you're going to get a lot of people calling you a stupid qtard
Which is why it ISN'T A "SISTER Q BOARD" FFS
This is widely known by nearly everyone in this forum - yet the fiction persists, and it keeps getting called "another Q board"
It is instead strongly antagonistic to Q and those who study the info in the messages. They hate us and literally believe we're hurting the Trump movement. Calling it a Q board is misleading and without justification.
Might just as well call it a socialist-democrat board or an islammy-commie board. They're equally against those groups as against Q and the autists and anons.
There’s a lot of overlap between the two communities. PDW hates the deep state and loves trump, too.
Meanwhile, there’s a lot of forum sliding and other disinformation tactics on display over there. You can’t take any account as a representative of their community at face value. If they make us forget we have a common enemy they break down two strong movements. Don’t let them.
Q basically said not to go full frontal infobombs on normies. We are more effective linking things q showed us in a manner that is acceptable for their consumption. If you can keep q topics and links gaining mindshare who cares if they never see the actual source? They aren’t in a position to accept that knowledge. But they’re getting the right messaging regardless.
GAW was spawned from TheDonald.Win (now Patriots.Win because... they gave up on Trump immediately after the election? I can't remember). We were bringing up Q stuff and it was asked if we should just go ahead and create our own Q board to establish more cohesive discussions and evade the vitriolic normie shit.
I can't speak for everyone but I do indeed hate you because you're dumb. Q is not information, it's cat shit in the shape of Elvis that you proles find to be a great omen. It's embarrassing, you're embarrassing, and you guys ARE hurting the Trump movement. Did you know that they have banned Q merchandise at Trump rallys because it really is embarassing?
Trust Sessions. Follow the White Rabbit. WWG1WGA. This is all prole shit for complete idiots, and you're all complete idiots.
Get out of politics, and get into something more appropriate for your mental level like football fandom or something. Maybe take up baseball card collection or something.
The point of the psyop was to make Trump supporters, and Trump support itself, ridiculous and full of idiots. Of course the media is going to say it's fake, it obviously is and they want to degrade MAGA.
Thanks for proving my point, patriot. Don't feel bad about not understanding that's what happened, and not perceiving what's going on. That doesn't matter. God loves you and so do I. We need everyone, no matter their level of education or class, to win this war. Hang in there and try to stay positive. You've brightened my day, friend!
I too was once a Qanon supporter. I had all the Qanon gear, Qanon action figures, and had Q-sex with my Q-loving q-tee Qfriend. In the end though Qanon only brought me misery as my bank account dwindled and I eventually woke up and decided that enough was enough, I wouldn't be bliked any longer.
I do understand your concerns but until all the people request accountability.... for everything not only election but for example where they send billions.
If you believe a super military team will arrive yo save us, it will be only another coup to the eyes of the people. We really need the silent majority to step in. Must be done in this way.
On our WIN these rejects get banned on sight. They add nothing to the conversation. There is ALWAYS "two more weeks" when you're awake and realize how much work there is still to do.
Make sure to use https:// for the links- anyone in IT or with a discerning eye for links (shout-out to my AOL Instant Messenger crowd) will refuse to click anything that's not HTTPS
That’s true. Nothing wrong with starting a career. But anybody who is reliable and can actually solve problems in a competent manner gets the bump to tier II very quickly. Then they usually only take calls as support coverage so they can spend more time fixing things.
On our WIN these rejects get banned on sight. They add nothing to the conversation.
If these people weren't "banned on sight" we would get more practice at countering their narrative, and would be better prepared to engage in the debate in the more hostile environment of TDW.
That is the problem with censorship of opposing ideas. It never really works out well for anyone. The Debate is the path to the Truth. Censorship of ideas expressed in earnest, no matter what those ideas may be, prevent the debate. Preventing the debate can only ever prevent stepping forward on the path to Truth.
