Yes, true, but the real mindblowing thing about Antarctica is that it was never supposed to be populated. It would show very advanced civilisations which must have been before the last ice age at least. That's currently not in the program.
I wonder if that's why they want to restrict carbon emissions,so badly. They desperately don't want the ice to melt, and for us to figure out who we really are.
Ha. I never thought of this but it makes perfect sense. Except for the fact that CO2 barely has any effect on temperature so I'm not sure what the angle is there.
CO2 is plant food. Highly increasing CO2 emissions would reverse desertification, among other things. Trees would get bigger, etc. It would eventually make the planet warm enough for all (or most) of the *permanent ice, to melt (seasons are still a thing). Water levels wouldn't rise, that's pseudoscience. But a lot would become exposed.
*edit: akshually, if anything: water levels would drop, because water expands when frozen.
Long ago co2 levels were around 8-9000, now we are at about 4-600 ppm. 10 degrees C difference. I think we'll be fine. Melt the ice caps and drown the coastlines with all the properties of the assholes that live there. Winning.
People have tried to plan flights there. They mysteriously disappear and are never heard from again.
And who the fuck is "you guys". I barely even give a shit about Antarctica. I'm just not retarded and know when things seem at the very least suspicious.
Also, gotta love the "restrictions to keep people alive" that they then shoot you out of the sky if you disobey.
It's a pretty neat thought! We know now that there are areas of Siberia that were once fertile enough to host herds of woolly mammoths, etc. It's exciting to think that, at some prior age, Antarctica could have been the same way
I also think it's great that there's a possibility of learning new things about the planet and Humanity, at this point in time. We think we know all there is to know but then we get a surprise and the opportunity to learn more.
If you haven’t already read about it, read up a bit on the island of Flores and Homo Floresiensis. The official story is that they’re long gone. The old timey locals say they were getting beaten up by Homo sapiens until a couple hundred years ago, disappeared into the jungle for safety, and are most likely still there.
Soooo...what am I supposed to be thankful for? That I can see a clear photo of frozen wasteland that has nothing on it at all? Pardon me if I fail to see the attraction. Please explain if I am missing something.
i looked at this before i had a coffee, and i looked at it after i had a coffee. i can't see what you're talking about, anon. do you have a link to this? can you explain more?
Looks like the side of a pyramid or Egyptian-styled temple. The "wall" has lines that make it look like similarly laid bricks, to those in Giza. Zoom in to the bottom of the white thing, near the bottom, and you'll see steps. The bright thing itself looks like it could be one of those giant carvouts of a pharaoh sitting on a throne. Like this: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/B7DYGG/giant-statues-of-the-pharaoh-at-the-temple-of-rameses-ii-abu-simbel-B7DYGG.jpg
Great post, thank you!
I didn’t realize this was happening and never believed the coverup explanation……
While Google Earth does offer you an immersive virtual tour around the world, there are some places that are blurred out, one of which, is Antarctica. The reason for this is simple. The entirety of Antarctica is either made up of some research facilities or a featureless ice spread. This makes it highly unnecessary to spend any budget on mapping it as it offers nothing to the users.
Some images are replaced with older imagery all along the southern border and at "military testing" sites. The most curious one for me is in the boot heel of New Mexico. Mexico and the surrounding farms/ranches on the southern side have established a right-of-way for four lanes of highway to Antelope Wells port of entry.
Has anyone else been able to get this to come up on a map? I keep getting "no results" when I look for it.
And I'm not an expert reading a map, but the 17th parallel S puts things up above south Africa. Just looking at lat and long on my globe, this is supposed to be out in the ocean near Easter island?
Just noticed that that's not the entire coordinates. Part is cut off.
This is why I shouldn't post before I have coffee.
Why do people make this type of thing so hard for us to verify it for ourselves?
Or are we supposed to just accept what they're telling us and not question it?
I did a reverse image search, and it came up with pics of black bears. 🤷♀️
If GAW were a book club, I would be the person that comes in having read the wrong book and absolutely clueless about what everyone else was talking about.
Because I have no idea of a) what this photo is supposed to be of and b) why it's important.
Neat. I stopped looking years ago, because it seemed short of launching my own satellites in to orbit, every last one of them was compromised. I remember Google Moon/Mars was basically ALL sus blurring. It'd be cool to see what Elon's satellites see.
you sure? I wouldn't put that many satellites in to space without cameras; especially if I were a billionaire and the price difference didn't matter. Not to mention, they probably have some equipped if for no other reason than navigation / geopositioning.
