It is amazing how many dolts there are out there. Just yesterday, I saw two people in a car with their masks on and at the grocery store, several more people were wearing them (at least double the amount since I'd been there last week). It is very bizarre... almost like a toddler's binky addiction. I also am triggered now by the floor stickers of feet denoting the six feet gap. It is time to take those off of the floor already as it was admittedly made up!
I ride a bike a few times a week, and sometimes the bugs get to be a problem as far as breathing them in! However, I've resisted the idea of wearing a bandana to filter them out, since I would be mistaken as a covid idiot :)
I often use a dust mask at work, to prevent DUST. Many times the first thing a homeowner says to me when they see me put my mask on is "Oh don't worry, I'm vaccinated" And I say Oh don't worry this is just for dust. It's irritating as hell.
I've noticed a larger percentage of POCs wearing masks. It's odd. You would think they would have the spirit to challenge narratives. This has been an interesting learning experience. Separated the wheat from the chaff.
If I recall correctly, the entire thing was based on a satanic ritual, 6 people, 6 ft apart, pentagram formation, all wearing ritual masks. That's probably why the sheep love it so much, they live in fear and love it when their masters tell them what to do.
Mask wearing was instituted to increase fatalities.
The masks (when worn more than once) carry the bacterial infections that cause pneumonia.
My guess is that a very large percentage of the people who died in 1918 from the "Spanish Flu" (that originated most likely from Rockefeller experimental vaccines on GIs, in Kansas) died because of the masks they were forced to wear.
So now we're arguing about the size of the virus and whether it could slip through the mesh of a face mask?
Let's start with the virus first. Was it ever isolated and purified? The CDC has provided the answer and it is "NO". How can anyone know the size then?
True, but it is also important to recognize how crucial this admission is.
Even for those who thought the virus was real (and nobody had proven it was not real until April 2021, when virologist Stefan Lanka did the experiment to prove that viruses are not real), the face mask mandate by a health department "official" was ... a MADE-UP LIE, with no evidence whatsoever.
In hindsight, it is understandable why there was never any evidence, since there is no virus from which to prove anything. But even in the context of thinking there really was a virus, the government employee who committed massive acts of fraud, coercion, and emotional distress on thousands of people ... LIED ABOUT ALL OF IT.
Thanks, Good response. What amazes me is from the 1918 Spanish flu experience, it was well recognized throughout the medical establishment that face masks didn't work to stop the spread of disease. This was later underscored by research conducted by OSHA for determining the use of face masks. Here, they focused their efforts on N95 face masks and categorized these (and some medical masks) as "respirators'. All other masks (cloth, etc.) were not recommended. The N95 was first produced by the 3M corporation and it was designed specifically for the coal mining industry.
OSHA studies verified what the medical industry learned from the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic about masks and proceeded in establishing regulations for their use. OSHA standards dealt with particulate size and use of respirators. 29 CFR 1910.146 Paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of the Respiratory Protection Standard states extensively its rationale for requiring that employees breathe air consisting of at least 19.5 percent oxygen.
“In some cases, respirator use itself can cause illness and injury to employees. There are a number of physiological burdens that are associated with the use of certain types of respirators. The weight of the respirator, breathing resistances during both normal operation and if the air-purifying element is overloaded, and rebreathing exhaled air from respirator "dead space" can all increase the physiologic burden of respirator use (Exs. 113, 22-1, 64-427). Job and workplace conditions, such as the length of time a respirator must be worn, the level of physical exertion required of a respirator user, and environmental conditions, can also affect the physiological burden (Exs. 113, 64-363). In addition, workers who wear glasses or hearing aids may have problems achieving appropriate fit with some respirator face pieces.”
All of this established consensus of over 100 years of study regarding face masks was thrown out the door. OSHA immediately amended and hid the past regulations with an "Update" claiming cloth face masks were now effective along with N95s in stopping viruses. Of course there was no legitimate study to back this.
