Funnily the redskull anon on 4chan posted yesterday that a whistleblower has been exposing Sotomayor and she will be impeached. This is the build up to that?
You are correct in more ways than you may know. What lawyers learn in Law School as the de facto teaching is called 'Law Positive'. Constitutional Law is taught as a hindsight.
We say that if a law is unconstitutional, we shouldn't follow it. It's wrong and should be changed.
They say, that every law is constitutional, as long as it passed was passed as law, and therefore you have to follow it, and if you want it deemed unconstitutional, you have to fight it in court.
There's the unfortunate possibility that all the arrests already happened behind the scenes and this is all just going to play out naturally and it'll be like suddenly law and order is working again. The plan is never truly revealed. And there's a "peaceful transition".
A full kinetic operation out in the open could send the nation into chaos.
If all the arrests already happened, I'm pretty sure that there would have been at least a leak or two regarding who was arrested.
And I don't believe there will truly be a "peaceful transition" anytime soon due to the fact that our indoctrination stations have brainwashed their sheep with Anti-American, Anti-God, Pro-Marxist beliefs.
They hate our Republic.
As far as possibly sending this nation into chaos, these last few years have been as chaotic as I can remember.
The marxist bastards in this country thrive on chaos, so if we the people ever want to once again have the possibility of having peaceful transition's, we may have to give them what they thrive.
I'm not going to get into the mathematics as that's impossible to calculate, but I think X1000 is a bit far fetched.
Yes there will be an increase due to the fact that they, the video game playing, doped up, anti-American, marxist drones will finally be receiving the resistance they so richly deserve.
The big cities will be the hot-spots but let's face it, most of those cities are blue anyways so who gives a fat, flying fuck.
Let them destroy their domain!
If they come to the rural areas and conservative small towns which still out-number the socialist shit-holes by a large margin, they will quickly realize their next social gathering may be a wake.
They (the drones) are still the minority by a long shot and "we the people" have had enough!
Instead of grilling potential justices on their past sex lives and whether they know what a woman is or not we should be testing them to see if they can pass a basic civics exam.
This. Also why we need to restore basic civics education to elementary schools, so future generations can put a check on justices that don't know the Constitution.
The other justice doesn't know what a woman is. This HAS to be a show because if it isn't, it is jaw-dropping. Can't believe the shitstorm of stupidity we've witnessed the last 3 years.
My understanding of humanity has gone from "human's will figure it out, we're smart" to "Humans are imbeciles and are idiot creatures."
She's choosing to ignore it. Which is most of her positions (A latina's rich experience...and hell no, I won't call her wise). Or perhaps she's trying to change the Constitution from her side and getting us to agree with what she says, not as things are/were.
This is probably taken out of context. Yes, we all know the 10th amendment. If you don't, it's the quote on the left in the image. However, there's a LOT of nuance in there and they have historically frequently overlapped resulting in about 240 years of case law meant to sort out precisely when a power is federal or state. Let me give you two obvious and relevant examples:
Can a woman kill her own fetus in utero? For most of my life, the SCOTUS's answer was: yes, this is within the domain of the feds and so we can have one nationwide rule. While there's nothing in the Constitution that says a woman can murder her own offspring up to the moment it passes the birth canal, the SCOTUS held for 50 years that this matter would not be regulated by the individual states.
Can a man marry a man? While there's nothing in the Constitution that specifically states it's the federal government's job to issue marriage licenses, the Obergefell decision legalizing Alphabet marriages asserts a nationwide rule over the rights of individual states to regulate the issue.
Yes, they're both wrongly decided. Both murder and marriage licenses are the states' purview, but they also illustrate that we deal with this question all the time when some clever lawyer figures out a way to claim something is implied by the Constitution to be one way or another. There are plenty of reasons Sotomayor could have said that statement in a perfectly valid way. She makes enough objectionable choices for which she can be criticized. We don't need to take cheap shots, IMO. It's beneath us and opens us up to equally cheap counter-accusations of being waycist.
Sotomayor has ALWAYS been the SCJ I thought was the most crooked of the 9 seated. Q has mentioned awhile ago that one would be forced to step down. I am banking on her being forced to step down.
Funnily the redskull anon on 4chan posted yesterday that a whistleblower has been exposing Sotomayor and she will be impeached. This is the build up to that?
Wonder if she legitimately passed the bar exam. Doesn’t seem like she has a clear grasp of the law. Guess time will tell.
Law yes. Constitution is not law to them.
You are correct in more ways than you may know. What lawyers learn in Law School as the de facto teaching is called 'Law Positive'. Constitutional Law is taught as a hindsight.
They also twist much of it in law school.
We say that if a law is unconstitutional, we shouldn't follow it. It's wrong and should be changed.
They say, that every law is constitutional, as long as it passed was passed as law, and therefore you have to follow it, and if you want it deemed unconstitutional, you have to fight it in court.
How true.
Bar and Law are very different things. (One could say the bar is very low, kek)
I love to see them freak out when you ask what the LSAT scores were...
Because then everyone would see they didn't earn their slots at the prestigious institutions they gain their credibility from...
Hoping she'll resign first.
My guess is the abortion verdict leak came out of her office.