They are communication satellites. Their orbits are selected for optimal communication, not surveillance. Collection of photo-intelligence is not part of their mission and would require large apertures for high resolution (if you want that). Another subsystem is extra complexity, extra volume, extra weight, extra power, extra processing, reduced system throughput, reduced system reliability, and MORE expense (per satellite, and fewer launched on a single booster).
What you wouldn't do is know much about satellites. You don't do navigation with cameras. You use GPS and maybe star sensors and horizon sensors.
This was a very good read. I didn't know what to make of it back when I read it. Even after everything we have learned, I'm still not sure what to make of this. Real or fake? I would love your input. https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=94
Nothing would open up hidden history more than giant pyramids in Antarctica.
SG1 lol
and the drone chair.
Drone chair?
It was just an outpost. No city.
I was responding to the SG1 comment. In SG1 they found a chair that was left by the ancients and used to fly attack drones against aliens.
Indeed.
Haha. I got it.
Yup, there's several down there.
I wonder if they finally looted them all of everything they had in them, so they don't if we find out anymore.
Sphinx in Romania, pyramids in Antarctica, Alaska, Bosnia, China
Yes, true, but the real mindblowing thing about Antarctica is that it was never supposed to be populated. It would show very advanced civilisations which must have been before the last ice age at least. That's currently not in the program.
I wonder if that's why they want to restrict carbon emissions,so badly. They desperately don't want the ice to melt, and for us to figure out who we really are.
Ha. I never thought of this but it makes perfect sense. Except for the fact that CO2 barely has any effect on temperature so I'm not sure what the angle is there.
CO2 is plant food. Highly increasing CO2 emissions would reverse desertification, among other things. Trees would get bigger, etc. It would eventually make the planet warm enough for all (or most) of the *permanent ice, to melt (seasons are still a thing). Water levels wouldn't rise, that's pseudoscience. But a lot would become exposed.
*edit: akshually, if anything: water levels would drop, because water expands when frozen.
Long ago co2 levels were around 8-9000, now we are at about 4-600 ppm. 10 degrees C difference. I think we'll be fine. Melt the ice caps and drown the coastlines with all the properties of the assholes that live there. Winning.
Which is why they don’t allow people there. We aren’t supposed to know about the Nephelim who will pose as aliens.
Except that you can go on a tour to be there. No problem not knowing about something that didn't exist. https://travel.quarkexpeditions.com
Ah yes, a guided tour so you only see what they want... very convincing...
People have tried to plan flights there. They mysteriously disappear and are never heard from again.
And who the fuck is "you guys". I barely even give a shit about Antarctica. I'm just not retarded and know when things seem at the very least suspicious.
Also, gotta love the "restrictions to keep people alive" that they then shoot you out of the sky if you disobey.
It's a pretty neat thought! We know now that there are areas of Siberia that were once fertile enough to host herds of woolly mammoths, etc. It's exciting to think that, at some prior age, Antarctica could have been the same way
I also think it's great that there's a possibility of learning new things about the planet and Humanity, at this point in time. We think we know all there is to know but then we get a surprise and the opportunity to learn more.
If you haven’t already read about it, read up a bit on the island of Flores and Homo Floresiensis. The official story is that they’re long gone. The old timey locals say they were getting beaten up by Homo sapiens until a couple hundred years ago, disappeared into the jungle for safety, and are most likely still there.
At some point in the past Antarctica was at the equator. Magnetic Pole shifts can seriously rearrange things
There are pyramids all over and under the sea
The thought of a melted Antarctica and what it might reveal, really had me cheering on 'global warming'! 😄
Soooo...what am I supposed to be thankful for? That I can see a clear photo of frozen wasteland that has nothing on it at all? Pardon me if I fail to see the attraction. Please explain if I am missing something.
I see an owl.
i looked at this before i had a coffee, and i looked at it after i had a coffee. i can't see what you're talking about, anon. do you have a link to this? can you explain more?
this is what I see: https://communities.win/p/16aANDgxk3/x/c/4TrH7e3l6bn
Do you mean this area: https://ibb.co/b1V2Qnb
which seems to have lines: https://ibb.co/9v7pFv3 if you use threshold on the color?
Correct. Also, map the vertical lines. Also: remember, all the boulders that made the pyramids in Giza were awkwardly shaped and custom fitted.
whats the link for google earth?
What is on this image,???
