It is the subtleties like this that truly piss me off the most because it is fed right into your subconscious. We need to pull this kind of shit off all screens. I'm soooooo tired of them pushing this insane and sick agenda on us.
You're right about it being fed into our subconscious - but even more disturbing, it's deliberately meant to target children.
The film is chock full of subliminals, not just the obvious ones - as well as presenting a huge array of conflicting and/or competing moving images and sounds - i.e. seductive 'shiny objects' - pitched to different sensory channels (visual, hearing, kinaesthetic, etc.)
Also if you notice, the storyline does not really 'resolve' (as it does in classic western film structure), but instead repeatedly raises emotional tension that does not really go anywhere.
All this strongly tends to bypass people's so-called 'left-brain', i.e. their analytical thinking. But in essence, the most disturbing aspect is that the way this film is made seems intended to covertly put people into a trance, in order to both ideologically program them plus alter children's/our cognitive development away from rational thought over time.
Who wants to read and think anymore, when there's the equivalent of an onscreen acid trip full of alluring sensory and emotional stimuli to immerse in, instead? Maybe keep kids away from this?
This psyops/psychological warfare technique of barraging a perceiver with myriads of conflicting and/or competing stimuli, pitched to multiple sensory channels was developed by master hypnotist Milton Erickson to quickly induce a trance state in subjects. It easily disarms and bypasses the rational mind. He called it the Confusion Technique.
The Confusion Technique by Milton H Erickson, from the Chapter Deep Hypnosis and Its Induction in Experimental Hypnosis (c)1948 By Leslie LeCron
'Erickson's "confusion technique" ... has been employed extensively for the induction of specific phenomena as well as deep trances. Usually, it is best employed with highly intelligent subjects interested in the hypnotic process, or with those consciously unwilling to go into a trance despite an unconscious willingness.
In essence, it is no more than a presentation of a whole series of individually differing, contradictory suggestions, apparently all at variance with each other, differently directed, and requiring a constant shift in orientation by the subject...'
If anything, the thematic messaging of this glutted Spider-Verse film/programming promotes 'A (spider-web) multi-verse of 'diversity inclusion equity' ('d.i.e.') + 'With so many kaleidoscoping perspectives, there can't be any actual objective truths...'
The movie doesn’t conclude normally because it is part one of a two part anthology. It was announced as such from the get go, with the second part releasing in 2024.
It’s not subliminal programming, it’s leaving on a clif hanger to get people to buy tickets to the next movie. It’s called marketing.
No it's not referencing the 2-part aspect, you're right, that's understandable.
But even within its multiple characters/storylines, the dynamic of a 'dramatic resolution' and the momentum of a 'through line' seems weak, compared with their just barraging you with constantly changing visual/auditory stimuli.
What I meant is that usually every sequence (even scenes) should have a sort of beginning, middle and ending mini-arc, with a protagonist vs. antagonist.
Characters can switch functions (protagonist, etc.) and do in this film, but their little dramas don't have much emotional release over time. The sequences just leave you kind of up-in-the-air, then they switch to something or someone else.
If this was a European film it could be more ambiguous and right-brained, but this one seems to raise and sustain tension vs. the rhythm of having a series of resolutions (even as the overall dramatic tension keeps rising).
So the texture of the film seems more sensorially rewarding, but not so much emotionally. It's like they substituted a large quantity of stimuli for a lesser quality of emotional reward (though it could have had both if they wanted).
And rising tension i.e. anxiety plays into the hypnosis thing, because covertly induced anxiety makes people much more vulnerable to suggestion and looking for a strong 'leader' who can tell them what to do.
Yeah i cant really get into anything with "multiversal" implications. Basically if there are infinite realities with infinite actions, there are infinite consequences and whatever we're watching is essentially meaningless. There can be no stakes. If something bad happens on screen, there is another universe (whether they show it or not) where it didnt happen.
It's too much to follow and too much to care about so I lose interest.
Wow, excellent information. I've always believed that there was something being done with the media to program people. We see it with TDS and how many people with it simply won't budge.
ONE of the reasons I come to this website is to get insights into the goings on of the entertainment world...and OTHER places...
Ever since Joan Rivers "died" in the dentist's chair I have been intrigued by the nature of WHAT THE OBAMA's are...
because this started with them...I believe there is a HUGE resource being put at the disposal of all involved and it will be UP to us and the military to "take care of business"...!!!
In ideological terms, yes. Their suppression of women, violent tendencies, the entire concept of taqiyya and their hatred of bacon makes Islam ideologically opposed to both western civilization and Christianity.
We may, however, be able to unite in large part over this. We can be opposed but peacefully agree to disagree and stay in our lanes, and even work together to take on a threat bigger than our differences that affects the future of both our ideologies and culture.
It was silly and dishonest to ever even have a notion to blame an entire people for 9/11 anyway, even if it had been a few of them.
"The evil muslims" are basically normal americans from before the sexual revolution and women's suffrage. The major difference is we circumcized our boys and they circumcize their girls.
