How Tucker Is Proving The Jan 6th Committee Are Lying. This Should Be Automatic Arrests of Them for Treason, as They Lied Under Oath and Recorded It!
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Tucker on an exclusive with Glenn Beck today, someone posted on Truth, off GWP. This should clearly give the US Marshals the ability to automatically arrest the Jan 6th committee, charge them with Treason, and free all the Jan 6th prisoners! Tucker details to Glenn how his they learned how and what they lied about on Jan. 6th. And theses idiots lied and recorded the lie under oath, never erasing or deleting what they watched! Why?! Because they never thought they’d get caught.
Congress people took an oath of office, but when did they take an oath not to lie? Usually the oath to be truthful is taken by a witness that testifies before a court, administrative body, or congressional committee.
Congressional Committees are under oath and can be held in contempt of Congress for lying. Again it’s all on legal record to We The People, and they can be charged if other members of Congress investigate them. Congress people that get caught and may face an investigation or charges usually resign or file to retire, thus many times avoiding charges from any “investigation”. This is why it is rare for us common folk to hear about “them” getting busted or in trouble. Resigning or retiring is their “get out of jail free card”. Kinda like, oh well they’re gone/not working here further, so nothing we can do now. And yes this is why they many times basically get away with murder. Because their feet aren’t held to the fire if they duck out and enjoy their fat tax payer supplied pension.
they are allowed to lie while in congressional session. they cannot be held accountable for anything they say in congress, while in session. out of congress, that is a different matter. but since when has a politician been held accountable for lies told to the media or through the media?
Yes, and arrest all these scumbags!
Military trials
Public executions
Clean up rest of the garbage
Tucker says not one journalist has asked him about what he is seeing on the tapes. That's a challenge for Mike Lindell. Get em Mike, Mr. PILLOW.
Interesting take. Is it the Judicial branch that provides the warrants? I think it is. So, what level does this come down from?
This is the question. I agree with everyone’s complaints, but how does this get tried with consequence?
It is my sincere desire to know. Not understanding what you mean by "everyone's complaint"?
Everyone is right to be angry about the lack of prosecutorial action, but what is the proper process by which these scoundrels would be indicted?
None, the penalty for treason is death. That’s the deterrent.
Of course, but who starts the process? A federal judge?
Treason is tried by the military (tribunals). What their timeline is, I have no clue. If the tribulations we face are part of gods plan, then I hope tribunals are too. Sorry it’s not the answer you’re looking for.
It would be the Department of Justice, which contains the US Attorneys, would be the ones to file and prosecute. And given the high profile nature of this I can't see anybody short of the Attorney General would make the decision to do this, because I doubt very much the AG would support it.
Thanks. This pretty much puts a lid on any action coming from these folks as long as AG Garland is the AG. Garland needs to be removed. I don't know if I've heard any Congress person call for this yet. His memo to go after school parents and the approval to charge, SWAT and terrorize, arrest and shackle a passive street abortion protester on the filmiest and most contrived charges after the allegation was reviewed and dismissed locally and at the State level are just two very good reasons why this individual needs to go.
Interesting he would interview with Beck since he was driven out of Fox.
It seems like a lot of previously questionable people have turned to the white hat side. Beck, Tucker, Elon, fucking Bill Maher, Russell Brand, Joe Rogan. My theory is they have been dispatched and replaced (definitely Elon) or they have been flipped to save themselves. I wonder if we will ever really know.
I really cannot see the kind of world that separates from the Cabal and the evil behind it as one that is born or created by offing people and replacing them with doubles to do duplicitous things.
The ends do NOT justify the means. That's Marxism, and pretty much every evil agenda.
But in case you haven't noticed, there is a great awakening going on. There are millions and millions now who even 3 years ago would not have accepted what they now accept as obvious and plain fact. When people wake up, they tend to change.
