104-50 ml N/A Sigma-Aldrich
RPMI1640 medium Cell culture medium 61870 N/A Gibco
Anti-firefly luciferase antibody (mAb21), Assay control ELISA ab64564 1:1,000 Abcam Mouse IgG isotype Assay control ELISA 0107-08 1:100 as starting dilution Southern Biotech
Goat anti-mouse IgG HRP Secondary antibody ELISA 115-035- 071 1:15,000 (if stored in 50% glycerol 1:7,500) Jackson WTF?
"Why Luciferase is actually good for your genetics" - Washington Post Probably
I won't call you a conspiracy theorist but the name Lucifer goes back hundreds of years before its use in the Bible and isn't even the original name for the devil. Lucifer was originally the Latin (i.e. Roman) name for Venus, the morning star. It was later used (in the middle ages) as the English representation of the original (similar meaning but very different pronunciation) Hebrew name of the devil, as well as being the root word for things like lucid, elucidate, lucidity, lucite, all of which relate to light.
It was used to describe this glowing protein because that's how you say light maker or light bringer in Latin. Most medical terms derive from Latin.
I downloaded and zipped them all up for convenience:
https://greatawakening.win/p/141s71s3JG/every-single-file-from-httpsphmp/
Ma dudes, there are pages and pages of documents. Lets get digging!
So many documents... They need a "Download All" button!
My read through -
This does not appear to be on the entire mRNA clot shot, but rather just the luciferase component.
This is what I got:
The luciferase on its own the body treats as an invader and sends T cells to attack. B cells are not activated.
And the study of the long term effects of luciferase in the body is 9 days long and it is on mice. And specifically just looking for weight and organ malfunctions. All their spleens were harvested and measured at the conclusion but I don't seen any results.
I don't see any research on how this formulation was studied with the other components . I guess human trials will eventually let us know how bad it is.
There is no rational why luciferase is needed. It appears to imply the claims it will activate your immune system...well yeah that is what happens when the body is under attack.
Tabulated Summary has table of organ distributions. I noticed spleen was really high.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf
Thank you!
On page 7 I see concentrations in various are still increasing by hour 48....and then no more data after 48 hours.
You can still see huge increases in ovaries of mice in the study in just 48 hr. Extrapolate that over more time and I wonder if concentration increases perpetually. So our bodies keep making more LPNP post jab. So crazy
Spleen and ovaries go up really high over time
My read is, they are testing the effects of Luciferase on mice because they intend to add it as part of the vaccine (as Bill Gates had mentioned long ago) to create a vaccine quantum dot.
Luciferase has been used in biomedicine for a long time, far predating modern vaccines.
Yeh, but has it been encoded in mRNA vaccines to make our body create it? Why would I want my body to create Luciferase regardless of how long its been used in biomedicine?
Rofl. Reading this dudes comments. He thinks that "Luciferase" existed as a word before the concept of Satan. Satan coming from hebrew, meaning adversary, and is literally thousands of years old. But Luciferase is older?
Keep an eye on this one. He's not a good fit for GAW, imo. If you know what I mean.
That debate I won't get into. My only point is that there's no real connection to the devil or Satanism because this word existed long before the concept of Satan.
I was not even thinking about that, just he fact that they had talked about using Luciferase for q-dot to track vaccine status. Since you bought it up, the way I see it, its not really whether it is connected to devil or satanism factually, but rather the symbolic meaning it holds to those who believe in such things.
That would be a pretty poor way to do a micro dot since the enzyme itself will rapidly break down and there's no evidence that your body would continue to produce it for very long after the vaccine. There's much more effective ways to permanently embed a marker into a person's tissues, like a small sample of a low grade atomic isotope. They could detect it under the skin and likely even tell when it was injected based on the decay rates.
Luciferase is a 150-year-old nothingburger.
I still dont get why they want to test mRNA encoding of Luciferase instructions so that the body can produce it.
Basically they were using mRNA to encode luciferase so that the body creates it, and testing its effects.
I got this from a Greek news site:
https://files.catbox.moe/ek2glm.pdf
The title says "Vaccines: Publishing 400,000 Pfizer-FDA Hidden Pages - Hundreds of Side Effects and Newborn Deaths"
The list of effects are Appendix I in this doc, starting at Page 30, produced last November.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Biolabs in Ukraine and Taiwan. All coming out at the same time with covid vax leaks. Waves will be fast and meaningful.
Which politician would like to step up first and read this line by line to us? Then at the end they can mention a specific time frame in which they knew these were negative effects of the jab they were pushing.