We don't censor opposing ideas, in fact, we're even known for stickying them. This is one of the richest destinations for debate and discussion on the entire Internet—but standards will apply. Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts are the equivalent of streakers running onto the field naked for attention, and field security (ie, the mod team) will continue to tag, bag, and relocate these rehabs to the sidelines where they belong.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts
I am not talking about "low info" or "low effort" comments. I know for a fact that many ideas in opposition to the consensus beliefs of "pro-Q" people have been censored, and people banned for expressing them. These comments were engaged in earnest and were still censored. I have had some really good conversations deleted because of this censorship (I was not the one being censored in all of those cases, but was engaging someone who was in earnest). That is not the path.
Why are we calling people "losers?" How is that helpful? That very concept is the antithesis of the GA. If someone is a doomer, and their beliefs and opinions are in earnest, then help them see the evidence. Even if they don't see it (which is common) other's will, and that exposure is a potent weapon in the learning and awakening process for all the world.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
"How can Pizzagate be real if there is no basement!?!"
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
"Fuck Trump" "Q is a larp" "there is no plan" are NOT opposing ideas.
Also, we have a sidebar with rules. Consider that the GAW Constitution. If you can't abide by it, you get deported.
The mods are more than patient with people articulating frustration. Do they make mistakes? Yes. They're still human and far from perfect. But I would rather deal with a few egos bruised than having to sift through doomfaggotry.
"Fuck Trump" "Q is a larp" "there is no plan" are NOT opposing ideas.
This is a strawman. It is so loosely associated with my argument as to be meaningless.
But I would rather deal with a few egos bruised than having to sift through doomfaggotry.
How are your feelings of "what you want to deal with" relevant to this conversation on the censorship of ideas? If you don't want to deal with it, no one is forcing you to read or respond to anything.
Censoring arguments and evidence that don't align with everyone's confirmation bias is not the path to the Truth. It is in fact, always the path away from it.
Is "two more weeks" a valid argument? What debate is there to be had here? I have no doubt this will take much longer than two weeks, but It is happening. I see it every day.
Dooming isnt opposing debate. Argue why you think speculation isnt true. Give counter ideas. Dooming with negative comments and not ideas, isnt productive to Q research.
I am talking about "ideas expressed in earnest". How hard is that to understand? If someone provides evidence that may be something we don't want to hear, isn't that something that should be debated? If someone gives an argument for something, and it is expressed in earnest, even if it isn't something "nice and pretty and confirmation biasy" is that something that should be censored or debated?
Let's look at the possible outcomes. What will censorship do for anyone involved? I assert it can only cause harm; it can only be a negative. No one benefits from such censorship. Try to find me a benefit, because I struggle to come up with one. There are fewer posts? I mean, meh. We aren't talking about that many posts engaged in earnest with opposing views.
On the other hand, what are the potentials if it is debated? People can learn things. Even if the "doomer" OP (who is engaging honestly) isn't convinced, any others that read the debate will likely learn something important (assuming any real debate was had). If no one decides to engage in debate on the other hand, the community self-censors and the result is the same as the best case scenario in censorship, except no harm was done.
I didn't say "censor nothing" I said we shouldn't censor opposing ideas engaged in earnest. Censoring people who come here specifically with the intent to harm, or AI's, etc. is a different thing entirely.
You need to draw the line somewhere.
Sure, "somewhere" is the key point. Censoring opposing ideas, which is exactly what this post states, simply because they are opposing ideas is not the right line.
I'd be more involved on this site and trusting if cats didn't delete my first post exposing a certain children show creator as a pedo. So cats will never not be sus to me. They sure are good at playing the long game, I'll give them that.
So I just lurk and comment occasionally. Been part of the movement since r/T_D 2015 but apparently that counts for nothing cause we have a glorified reddit mod who tries to personally be the face of the board out of ego.
I mean they can say I'm wrong but actions speak louder than words. Which is funny cause their go to deflection is my lack on involvement on the board. Intentionally ignoring the fact that they are the sole reason for it. 🤷♂️
Tl;Dr: overstepping your authority is a quick trip to eroding any hope of trust from fellow truth seekers, especially when done to those who have already endured hatred, harassment and censorship from every other tech platform under the sun. Plain and simple. You'd think they'd be more mindful.