Obviously the difference between islam and christianity is more complex than that, since mohammed was a warrior and jesus was not. But it's not like your average muslim family is a jihadi any more than your average christian family is a soldier
I don't think you understand that before the modern day Islam, before we fucked up the Middle East, women were like western women 10-15 years ago. They wore bikinis, they weren't covered up, they weren't denied all of these normal every day rights.
You are actually retarded if you think oppressing women like modern day Islam is the way, and there is no common ground to be had here.
You are entitled to your wrong opinion, but a reminder from a Constitutionalist that nowhere in the Constitution is there anything about suppressing women.
Women also never gained the right to vote, as they always had that right as the Constitution made no distinction between sexes.
What you are pointing to as "the sexual revolution" has literally no bearing in the problems of today.
I mean. Larry Fink of Blackrock has all but admitted the investment firms and Financial institutions were ultimately behind most of this shit. At least as far as the Business world is concerned.
Compelling and threatening people who weren’t already on board into compliance. Or they’d destroy their Companies and lives.
I don't know how it happened, but Amy Pascal got control over the Spiderman IP due to some fake situation with the company (Sony).
She is an UBERSJW in the same vein as Kathleen Kennedy. She's a middle man.
She held Spiderman hostage for years and you cannot make a modern Spiderman with here SJW fingers on it. Hence Flash Thompson and Spidey's high school friends being multicultural in the Marvel Movies, and the bullshit with Zendaya's MJ (that they didn't want to call Mary Jane because it would have caused a boycott of Spiderman even back then).
All the Donald Glover shit in Spiderman was due to her. It's all her.
It is the subtleties like this that truly piss me off the most because it is fed right into your subconscious. We need to pull this kind of shit off all screens. I'm soooooo tired of them pushing this insane and sick agenda on us.
You're right about it being fed into our subconscious - but even more disturbing, it's deliberately meant to target children.
The film is chock full of subliminals, not just the obvious ones - as well as presenting a huge array of conflicting and/or competing moving images and sounds - i.e. seductive 'shiny objects' - pitched to different sensory channels (visual, hearing, kinaesthetic, etc.)
Also if you notice, the storyline does not really 'resolve' (as it does in classic western film structure), but instead repeatedly raises emotional tension that does not really go anywhere.
All this strongly tends to bypass people's so-called 'left-brain', i.e. their analytical thinking. But in essence, the most disturbing aspect is that the way this film is made seems intended to covertly put people into a trance, in order to both ideologically program them plus alter children's/our cognitive development away from rational thought over time.
Who wants to read and think anymore, when there's the equivalent of an onscreen acid trip full of alluring sensory and emotional stimuli to immerse in, instead? Maybe keep kids away from this?
This psyops/psychological warfare technique of barraging a perceiver with myriads of conflicting and/or competing stimuli, pitched to multiple sensory channels was developed by master hypnotist Milton Erickson to quickly induce a trance state in subjects. It easily disarms and bypasses the rational mind. He called it the Confusion Technique.
https://lermanet.org/scientology/confusion-technique2.html
The Confusion Technique by Milton H Erickson, from the Chapter Deep Hypnosis and Its Induction in Experimental Hypnosis (c)1948 By Leslie LeCron
'Erickson's "confusion technique" ... has been employed extensively for the induction of specific phenomena as well as deep trances. Usually, it is best employed with highly intelligent subjects interested in the hypnotic process, or with those consciously unwilling to go into a trance despite an unconscious willingness.
In essence, it is no more than a presentation of a whole series of individually differing, contradictory suggestions, apparently all at variance with each other, differently directed, and requiring a constant shift in orientation by the subject...'
If anything, the thematic messaging of this glutted Spider-Verse film/programming promotes 'A (spider-web) multi-verse of 'diversity inclusion equity' ('d.i.e.') + 'With so many kaleidoscoping perspectives, there can't be any actual objective truths...'
The movie doesn’t conclude normally because it is part one of a two part anthology. It was announced as such from the get go, with the second part releasing in 2024.
It’s not subliminal programming, it’s leaving on a clif hanger to get people to buy tickets to the next movie. It’s called marketing.
No it's not referencing the 2-part aspect, you're right, that's understandable.
But even within its multiple characters/storylines, the dynamic of a 'dramatic resolution' and the momentum of a 'through line' seems weak, compared with their just barraging you with constantly changing visual/auditory stimuli.
What I meant is that usually every sequence (even scenes) should have a sort of beginning, middle and ending mini-arc, with a protagonist vs. antagonist.
Characters can switch functions (protagonist, etc.) and do in this film, but their little dramas don't have much emotional release over time. The sequences just leave you kind of up-in-the-air, then they switch to something or someone else.
If this was a European film it could be more ambiguous and right-brained, but this one seems to raise and sustain tension vs. the rhythm of having a series of resolutions (even as the overall dramatic tension keeps rising).