It's obvious to me there are crimes against humanity. The face masks was always part of the Great Lie used to remind us everyday there was a 'virus' (Bogey man) out there under every bed and lurking in every human.
Yes, we knew all this early on. The people who ran OSHA, and lied about the decades of known data on face masks, also need to go to prison for their crimes.
On a similar note, I came across this publication from 1934. It is about fasting and sun bathing for health. It's a long read, and a bit tough due to the author's writing style from almost 100 years ago, but he throws in many, many bits of info that demonstrate that the "medical community" has been lying about facts and research for well over 100 years. He goes back into pre-Civil War era, discussing what was known then about human health, and how the government/medical monopoly had lied all along. Circa 1934, he laments how "modern times" have produced so little understanding of real human health.
I disagree with his pro-vegetarian stance, because I believe he is wrong about that, but the fasting information is really interesting. Also, he discusses sun tanning, and talks about all the fake "potions" that were available (sun tan lotions) that were not only not helpful, but downright harmful.
Even if you ballparked it based on sizes of other viruses that have been isolated, or even using the largest viruses known to exist, mask holes are still orders of magnitude larger and thus completely inefficient in stopping viral particles. Didn't work with smallpox and the plague, but of course we know better... With our Chinese technology lol
That is only valid if a virus has been isolated and purified. Except, we have to peel back all the layers of lies. What we find is no virus has ever been isolated. The entire virology field is based on a massive fraud. It was concocted for profit making in the pharmaceutical industry.
Did you watch the video I included? Around 1900-1930, scientists weren’t at all decided on which theory was correct. Germ theory took root after Rockefeller funded germ theory advocate Louis Pasteur “won” the discussion by presenting fraudulent proof of infection against terrain theory advocate Antoine Béchamps.
Another nail in the terrain theory coffin was the Rockefeller funded Carnegie Flexner report [archive.org, pdf] which weaponized politics in favor of centralized, drug-based medicine against natural medicine. It was a hostile takeover.
Why would somebody want this falsehood sustained?
Fear for organisms invading your body sells drugs and vaccines. Viruses also provide a cover explanation when people get sick from environmental toxicity or to perpetrate a pandemic power grab for totalitarian control.
What the medical establishment claims to be viruses, are manifestations of our own bodies that happen when there’s an insult. They are a reaction to toxins, a defense mechanism. They are not the cause of illness but the solution, created inside and by the body to solve a specific problem and they’re not transmissible.
So the idea of a virus as an infectious particle in the air or fluids causing infection and illness is false. That does not exist. At the very least, decent science to prove the notion, does not exist.
What the medical establishment claims to be viruses, are manifestations of our own bodies that happen when there’s an insult. They are a reaction to toxins, a defense mechanism.
Even this is not accurate -- or, at least, is not proven.
There has NEVER been a single virology experiment that shows what happens INSIDE the body. ALL of virology is conducted in a laboratory, and never looking inside the body.
What happens in a petri dish might or might not have anything to do with what really happens inside the human, living organism.
The experiments done in a lab by "virologists" ALWAYS (as in 100% of the time, not 99%) use a PROCESS THAT CREATES THE SO-CALLED "VIRUS."
See my other post here. They add things to the fluid sample, and add that to vero cells, and then poision the vero cells, and then the vero cells break down and die, and then photos are taken in an electron microscope, and THEN ... they claim they "see" the virus in the photos.
What they are seeing is nothing more than cellular debris.
No person has EVER seen what really happens inside the human body.
What you stated about what happens inside the body MIGHT be true, but there is NO EVIDENCE that it is.
It is ALL conjecture, without proof (or even solid evidence), which means ... IT IS ALL MADE UP.
"Lockdowns will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Social distancing will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Wearing face masks will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Taking a vaccine will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"A virus causes sickness, leading to a pandemic" ... is MADE UP.
"Even this is not accurate -- or, at least, is not proven."