I JUST CHECKED YOUR POST HISTORY. I ALMOST DIED OF ANEMIA.
Holy shit. Hey... remember this comment of yours from almost a year ago?
"Now the mod I dont like/trust is cats for reason #1. And now both the OP and Uhtred dodged my question why the OPs post kept getting removed because that threw uo a red flag for me. With a snarky response, mind you. Big mistake." 21.02
Please continue to lurk. And pls continue to view me as sus. I don't work for you—I answer to the hardest working researchers and decoders in the movement. Period. I DGAF what do-nothing low-info whiners like you think. Get to work or find another home.
Then someone with a bunch of bots spams this board with "opposing ideas," being obtuse in their arguments to defend it, and it drives people away.
I addressed this "hypothetical" specifically by suggesting that banning AIs was a good thing. You are creating an orange to compare to my apple.
One of the most effective ways of arguing with intent to harm is to simply ignore arguments against yours.
And people will come along and see the argument and will be able to think for themselves whether or not any point has been sufficiently defended. There is no need to censor under such nebulous circumstances.
Trying to catch all these "maybe they have bad intent" people will certainly catch people who don't. Any such "accidental casualty" will be a greater harm to the community and the GA as a whole. Will any positive effect occur from such a tactic? If someone wishes to do harm, though it's not really that easy to be sure they mean to do harm, and their argument is rebutted in debate, the argument has been seen. It doesn't matter what their intent is; the particular argument or tactic has been exposed. The community as a whole is improved.
There is nothing to be gained by censorship except in cases that are (actually) obvious. If we don't trust people to learn how to counter such subversive agents as you hypothesize, how can we possibly have a GA? That is the entire point of the GA.
A certain number of people will, and a certain number of people won't.
And that is the necessary lesson of the GA. I assert The Argument Will Out. You seem to believe that we need overlords protecting us.
This is a fundamental difference between our viewpoints, and I suggest also a fundamental lesson of the GA. Overlords/protectors, are not the path. One of the primary lessons of the GA is to learn to think for ourselves; to be our own agents in life. If we can't learn that here where we have support and people engaged in an honest attempt to route it out, where better is there?
It is important that we do set some spaces aside where the regular individuals in our society can find respite from the battle.
I suggest it is essential that we set up spaces where people can learn how to use debate and critical thinking to understand those who act against us. (Please read that link, I think it will help you.)
And, just to be clear, I am confident that you are arguing in bad faith to try and gain more access to this board to further harm our community.
What the holy shit!?!
This suggests your capabilities of perception are in dire need of good solid lessons in debate and critical thinking. I suggest you are exactly the type of person that needs to see such arguments against agents acting against the interests of We The People play out in the debate process.
I'd say we need a government laxative, but I think what we really need is a government enima. We have 250+ years of backed up shit. Let's get all the shit out of there.
Hell, lets' remove the whole fucking colon, just to be sure we get it all.
LOL - 1) well it's not banned now, and 2) he drops proofs and Q's all the time. He confirmed Q literally this week.
As for respect, respect is earned. Maybe you could sort me by top and point me to someone else that has carried more water for PW than yours truly. I also had over a million on r/The_Donald. NOBODY has out-worked me, period.
As for what I'm posting, investigate it a little. Learn what devolution is. You can learn it now, and enjoy whatching that unfold, or learn it later. Your call.
As for the rest of it, we do NOT want to take over your board or become a nuisance to you guys. Just adding further research where appropriate, is all. We will not troll PW. You have my word on it.
EDIT: u/chickeninspector may be one of the mods that is ruining PDW and censoring a lot of posts that I come across... If not, at least one of your mods is controlled opposition...
Btw your microcontrollers .WIN is EMPTY, why did you make it? Do you do anything with Arduinos/microcontrollers?
