TDLR: It is a fake contract, and sheeple being tricked without recourse in Contractual Law.
In order for a contract to be valid where the supplier takes on liability, there has to be an "exchange" where the someone pays for the good offered by the supplier.
Although I do recognize that from business contract law you are correct in your assessment.
There are aspects of law wherein the harmful effects and outcomes caused by the vaccines would not negate the vaccine provider from liability.
For instance if I were to prepare food at my own cost and I chose to use rotten or rancid food or if I prepared the food in a way which introduced a pathogen /contaminant (salmonella) due to my negligent preparation method or if I prepared the food as the vaccine companies choose to prepare vaccines ( ie to intentionally add known biological poisons and harmful materials to the product). If I hand out my tainted food product for free and people are injured or die from consuming said food then I legally would have liability for the injury or death I had caused.
Now I realize in America, the vaccine companies have been indemnified through congressional law and our government (by the public), but if we prove fraud these barriers may yet be removed and therein I believe the public may yet have a legitimate case to sue for the damagecaused.r
Correct. Just pointing out that they intentionally manipulated the situation to avoid the obvious form of liability if they truly were doing it "for our protection". Not liable per contract law, but clearly liable under other types of law.
Also, if it was highly effective and truly worked, economics of demand would indicate astronomical prices to get it. Valuable product in low supply should not be free, even with go'vt subsidies. Black market should have developed, and not clear that it did.
I am raising awareness on this because the cabal appears to be Trust Law (asset protection) and Contract Law (commercial contracts in the form of Roman Civil Law/UCC) experts. And this gives them cover in state courts and DC courts ( Article I).
However, they are extremely vulnerable per Constitutional Law/Common Law enforcement at the Federal District, Circuit, and SC levels (Article III). Not just a chink in the armor, it is a missing metal plate where we can target for the kill.
Its "free" to the people, but the governments are paying billions - so the contract (between Govt and Pharmas) itself is still valid - unless the fraud is proven, which should not be too hard.
Agreed. Not saying they are untouchable. Just pointing out the trickery. And one could argue that the gov't is actually a co-conspirator in the fraud.
Thats actually the defense by Pfizer and co, that govt knew they were buying fraud, so they are free and clear. Very similar to the Durham case where the lawyer who lied to FBI claimed that FBI knew it was a lie.
In the end they will get screwed in a million ways, as all these "loopholes" mean nothing as people watch their loved ones dying.
Im glad pfizer has so many loopholes with which to hang from.
Its by design. My reply to another comment is relevant here too.
^expert in turning loopholes into nooses...hehe
So if you slip a roofie in a drink and give it to a woman you're golden as long as it's free?
If I give out free legal or medical advice I can't be sued?
Not trying to be disagreeable, just trying to understand your point and where the lines have been drawn from case history.
Good points. You are correct. It is still a crime if you do harm, even if the person "consents", but is unaware. The point is that a crime cannot be legalized with an agreement disguised as a contract that authorizes the crime, effectively.
I believe the bad guy thinking is that they are operating under Trust Law, and what they do is legal even if the victims do not understand what they are consenting to. Pretty sure they f'ed up legally in numerous way.
But we did pay for it via tax
But technically, didn’t “we” pay big pharm companies through taxpayer money for these mRNA drugs? They didn’t hand them out like candy on Halloween. Governments round the world subsidized the distribution.
By paying taxes that funded it all to begin with, then yes, one would have reasonable claims. As would the public at large for misuse and criminal use of public coffers.
I am pretty sure that Jews in the concentration camps did not pay for their experimental vaccines.
They got tricked as well. Just get in this train car "for your protection". Once one consents to being physically controlled, there is likely no escape.
If I give you a lollipop laced with poison, you can still sue me even though it was free.
If I did it with criminal intent, you can charge me with a crime.
Except if it kills you, who sues? This is what they counting on. One legal way around this is to make a person’s estate one of the Plaintiffs (if you or family have been poisoned and might die before conclusion of litigation).
Sounds exactly like the type of convoluted BS reasoning the Cabal uses to tell itself it has no liability generally.
"They have to show you what they're planning to do" for the same reason; they've TOLD YOU it's coming and you didn't object, so in their own eyes (and in the eyes of Satan, for those who believe in him) they are blameless.