Thanks, this was a copy/paste quote I overlooked. I see your point with that statement. I do see what she is getting at, but I believe it is misleading. I agree with everything you posted here. Germ theory heavily benefits pharmaceutical companies and the fraud is beyond fixing.
Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.
That is false.
Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.
You do not understand the process they use.
They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including gentimicin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("vero cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.
An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."
The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.
Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.
Those 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.
In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.
This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.
Lol... tell me you know nothing about virology without saying as much.
Stefan Lanka hasn't scientifically disproven anything. He is conveniently missing the right control groups that would have been a substantial finding had his theory been correct.
Kidney cells are not the only cells used in cell culture. Viruses of their respective families have the same physical characteristics as visualized via microscopy across a number of cell lines for which they are tropic.
COVID is still a scam, but not because viruses aren't real. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Stefan Lanka hasn't scientifically disproven anything. He is conveniently missing the right control groups that would have been a substantial finding had his theory been correct.
And, that means ... YOU CAN show us the "right control groups."
Let's see what ya got.
The fact that you just made a vague claim without fleshing it out, tells me you don't have anything else. You are just dreaming.
Kidney cells are not the only cells used in cell culture.
Vero cells are the most commonly used. Show me a study that uses something else, and does NOT also use a poison in the mix.
Besides that, you are ignoring the FACT that they have never isolated AND purified what they claim is a virus, from a bodily fluid of any human (or animal).
They never isolate and purify. Instead, they mix the fluid with other genetic material NOT from that subject, and proceed with the innoculation and poisoning.
COVID is still a scam, but not because viruses aren't real. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
You are wrong, and I know that you have no idea what you are talking about by the fact that you use vague language with no specificity and no substance.
I'm not writing a dissertation in response to a comment on a forum, smart guy. If that's your expectation in response to your claims (for which we notice that you yourself did not provide substantiary evidence. Hypocrisy, thou name art MAG768720), then you're destined to live in your own echo chamber.
Vero cells are used for culturing many viruses that are tropic for monkeys and kidneys, but other viruses that are tropic for multiple species or organs are grown in those cell cultures. Vero is not the most commonly used either. ATCC had a comprehensive list of those cell lines for further research on your own time, should you be interested. Methinks you are not, because you are drowning in the Koolaid of your own ignorance, but hey, you do you man.
Viruses are regularly purified by density gradient centrifugation. Next.
As far as Lanka goes, he just demonstrated that some cell culture components are capable of causing CPE at certain concentrations, given enough time. There's a reason laboratories titer their media components to ensure they're not making cells sick on their own before testing anything else on them. All conditions have to be the same on an experiment, save the single condition being tested. Plus or minus virus.
If he wanted to demonstrate that viruses in culture are not causing CPE, he would need to culture a sample in their correct cell line for a positive group, and then culture cells regularly without the virus, or if he wanted to be extra smart, coincubate sonicated cells from samples from uninfected individuals. Monitor CPE. Or, if one is limited access to human samples, or concerned with narrowing down which components of cell culture are causing CPE, you can just take the supernatants from first cultures and use them to infect a secondary cell culture to observe CPE. This would demonstrate that an extracellular component was capable of causing CPE in the positive vs negative control. He could also test intracellular components by sonicating the cell layer of the first set of experimental groups, and using the cell lysates to infect and observe CPE over time. This is pretty basic virological and cell culture techniques. You can also run western blots, immunofluorescent microscopy, electron microscopy, PCR or sequencing to further narrow down what is causing the issue. There is sufficient evidence that viruses are real and they induce pathological effects that can be reliably documented.
I have a PhD. Second thought after publishing my first paper: If I can publish THIS, anyone can publish anything (first thought was relief that I didn’t have to do more revisions lol).
Every human is biased at the very least. They may also be negligent and/or malevolent.
True. An editor for both Lancet and for Journal of American Medical Association both stated on the record, independently, that at least half (i.e. "most") of what is published in their "prestigious" journals is false.
What's even sadder is that people just bought into this shit with zero thought. When we asked in the very start of this that we wanted to see a clean sample of the covid-19 virus we were attacked over it. Really? Don't you idiots want to see an actual clean covid-19 virus so we can study it? FYI to this day there is NO clean sample of this aledged virus for scientist to study.
That was my first thought when I saw this. That they are laying the groundwork for a narrative of wide eyed innocence. That would work for about the first two weeks when most people really didn't know what was up but the second you agreed to the cancelation of any other theories or treatments, you are guilty as fucking sin. No. No way do you skate on this. You destroyed people's lives and sorry just ain't going to cut it. You rammed a shit sandwich down people's throats without ever taking a bite yourself. Guess what? It's your dinnertime
The Bangladesh study? You mean the one who showed there's barely like a 5% increased protection "if everyone wears their mask perfectly well at all times" , which is impossible, look around you, people keep removing their mask for no reason, or don't even cover their nose, just the mouth. Even politicians couldn't do it.
Or the same one that says something like "To save 1 life, 21000 people must wear their mask perfectly well at all times", so basically, a number so pathetically low it may just be statistical noise. At this point, you may just run outside for 3 minutes, it's going to be much better for your health (unless you're vaccinated I guess?).
We're talking about this study then, right? If you actually looked at it, you'd have noticed the flaws immediately.
Now the world can shove all those dirty looks I got for not wearing a snot diaper, straight up their asses. Vindicated, yet again. Just your average every day "conspiracy theorist" if all you listen to is corporate media.
I don't think they ever claimed masks would stop individual virus particles; they seemed to suggest it was only intended to stop coughs and sneezes from spreading "mist", or from stopping such "mist" from being breathed in. The thing is, most masks worn let all sorts of unfiltered breath in and out; it was ALWAYS mostly just symbolic. Now the general public's belief in masks function/performance is another matter.
I don't think they ever claimed masks would stop individual virus particles; they seemed to suggest it was only intended to stop coughs and sneezes from spreading "mist", or from stopping such "mist" from being breathed in.
Interestingly the article has been pulled, and Kirsch says that it was published prematurely before he had attorney authorization. Looks like the cat is out of the bag a little early but you can’t read the full article anymore, not yet anyway.
well i mean we kinda already fkin knew this but i guess my question now is that how are we gonna hold her accountable? you know how many people lost their fucking jobs and the insane amount of histeria that happened just because this bitch was "playing it by ear" cmon
There isn't actually much in the way of joy at being right here. What satisfaction there is in people telling the truth is, unfortunately, darkly colored by the sometimes irreparable damage done through the Plandemic and its accompanying horrors.
I'm looking forward to Covid masks being used during robberies, if it hasn't already happened. Nyah nyah, can't identify me. Now gimme the cash. They mandated this shit. Time to own it.
It is amazing how many dolts there are out there. Just yesterday, I saw two people in a car with their masks on and at the grocery store, several more people were wearing them (at least double the amount since I'd been there last week). It is very bizarre... almost like a toddler's binky addiction. I also am triggered now by the floor stickers of feet denoting the six feet gap. It is time to take those off of the floor already as it was admittedly made up!
Yesterday I saw I big black dude standing at an intersection, waiting to cross, wearing a mask. Zero other pedestrians around.
Best is the person who is alone in a car with two masks on and latex gloves.
And the people who wear them while swimming in the ocean.
I ride a bike a few times a week, and sometimes the bugs get to be a problem as far as breathing them in! However, I've resisted the idea of wearing a bandana to filter them out, since I would be mistaken as a covid idiot :)
I often use a dust mask at work, to prevent DUST. Many times the first thing a homeowner says to me when they see me put my mask on is "Oh don't worry, I'm vaccinated" And I say Oh don't worry this is just for dust. It's irritating as hell.
Also the amount of people who think the vaccination actually works 🤦🏼♀️ That drives me BATTY.
And because of the covid nonsense, dust masks at Home Depot, if you can even get them, are outrageously overpriced!