2 more weeks crowd? That's us? Kek! I've been on here a fair bit of time and I've only seen those words maybe once and it was even in jest. But yes come to think of it we all get new awakenings within 2 weeks ad infinitum. Especially these days when soooo much is happening all the time!
Translation: For the greatest impact, be a tree falling in the forest; an unstoppable force.
Translation: If you're not there to hear yourself fall, you won't make any noise.
...
I think I messed up somewhere.
Which is why it ISN'T A "SISTER Q BOARD" FFS
This is widely known by nearly everyone in this forum - yet the fiction persists, and it keeps getting called "another Q board"
It is instead strongly antagonistic to Q and those who study the info in the messages. They hate us and literally believe we're hurting the Trump movement. Calling it a Q board is misleading and without justification.
Might just as well call it a socialist-democrat board or an islammy-commie board. They're equally against those groups as against Q and the autists and anons.
There’s a lot of overlap between the two communities. PDW hates the deep state and loves trump, too.
Meanwhile, there’s a lot of forum sliding and other disinformation tactics on display over there. You can’t take any account as a representative of their community at face value. If they make us forget we have a common enemy they break down two strong movements. Don’t let them.
Q basically said not to go full frontal infobombs on normies. We are more effective linking things q showed us in a manner that is acceptable for their consumption. If you can keep q topics and links gaining mindshare who cares if they never see the actual source? They aren’t in a position to accept that knowledge. But they’re getting the right messaging regardless.
GAW was spawned from TheDonald.Win (now Patriots.Win because... they gave up on Trump immediately after the election? I can't remember). We were bringing up Q stuff and it was asked if we should just go ahead and create our own Q board to establish more cohesive discussions and evade the vitriolic normie shit.
I can't speak for everyone but I do indeed hate you because you're dumb. Q is not information, it's cat shit in the shape of Elvis that you proles find to be a great omen. It's embarrassing, you're embarrassing, and you guys ARE hurting the Trump movement. Did you know that they have banned Q merchandise at Trump rallys because it really is embarassing?
Trust Sessions. Follow the White Rabbit. WWG1WGA. This is all prole shit for complete idiots, and you're all complete idiots.
Get out of politics, and get into something more appropriate for your mental level like football fandom or something. Maybe take up baseball card collection or something.
Seethe harder shill
The point of the psyop was to make Trump supporters, and Trump support itself, ridiculous and full of idiots. Of course the media is going to say it's fake, it obviously is and they want to degrade MAGA.
Thanks for proving my point, patriot. Don't feel bad about not understanding that's what happened, and not perceiving what's going on. That doesn't matter. God loves you and so do I. We need everyone, no matter their level of education or class, to win this war. Hang in there and try to stay positive. You've brightened my day, friend!
Cheers
Are you a (passive-aggressive) boomer?
Are you a douche nozzle with shit for brains?
Rhetorical question. (Look that up before you answer. :)
Asking for a friend: why you here?
I too was once a Qanon supporter. I had all the Qanon gear, Qanon action figures, and had Q-sex with my Q-loving q-tee Qfriend. In the end though Qanon only brought me misery as my bank account dwindled and I eventually woke up and decided that enough was enough, I wouldn't be bliked any longer.
I do understand your concerns but until all the people request accountability.... for everything not only election but for example where they send billions. If you believe a super military team will arrive yo save us, it will be only another coup to the eyes of the people. We really need the silent majority to step in. Must be done in this way.
Nah, I like to mess with the glowies and stormfags.
Who doesnt like messing with glowies and stormfags? LMAO!
Every time I post in retort, they run away and the post gets buried.
Case in point:
https://patriots.win/p/15IXu1Pxyy/qtard-review-q-glowop-tries-to-r/
Don't post yet, I have him on the ropes. Or out of the ring... If he ever comes back...
The comment I left:
On our WIN these rejects get banned on sight. They add nothing to the conversation. There is ALWAYS "two more weeks" when you're awake and realize how much work there is still to do.
