Just humiliate them with photos of curved water on a still flat lake. the only way To get those people is with cold hard facts. They are not swayed by theories of gravity or Stanley Kubrick's NASA films anymore. Even the new NASA "images" are being scoffed at as if NASA uses Photoshop. Humiliate them with live go pro footage of rocket launch to landing. 1931 Pickard will be proven wrong.
Not to be a jerk but there is a photo of Mars terrain on the NASA site that when you zoom in there is a small animal in the image. I will see if I can find the link.
No problem pointing out inconvenient truths. Nobody can say how it got there. A rat was also filmed during a spacewalk as well. Rats are nasty and the get in the darnedest places. If a space pirate ship landed there anytime in the infinite past, then obviously there could be Stray space rats. I'm not a rocket scientist so I can't prove or disprove the existence of space rats.
Yes, and in paleoclimate courses in college in the 90's also. It is all based on the data of isotope ratios from the glaciers of Greenland and Antarctica.
We have climate data from the isotope ratios in seashells going back 550 million years as well. The climate hoax required all of that paleoclimate data to be ignored so they could spread the false narrative that carbon dioxide controls the Earth's climate.
You can find graphs of the Earth's climate going back 500 million years at the link below if you are interested:
The glowbull warming scam was my introduction to how much science is corrupted. Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist, has been saying that the sun, not CO2, is the driver of our climate for years. The PTB really gave this poor guy a rough ride because he was telling the truth.
I saw a solar physicist on YT--never saved it alas--make the argument that the sun is almost 100% controlling climate. Nothing else comes close. SO convincing!
Money shot: Solar physics can actually create a real, PREDICTIVE model for forecasting Earth's climate. (hockey sticks? lol) Solar physicists are better at predicting climate than "climatologists", meteorologists, etc....I'm going to look for it to find a link for this thread...
Wait, the varying output of the celestial object that provides all our light and heat can affect our temperature? π€― What can we now blame on the producing members of society in order to get out stuff for free?
I'm still waiting for the giant solar system dynamo theory to show up. We have electrons and rotating magnetic fields moving through a steady stream of electrons and a rotating magnetic field, so it must be doing something grand in our solar system.
It's not nuclear fire. The sun is a ball of metallic hydrogen and is producing heat and light electrically. Everything in the universe is connected by, governed by, and created or destroyed by electromagnetism.
Sky Scholar is a good one. Adjacent to the subject is Thunderbolts Project. Both are seeking to explain and research another, older theory of cosmology.
Ben Davidson I have not heard. I know about an author Robert Felix. He said about the same about the 12, 000 cycle. We should be going into ice age soon.
I have stated this multiple times here, recently. The sun and solar system drives 99.9% of what happens on this planet in regards to climate. If the sun changes with more solar output or less, it directly and hugely effects our climate. The moon is a distant second compared to the sun, followed even further down by the other planets in our system. Everything else is very minute in magnitude. All of these things are carefully balanced to get the environment that we live in. Any one of these changes and we will experience large climate effects. Everything else on this planet is balanced as well, within a closed system, however it does not cause great climate effects when the balance is upset, it causes temporary changes that causes disruption to the normal patterns, but the system is closed and rebalances itself very quickly compared to the geological time scale. Effectively, we can affect weather, but we would have a very difficult time in changing the climate. As an example of relativity, research the eruption of Krakatoa in 1883. This volcanic eruption blew an estimated six cubic miles of matter into the atmosphere up to 50 miles straight up. The amount of CO2 and other gases released is unmeasureable. The eruption was equated to 200 megatons of TNT. In comparison the atomic bombs dropped on Japan was far weaker. This massive release of energy also created a 120ft tall tsunami that wiped out coastlines of nearby ocean front of neighboring islands and spread out to lesser strength to devastate hundreds of miles of further coastlines. Tens of thousands died from the relatively sparse population in Java, to the larger populations killed by the tsunami. The eruption was heard nearly 3000 miles away in Austrailia.
I've been following solar weather for quite a few years. I can predict overcast days by cme events. And a warming trend following a large earth bound cme. It's just like clockwork. And it causes forecasts to change predictably, when they are wrong.
Sunspots not so much (as far as my ability to predict). Flares and CMEs definitely. Usually get 2-3 days warning of when they'll hit us. But I'm beginning to see patterns in the weather before the CME events happen. Haven't paid enough attention to know for sure yet.