There may be deals and some degree of organization by white hat forces involved in some cases, particularly of people in positions of power, but all of the above you have mentioned are human beings, most of whom i believe have the capacity to change and grow.
Brand, for example, has most certainly grown and evolved in his views over the past several years.
"flipped" is a concept that I would say specifically applies to assets held. I.e. DS assets, WH assets. But not everyone is a DS asset. Some people are just lost deep in the matrix until .... a great awakening occurs.
Unless one can prove that someone is or was a DS asset, then you can't really prove that they were 'flipped' either. Even logically. But as you say, wonder if we'll ever know....
Musk bored the DUMB tunnels and wanted neurolink. Maher is a red shoe pedovore. Biden has obviously been replaced, being as evil and corrupt as possible in a very obvious fashion waking up the normies. You don't get to the level of fame Brand did without cabal approval.
I'm just saying they are using these personalities to further the Great Awakening as they are familiar to the masses. Flipped, doubles, clones? I know Biden and Musk are different "people."
https://yandex.com/images/touch/search?text=old%20elon%20vs%20new%20elon%20musk&source=tabbar
Elon Musk did not make the DUMBs currently being cleansed of child trafficking and human farming and all kinds of mega-evil shit. Do you know how old places like Dulce are?? Do you think all boring done is bad? Other countries used boring to create their 200 mph reverse manetism train transport systems. As for neuralink, which can help quadraplegic walk and the blind see, is not something he'd go to hell for. Besides, the cabal is blocking neuralink, because Elon is a White Hat they are pissed at because of twatter. That should tell you something.
Whoah whoah give some sauce on this theory, especially Elon. Dispatched and REPLACED? Thanks
Not the same guy.
https://yandex.com/images/touch/search?text=old%20elon%20vs%20new%20elon%20musk&source=tabbar
Check out the photos
I understand how people get hung up on things like this but Elon Musk photos of when he is younger and geekier and losing his hair very early, vs. how he looks more mature and after his admitted hair transplant, prove only that time passes and people change.
I am deeply sorry for being a Tucker naysayer, but he has a terrible history of deductive reasoning or even surface research. He was shocked by what he learned about this? All of us have seen the irrefutable evidence that J6 was an FBI-antifa operation before the new videos and that the J6 prisoners were being tortured, with no Constitutional protection. Just exactly like his declaration that Joe Biden won fair and square. It doesn't add up. He is way too susceptible to accepting main stream media narrative and then "discovering" the truth when second grade reasoning should have made him suspicious of wrong doing at the beginning. Smells to high heaven.
Note: Tucker and ALL media presenters of that nature are primarily ACTORS. That's what they do. Take Tucker saying he was shocked with a few grains of salt. It's TV, its presentation, and 51% performance art.
IMO.
instead of attempting to dissect where Tucker is coming from based on what he is saying, instead, try looking at the net effect of what he is saying, and whether it aids the Cabal, the Deep State, and their agenda, or whether it hurts it, and is to our advantage.
FWIW, I think its treacherous territory logically to start to interpret people's thinking processes and internal positions based on your own thinking processes and internal positions. Human beings are subjective creatures.
So, we should take things at face value and never try to understand the inconsicities and hypocrisy? I should have accepted what he said two years ago and never questioned Joe's legitimacy? Are you telling me I should be a better sheep? Seriously?
Tucker has always been like Hannity providing enough truth to drip feed people but not going all the way into a topic because he is an actor like the others.
I think with the J6 tapes he has crossed a threshold so he probably has flipped at this point IMO.
We all know that his ties to Hunter Biden and his wishy washy stance regarding election fraud doesn't put him in a positive light IMO.
One of the real temptations in the Great Awakening process is to reject old icons and idols, but then simply establish new 'sanctified' ones, and replace one object of projection with another.
I don't really know much about Carlson, as I never paid much attention to him. I wasn't aware that he actually denied the election steal or came out as saying Sleepy Joe won legitimately.
