297
Comments (90)
sorted by:
27
WinnerofGames [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

https://t.me/themeitryx/4888

With the announcement of Julian Assange's extradition approval this morning, it's not surprising that HRC is panicking. June ETA?

"Server or JA = truth exposed (SR)."

"The 'server' brings down the house."

https://qanon.pub/?q=SR

Michael Luttig

https://freeatlantis.com/@johnglavine/108467588308418357

16
1KewKlew7 16 points ago +16 / -0

I also think the Q posts that mentions "2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS."

are using 2018 as a placeholder for 2022

7
Woefully_Inept 7 points ago +8 / -1

God I really hope so. It's hard not to doomfag these days. Ugh

4
45-4KAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

I really hope so

2
Chimera 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would be nice if things just lined up from then on.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Jacurutu99 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL no wonder Schiff let his grabass pals in the capitol, they all know they are fucked anyway.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Stephanie1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why? The deep state will kill julian in prison.

23
CovfefeNegro 23 points ago +23 / -0

His wife says he has threatened suicide if he is to be extradited, we shall see.

For a guy who some folks claim is reasonably bright that's a poor move, announcing you wanna suicide while so many people are planning your arkancide is beyond ghey.

8
mrsray 8 points ago +8 / -0

he knows they are going to torture him, look at what they are doing to the j6 people

4
CovfefeNegro 4 points ago +9 / -5

Look what they do to 'us', and we're not even criminals...

23
dudehat 23 points ago +23 / -0

Assange and J6 aren't criminals.

-14
deleted -14 points ago +1 / -15
27
dudehat 27 points ago +27 / -0

The Founding Fathers were criminals by definition too, get your head out of authority's ass.

2
Notimportant81 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

2
pcpoet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sometimes being a criminal is the only moral thing. I believe in the rule of law but at some point, you may be put in the position to choose between morality and law. in a just society law helps morality express itself but society is not always just.

1
Rubieroo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Culture isn't the barometer.

1
lsvogel 1 point ago +1 / -0

The founding fathers wrote the Constitution so that the document would be ever lasting through the changes of time. They knew from their own 'living through Hell' experiences under a tyrannical regime it most likely would and could happen over and over, again and again.

And here we are, defending what was written 200+ years ago.

The Constitution is biblical in a sense and protects humanity in our nation from the evils of the world, including our own from within.

-15
CovfefeNegro -15 points ago +2 / -17

Well now fella or fellette watch your mouf.

Riddle me this then; if Ashli Babbit broke into your house and then was breaking into your locked bedroom as you warned her not to do so what would you do? And remember at the time you don't know who she is or why she's breaking in and why she doesn't stop EVEN after being warned you will shoot...

16
libtards_r_stoopid 16 points ago +16 / -0

I'll riddle you and step in it too. How about this, evacuate the building and give ground. You know, kinda like the kid glove treatment the actual insurrectionist DS antifa & blm get. She was murdered. Period.

12
Aspie 12 points ago +12 / -0

How about she wasn't shot? She might be dead now for all I know, but that black guy in a suit didn't shoot her. Slow motion replay of the video shows that he turned his gun away from her, fired down the hall, then quickly turned the gun back toward her. Anyone really shot in the neck would have been bleeding like a stuck pig immediately. She did show a drop of red until her helper stuck in his hand and made it happen. Also the crowd didn't break into the Capitol. The capitol police opened the doors and pointed the way for them to go. In other words, they were actually invited in.

6
Notimportant81 6 points ago +7 / -1

It's not your house, it's a public building, with hundreds of guards and there were dozens of people who could take one woman down and no one, not one, in that chamber, who was remotely in danger. The House was threatened when the Puerto Ricans showed up, but not one member was in danger on Jan 6th.

5
Greatheart 5 points ago +5 / -0

I will riddle you this. If three police officers were standing directly behind Ashli Babbit would you still shot her? Look at the video. https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/newly-released-footage-shows-ashli-babbitt-begging-capitol-police-to-intervene-with-rioters//

4
dudehat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Deez

5
BOFNGL 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are you for real?

Who stole Nancy's laptop?

The patsy they pinned it on, or some tier 1 team guys?

There was more than just the drunks laptop taken.

-7
CovfefeNegro -7 points ago +2 / -9

Doesn't matter does it, by allowing 'themselves' to be used they became criminals, remember Trump said, Peacefully. They did not remain Peaceful they all knew - except the Grandma maybe- they were rioting.