Klaus Schwab says don't worry about the bugs.
Vee vill have to charge you three dollars fifty for all the bugs you ate on your bike rides this year
And a face shield.
The worst is when the dumb fuck doesn’t even put the mask over the nose….like wtf are you doing?
I've noticed a larger percentage of POCs wearing masks. It's odd. You would think they would have the spirit to challenge narratives. This has been an interesting learning experience. Separated the wheat from the chaff.
I’m seeing more again too… why??? I’ve come to ignore them almost completely
Fauci can't be accused of being wrong about masks, because he said every possible answer about masks over time.
Exactly! And didn't we just find out this week that the whole 6 foot thing was made up?
If I recall correctly, the entire thing was based on a satanic ritual, 6 people, 6 ft apart, pentagram formation, all wearing ritual masks. That's probably why the sheep love it so much, they live in fear and love it when their masters tell them what to do.
That was known by skeptics from the beginning.
tar and feathers are in order
Agree!
Mask wearing was instituted to increase fatalities.
The masks (when worn more than once) carry the bacterial infections that cause pneumonia.
My guess is that a very large percentage of the people who died in 1918 from the "Spanish Flu" (that originated most likely from Rockefeller experimental vaccines on GIs, in Kansas) died because of the masks they were forced to wear.
So now we're arguing about the size of the virus and whether it could slip through the mesh of a face mask?
Let's start with the virus first. Was it ever isolated and purified? The CDC has provided the answer and it is "NO". How can anyone know the size then?
True, but it is also important to recognize how crucial this admission is.
Even for those who thought the virus was real (and nobody had proven it was not real until April 2021, when virologist Stefan Lanka did the experiment to prove that viruses are not real), the face mask mandate by a health department "official" was ... a MADE-UP LIE, with no evidence whatsoever.
In hindsight, it is understandable why there was never any evidence, since there is no virus from which to prove anything. But even in the context of thinking there really was a virus, the government employee who committed massive acts of fraud, coercion, and emotional distress on thousands of people ... LIED ABOUT ALL OF IT.
She needs to be prosecuted for her crimes.
Thanks, Good response. What amazes me is from the 1918 Spanish flu experience, it was well recognized throughout the medical establishment that face masks didn't work to stop the spread of disease. This was later underscored by research conducted by OSHA for determining the use of face masks. Here, they focused their efforts on N95 face masks and categorized these (and some medical masks) as "respirators'. All other masks (cloth, etc.) were not recommended. The N95 was first produced by the 3M corporation and it was designed specifically for the coal mining industry.
OSHA studies verified what the medical industry learned from the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic about masks and proceeded in establishing regulations for their use. OSHA standards dealt with particulate size and use of respirators. 29 CFR 1910.146 Paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of the Respiratory Protection Standard states extensively its rationale for requiring that employees breathe air consisting of at least 19.5 percent oxygen.
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08
OSHA further states the following:
“In some cases, respirator use itself can cause illness and injury to employees. There are a number of physiological burdens that are associated with the use of certain types of respirators. The weight of the respirator, breathing resistances during both normal operation and if the air-purifying element is overloaded, and rebreathing exhaled air from respirator "dead space" can all increase the physiologic burden of respirator use (Exs. 113, 22-1, 64-427). Job and workplace conditions, such as the length of time a respirator must be worn, the level of physical exertion required of a respirator user, and environmental conditions, can also affect the physiological burden (Exs. 113, 64-363). In addition, workers who wear glasses or hearing aids may have problems achieving appropriate fit with some respirator face pieces.”
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08
All of this established consensus of over 100 years of study regarding face masks was thrown out the door. OSHA immediately amended and hid the past regulations with an "Update" claiming cloth face masks were now effective along with N95s in stopping viruses. Of course there was no legitimate study to back this.
It's obvious to me there are crimes against humanity. The face masks was always part of the Great Lie used to remind us everyday there was a 'virus' (Bogey man) out there under every bed and lurking in every human.