What I AM interested in is the role he is currently playing and the impact of his current reportings. I'm not so interested in evaluating the person as I am in evaluating and understanding the impact.
The need to evaluate personalities seems to me to be tied to the impulse towards (or a reaction against) idolization of figures.
None of the people on the stage are infallible or perfect. if we assign idol status, (This can be done consciously or unconsciously), we end up in a situation where "Oh, I trust this person so I can just believe what they say" or "I distrust this person, so I cannot believe what they say", when any and all actors in the information and narrative war are liable to put out both truth and false things at any time. IMO.
So, focus on the information being shared, look to its net effect. It's almost impossible to know directly whether someone like Carlson, for example, has been a long-term plant, being controlled opposition and playing a role UNTIL the right time, to begin spilling the beans, etc. or whether he has been 'flipped' aka was somehow a DS asset, or whether he's been 'persuaded' to start focusing on truth, etc. IMO.
So, any thinking about this aspect of things, unless tied to examination of the overall impact of the role the person is playing on the greater narrative and information war (aka the war for the minds and hearts of the people), is likely to slide down into establishing either idols or devils in one's own mind, and then settling on one's own thinking with a prejudice.
If you know what I mean.... (erg) /s
Gee, don't you think that your reactive response here is a bit polarized and over-the-top?
Are there only two options? That one must take the view that Tucker Carlson's current direction stinks to high heaven or otherwise, just be asleep, not question, always takes things at their face value and not try to understand things?
Don't answer. It's a rhetorical question.
I think the nature of your response is really interesting, potentially, for you, if you care to examine it.
But like DJT had to finally do when idiot media kept pestering him and demanding that he 'denounce white supremacy', I'll respond:
Resist taking things at face value, make plenty of effort to reflect on all the information and apply logical thinking. Question what people are doing, on both sides of the war, but also pay attention to your own emotional reactions. Beware of your own biases and blind spots, recognize that you inherently have blind spots and develop the ability to entertain a variety of potential explanations for surface activity and behaviors by actors around you.
Have a nice day!
Don't answer, it's rhetorical? Well, your rhetoric is both officious and insulting. And since you were so condescending to offer a stranger personal advice, may I return the favor? Obvious efforts to be pedantic generally end up being gobbledygook.
Hey, thanks for the favor.
Note: occasionally, I come across someone who finds my particular style to be... well, as you say, 'officious'. It's certainly true that I can be pedantic sometimes. My writing style, not to mention thinking style, occasionally rubs some people the wrong way. Some people experience it as condescending, but I don't have a problem with that. There are enough people who find my particular writing style eloquent, insightful, helpful, articulate, inspirational even. They are the people I write for. Not everyone needs to like it.
I'm not sure why, but it seems like me challenging your particular argument and way of thinking (as expressed in your comment) triggered a pretty strong reaction. I wouldn't sweat it. We don't need to agree on everything. What's really important is that we agree, by and large, on why we are here.
If my comment didn't help you or benefit you, well, I'm sad. But maybe it contributed to others who read it.
Either way, have a good day.
Edit: PS. What I wrote as "Resist taking things at face value..... by actors around you", well, that certainly applies to me as well. To any and all anons, I think. But I only really offered it because you seemed to be asking (or even suggesting) that I was telling you what to do, as in be a sleepy sheep, or whatevs. I RESPONDED to you. Maybe you should look at what YOU wrote as a starting point for looking at what I wrote in response.
But either way, either way, thanks for the favor and the advice!
PPS. If you wish to discuss further, I'm open to that. Btw, "don't answer" wasn't meant to shut you down. But I do think you're overreacting to what are essentially text messages over the net. Text is really very poor at communicating a LOT of things that are very important to real human communication. As such, it's also often liable to misinterpretation. But both you and I know that, right?
I think I'd better cease and desist here....
Define sleeper
I can't read minds. Can only deduce by what we're given. For example, deSantis. And Pence. And Sessions. The list is very long.
