I think TS is actually the platform and infrastructure that needed to be built for when Twitter is bought by musk. Hear me out - day 1 of Musk control 95% of the staff is either going to quit or be fired. after the mass exodus the Truth social staff and team will need to jump in to keep twitter operational and make the transition as seamless as possible to the userbase (ie limit platform downtime). no small task if you think about since the new team will have to get up to speed ASAP on any properietary info not to mention the code and all the tech. plus i am sure the bitter twitter staff is going to take a shit on several things on the way out the door to purposely not make it easy on their successors. It is a huge undertaking to be sure - wouldnt it be nice if there was already several hundred tech employees and a management team capable of running a social media platform somewhere?
Same here and I signed up when it was first mentioned that Trump was putting it out there before the app was available. I am currently waiting for my notification number to come up. My husband signed up much later and got on about three weeks ago now.
Yep, it's either incompetence/poor-planning or strategic. Who knows, everything is on such a slow roll that I don't really care on the details and just live my life.
When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!
People aren't understanding the board thing at all.
Most companies have different kinds of boards or directors. The ones on twitter that own basically none of it were incorrectly labeled "the board." They are actually a board of advisors. Look up their names individually, they are not actual "Board" members, they're just key advisers that talk to the executive team - it's an honorary position and they typically aren't paid or rewarded.
Twitter board members are paid a collective 3M a year, but the real power of the board comes from their members sitting on other corporate boards, directling policy to their mutal benefit. All the boards of major corporations have interlocking directerories with other big media, finance, pharma, miliary/aerospace, etc, creating a seemingly impenetrable 5th column of corporate rulers, beholden to one, that lie and censor for their own greed and social interests. This is the Deep State. Years back, there was great site where you could input almost any large corporation and see a graph of who sits on who whose board. I would love to see what network of boards the Twitter board members also sit on. No doubt, Pfizer has a seat at the table, but who else? This site has some old examples, but, unfortuneately, all the links to the old sites I tried are dead.
If by "an underground of workers making policy", you mean corporate board directors, than yes, though they're not underground, and calling them "workers" sounds funny, though a job is a job. How do you think power has been consolidated in the last few decades? How do you figure we went from having dozens of media outlets 30 years ago to having six today? And how the same has been achieved in almost every other industry? You don't see why this is necessary for totalitarian control of a population? WEF promotes the idea that you'll live in a pod, eat bugs, own nothing and be happy, but you"ll get your pod from Home Depot, your bugs from Monsanto, financed by Citibank. Choice doesn't have a place in the dystopia they want for you. The deep state is an unelected, unaccountable body of financial, political and social control, and these incestuous, interlocking directorates certainly fit the bill.
Trump has an ace up his sleeve that no one has picked up on, yet. And I think that it's huge! It could be the real "Watch the Water". Follow me on this.
DWAC (the acquisition company poised to launch Truth Social) and CFVI (Rumble SPAC) appear to be waiting to pull out all the stops when the time is right.
It looks (for all the world) like they are both holding back and beta testing their platforms for the release. Because, even without the anticipated attacks, it will be a tremendous strain on the infrastructure.
Enter Elon Musk. He's made his fortune on Deep State funding. And he's been telling us that he knows the jig is up. AI is a genie that can't be put back in the bottle. Electric vehicles are a disastrous idea. Lithium is environmentally devastating and cost-prohibitive.
I believe that Trump had a "come to Jesus" meeting with Musk and offered him an out. A way to move his fortune from certain failure to certain success.
Launch a satellite network under the guise of the neuralink project (to keep the DS off the scent), start acting like a loose cannon and get the libs to hate you.
Shake up the big tech platforms and expose their true ownership while setting the stage for the merger of the century.
Musk can be the front for the operation while acting on behalf of the various SPACS who can come together to buy up the platforms and server banks at a discount. As horrible as they are, Twitter, Youtube, Disney, Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, etc. have got it wired. Acquisition is the best way for a smooth transition.
There are two caveats, and maybe some pedes can help me suss out the first one. That is the payment system. I know that Dan Bongino talks about this and has something going in his parallel economy project. And Elon Musk would certainly be a good candidate for overseeing it (PayPal and all).
So we would have a freedom of information platform encompassing all aspects of social media, a satellite network to bypass outages should the deep state networks pull access, and a payment system.
The final piece is how to manage both the exorbitant costs of powering server banks the size of cities and the real threat of an attack on the power grid. I read that the server costs for Twitter run $1 billion per month. Perhaps someone can verify that? No way that a non-black money funded entity could afford that on a free site. It's obvious that they could never be profitable without three-letter agency backing.
And in steps the sleeper. (Thanks if you have made it this far.)
Peter Orlando is the owner of DWAC. He also owns another SPAC with same funding company. That company is called Benessere Capital Acquisition Corp. (BENE on the NASDAQ).
This company makes industrial hydrogen fuel cell generators, powerful enough to run all of the infrastructure for these sites. Water-powered, zero-carbon, super-efficient energy.
Remember that both Q and Trump have alluded to a new form of energy which is almost free. Remember that Trump's uncle was the person to secure the papers on Nikola Tesla after his death.
