H.R.6552, the Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022 just went up for vote in Congress on Tuesday. It passed with all Democrats and all but 20 Republicans voting yae. Among the 20 who voted nay were Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.
This doesn't make sense to me. If the bill does what the name suggests then why would they vote against it? Why would every democrat vote for it? There has to be something hidden here I am missing.
Can you guys help me find it?
More money to pass around amongst themselves. Pork is what we used to call it.
And there it is.... More money laundering in the guise of helping the people. Color me shocked
Seems like you need to ask Matt Gaetz and Marjorious MTG about this.
Democrats frequently give their legislation misleading names.
Such as the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which was a Clinton concoction aimed at offering Federal cash incentives to state CPS (up to $8000 per child) to rip children away from their families and put them in foster homes.
And also to ensure that those who see through it and hence vote against it are subsequently seen as 'mean and nasty' to the headline-skimming public.
"affordable care act"
affordable care act for expensive healthcare, patriot act to spy on patriots, DHS to rape the homeland. These people are full on poets.
💯% u/Lapstrake 👈🏻
Look at Joe Manchin's new bill.
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
This is the Green New Deal and creates a minimum of a half Trillion in New taxes for Americans.
We all know this will do Nothing for inflation. To stop inflation, you need to Stop Spending! This only increases the spending. And it increases the tax burden. More inflation and more taxes.
But they call it the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. All total bullsh!t.
All the while, giving themselves pay raises too. These people are sick....
Well, they hadn't gotten a cost of living pay raise in over a month.
Oh you right.... How silly of me to forget that!
Legit way to go. Let's seenif they'll explain it.
I doubt I'd vote for an anti-trafficking bill put forward by the nation's biggest trafficking organisation either.
The name of a bill is traditionally the opposite of what the contents of the bill actually does. It's been that way forever and they probably do it to laugh at us.
It’s the usually shell game. Here’s a bill Feed The Hungry Children Act sounds great then they add 25 pages of fees, taxes, new laws that waste money, set up new agencies, give contract to their friends and family, it’s disgusting
A Democrat bill never does what the name suggests.
Shoot, more than that, often Republican bills are oxymorons as well. Just look at the Patriot Act. Would any true patriot support it?
True. I’m referring more to current day, but yes.
It's been like this since 2001, at least, Starting with the Patriot Act. Then you have the (un) Affordable Care Act. (Obama) (which gets honorable mention in Remy's version of Isn't It Ironic- https://reason.com/video/2014/03/20/remy-isnt-it-ironic/
Build Back Better, The Election Integrity Act and more.
Come on.. you should know that the names of these bills barely ever have anything to do with.. well, their names.
I do believe they should receive financial compensation as well as exhaustive counseling due to what they went through, but the financial compensation should come from their abusers. If they aren't able to pay, then it should come from the government.
"...come from the government". You mean that we the taxpayers should pay for foreign victims of foreign criminals. Fuck no.
Keep in mind that they will just classify every child brought across our borders as victims of human trafficking. This way, the "dreamers" will be fully funded by taxpayers this time around.
Prot tip: That is NEVER the case.
This is about the oldest trick in the book. It's always a safe bet to think the bill will do the opposite of the title. At least you questioned it instead of just accepting it. Obviously MTG and Gaetz know something we don't.
Can I get on the UBI? Im starving
Its a matter of logic.
This is given out. You can choose for it to go to a based, gun toting, red blooded American
Or a foreign invader, whether intentionally or ignorant, whose sole purpose is to erase you and everyone you share one drop of blood with from both history and the future.
Even Jim Jordan voted for it.
I know it would take a very long time, but the whole thing needs to be read to understand why someone might vote for or against.
MSM headlines:
“New studies show How trafficking actually benefits victims”
You should know by now not to trust the name of bills. The dems always name their bills something benign or wholesome while hiding the most dastardly things in them.
If it passed all dems and is for human trafficking it’s highly suspicious.
No bill ever does what it's title implies.
The prevention and protection part is for the perpetrators, to prevent and protect them from getting caught.
Doesn't matter what's in it, you can go by the bills name that it's indeed the opposite, and verified by who votes for it.
If you haven't picked this up yet, you may want to consider taking up knitting instead...
They usurped it with ridiculous damaging and useless riders. There are already laws on the books Nd theybare being pursued by some. Vets 4 child rescue is one good one.
Same game plan they always use, for pedophilia, infanticide, cannibalism, illegal aliens, violent riots, illegal surveillance, drug abuse, human rights violations, medical malpractice, constitutional infringement, illegal seizures, illegal imprisonment…
👉Decriminalize it…if possible. If not:
👉Ignore existing laws against it
👉Normalize it in entertainment
👉Stir sympathy with Talking heads
👉Trot out “experts” to “re-educate” critical thinking
👉Prosecute opposition WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE
👉Force society and detractors to accept it
👉Repeat steps as necessary
🤡 Problem solved 🤡
You are witnessing “phase 1” of them solving a “problem”
Regardless of what any bill is named, there are always like 20 add ones for shady shit that most people, not even elected ones are going to read.
Then they play games like 'oh you voted against this perfectly normal bill to save puppies what a monster, and not mentioning the babies' killing provision 1000 pages in etc.
Democrats very frequently give legislation very misleading names designed to evoke emotional reaction. They then add woke bullshit to the bill. This is a problem where we lack a requirement that bills be single-issue.
It is designed to bait republicans with a moral compass to vote "Nay" so they can use that as a political hit.
First clue if Demonrats and Rinos are for it then it's CUCKED!!