I hear ya
Hopefully this exposes the scumbags who made political prisoners out of a few patriots, and pisses off the normies just a little.
Man the deep state is firing everything at discrediting tucker right now. We must be over target. God I can’t wait to watch these fucking bastards pay.
Democrat? Charges dropped.
I hope this isn’t Shillin?
Because they Know they are above the law. This entire thing will be memory holed after the next mass casualty event. (prob. WW3)
I hate to state the obvious, but it seems I must. Am I the only one that sees the real problem here and why no one is being held accountable for their treason? It's the Constitution Dummy! It's true that we have been lied to about everything (literally everything!) for the last 100+ years of our history. The Civil War was a lie, both World Wars were lies, Vietnam, 9/11, Oklahoma, Covid...and on an on. So it doesn't surprise me in the least that we have also been lied to about what really took place in 1786-87 when our current Constitution was ratified.
I believe the Constitutional Convention of that time was a Freemason/Illuminati coup to get us out of the Articles of Confederation and into what Patrick Henry said was a Constitution that was nothing more than "Masked Aristocracy!"
And here we are now...living exactly what Patrick Henry and all the other Anti-Federalist predicted to a tee.
I'm not saying we need to scrap the Constitution, but I am saying we need to understand that it's not exactly what it's been portrayed as for the last 200+ years. Truth is very difficult to accept sometimes, but unless we have a clear understanding what we are up against we cannot hope to overcome the seductive and very intelligent evil we are up against.
Our Constitution has major flaws...the first being it gave WAY too much power to the Executive branch and the fact that it was designed to give us a Federal behemoth! The reason the demoncraps have so much power is that they (through our Constitution and it's glaring flaws) have complete control over the FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc,, etc. This is why no one is being held accountable and they were able to get away (so far) with the Jan 6th horror show! Think about it, we actually have American citizens being held illegally against their will in the US! No charges, no due process, not phone call, no attorney representation for the most part and no TRIAL! How can that happen if our Constitution was really as good as we think it is.
One amendment that immediately needs to be made to the Constitution is that if any person who takes the Oath to Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States (that means all Law Enforcement, Military Personnel, and Public Servants) and then is found to break that Oath in ANY WAY, they are immediately executed! They are charged, trialed, and if found guilty...executed within 24 hours. No appeal...nothing!
There are many other changes that need made as well...but this is already too long and my blood pressure is already high!
You are too hysterical. The people who are being charged in connection with January 6th have been held on the authority of the Congress, not the Executive, so you are in a panic over the wrong body---in this case. Plenty of corruption all around, and needs to be dealt with. "Immediate execution"? Not when being arrested, charged, arraigned, tried, and judged can take whatever time it takes. If there are appeals possible, they must be respected. You can't preserve and protect the Constitution by short-cutting it.
I stand by my previous language fren. You are not hysterical enough and freedom isn't important enough to you apparently. I do believe in due process of law, but it must be swift and final in this case...do you understand the premise of speedy trial? Apparently not. Especially in the case of treason against our Constitution which could affect the very lives of so many people...indeed all people in our fair nation. It's legislation and rhetoric not upheld by our Constitution that's directly led to the place where we are now...slaves in our own land...a land that our forefathers died to give us! It should take a long, drawn out trial to determine if something is Un-Constitutional and appeals in this case would just work to give the traitor more time to weasel their way out of the verdict. This isn't like murder. Treason against the Constitution is black and white, cut and dry...and I don't know how you figure abiding by the Constitution and giving due process...i.e. a fair trial is short-cutting it?
By implication you admit you are hysterical (what I said), and hysteria is no good thing when it comes to doing the right thing. You believe in due process of law...which is open-ended when it comes to timeline because of procedural protections. I can only construe your insistence on "swift and final" as a lust for lynching. You jump to the conclusion that the crime is "treason," when it may not be (and there is no good reason to think it is, since it is not defined in the Constitution as you are insisting it is). Don't lecture me about what my forefathers fought for. I happen to have forefathers, and they go back 400 years, so peddle that sentiment elsewhere.