Still up in the air about whether Musk is a white hat or a black hat. His company, Tesla is partially owned by Vanguard and BlackRock - not a good sign.
I believe Musk is more in the middle and doesn't particularly care about either side but more so about science and technology. It just so happens that what benefits him and his companies also benefit us. I believe if it would benefit Musk to go against us that he would. It's that old saying about the enemy of my enemy is my friend or something along those lines.
I'm pretty much of the thinking that if his goals benefit our side more than the cabal's side then might as well accept it. People should never be under the illusion that Musk is on Trump's side though. Musk is on Musk's side and to achieve his goals, he needs capitalism to thrive which goes against what democrats seem to want.
I heard an interesting theory about BlackRock.
Suppose that they do own many of the assets in the US. Now suppose that they are somehow controlled by the white hats. They'd have the system by the balls.
I wonder if the liberals are being told to try to buy stocks in twitter now so they can take away musks control. I know theybare dumb but maybe they are panicing so bad that they try anything and when the stock dumbs a fat one they melt down cause they have no money
Popcorn? Check ✔
u/#pepecozy
Is that raining popcorn? Kek
*snowing, yes
was TS a distraction? Such a slow roll out.
I think TS is actually the platform and infrastructure that needed to be built for when Twitter is bought by musk. Hear me out - day 1 of Musk control 95% of the staff is either going to quit or be fired. after the mass exodus the Truth social staff and team will need to jump in to keep twitter operational and make the transition as seamless as possible to the userbase (ie limit platform downtime). no small task if you think about since the new team will have to get up to speed ASAP on any properietary info not to mention the code and all the tech. plus i am sure the bitter twitter staff is going to take a shit on several things on the way out the door to purposely not make it easy on their successors. It is a huge undertaking to be sure - wouldnt it be nice if there was already several hundred tech employees and a management team capable of running a social media platform somewhere?
That could be because TS is not concerned about launching its platform for Windows or Android users. Twitter was the plan all along.
Nunes confirmed that TS will launch for PC. They have the option of using a Progressive Web App that universally functions within Android and Windows.
That's good news. Thanks
Devin has said there are only six people working on TS infrastructure before, that's not enough to keep Twitter running.
If TS takes over Twatter, I can't imagine the impact that will have. People will probably leave?
Thus spreading truth will be less?
Same here and I signed up when it was first mentioned that Trump was putting it out there before the app was available. I am currently waiting for my notification number to come up. My husband signed up much later and got on about three weeks ago now.
same here. i signed up the second it was possible. still waiting.
Yep, it's either incompetence/poor-planning or strategic. Who knows, everything is on such a slow roll that I don't really care on the details and just live my life.
I got in about 3 weeks ago. But it was a good 2-3 week wait.
I sure hope they finally let me on soon.
Everyone Truth i want to hear from is mirrored on qalerts.app so it's no biggie
You had the calm. Then you get the <perfect> storm. It's elementary.
Exactly!
When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
Lifelog - you misspelled FaceBook…. Oh I see what you did there.
Please report to the CIA’s office of reeeeeducation for further help.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!
that was a powerful disclosure. shareholders will be pissed if board doesn't accept the offer
People aren't understanding the board thing at all.
Most companies have different kinds of boards or directors. The ones on twitter that own basically none of it were incorrectly labeled "the board." They are actually a board of advisors. Look up their names individually, they are not actual "Board" members, they're just key advisers that talk to the executive team - it's an honorary position and they typically aren't paid or rewarded.
Twitter board members are paid a collective 3M a year, but the real power of the board comes from their members sitting on other corporate boards, directling policy to their mutal benefit. All the boards of major corporations have interlocking directerories with other big media, finance, pharma, miliary/aerospace, etc, creating a seemingly impenetrable 5th column of corporate rulers, beholden to one, that lie and censor for their own greed and social interests. This is the Deep State. Years back, there was great site where you could input almost any large corporation and see a graph of who sits on who whose board. I would love to see what network of boards the Twitter board members also sit on. No doubt, Pfizer has a seat at the table, but who else? This site has some old examples, but, unfortuneately, all the links to the old sites I tried are dead.
So now the deep state is companies and not an underground of workers who have been making policy for decades?
If by "an underground of workers making policy", you mean corporate board directors, than yes, though they're not underground, and calling them "workers" sounds funny, though a job is a job. How do you think power has been consolidated in the last few decades? How do you figure we went from having dozens of media outlets 30 years ago to having six today? And how the same has been achieved in almost every other industry? You don't see why this is necessary for totalitarian control of a population? WEF promotes the idea that you'll live in a pod, eat bugs, own nothing and be happy, but you"ll get your pod from Home Depot, your bugs from Monsanto, financed by Citibank. Choice doesn't have a place in the dystopia they want for you. The deep state is an unelected, unaccountable body of financial, political and social control, and these incestuous, interlocking directorates certainly fit the bill.
Are people finally understand8ng that these tech geniuses are just selected pawns to use a business to cover their service to the deep state.
Unless they know that they themselves, friends and loved ones are in mortal danger
I sure hope and pray so
yep about 2 weeks........