No doubt in my mind
Can you provide a link? I'd like to lurk there.
Sotomayor is so, so, so Bader Ginsburg adjacent!
Agreed. Anything short of that is useless. Insulting even.
There's the unfortunate possibility that all the arrests already happened behind the scenes and this is all just going to play out naturally and it'll be like suddenly law and order is working again. The plan is never truly revealed. And there's a "peaceful transition".
A full kinetic operation out in the open could send the nation into chaos.
If all the arrests already happened, I'm pretty sure that there would have been at least a leak or two regarding who was arrested.
And I don't believe there will truly be a "peaceful transition" anytime soon due to the fact that our indoctrination stations have brainwashed their sheep with Anti-American, Anti-God, Pro-Marxist beliefs.
They hate our Republic.
As far as possibly sending this nation into chaos, these last few years have been as chaotic as I can remember.
The marxist bastards in this country thrive on chaos, so if we the people ever want to once again have the possibility of having peaceful transition's, we may have to give them what they thrive.
No X buttons and no respawns.
Their games would be over in no time.
Yes but we're talking the scale of BLM riots x1000 all across the country
I'm not going to get into the mathematics as that's impossible to calculate, but I think X1000 is a bit far fetched.
Yes there will be an increase due to the fact that they, the video game playing, doped up, anti-American, marxist drones will finally be receiving the resistance they so richly deserve.
The big cities will be the hot-spots but let's face it, most of those cities are blue anyways so who gives a fat, flying fuck.
Let them destroy their domain!
If they come to the rural areas and conservative small towns which still out-number the socialist shit-holes by a large margin, they will quickly realize their next social gathering may be a wake.
They (the drones) are still the minority by a long shot and "we the people" have had enough!
We can only hope
And I am so tired of the waiting game. So Tired!!! 😴
Yep, you are correct.
Instead of grilling potential justices on their past sex lives and whether they know what a woman is or not we should be testing them to see if they can pass a basic civics exam.
This. Also why we need to restore basic civics education to elementary schools, so future generations can put a check on justices that don't know the Constitution.
That is why Obama picked her.
LakotaPride!
Long time no see! It's been ages. What's you been up to?
Glad to see you also, it has been a long time.
Still the same. Giving God thanks for giving me the ability to piss evil off by exposing the truth to the people.
Libtards is a term for a reason.
These people are absolutely retarded.
The other justice doesn't know what a woman is. This HAS to be a show because if it isn't, it is jaw-dropping. Can't believe the shitstorm of stupidity we've witnessed the last 3 years.
My understanding of humanity has gone from "human's will figure it out, we're smart" to "Humans are imbeciles and are idiot creatures."
It's like that Men In Black movie quote: A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky animals, and you know it.
Ladies and gentlemen, IDIOCRACY!!!
Stupid, corrupt bitch.
That’s why she’s there.
I think she understands it just fine.
She's choosing to ignore it. Which is most of her positions (A latina's rich experience...and hell no, I won't call her wise). Or perhaps she's trying to change the Constitution from her side and getting us to agree with what she says, not as things are/were.
I'm not a fan.
This
She wasn’t hired for her brains, just her gender and being an as lefty’s say, “POC”. 😒
She doesn't need to know anything for her to vote as she's told.......
Wise Latina? 🤔 or was that Kagan
yep, it was her not Kagan.
Kagan is a man.
Another victory for Affirmative Action... 😒😒
This is probably taken out of context. Yes, we all know the 10th amendment. If you don't, it's the quote on the left in the image. However, there's a LOT of nuance in there and they have historically frequently overlapped resulting in about 240 years of case law meant to sort out precisely when a power is federal or state. Let me give you two obvious and relevant examples:
Can a woman kill her own fetus in utero? For most of my life, the SCOTUS's answer was: yes, this is within the domain of the feds and so we can have one nationwide rule. While there's nothing in the Constitution that says a woman can murder her own offspring up to the moment it passes the birth canal, the SCOTUS held for 50 years that this matter would not be regulated by the individual states.
Can a man marry a man? While there's nothing in the Constitution that specifically states it's the federal government's job to issue marriage licenses, the Obergefell decision legalizing Alphabet marriages asserts a nationwide rule over the rights of individual states to regulate the issue.
Yes, they're both wrongly decided. Both murder and marriage licenses are the states' purview, but they also illustrate that we deal with this question all the time when some clever lawyer figures out a way to claim something is implied by the Constitution to be one way or another. There are plenty of reasons Sotomayor could have said that statement in a perfectly valid way. She makes enough objectionable choices for which she can be criticized. We don't need to take cheap shots, IMO. It's beneath us and opens us up to equally cheap counter-accusations of being waycist.
I wonder how painful it is to be that stupid and still be a Supreme Court Justice.
Minority hire. What do you expect? Fully indoctrinated, not fully educated.
I always called her So to my your." So to my pockets, your money.
Sotomayor has ALWAYS been the SCJ I thought was the most crooked of the 9 seated. Q has mentioned awhile ago that one would be forced to step down. I am banking on her being forced to step down.
Diversity hire.
Is this true? How could she be that dense, that is a question I asked my 4 th graders on a test last school year...