Yes, we knew all this early on. The people who ran OSHA, and lied about the decades of known data on face masks, also need to go to prison for their crimes.
On a similar note, I came across this publication from 1934. It is about fasting and sun bathing for health. It's a long read, and a bit tough due to the author's writing style from almost 100 years ago, but he throws in many, many bits of info that demonstrate that the "medical community" has been lying about facts and research for well over 100 years. He goes back into pre-Civil War era, discussing what was known then about human health, and how the government/medical monopoly had lied all along. Circa 1934, he laments how "modern times" have produced so little understanding of real human health.
I disagree with his pro-vegetarian stance, because I believe he is wrong about that, but the fasting information is really interesting. Also, he discusses sun tanning, and talks about all the fake "potions" that were available (sun tan lotions) that were not only not helpful, but downright harmful.
You might want to check it out.
http://loveandtruth.net/shelton-fasting.html
Thanks, I'll look at it.
Even if you ballparked it based on sizes of other viruses that have been isolated, or even using the largest viruses known to exist, mask holes are still orders of magnitude larger and thus completely inefficient in stopping viral particles. Didn't work with smallpox and the plague, but of course we know better... With our Chinese technology lol
That is only valid if a virus has been isolated and purified. Except, we have to peel back all the layers of lies. What we find is no virus has ever been isolated. The entire virology field is based on a massive fraud. It was concocted for profit making in the pharmaceutical industry.
You give too much credit to pharma. Virology may have been exploited for profit, but it wasn't concocted for such.
Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.
Did you watch the video I included? Around 1900-1930, scientists weren’t at all decided on which theory was correct. Germ theory took root after Rockefeller funded germ theory advocate Louis Pasteur “won” the discussion by presenting fraudulent proof of infection against terrain theory advocate Antoine Béchamps.
Another nail in the terrain theory coffin was the Rockefeller funded Carnegie Flexner report [archive.org, pdf] which weaponized politics in favor of centralized, drug-based medicine against natural medicine. It was a hostile takeover.
Why would somebody want this falsehood sustained? Fear for organisms invading your body sells drugs and vaccines. Viruses also provide a cover explanation when people get sick from environmental toxicity or to perpetrate a pandemic power grab for totalitarian control.
What the medical establishment claims to be viruses, are manifestations of our own bodies that happen when there’s an insult. They are a reaction to toxins, a defense mechanism. They are not the cause of illness but the solution, created inside and by the body to solve a specific problem and they’re not transmissible.
We know they’re not transmissible because scientists tried to infect healthy people with the Spanish flu using fluids from the sick. They squirted the fluids in the nose, throat and even injected it. The healthy did NOT took ill.
So the idea of a virus as an infectious particle in the air or fluids causing infection and illness is false. That does not exist. At the very least, decent science to prove the notion, does not exist.
Even this is not accurate -- or, at least, is not proven.
There has NEVER been a single virology experiment that shows what happens INSIDE the body. ALL of virology is conducted in a laboratory, and never looking inside the body.
What happens in a petri dish might or might not have anything to do with what really happens inside the human, living organism.
The experiments done in a lab by "virologists" ALWAYS (as in 100% of the time, not 99%) use a PROCESS THAT CREATES THE SO-CALLED "VIRUS."
See my other post here. They add things to the fluid sample, and add that to vero cells, and then poision the vero cells, and then the vero cells break down and die, and then photos are taken in an electron microscope, and THEN ... they claim they "see" the virus in the photos.
What they are seeing is nothing more than cellular debris.
No person has EVER seen what really happens inside the human body.
What you stated about what happens inside the body MIGHT be true, but there is NO EVIDENCE that it is.
It is ALL conjecture, without proof (or even solid evidence), which means ... IT IS ALL MADE UP.
"Lockdowns will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Social distancing will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Wearing face masks will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"Taking a vaccine will save lives" ... is MADE UP.
"A virus causes sickness, leading to a pandemic" ... is MADE UP.