Would you like to know more?
http://greatawakening.win
And want to better understand the framework Trump activated that still puts him in power?
http://DEVOLUTION.LINK
Love the approach, just one small tweak:
Make sure to use https:// for the links- anyone in IT or with a discerning eye for links (shout-out to my AOL Instant Messenger crowd) will refuse to click anything that's not HTTPS
Anybody in IT would be smart enough to insert their own S.
Except maybe the Level 1 helpdesk folks. Their job is basically to prevent the competent people from getting stupid phone calls all day long.
Everyone's gotta start somewhere. Whether it be those who haven't heard of our community, or help desk techs.
Just a friendly suggestion is all.
That’s true. Nothing wrong with starting a career. But anybody who is reliable and can actually solve problems in a competent manner gets the bump to tier II very quickly. Then they usually only take calls as support coverage so they can spend more time fixing things.
Tier I is usually 80% or more just phone fodder.
Use https
If these people weren't "banned on sight" we would get more practice at countering their narrative, and would be better prepared to engage in the debate in the more hostile environment of TDW.
That is the problem with censorship of opposing ideas. It never really works out well for anyone. The Debate is the path to the Truth. Censorship of ideas expressed in earnest, no matter what those ideas may be, prevent the debate. Preventing the debate can only ever prevent stepping forward on the path to Truth.
We don't censor opposing ideas, in fact, we're even known for stickying them. This is one of the richest destinations for debate and discussion on the entire Internet—but standards will apply. Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts are the equivalent of streakers running onto the field naked for attention, and field security (ie, the mod team) will continue to tag, bag, and relocate these rehabs to the sidelines where they belong.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
I am not talking about "low info" or "low effort" comments. I know for a fact that many ideas in opposition to the consensus beliefs of "pro-Q" people have been censored, and people banned for expressing them. These comments were engaged in earnest and were still censored. I have had some really good conversations deleted because of this censorship (I was not the one being censored in all of those cases, but was engaging someone who was in earnest). That is not the path.
Why are we calling people "losers?" How is that helpful? That very concept is the antithesis of the GA. If someone is a doomer, and their beliefs and opinions are in earnest, then help them see the evidence. Even if they don't see it (which is common) other's will, and that exposure is a potent weapon in the learning and awakening process for all the world.
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
Those mods should be identified and rooted out.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
If it's on Q, and if Q were to direct us to take it seriously and talk about it, it would be all over this WIN.
Still waiting for info on how the chemtrail team somehow covers the skies in every corner of the country... Waiting for how they turn it off and on of its an additive in the fuel... Waiting for photos of the injection hardware installed en mass in commercial aircraft
Show me THAT and I'll sticky this shit all over the place 24/7 for a week straight
Your beliefs of "what is true" are irrelevant. The evidence either supports something or it doesn't. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. If people aren't allowed to present evidence, how can you possibly see it? How can anyone see it? How can we debate it?
You are making yourself The Arbiter of Truth. You aren't helping anyone by silencing evidence you think is bunk, you are harming an honest investigation into the Truth. If you think the evidence is bunk, present evidence to the contrary. Protesting "but why haven't we seen X, Y, and Z" is not an argument against evidence.
Let me give you an example you might appreciate.
How often do we see exactly this argument. If evidence of the basement is censored, the belief continues ad infinitum. This is exactly the same type of action of censorship you are promoting with your "disbelief" argument (and power to censor).
My guy, these mods were so petty that they took away my pepe avatar. Why? Probably for questioning the religious hivemind here.
Get the mods butthurt and they act accordingly.
It’s ironic because MasterJediPepe calls out catsfive for this in the comment thread above.
"Fuck Trump" "Q is a larp" "there is no plan" are NOT opposing ideas.
Also, we have a sidebar with rules. Consider that the GAW Constitution. If you can't abide by it, you get deported.