The people who did interrupt Congress may have caused the false election to be certified by their criminal invasion of the Capitol.... because the natural order of government WAS interrupted.

Yeah many of them were played - they walked into it after being warned not to do so.

5
NOTWOKE 5 points ago +6 / -1

You had to be there. You've been drinking to much of the blue juice

4
AlgaeBanquet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would it be that Pelosi et al refuse the release of 14000 hours of video footage from that day I wonder...

They were let in by corrupt cops with instructions to open the impenetrable magnet doors. Unless the patriots were sporting an RPG or two the only way in was by invite.

1
lsvogel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Newly released video (most likely leaked by white hats) shows there were scores of people buying thing at the Capitol gift shop! The bags they were carrying had the Capitol seal on it. And new video shows peaceful supports outside the Capitol stairs singing God Bless America.

These are some examples of TRUTH and why they don't want to show the 14000 hours. They only want to push their 'insurrection' narrative, which we now were paid thugs and instigators of FBI, CIA and Pelosi/Schiff event orchestration to cover up the real insurrection of the stolen election from Nov 3rd, 2020.

Remember; Schiff is a pathological liar and he got caught on the Russia, Russia evidence narrative and the Ukraine phone call. Over and over it's been proven he's a liar.

Satan is a liar and deceiver...Just saying.

2
BWolf79 2 points ago +3 / -1

Are they still criminals if the capital police opened barriers and doors and waved them in?

3
jackrotten 3 points ago +3 / -0

He has no reply because the narrative against this hasn't been spun up by people smarter than him, yet.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
jackrotten 1 point ago +2 / -1

Looks like you're a bad takes machine. Back to reddit.

3
Chimera 3 points ago +3 / -0

I definitely wouldn't threaten suicide if I were in his position. I would say I am not suicidal.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
CovfefeNegro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well she was, yeah, a long time ago.

Assange has good reason to not wanna come here, hillary and a thousand others who have demonstrated they can and will kill you in prison are waiting. And he knows he is guilty of some serious crimes which we will insist be reckoned, he should have stopped fighting extradition under Trump and made a deal.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Assange is at risk then Q isn't real.

If Q is real then Assange isn't at risk.

Your statement seems to indicate you don't think Q is real.

Is that the case?

1
CovfefeNegro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I might not agree that 'Q' suggested Assange was 'safe'.

Or I might consider that 'Q' uses disinformations.

I consider it near impossible for 'Q' to not be real, actually. But all I posted was the fact his wife repeats what he has said before, that is, that he would rather suicide.

https://files.catbox.moe/9kz9lk.jpg

1
Chimera 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mike Pompeo said he wanted to kill Assange. Why do you think he'd say that?

2
Jackdagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

For Pompeo he probably isn't a white hat. Never liked him and he had all the background of a clown in action. Some Bible verse posts won't convince me he is a good dude.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
An_Extinct_DQDQ_Bird 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe his wife is compromised and is being used to set the stage for a "legitimate suicide."

9
PunaAnon 9 points ago +9 / -0

I will not be the least surprised if JA shows up with a nice tan. My bet is that he has been guarded by white hats before Q ever mentioned him. The Q drops were the trailer for this movie we find ourselves in. JA is coming on stage per the script. Gawd, this is getting good.

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish what you said is true, but the reality is that not all goes as plan and my thinking is that several back up plans had to be used to keep Assange alive. till he could testify.

1
Rubieroo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assange has been under white hat protection for YEARS.

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

while good people behind the scenes have tried to keep him safe it does not mean the last 7 years was not torture on the man.... would love to think he was safe but with everything going on the man is lucky to be alive.... reviewed your posting to get a sense of where you were coming from with your comments. I thought you might be a troll. You are not a troll you are just an idiot. as for my thoughts on Q I am agnostic. I have fallowed the drops from almost day 1 and have better than a cursory understanding of the drops because unlike most I have time to study them being retired. I said I am agnostic on Q because I don't trust anything done online through an anonymous source and realize that this is intel op ran by an unknown entity. before Q ever started posting I explored conspiracies and deception done by intelligence agencies ours and foreign. I am sure that this place is monitored heavily by intelligence agencies worldwide plus a good percentage of those posting in here are doing so for countries like China, Brittan and Israel. I say all this because your statement a Q defended forum is meaningless and implies my post was somehow an attack

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

if you think that everything goes to a plan with no deviation you are an idiot...