You aren't interested in correction or justice. You just want heads to roll, for your own hysterical satisfaction. You are NOT part of the solution.
It's very interesting that whenever someone (like myself), displays a strong emotion with regard to something or comes off as radical, there is always the poor, spineless tool out there who tries to side track the issue by applying a negative term or word to that person and adds zero to the discussion. And here you are...a classic example of said tool.
Yes...I will agree...I am "hysterical" for my country, for the future of my grand children and for freedom. Yes, I do have very strong feelings against those who would go against their sworn Oath to move my grandchildren one step closer to slavery. They treat our Constitution like just so much toilet paper to be used for their nasty purposes and then discarded whenever they are done...and our current Constitution allows them to get away with it because...as you stated yourself...treason isn't defined in the Constitution. However, it is defined in the Oath they took as long as the Oath is taken seriously...which it is not! And herein lies the problem.
I cannot think of a worse crime to commit against our country that to actively try and circumvent the Constitution and Bill of Rights. You may believe that this activity is a gray area, but it is not. Legislation is either pro Constitution and works to strengthen or clarify it or it does the opposite. A perfect example of this is the Second Amendment. It says pretty clearly to the rational, just and truthful mind that there shall be no legislation passed that serves to infringe upon a persons right to keep and bear arms. And yet...many of our elected officials have abrogated their Oath to uphold the Second Amendment to our Constitution which has served to facilitate the murder of untold millions of defenseless American citizens. And that's just one example...I could literally write a book on this.
To end this conversation with you, I would like to point out that had it not been for my so called, "hysteria" you probably wouldn't have bothered responding and thus I wouldn't have been able to share with you my thoughts. You may disagree with me, but you cannot unsee what you have read...I guess my "hysteria" accomplished what it was intended to...Thank you very much!
Thanks for calling me "spineless." I guess I must be the most annoying invertebrate on the planet. You misread me. Treason is the ONLY crime that IS defined in the Constitution, so you had better read up on it. You want to use it as spray paint to assuage your hysteria. As for the rest, I have been an ardent Constitutionalist from a long time ago. You aren't bringing me any news.
He is FEARLESS
Yes let’s do it. It’s like the 17000th law they have broken anyways but a solid cherry on top
We should have an arrest the J6 committee rally at the capitol!
Not to be a party-pooper, but I'm not actually certain that lying under oath falls under the legal definition of treason.
I'm not saying they aren't treasonous, but there are laws, statues and stuff that actually define legal treason, and it really has to be on the basis of law and order that justice is meted out, don't you think?
Agree that treason has a specific definition
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim#:~:text=Whoever%2C%20owing%20allegiance%20to%20the,not%20less%20than%20%2410%2C000%3B%20and
Kek. The downvotes. Never let facts get in the way of a good, emotional self-righteous outrage, right?
Some people are just too in love with their own emotional stances. Imagine downvoting facts because someone failed to slam (label) someone else as a treasonous bastard, for example. Wait... Isn't that exactly what the Marxists do?
Hmmm....
Seems like some awakenings are not so great. Kekkle.
So i don't know if lying to Congress is treasonous or if it depends on what the person is lying about.
Regarding the downvotes - Not everyone is smart, fren. And a lot of people have really, really poor reading comprehension. And then there are those people who don't ever let the facts confuse them. hahaha
hahah.
OK.
It's a bit of a pet peeve I guess, but I'm very wary of (and aware of, too, I suppose) certain tendencies in we humans towards mob mentality and rule. That includes some pedes and anons, obviously. Not helpful, imo.
I agree with you!
No, they never thought they would be in danger of being made responsible. They knew the justice system was in their pockets. So, they are still safe. Still. Until someone with courage begins to arrest these criminals. It may never happen.