Looks like the side of a pyramid or Egyptian-styled temple. The "wall" has lines that make it look like similarly laid bricks, to those in Giza. Zoom in to the bottom of the white thing, near the bottom, and you'll see steps. The bright thing itself looks like it could be one of those giant carvouts of a pharaoh sitting on a throne. Like this: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/B7DYGG/giant-statues-of-the-pharaoh-at-the-temple-of-rameses-ii-abu-simbel-B7DYGG.jpg
or this: https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1500879/pharaoh-amenhotep-iii.jpg
Just looks like sedimentary layers on the exposed side of a mountain.
I see nothing.
Zoom in, look at the lines. It looks like this: https://images.freecreatives.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Swedish-brick-wall.jpg
Albeit, obviously, dilapidated and uneven.
looks like a persons backside with pants on.
I like your imagination.😁 It kind of does.
Great post, thank you! I didn’t realize this was happening and never believed the coverup explanation…… While Google Earth does offer you an immersive virtual tour around the world, there are some places that are blurred out, one of which, is Antarctica. The reason for this is simple. The entirety of Antarctica is either made up of some research facilities or a featureless ice spread. This makes it highly unnecessary to spend any budget on mapping it as it offers nothing to the users.
Some images are replaced with older imagery all along the southern border and at "military testing" sites. The most curious one for me is in the boot heel of New Mexico. Mexico and the surrounding farms/ranches on the southern side have established a right-of-way for four lanes of highway to Antelope Wells port of entry.
So am i allowed to ask what the hell you are seeing?
What is this photo supposed to be of?
Has anyone else been able to get this to come up on a map? I keep getting "no results" when I look for it.
And I'm not an expert reading a map, but the 17th parallel S puts things up above south Africa. Just looking at lat and long on my globe, this is supposed to be out in the ocean near Easter island?
Just noticed that that's not the entire coordinates. Part is cut off.
This is why I shouldn't post before I have coffee.
Why do people make this type of thing so hard for us to verify it for ourselves?
Or are we supposed to just accept what they're telling us and not question it?
I did a reverse image search, and it came up with pics of black bears. 🤷♀️
If GAW were a book club, I would be the person that comes in having read the wrong book and absolutely clueless about what everyone else was talking about.
Because I have no idea of a) what this photo is supposed to be of and b) why it's important.
I don’t know what’s happening.
I tried it doesn’t come up with any information in Google maps. Just a blank screen
I'm sorry, but what are we suppose to be seeing here?
Check out these coordinates. It almost looks like it could have been a walled city at one point.
-82.0587301 -87.8809219
Also, the resolution on the image appears to be much higher than for the surrounding area.
Can someone paste the co-ordinates so we can all have a look please?
Check these out: -82.48584313541832, -104.62482904133856
Looks like some pointy structures in the area :)
On the photo above, it says °17'52"S 112°37'22"W
Part is cut off. Nevermind.
I am not the most observant person first thing in the morning. 😊
OP, where did you find this? Was there a link to it? Were you able to find the entire coordinate? Did you do anything to independently verify?
What is this image showing?
North side of Green land has some weird shit too.
A Starbucks & a McDonalds are bottom right left of center just past the hazy area on the left bumpless shadow.
just a copy an paste.
Suspicious observers - YouTube. That'll explain a lot..
Neat. I stopped looking years ago, because it seemed short of launching my own satellites in to orbit, every last one of them was compromised. I remember Google Moon/Mars was basically ALL sus blurring. It'd be cool to see what Elon's satellites see.
The Starlink satellites have no cameras.
you sure? I wouldn't put that many satellites in to space without cameras; especially if I were a billionaire and the price difference didn't matter. Not to mention, they probably have some equipped if for no other reason than navigation / geopositioning.
They are communication satellites. Their orbits are selected for optimal communication, not surveillance. Collection of photo-intelligence is not part of their mission and would require large apertures for high resolution (if you want that). Another subsystem is extra complexity, extra volume, extra weight, extra power, extra processing, reduced system throughput, reduced system reliability, and MORE expense (per satellite, and fewer launched on a single booster).
What you wouldn't do is know much about satellites. You don't do navigation with cameras. You use GPS and maybe star sensors and horizon sensors.
This was a very good read. I didn't know what to make of it back when I read it. Even after everything we have learned, I'm still not sure what to make of this. Real or fake? I would love your input. https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=94
These are mountaintops. The ice is, on average, 2 km thick.
And why they are all worried about supposed glibal warming. They don’t want it exposed