"The virus exists" ... is MADE UP.
Thanks, this was a copy/paste quote I overlooked. I see your point with that statement. I do see what she is getting at, but I believe it is misleading. I agree with everything you posted here. Germ theory heavily benefits pharmaceutical companies and the fraud is beyond fixing.
That is false.
Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.
You do not understand the process they use.
They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including gentimicin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("vero cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.
An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."
The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.
Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.
Those 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.
In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.
This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.
Lol... tell me you know nothing about virology without saying as much.
Stefan Lanka hasn't scientifically disproven anything. He is conveniently missing the right control groups that would have been a substantial finding had his theory been correct.
Kidney cells are not the only cells used in cell culture. Viruses of their respective families have the same physical characteristics as visualized via microscopy across a number of cell lines for which they are tropic.
COVID is still a scam, but not because viruses aren't real. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
And, that means ... YOU CAN show us the "right control groups."
Let's see what ya got.
The fact that you just made a vague claim without fleshing it out, tells me you don't have anything else. You are just dreaming.
Vero cells are the most commonly used. Show me a study that uses something else, and does NOT also use a poison in the mix.
Besides that, you are ignoring the FACT that they have never isolated AND purified what they claim is a virus, from a bodily fluid of any human (or animal).
They never isolate and purify. Instead, they mix the fluid with other genetic material NOT from that subject, and proceed with the innoculation and poisoning.
You are wrong, and I know that you have no idea what you are talking about by the fact that you use vague language with no specificity and no substance.
I'm not writing a dissertation in response to a comment on a forum, smart guy. If that's your expectation in response to your claims (for which we notice that you yourself did not provide substantiary evidence. Hypocrisy, thou name art MAG768720), then you're destined to live in your own echo chamber.
Vero cells are used for culturing many viruses that are tropic for monkeys and kidneys, but other viruses that are tropic for multiple species or organs are grown in those cell cultures. Vero is not the most commonly used either. ATCC had a comprehensive list of those cell lines for further research on your own time, should you be interested. Methinks you are not, because you are drowning in the Koolaid of your own ignorance, but hey, you do you man.
Viruses are regularly purified by density gradient centrifugation. Next.
As far as Lanka goes, he just demonstrated that some cell culture components are capable of causing CPE at certain concentrations, given enough time. There's a reason laboratories titer their media components to ensure they're not making cells sick on their own before testing anything else on them. All conditions have to be the same on an experiment, save the single condition being tested. Plus or minus virus.
If he wanted to demonstrate that viruses in culture are not causing CPE, he would need to culture a sample in their correct cell line for a positive group, and then culture cells regularly without the virus, or if he wanted to be extra smart, coincubate sonicated cells from samples from uninfected individuals. Monitor CPE. Or, if one is limited access to human samples, or concerned with narrowing down which components of cell culture are causing CPE, you can just take the supernatants from first cultures and use them to infect a secondary cell culture to observe CPE. This would demonstrate that an extracellular component was capable of causing CPE in the positive vs negative control. He could also test intracellular components by sonicating the cell layer of the first set of experimental groups, and using the cell lysates to infect and observe CPE over time. This is pretty basic virological and cell culture techniques. You can also run western blots, immunofluorescent microscopy, electron microscopy, PCR or sequencing to further narrow down what is causing the issue. There is sufficient evidence that viruses are real and they induce pathological effects that can be reliably documented.
Spoiler alert: every study is flawed.
I have a PhD. Second thought after publishing my first paper: If I can publish THIS, anyone can publish anything (first thought was relief that I didn’t have to do more revisions lol).
Every human is biased at the very least. They may also be negligent and/or malevolent.
True. An editor for both Lancet and for Journal of American Medical Association both stated on the record, independently, that at least half (i.e. "most") of what is published in their "prestigious" journals is false.
In his book the Psychology of Totalitarianism, Matis Desmet devotes a section to this - how there was a scandal in academia about 15-20 years ago.