IT (Bright Ball in Sky) causes 98-99% of the Carbon in Our Atmosphere! But Carbon Only Makes Up About .03-.04% of the Air Mixture We Breathe!! Of that .03-.04% of the Total Carbon Amount, Human/Animal Population Contributes less than <1%!! And "What On Earth", Benefits from the Carbon in the Atmosphere and Grows During the "Process of Photosynthesis"!! Grasses/Plants/Trees!!
Holt sh*t! I just went out and took a peak. Its real !!
F*ck you and your disinformation. l'll wait for CNN to say whether it's safe to believe or not.
Masks! Masks for our eyes! That will protect us from that big, burning ball of flame!! Double mask to be certain!!!
Kek.
I know someone who would say that.
LOL
Oh wow! I am going to go look later. A big ball of burning light? I wondered why the sky was lighted.
Flat Earthtards entering the chat in 3....2...1..
Just humiliate them with photos of curved water on a still flat lake. the only way To get those people is with cold hard facts. They are not swayed by theories of gravity or Stanley Kubrick's NASA films anymore. Even the new NASA "images" are being scoffed at as if NASA uses Photoshop. Humiliate them with live go pro footage of rocket launch to landing. 1931 Pickard will be proven wrong.
Not to be a jerk but there is a photo of Mars terrain on the NASA site that when you zoom in there is a small animal in the image. I will see if I can find the link.
I would like to see. LOL
No problem pointing out inconvenient truths. Nobody can say how it got there. A rat was also filmed during a spacewalk as well. Rats are nasty and the get in the darnedest places. If a space pirate ship landed there anytime in the infinite past, then obviously there could be Stray space rats. I'm not a rocket scientist so I can't prove or disprove the existence of space rats.
Up vote for "Flat Earthtards."
Science is repeatable. Check again in 12 hours to see if its still there
Thanks bro. I almost fell for the conspirawcy theorasts!!
Did you take a gander in your shorts or tightie whities?????
πππππππππ€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£πππππ
This was taught to me in elementary school, early 80's.
And that Aqua Net was going to destroy the ozone laterπΈ
I probably had a hole dedicated to me just from the amount I used in potato guns and on my 1980s rock and roll hair.
Lmaoπ
Good 'ol Aqua Net....ts ts ts tssss
Yes, and in paleoclimate courses in college in the 90's also. It is all based on the data of isotope ratios from the glaciers of Greenland and Antarctica.
We have climate data from the isotope ratios in seashells going back 550 million years as well. The climate hoax required all of that paleoclimate data to be ignored so they could spread the false narrative that carbon dioxide controls the Earth's climate.
You can find graphs of the Earth's climate going back 500 million years at the link below if you are interested:
https://www.c3headlines.com/temperature-charts-historical-proxies.html
The latest hoax is to try to demonize Nitrogen, but I don't think that is working out for them...
Nitrogen, like what's used to fertilize soil? I'm not surprised.
The REAL problem is oxygen. WE must rid the air of all oxygen to make it safe for humans to live.
Hahaha. I learn that also.
Ok, we better sacrifice a virgin!
That usually works!
Fauci will do it for you.
If Hillary is still alive,she might have some useful tips on the best way to do it too!
Yeah, Hillary is despicable.
You're on the money there. What a creature!
In this day and age...good luck in finding one!!!!
You are right on that one. They are very thin on the ground now!
Pretty soon they will report that the tilt of the Earth causes the change in seasons, and that it gets colder at night when the sun is down :)
Most possible theory.
The glowbull warming scam was my introduction to how much science is corrupted. Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist, has been saying that the sun, not CO2, is the driver of our climate for years. The PTB really gave this poor guy a rough ride because he was telling the truth.
I finally understood their lies once I heard Rover up there on Mars is putting out so much CO2 and Mars warming just like Earth.
Grand Solar Minimum. Maunder Minimum was the last one, weβre heading into the Eddy Minimum now....
Trump: βItβs going to get a lot colderβ...
Yes. I heard that also.
I saw a solar physicist on YT--never saved it alas--make the argument that the sun is almost 100% controlling climate. Nothing else comes close. SO convincing!
Money shot: Solar physics can actually create a real, PREDICTIVE model for forecasting Earth's climate. (hockey sticks? lol) Solar physicists are better at predicting climate than "climatologists", meteorologists, etc....I'm going to look for it to find a link for this thread...
Yeah. If you can find the link, I'll like to see it.
Thanks.
Wait, the varying output of the celestial object that provides all our light and heat can affect our temperature? π€― What can we now blame on the producing members of society in order to get out stuff for free?
Without the sun, we will all have major problem. Like we won't be able to survive.
I'm still waiting for the giant solar system dynamo theory to show up. We have electrons and rotating magnetic fields moving through a steady stream of electrons and a rotating magnetic field, so it must be doing something grand in our solar system.