Brace yourselves
Trump card coming?
https://qalerts.app/?n=1201
4 Year Delta no less?
Wow, and 4/20 is a very likely date for Elon. I don't have enough popcorn for this one, I need to hoard it like TP.
10 days....
...
...
Nah fuck that. I'm not date fagging.
I'm short selling TWTR stock. Just bought more puts.
I'm thinking it may go way up.
The puts expire in August. By that time TWTR will be way down.
I shorted it also. The Musk offer is going nowhere. Twitter is going down the tubes the second this fades into the sunset.
Exactly. Can't wait to profit off Twitter's demise.
Bad call.
Mark my words:
Trump has an ace up his sleeve that no one has picked up on, yet. And I think that it's huge! It could be the real "Watch the Water". Follow me on this.
DWAC (the acquisition company poised to launch Truth Social) and CFVI (Rumble SPAC) appear to be waiting to pull out all the stops when the time is right.
It looks (for all the world) like they are both holding back and beta testing their platforms for the release. Because, even without the anticipated attacks, it will be a tremendous strain on the infrastructure.
Enter Elon Musk. He's made his fortune on Deep State funding. And he's been telling us that he knows the jig is up. AI is a genie that can't be put back in the bottle. Electric vehicles are a disastrous idea. Lithium is environmentally devastating and cost-prohibitive.
I believe that Trump had a "come to Jesus" meeting with Musk and offered him an out. A way to move his fortune from certain failure to certain success.
Launch a satellite network under the guise of the neuralink project (to keep the DS off the scent), start acting like a loose cannon and get the libs to hate you. Shake up the big tech platforms and expose their true ownership while setting the stage for the merger of the century.
Musk can be the front for the operation while acting on behalf of the various SPACS who can come together to buy up the platforms and server banks at a discount. As horrible as they are, Twitter, Youtube, Disney, Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, etc. have got it wired. Acquisition is the best way for a smooth transition.
There are two caveats, and maybe some pedes can help me suss out the first one. That is the payment system. I know that Dan Bongino talks about this and has something going in his parallel economy project. And Elon Musk would certainly be a good candidate for overseeing it (PayPal and all).
So we would have a freedom of information platform encompassing all aspects of social media, a satellite network to bypass outages should the deep state networks pull access, and a payment system.
The final piece is how to manage both the exorbitant costs of powering server banks the size of cities and the real threat of an attack on the power grid. I read that the server costs for Twitter run $1 billion per month. Perhaps someone can verify that? No way that a non-black money funded entity could afford that on a free site. It's obvious that they could never be profitable without three-letter agency backing.
And in steps the sleeper. (Thanks if you have made it this far.)
Peter Orlando is the owner of DWAC. He also owns another SPAC with same funding company. That company is called Benessere Capital Acquisition Corp. (BENE on the NASDAQ).
In January of 2021, BENE acquired a company called "Ecombustible Energy LLC"
This company makes industrial hydrogen fuel cell generators, powerful enough to run all of the infrastructure for these sites. Water-powered, zero-carbon, super-efficient energy.
Remember that both Q and Trump have alluded to a new form of energy which is almost free. Remember that Trump's uncle was the person to secure the papers on Nikola Tesla after his death.
How many coincidences until it's impossible?
I'm picking up what you are laying down!
Thanks for taking the time to bring us this great perspective.
Still up in the air about whether Musk is a white hat or a black hat. His company, Tesla is partially owned by Vanguard and BlackRock - not a good sign.
I believe Musk is more in the middle and doesn't particularly care about either side but more so about science and technology. It just so happens that what benefits him and his companies also benefit us. I believe if it would benefit Musk to go against us that he would. It's that old saying about the enemy of my enemy is my friend or something along those lines.
I'm pretty much of the thinking that if his goals benefit our side more than the cabal's side then might as well accept it. People should never be under the illusion that Musk is on Trump's side though. Musk is on Musk's side and to achieve his goals, he needs capitalism to thrive which goes against what democrats seem to want.
I've also heard him say AI will make humans useless. Depopulation? Who knows. One thing we do know... He's pretty crazy!
https://notthebee.com/article/elon-musk-slams-the-uns-ridiculous-population-estimates-as-he-warns-of-the-coming-population-crisis
I heard an interesting theory about BlackRock. Suppose that they do own many of the assets in the US. Now suppose that they are somehow controlled by the white hats. They'd have the system by the balls.
What if he's pissed about it and wants to destroy them to free himself of their control?
What if he's an antichrist?
Whole lot of variables here.
That’s one determined guy.
Musk taking Twitter would be intensely satisfying. I might actually have a steak and a beer in celebration.
10 days huh? What an...oddly specific number.....
I wonder if the liberals are being told to try to buy stocks in twitter now so they can take away musks control. I know theybare dumb but maybe they are panicing so bad that they try anything and when the stock dumbs a fat one they melt down cause they have no money
F Musk.
Investors....like TMTG?
Datefag comin' in HOT!
:)
Can't read article - not turning off ad block for Fox News
Gist?
JUST
TWO
MORE