California slides further into Orwellian realm….. this can’t be constitutional.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
And what constitutes false information?
(I think I know the answer)
Exactly. Everything is shifty with these people. They are constructing it so it’s whatever they want it to be
IMO this will backfire on them big time.
I can hear In the Hall of the Mountain King now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okw8mZbz_6U
I forgot how great that video is. Thanks! 😁
This.
Galileo is flip flopping in his grave like a freaking mad man. I'm waiting for them to start literal witch trails because the Wiccans start recommending herbal remedies that might work etc etc. These people have totally lost it.
I think we're far more likely to get a wiccan as Fauci's replacement.
True, but every once in a while they will eat their own.
It's what we decide, regardless of the facts and studies we choose to suppress. Tow the line or off to the gulags with you.
Ivermectin
works
Still covid free.
There is no "balance". Free speech is free speech.
By the government infringing upon it, they are breaking the Constitution.
Unfortunately who holds government to account? It's supposed to be citizens
Mirror.
When the shit hits the fan, I don't really think the DS are going to have the blame lay at their feet. Because the normies just totally go with whatever the Gov't and CNN tell them, the next step is "well, nobody forced you to get it".
This will wake normies up, but not in the way we want. They will immediately turn on the doctors saying "why didn't you tell us the dangers?"
These scumbags like the mirror thing, and a mirror works both ways.
The Democratic People’s Republic of California.
California went off the charts years ago. Cant fix stupid.
All doctor's now agree! because it's illegal to disagree. Sounds like a wonderful system.
Great, then how bout we punish ALL of the doctors claiming the vaxx is safe and effective? We have PROOF of disability and death from these poison vaxxes.
To be honest they should be turning on the doctors, nurses, pharmacists, politicians, police and any other group responsible for the poison vaccine forced on everyone. Any doctor that did not or does not speak up is complicit period and needs to go down with the rest of the criminals.
they should, but they won't.
Most won't even feel guilty for more than an hour when the truth is widely accepted.
Just in time when the narrative is falling apart an anyone still claiming vaccines are effective, safe or necessary can be prosecuted under this!
u/#topkek
Last I heard is Newscum has to sign it. Go ahead. Sign it. Then run for President.
not like they already dont, this just seems like something that could blow up in their faces by forcing it to go to court and the facts be heard.
Apparently they think it isn't censorship -- it's just "striking a balance."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/29/technology/california-doctors-covid-misinformation.html
Google gets another "fact check" contract.
Forced into political lies.
Citizens need to flood the system with lawsuits against doctors who claim the vaccines are safe AND effective.
Oh? And "who" determines what is true and what if false or fake, I wonder?
They're writing a law that they'll be prosecuted with in the future (assuming a judge doesn't strike it down).
that is so subjective , this leads to abuse.
No more safe and effective then?
The silver lining about this is that it will effectively remove the good doctors from California. Leaving Californians even closer to becoming a barbaric state and helping to relieve the doctor shortage in other states.
But telling parents that puberty blockers are 100% safe and reversible is just fine.
Guess we won’t be hearing anymore false information such as, “safe and effective”.
This is unconstitutional, and will be struck down.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969 clarified Schenck v. United States, 1919 about government limits regarding the 1st Amendment. The California bill clearly oversteps those extremely narrow limits.
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/schenck-v-united-states-defining-the-limits-of-free-speech
wokeapedia sucks, but they have a decent page about it as well:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States
What makes you think that the population of California, or the US, are living under the jurisdiction of the constitution?
The last two years should be pretty clear evidence that this isn't the case.
This might help: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nTuQoDQt23hf/
Raises some issues and factoids it's good to be aware of. imo. (Although, don;t take everything said in this as gospel, if you know what I mean)