The mods are more than patient with people articulating frustration. Do they make mistakes? Yes. They're still human and far from perfect. But I would rather deal with a few egos bruised than having to sift through doomfaggotry.
This is a strawman. It is so loosely associated with my argument as to be meaningless.
How are your feelings of "what you want to deal with" relevant to this conversation on the censorship of ideas? If you don't want to deal with it, no one is forcing you to read or respond to anything.
Censoring arguments and evidence that don't align with everyone's confirmation bias is not the path to the Truth. It is in fact, always the path away from it.
Yeah I can't even stand to ready your comments anymore. Type like a normal person else others may ignore you too.
Is "two more weeks" a valid argument? What debate is there to be had here? I have no doubt this will take much longer than two weeks, but It is happening. I see it every day.
Dooming isnt opposing debate. Argue why you think speculation isnt true. Give counter ideas. Dooming with negative comments and not ideas, isnt productive to Q research.
I am talking about "ideas expressed in earnest". How hard is that to understand? If someone provides evidence that may be something we don't want to hear, isn't that something that should be debated? If someone gives an argument for something, and it is expressed in earnest, even if it isn't something "nice and pretty and confirmation biasy" is that something that should be censored or debated?
Let's look at the possible outcomes. What will censorship do for anyone involved? I assert it can only cause harm; it can only be a negative. No one benefits from such censorship. Try to find me a benefit, because I struggle to come up with one. There are fewer posts? I mean, meh. We aren't talking about that many posts engaged in earnest with opposing views.
On the other hand, what are the potentials if it is debated? People can learn things. Even if the "doomer" OP (who is engaging honestly) isn't convinced, any others that read the debate will likely learn something important (assuming any real debate was had). If no one decides to engage in debate on the other hand, the community self-censors and the result is the same as the best case scenario in censorship, except no harm was done.
I didn't say "censor nothing" I said we shouldn't censor opposing ideas engaged in earnest. Censoring people who come here specifically with the intent to harm, or AI's, etc. is a different thing entirely.
Sure, "somewhere" is the key point. Censoring opposing ideas, which is exactly what this post states, simply because they are opposing ideas is not the right line.
It is never the right line.
I'd be more involved on this site and trusting if cats didn't delete my first post exposing a certain children show creator as a pedo. So cats will never not be sus to me. They sure are good at playing the long game, I'll give them that.
So I just lurk and comment occasionally. Been part of the movement since r/T_D 2015 but apparently that counts for nothing cause we have a glorified reddit mod who tries to personally be the face of the board out of ego.
I mean they can say I'm wrong but actions speak louder than words. Which is funny cause their go to deflection is my lack on involvement on the board. Intentionally ignoring the fact that they are the sole reason for it. 🤷♂️
Tl;Dr: overstepping your authority is a quick trip to eroding any hope of trust from fellow truth seekers, especially when done to those who have already endured hatred, harassment and censorship from every other tech platform under the sun. Plain and simple. You'd think they'd be more mindful.
I JUST CHECKED YOUR POST HISTORY. I ALMOST DIED OF ANEMIA.
Holy shit. Hey... remember this comment of yours from almost a year ago?
Please continue to lurk. And pls continue to view me as sus. I don't work for you—I answer to the hardest working researchers and decoders in the movement. Period. I DGAF what do-nothing low-info whiners like you think. Get to work or find another home.
Insulting me because I choose to stand my ground to tyranny? That's rich.
Have fun being an obedient coward your whole life.
I addressed this "hypothetical" specifically by suggesting that banning AIs was a good thing. You are creating an orange to compare to my apple.
And people will come along and see the argument and will be able to think for themselves whether or not any point has been sufficiently defended. There is no need to censor under such nebulous circumstances.
Trying to catch all these "maybe they have bad intent" people will certainly catch people who don't. Any such "accidental casualty" will be a greater harm to the community and the GA as a whole. Will any positive effect occur from such a tactic? If someone wishes to do harm, though it's not really that easy to be sure they mean to do harm, and their argument is rebutted in debate, the argument has been seen. It doesn't matter what their intent is; the particular argument or tactic has been exposed. The community as a whole is improved.