7
Copperselectrons 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nice compilation.

Its interesting how under DT the extradition has continually been pursued and made me personally believe it would lead to important events--a very GOOD thing. BC if we travel back to 2016, we remember JA's connection to SR. Very big deal bc it would bring it full circle, JA has always been the full circle catalyst, IMO.

I also remember oct 2016 well--strange thing, cpl strange days if anyone remembers with me.

7
17JCsCrib26 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wonder if SR is going to be the tiger project that Gregg Phillips is talking about

5
Copperselectrons 5 points ago +5 / -0

well, now THAT would be a boom alright

6
twattler2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oct 2016 was when things escalated quickly. Pizzagate, spirit cooking, comms within “spam” emails. Very interesting times

5
Copperselectrons 5 points ago +5 / -0

And the wikileaks insurance codes/kill switch wth are they called? same day the closure of Heathrow airport--and many believed that JA was taken from embassy-- pics were circulating him being removed--whether true or not we dont know. Most thought it was good guys that took him--but no one knows. Also before that oct day, he was at embassy balcony sometimes, we havent seen him speak from there again, other than interview with Sean H, which looked green screen. Same week fbi vault dropped a bunch of related docs after being quiet for a long time. What a month it was, whew!

3
1KewKlew7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the picture. I just did this linking Q posts on another persons post but I don't know how to building pictures like this. Check out my post replies and see if you overlooked anything

https://greatawakening.win/u/1KewKlew7/

3
74nooffub 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that why all your people wind up dead, Clinton?

3
Avey 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am trying to read the names of the 8 democrats who demanded his asylum be revoked , very hard to read. Can anyone else make out the names?

3
A_whole_nother_thing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ooh you just started a new game. My guess:

Fauxcahontas, Feinstein, Durbin, Schumer, Kelly, Warnock, Coons, Blumenthal

[looks at letter]

4 for 8, not bad.

1
All_in 1 point ago +1 / -0

Joseph Manchin III?

1
A_whole_nother_thing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, very surprising. Maybe this is him playing both sides of the fence as he does.

2
Redeemed2014 2 points ago +2 / -0

FFS People. The Biden DOJ are the group requesting and receiving JA. Once he is in their grip he will be silenced.

Trump should have pardoned him when he had the chance. He F’d up big time not doing that and now here we are.

2
Hakencruze1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good dig Anon

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
makemyday007 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where is the “it’s happening” guy???

1
BerlinWallCrosser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Julian Assange did NOT kill himself.

1
WinnerofGames [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/FractalizingIron

Thoughts?

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

The timing all seems .... curious .... from the viewpoint of the Q drops, but then, the Qrops have all emphasized that JA is significant.

According to the Qdrops:

JA is the 'source' of wikileaks. Wikileaks is (or was) controlled by the CIA. JA knows the truth about Seth Rich.

What are the implications of Seth Rich's whistleblowing?

  1. That the narrative that the Russians hacked Clinton's emails is false.

  2. The diversionary tactic of accusing Trump and the Russians fails, allowing people to freely re-align attention to Clinton's email server issue.

Note: in 1626 Q says Server OR JA = truth exposed

One imagines that JA knows a lot more about the Democratic corruption:

Having Seth Rich whacked?

Uranium One dealings

etc.

All the attacks on Trump pre and post election (2016) seem designed to distract everyone they can away from all the corruption that the Dems were doing during the Obama era. POssibly, JA coming back to the US might represent a turning point in which that entire distraction era 2016 - 2022 has reached its end.

Considering the Durham timings, too, it's hard to think this is coincidental. Also, think: The Hunter laptop story was released just prior to the 2020 election. It's hard to imagine that the Good Guys don't have any hard and heavy surprises scheduled for August and October this year.

One thing of concern is that (I read) Assange's wife saying he would commit suicide if he is actually extradited because of all the times the CIA has tried to poison him.

That concerns me. One because its his wife saying this (I don't know her; but is she actually a good guy) and because of the possibility that this is simply narrative building.

Conclusion: buckle up, keep eyes on, and pray that God guides it all.

1
Cuomos_nipple_rings 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trumps rally in Casper Wyoming recently. There was a lot of speculation about what the comms meant, ghost comms. Well what if assange being very pale blond was the "ghost" reference from 3 weeks ago. What other hints were dropped at that rally?