It's not nuclear fire. The sun is a ball of metallic hydrogen and is producing heat and light electrically. Everything in the universe is connected by, governed by, and created or destroyed by electromagnetism.
Have always been told sun is nuclear. Any info on metallic hydrogen?
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/
Let people smarter than me who have been working on it for decades explain it
Yeah, let those scientists figure it out.
It's an Exotic Vacuum Object, or quintillions of little EVO's.
These people have found out how to make one, and also how to measure an EVO.
Its more about ball lightning and static electricity than anything else.
https://remoteview.substack.com/
Sky Scholar is a good one. Adjacent to the subject is Thunderbolts Project. Both are seeking to explain and research another, older theory of cosmology.
Here is one vid explaining LMH
Hey, this is really good. Thanks.
Ben Davidson I have not heard. I know about an author Robert Felix. He said about the same about the 12, 000 cycle. We should be going into ice age soon.
The joke went over your head.
Scientists baffIed, can't explain correlation between absence of Iarge skybaII and cooling of temps.
Those scientists are very baffled.
Fuckβ¦. We might need to blow up the sun in order to stop this warmingβ¦.. π
LOL
Plenty of talk about dimming the sun throughout the last decade.
Yeah. Didn't Bill Gates want to to that in Finland or Norway and got people all rife up and they kicked him out?
It was about scattering particles in the atmosphere that'd reflect the sun back, so, not sure how they could stop him.
I have stated this multiple times here, recently. The sun and solar system drives 99.9% of what happens on this planet in regards to climate. If the sun changes with more solar output or less, it directly and hugely effects our climate. The moon is a distant second compared to the sun, followed even further down by the other planets in our system. Everything else is very minute in magnitude. All of these things are carefully balanced to get the environment that we live in. Any one of these changes and we will experience large climate effects. Everything else on this planet is balanced as well, within a closed system, however it does not cause great climate effects when the balance is upset, it causes temporary changes that causes disruption to the normal patterns, but the system is closed and rebalances itself very quickly compared to the geological time scale. Effectively, we can affect weather, but we would have a very difficult time in changing the climate. As an example of relativity, research the eruption of Krakatoa in 1883. This volcanic eruption blew an estimated six cubic miles of matter into the atmosphere up to 50 miles straight up. The amount of CO2 and other gases released is unmeasureable. The eruption was equated to 200 megatons of TNT. In comparison the atomic bombs dropped on Japan was far weaker. This massive release of energy also created a 120ft tall tsunami that wiped out coastlines of nearby ocean front of neighboring islands and spread out to lesser strength to devastate hundreds of miles of further coastlines. Tens of thousands died from the relatively sparse population in Java, to the larger populations killed by the tsunami. The eruption was heard nearly 3000 miles away in Austrailia.
Yes, I know about the Krakatoa. Just like Mt St. Helens, it disrupted the weather in Pacific NW for a while but no long time effects.
Right now we have 54 last count of volcanoes going. No one talks about the effects of them. Mum is the word.
u/#kek
I've been following solar weather for quite a few years. I can predict overcast days by cme events. And a warming trend following a large earth bound cme. It's just like clockwork. And it causes forecasts to change predictably, when they are wrong.
Interesting. Solar weather, you mean like sunspots and flares?
Sunspots not so much (as far as my ability to predict). Flares and CMEs definitely. Usually get 2-3 days warning of when they'll hit us. But I'm beginning to see patterns in the weather before the CME events happen. Haven't paid enough attention to know for sure yet.
But, but, but maybe our carbon footprint here on earth is causing the sun to emit more radiation. You see, so it is us humans causing climate change.
The dopes don't like to admit they were wrong so they'd probably believe my statement above.
Of course. Just like those jabbed said it cannot be the vaccines. It has to be something else causing all the young athletes to collapsed on tv.
Truth is so toxic to them.
Not many good scie test out there apparently.
Oh no, I disagree. It is humans on the planet and no one is going to change my mind!/s
Kek.
Not many good scie test out there apparently.
Guess not. LOL
IT (Bright Ball in Sky) causes 98-99% of the Carbon in Our Atmosphere! But Carbon Only Makes Up About .03-.04% of the Air Mixture We Breathe!! Of that .03-.04% of the Total Carbon Amount, Human/Animal Population Contributes less than <1%!! And "What On Earth", Benefits from the Carbon in the Atmosphere and Grows During the "Process of Photosynthesis"!! Grasses/Plants/Trees!!
Of course it does. The bright ball is called the sun.