Neurotic fantasy justification for evil behavior, is all it is.
I think this is the top comment. Obvious to manufacture consent, but no so obvious the sheeple figure it out right away. Unfortunately, this is showing how little sheeple understand basic economics and how little critical thinking skills they have.
The government stole our money through illegal taxation, funded biolabs, and paid for a fraudulent product meant to maime and kill people. Then tried to force it upon everyone.
It's not free people!!! The government can not "give" without first "taking".
^^^^THIS. I have been digging into Constitutional Law, and it appears most of Executive Branch all state governments, courts, and agencies are unconstitutional. Distilling the info down and posting for anons to take Pro/Se (without lawyer) action. Now have case prepared to largely neuter the IRS, and attacking state tax boards next. Go read W. Virginia v EPA case (2022) to understand what has happened. To understand the states go read Article IV, Section 4 of Constitution and understand that there is a corporate state overlay on top of sovereign states in the form of a Municipal Service Corporation (not Republican form of gov't!)
I believe this particular case victory was provided for us anons to bring down all Executive Branch agencies, especially the IRS.
Wait. Facebook is free. Twitter is free. Gab is free. Rumble is free. Parler is free. Truth Social is free. Does this logic apply to all those? All of those also collect personal information such as name, email, and phone number from you. How do we reconcile that? Hell, GAW is free.
Yes. One could argue that these are also “info traps” to capture data of users. Minor difference in using a service (outside the body) versus using a deliverable product that is put into the body under false pretenses.
Clearly they trying to converge the two by putting stuff in your body that runs a “service” of some sort (like crypto mining algo?) with your “consent”.
I think cabal allowing competing “info traps” because they are either constrained or they think they can take them over or destroy them later.
I would like someone to clarify the "catch" to free shit. Terms and conditions may apply, and most of them are so cryptic in legalese that you don't even have a clear image of fair or unfair agreements. Then, say the wrong thing in the wrong place gets you in violation of some shadowy contract, THAT YOU UNWITTINGLY ENTERED INTO. Read and study that shit before you click or scribble your SIGNATURE. And question everything that's not already cemented into your head and soul.
You can periodically sign affidavits cancelling “all contracts entered into unknowingly” in order to keep yourself legally unencumbered. This is important to do as cabal clearly trying to enslave via commercial contracts.
They were paid with taxpayer monies. Maybe a loophole!
No. The vaxx pushers were indeed paid for their falsely advertised, and dangerous product. Their bank a counts show the proof of that. Congress authorized payments for the drugs, congressmen are legally our representatives.
That means we paid for the shit through our representatives. Shit that was neither safe, nor effective, and was falsely advertised as a "vaccine" instead of mRNA gene therapy. That also means that, our representatives who lost/wasted/stole our money to buy the drugs were also defrauded, along with the buyers they represent (us citizens) and that vitiates everything.
It is all a game of with what you can get away with.
This game is played on the international stage, but also on the national stage. It makes the "right of the people to abolish such detrimental form of government and institute new government as to them will seem best to affect their future Happiness and Safety" quite eh ... fearsome.
In such a situation, big pharma with their shit have no recourse but to die after being stripped of everything. Might makes right, if there is no one to challenge the superimposition of your will.
Truth, then, is a force of nature and causes a storm....
And they may get away with it all if allowed to start WW3. We are about to find out about those “safeties” alluded to by Q.
While most likely true, the Gov't, however,. DID purchase the vaccines, and so they would be able to pursue remedy under the law. Dasting!
Oh wow, that is interesting. If gov’t actually flips on BigPharma. I was assuming they all getting imploded together.
Fraud vitiates everything
Yes. And I wish it was insta-proof and redress, but it takes time to work through courts, and cabal counting on this time to destroy all evidence with a WW3, imo.
"The mouse gets caught in the trap because it does not understand why the cheese is free."
Exactly. Understand we are the mice right now. However, it appears that other “free stuff” has been used to ensnare cabal minions as well who are different “mice”.
Or They Were Deceived for Why this Cheese is Free! Quote: For the Benefit of the Whole Populace! Now, Just a Bold Faced Lie! Which Fits the Fraud/Deception Criteria!