There is nothing to be gained by censorship except in cases that are (actually) obvious. If we don't trust people to learn how to counter such subversive agents as you hypothesize, how can we possibly have a GA? That is the entire point of the GA.
And that is the necessary lesson of the GA. I assert The Argument Will Out. You seem to believe that we need overlords protecting us.
This is a fundamental difference between our viewpoints, and I suggest also a fundamental lesson of the GA. Overlords/protectors, are not the path. One of the primary lessons of the GA is to learn to think for ourselves; to be our own agents in life. If we can't learn that here where we have support and people engaged in an honest attempt to route it out, where better is there?
I suggest it is essential that we set up spaces where people can learn how to use debate and critical thinking to understand those who act against us. (Please read that link, I think it will help you.)
What the holy shit!?!
This suggests your capabilities of perception are in dire need of good solid lessons in debate and critical thinking. I suggest you are exactly the type of person that needs to see such arguments against agents acting against the interests of We The People play out in the debate process.
Wish you would get on your local school board and push shit faster.
TOP KEK 🐸👌
Get off your ass and get involved locally, then.
I'd say we need a government laxative, but I think what we really need is a government enima. We have 250+ years of backed up shit. Let's get all the shit out of there.
Hell, lets' remove the whole fucking colon, just to be sure we get it all.
PDW mod here. Please stay on your reservation and remember to take your lithium pills. Thank you.
We're being respectful. 🐸👌
Your very presence is disrespectful as GEOTUS has banned Q material from Trump rallys in the past.
LOL - 1) well it's not banned now, and 2) he drops proofs and Q's all the time. He confirmed Q literally this week.
As for respect, respect is earned. Maybe you could sort me by top and point me to someone else that has carried more water for PW than yours truly. I also had over a million on r/The_Donald. NOBODY has out-worked me, period.
As for what I'm posting, investigate it a little. Learn what devolution is. You can learn it now, and enjoy whatching that unfold, or learn it later. Your call.
As for the rest of it, we do NOT want to take over your board or become a nuisance to you guys. Just adding further research where appropriate, is all. We will not troll PW. You have my word on it.
Look at his username…
You don't carry water for us, thanks.
Nothing has been proven, nothing has been confirmed. The alphabet soup spelling "RBBIT" is not proof.
All of GAW on the day PDW finally catches up...
u/#toldyou
Yes, you've been telling us for years. When the cat shits in the basement in the shape of Jeff Sessions you'll say it's confirmation all along. ZZZ.
Hey u/chickeninspector (nice pedo name by the way you sick fuck) what do you think of the song name on GEOTUS’s new TS post.
Cats may have been respectful but I’ll tell you to go fuck yourself any day of the week, eat crow you stupid POS
EDIT: u/chickeninspector may be one of the mods that is ruining PDW and censoring a lot of posts that I come across... If not, at least one of your mods is controlled opposition...
Btw your microcontrollers .WIN is EMPTY, why did you make it? Do you do anything with Arduinos/microcontrollers?
What?
Sorry, meant chicken inspector, replied to wrong person like an idiot.
2 more weeks crowd? That's us? Kek! I've been on here a fair bit of time and I've only seen those words maybe once and it was even in jest. But yes come to think of it we all get new awakenings within 2 weeks ad infinitum. Especially these days when soooo much is happening all the time!
So good reply catsfive.
we can all use Q logics without talking about Q. Reformulate Q words and post. We need to unite. United we cant fail. division is weakness.
I’m not sure it read as negative for me. Am I missing context? He sounded like the anti-Doomers I see here from time to time.
And there always will be even at the conclusion of this operation, though... It'll be a bit more subtle...
I love this idea
reminds me of the movie , the money pit. I know, tom hanks, fuck him, BUT when ever he or shelly ask how long it will take, the answer is "two weeks".