So the texture of the film seems more sensorially rewarding, but not so much emotionally. It's like they substituted a large quantity of stimuli for a lesser quality of emotional reward (though it could have had both if they wanted).
And rising tension i.e. anxiety plays into the hypnosis thing, because covertly induced anxiety makes people much more vulnerable to suggestion and looking for a strong 'leader' who can tell them what to do.
Yeah i cant really get into anything with "multiversal" implications. Basically if there are infinite realities with infinite actions, there are infinite consequences and whatever we're watching is essentially meaningless. There can be no stakes. If something bad happens on screen, there is another universe (whether they show it or not) where it didnt happen.
It's too much to follow and too much to care about so I lose interest.
Wow, excellent information. I've always believed that there was something being done with the media to program people. We see it with TDS and how many people with it simply won't budge.
ONE of the reasons I come to this website is to get insights into the goings on of the entertainment world...and OTHER places...
Ever since Joan Rivers "died" in the dentist's chair I have been intrigued by the nature of WHAT THE OBAMA's are...
because this started with them...I believe there is a HUGE resource being put at the disposal of all involved and it will be UP to us and the military to "take care of business"...!!!
Loved Milton Erickson. Also the music today never resolved. Just fades out.
They cut people's heads off. I'll bet this Trans crap would come to a screeching halt if heads started rolling, hypothetically speaking of course.
Did everyone miss this? They don't force this on the muslims, just the whites.
Unite with the Muslims.
We can settle our differences later.
We have a common enemy.
And in light of what we know about 911, were the Muslims ever our enemy?
In ideological terms, yes. Their suppression of women, violent tendencies, the entire concept of taqiyya and their hatred of bacon makes Islam ideologically opposed to both western civilization and Christianity.
We may, however, be able to unite in large part over this. We can be opposed but peacefully agree to disagree and stay in our lanes, and even work together to take on a threat bigger than our differences that affects the future of both our ideologies and culture.
It was silly and dishonest to ever even have a notion to blame an entire people for 9/11 anyway, even if it had been a few of them.
Idk suppression of women seems like a better idea than faggots twerking pantsless for kids on the white house lawn every june.
If you don't understand that those are two completely separate things then you are as lost as the left is.
"The evil muslims" are basically normal americans from before the sexual revolution and women's suffrage. The major difference is we circumcized our boys and they circumcize their girls. Obviously the difference between islam and christianity is more complex than that, since mohammed was a warrior and jesus was not. But it's not like your average muslim family is a jihadi any more than your average christian family is a soldier
I don't think you understand that before the modern day Islam, before we fucked up the Middle East, women were like western women 10-15 years ago. They wore bikinis, they weren't covered up, they weren't denied all of these normal every day rights.
You are actually retarded if you think oppressing women like modern day Islam is the way, and there is no common ground to be had here.
You are entitled to your wrong opinion, but a reminder from a Constitutionalist that nowhere in the Constitution is there anything about suppressing women.
Women also never gained the right to vote, as they always had that right as the Constitution made no distinction between sexes.
What you are pointing to as "the sexual revolution" has literally no bearing in the problems of today.
This is what THEY want
Both liberal feminism and Christian fundamentalism movements are being used by cabal to move towards Sharia law in the west
FTM Sexual Reassignment Surgery is just Islamic Female Genital Mutilation
https://qalerts.app/?q=unite+all
humanity is standing up
I mean. Larry Fink of Blackrock has all but admitted the investment firms and Financial institutions were ultimately behind most of this shit. At least as far as the Business world is concerned.
Compelling and threatening people who weren’t already on board into compliance. Or they’d destroy their Companies and lives.
Amy Pascal
I don't know how it happened, but Amy Pascal got control over the Spiderman IP due to some fake situation with the company (Sony).
She is an UBERSJW in the same vein as Kathleen Kennedy. She's a middle man.
She held Spiderman hostage for years and you cannot make a modern Spiderman with here SJW fingers on it. Hence Flash Thompson and Spidey's high school friends being multicultural in the Marvel Movies, and the bullshit with Zendaya's MJ (that they didn't want to call Mary Jane because it would have caused a boycott of Spiderman even back then).
All the Donald Glover shit in Spiderman was due to her. It's all her.
Also they're trying to blackwash Spider Man
That's why I could never get behind Miles Morales. He's not Peter Parker and never will be.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12203023/New-Spider-Man-movie-PULLED-Muslim-majority-countries-Protect-Trans-Kids-poster.html
Protect KIDS by jailing everyone involved in this sick attack on their innocence.
should be "protect kids from trans agendists" or just "protect kids from groomers"
Damn. Really liked that movie too.
Main issue with these movies is they are seizure triggers even for non epilipetics
I will watch them at home in a brighrly lit room..no idea why they had to make them so visually overwhelming
I'm no moslem, but I can think of many reasons to find that stupid film objectionable.
Just don't allow the children to watch that crap.
I missed the part of the movie where they united Muslims and Christians against globohomo. Lol