Familiarity breeds contempt.
Folks on the outside think that the Ivory Tower is a lot more ideal, perfect, clean, etc. than it is.
Folks on the inside see the flaws.
And worldview determines a lot.
How one answers "what is the end of man" will determine where the rest of his bias' lean towards.
What's even sadder is that people just bought into this shit with zero thought. When we asked in the very start of this that we wanted to see a clean sample of the covid-19 virus we were attacked over it. Really? Don't you idiots want to see an actual clean covid-19 virus so we can study it? FYI to this day there is NO clean sample of this aledged virus for scientist to study.
"It's not my fault, I was tRuStInG the daTa"
That's how so many of these slimebags, are going to get out it. "Look I was just trusting the science"
That was my first thought when I saw this. That they are laying the groundwork for a narrative of wide eyed innocence. That would work for about the first two weeks when most people really didn't know what was up but the second you agreed to the cancelation of any other theories or treatments, you are guilty as fucking sin. No. No way do you skate on this. You destroyed people's lives and sorry just ain't going to cut it. You rammed a shit sandwich down people's throats without ever taking a bite yourself. Guess what? It's your dinnertime
As a certain someone said - no deals.
Some Jew realtor said to me "I trust the science" and I said "whose science? He who pays the piper gets to pick the tune." and he looked confused.
I've seen that confused look.
The Bangladesh study? You mean the one who showed there's barely like a 5% increased protection "if everyone wears their mask perfectly well at all times" , which is impossible, look around you, people keep removing their mask for no reason, or don't even cover their nose, just the mouth. Even politicians couldn't do it.
Or the same one that says something like "To save 1 life, 21000 people must wear their mask perfectly well at all times", so basically, a number so pathetically low it may just be statistical noise. At this point, you may just run outside for 3 minutes, it's going to be much better for your health (unless you're vaccinated I guess?).
We're talking about this study then, right? If you actually looked at it, you'd have noticed the flaws immediately.
This video covers the absurdity rather well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0Nk1iwbLtw
Why would they admit it when they usually always just double down?
Now the world can shove all those dirty looks I got for not wearing a snot diaper, straight up their asses. Vindicated, yet again. Just your average every day "conspiracy theorist" if all you listen to is corporate media.
I don't think they ever claimed masks would stop individual virus particles; they seemed to suggest it was only intended to stop coughs and sneezes from spreading "mist", or from stopping such "mist" from being breathed in. The thing is, most masks worn let all sorts of unfiltered breath in and out; it was ALWAYS mostly just symbolic. Now the general public's belief in masks function/performance is another matter.
Seems like a distinction without a difference.
The leaders of the mass formation believe in the narrative so strongly that they are willing to lie and do misdeeds to perpetuate it.
Interestingly the article has been pulled, and Kirsch says that it was published prematurely before he had attorney authorization. Looks like the cat is out of the bag a little early but you can’t read the full article anymore, not yet anyway.
well i mean we kinda already fkin knew this but i guess my question now is that how are we gonna hold her accountable? you know how many people lost their fucking jobs and the insane amount of histeria that happened just because this bitch was "playing it by ear" cmon
And Dr. Fauci we’ll have a lot to answer for…
For those who might feel like something wicked this way comes, but cannot exactly put their finger on it ... meet the enemy:
Shots: From Eugenics to Pandemics
Pretend all you want. You won’t escape the crimes you have committed.
The word doctor should become synonymous with “little bitch”. Or at least “chickenshit liar”.
Of course some should just be rightly called “murderer”.
There isn't actually much in the way of joy at being right here. What satisfaction there is in people telling the truth is, unfortunately, darkly colored by the sometimes irreparable damage done through the Plandemic and its accompanying horrors.
I'm looking forward to Covid masks being used during robberies, if it hasn't already happened. Nyah nyah, can't identify me. Now gimme the cash. They mandated this shit. Time to own it.
I'm in santa clara.. let's hope we're never bullied into this bullshit mask crap again!