Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

216
💥I All 9 Supreme Court justices push back on oversight: 'Raises more questions,' Senate chair says (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by 7Nick9 3 years ago by 7Nick9 +216 / -0
53 comments download share
53 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (53)
sorted by:
▲ 38 ▼
– Mr_A 38 points 3 years ago +38 / -0

Darn right they did!

Maybe the Supremes should come out with a code of conduct for congress, see how they like it!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Island_Photo 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Of course the court can't make laws but imagine if members of government had to prepare a summery of how their actions had supported the Constitution (which of course they have all sworn to uphold). Sort of like an annual review process

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Luminescent 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I'm a master electrician, I had to document 8,000 hours of work only allowing half to be residential experience... then I had to document 3,000 hours of planning and layout under direct supervision of a master electrician. 11,000 hours, that's 5.5 years of your life if you only take 2 weeks of vacation each year. I'm allowed to wire a building now legally but if you make it six months in the academy they give you a squad car and a gun.

I have to do "continuing education" to maintain my license. Civil servants should be quizzed on constitutional rights frequently and have to volunteer for 4 years before they collect a check. My little cousin volunteered 4 years for the fire department and now he's a hot shot. Kid runs a full crew of smoke jumpers and he didn't do it for the paycheck.

Make those fuckers wear Nascar jackets showing their sponsors and make sure they understand the constitution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TakeItBack 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

That should be required for every single word that they put to paper. It was / is the job of the people in each county to carefully watch all elected public servants who came from their counties. The Committeeman is then SUPPOSED to hold these miscreants absolutely accountable for every misstep via recall or indictment. G.R. Mobely (http://reclaimingtherepublic.org) is working with legislators of several states (so far) to educate them about the Republic Review process whereby they will examine every bit of "legislation" emanated by our public servants. This is how we will eliminate the 3-letter agencies ALL of which are illegitimate.

He is also working with county commissioners in a few states (so far) to educate them about what they are lawfully supposed to be doing. This is how we get the state and fed mafia out of our lives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– HOSEQ 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Both of the ""Houses of Representatives I and II"" supposedly have Codes of conduct or some such thing....

But they're Hush Hush, secrets, because the Public do not deserve to know....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TakeItBack 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

That must change. They work for us; we do not work for them--as it's been for many years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ghostsage 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah, stop congress in the name of love.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– Supercritical 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

Should have taken up that election case.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– inspoken 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

I assume it wasn't time yet. From this, it is obvious that Thomas is on the white hat team & they know he will lead the court on the corruption of the deep state when the time is right

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ravonaf 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Oddly enough. The case still isn't dead.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Fefifofumdrum 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Oversight? By whom?

Constitution gives the Judicial Branch equal significance. The courts are not subject to "oversight" by another branch.

If course they push back.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mikeua68 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

:0) the constitution

Is that even a thing anymore?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mikeua68 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Does the Constitution apply in a Banana Republic?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– TaQo 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Doesn't matter. It's all theater. The military has been in control since before this movie started. 🍿🍿🍿

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AnonDan 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I don’t believe it for a second. The military part. The unelected bureaucrats are the ones that seem to be in control. That and the Chinese money that’s spread around DC.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TaQo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That's because our military intelligence is smart enough to fool you... and I'm thankful for that because you don't seem too bright given all the clues right in your face.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/9-supreme-court-justices-push-back-oversight-raises/story?id=98917921sauce

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

"It's very clear [all the justices] recognize what's going on. That's why they signed this statement. This isn't about the ethics code, because they've got one," Severino contended. "This is about intimidating certain members of the court, and they all can get behind exactly what the proper guidelines are."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– electricbroth1 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What is your take on this?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Hopefully not to be bought out !

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– HOSEQ 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

It's just a bunch of Asshole Leftists that for about 40 years have been working hard at finding a way to set up a ""Watchdog Group"" that oversees what SCOTUS does, En Toto, meaning when they Shit, Sleep, Eat, what they drink, what tv shows they watch, etc....

It is INTENDED for this Group to gain Full Control of SCOTUS with the Intention of having the ability to tell members of SCOTUS what they will chose with each case that comes in front of them....

In other words, it's just another Criminal Element Group trying to overthrow another part of the Federal Government....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– inspoken 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

It's gives me hope that Roberts is standing firm & even the one that doesn't know what a woman is, at least knows when she could be next

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– corrbrick 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Right. It doesn't take principles to object to measures that threaten to strip your power. The founders certainly knew what motivated people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TrappedInBlueState 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Tring to turn it into a bureaucratic nightmare like everything else at the frderal oevel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bloggerchick 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

It makes me think of the Brunson case and how they talked about congress planning to reduce the power of the Supremes. This feels to me like they understand that in order to save their own skins, they have to have a united front on any such attempt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TakeItBack 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS needs to be brought back into line as well as the rest of our public servants.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– branded 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Whose line ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TakeItBack 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Back within their constitutional confines. They are not allowed to make law, among other things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Monomial 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

There's no actual evidence of corruption in the outcome of any case or even the appearance of corruption in any case.

Really? Not even an appearance of corruption? That is completely and totally false. There is a mountain of "appearance of corruption" in their refusal to take on Texas v. Pennsylvania in the election fraud of 2020.

These radical left media outlets just lie whenever they feel like it. I get that you have to prove actual corruption, and it's never been proven. But appearance of corruption is very evident to anyone who read that disgusting opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– inspoken 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I assume that when they over state something with lots of unnecessary adjectives ("no actual evidence of", "even the appearance of") to the point where it's impossible they are trying to tell the reader that the exact opposite is true but there is someone holding a gun to their head as they type.

You know like the old Freudian slip by Freud himself: “I can certainly recommend the Gestapo to everyone” - Sigmund Freud, 1938

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– fayebarker 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Sounds like the Supreme Court is about ready to call Option One Plumbing!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bigsix 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I read that as getting the clots out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AngelCole 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Archived link. https://archive.is/pZVsl

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Thank you !

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Oversight on what?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Slyder8 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

“Ruling the correct way”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The obvious question: Who decides what the correct way is?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– FractalizingIron 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

The court. That's why there is the separation of powers in the constitution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I meant in the supposed oversight. I agree with you here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Slyder8 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That would be the probable oversight committee of political appointed hacks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Shalimar 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Does Congress have the power to enact laws concerning the Supreme Court? Each branch is equal but separate - seems to me, this would be like trying enact laws the President has to follow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Goyard88 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

This job could easily be replaced with AI

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 45-4KAG 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What job can't be?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BufordXL 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The SCOTUS needs to make a 'sticker' that says 'Any law that conflicts with the US. Constitution, OR The Bill of Rights, is not only null and void, but will be considered treason by the Congress'. Then slap it on the law and send it to the DOJ for referral.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Moosemeadow 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I have two questions 1) who leak 2) who owns Roberts

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 4Hope70 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This is rich, coming from Congress. Where is their code of conduct? How many millions are paid out secretly every year for members accused of sexual misconduct? This is kept secret from we, the taxpayers. Also where is your code of conduct in accepting payoffs from lobbyists, doing insider trading and voting on bills which you have been paid off by lobbyists to vote in their favor?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Interpretation: They what Thomas reined in. They know that he is on the white hat team & will lead the court in prosecuting their corruption & they can't call him racist.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy