This is a definite WOW! article. Martin Geddes transformation from journalist to full fledged anon writing about DUMBS, weather warfare, geo warfare, DEWs, Bluebeam and Galactic Federations is astounding. His points of how long this war has been fought and how nothing is as it seems and how they use events to confuse and conflate, to herd us into predictable funnels, is not lost on anons. This is a serious guy who is confirming that our speculations are close to the point. He is us, we are him. Truth seeking anons.
His view of our role in all of this is also on point. It is our job to be the bridge from the old to the new and to ensure that the evils of the past are not incorporated into the institutions of the future.
This article is an incredible step towards the Great Awakening and needs to be disseminated widely.
I read the article. It has a good, flowing style. It is very "Q", and outlines some of the big themes.
As I read it, I realized that this whole war is so multi-dimensional that's its very likely beyond all but the most dedicated anons to really grasp in its entirety. Like the private, the corporal, the captain or the lieutenant, we necessarily have a limited view of the overall operation, but for that reason, our key arsenal is faith, truth, diligence and good practice.
Its a good read. Regardless of which aspect of the operation you are focused on or paying most attention to, I suspect that this essay has something for everyone.
Martin is a genuinely good writer. Something we don't see much of these days. I appreciate his work because of that as well as his British anon perspective. He's got a sharp mind and he's hung in there despite the attacks on all sides that came his way. God bless him.
Stickying is the most effective method of bringing a post to the attention to the board. As such, some people ask for a sticky, if they think the post has high value or high potential or is of some high tier value.
It could be that the meme is particularly poignant, the ideas provoking, the link is noteworthy, or the post hits the target for whatever reason. Sometimes a post is stickied by mods simply to raise attention to it. Essentially, a sticky is NOT an endorsement. Sometimes something that needs to be pulled apart or blown out of the water is stickied.
Essentially, a sticky is a "Look Here" marker. People will call for it, or a mod will execute it, if they think the post is noteworthy.
I haven’t made any posts because I never looked into how to post. I don’t feel like I know enough to post. I’m surprised I’ve made 23 comments, but it’s possible for sure. I wasn’t fully awakened until November 2020, when the election was stolen. I was in shock for weeks. Then one night, I saw a video that woke me up to child trafficking. I didn’t sleep for two days. I read like crazy. I read GAW, citizens free press (CFP), and Townhall regularly, and I consider myself very awake. I no longer trust just about anything government spewed or MSM. Stopped watching Fox after the election crap, except Tucker Carlson. When he was fired, I stopped completely.
You say I’m not new at this, but I still have a handshake symbol…? I don’t know what that is.
What’s a gif? The number on the left side of a comment with an arrow above and below it? I LOVE learning new things, Patriot11Retiree! I’d like to meet up with local fellow GAW readers; do people do that?
Geddes' initial 'analysis' of Q was that there was no real group behind a psyop.
Now it's 'we'.
Notice the subtitle.....'It's real at last.'
Real at last?
It's great he's changed his mind or gotten serious about it, but this is a tail wagging a dog.
You have all the Q drops and years of research should have shown more than a johnny-come-lately 'polymath' can bring to the table.
"My research says that this end game has been planned for a minimum 70 years, and the plan as a whole has a heritage that goes back 160 years to the era of Lincoln and the American Civil War. We are witnessing the culmination of extremely long range multi-generational infiltration and subversion, by both sides."
Minimum of 70 years. Why did it take this long to come to this conclusion then?
Hopefully his 'research' will lead him deeper into the holes he's just now discovered. I'm curious to know what he considers 'both sides'.
I said when Q began that I can't wait until everyone pretends they always knew what was coming.
It's great he gets it now, being the polymath. Me, I'm still waiting for his answer to an email about a subject in math, and I'm tired of would-be leaders bringing up the rear.
Martin Geddes is not a "johnny-come-lately". He was a top-notch anon from the very early days of Q. While I usually don't resort to this level of straightforwardness, after reading your full comment here and noting the multiple inaccuracies, I'm prepared to say it straight out: you don't know what you're talking about here.
Agree. I responded to 2EyesOpen directly, but didn't know if you'd see it:
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump."
administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
Like I said. I read him from the beginning. He was on the fence about Q.
He was doing analysis of its existence more than the info presented.
I tested that water with conversation.
You're too easily impressed by johnny come lately.
I'm glad if he's now understanding Q and neither he nor you always knew.
You should try having done this for over 50 years.
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump."
administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath?
What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist?
One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons.
Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."
Well, I imagine to somebody who's done this for over 50 years, then the early anons following Q would look like johnny-come-latelys. So what does "having done this for over 50 years" entail?
Inside Information and
Diligent burning of the midnight oil.
I'd add that all current systems, blackhat and white, are all derivation/deviations of eternal universal truths they use as power over those who don't see that.
Two on a high place. One truth. Only one of the two sees the All-in-One, One-in-All. The other uses it to rule the plain (matrix).
The battle is on the micro (revelations within) and the macro as they are enacted,
and is as old as the history of religion.
So when you say "inside information", you mean the revelations within or the other meaning most people give to "inside information", i.e., information from an insider?
Sorry to put the mockers on Mr Geddes, I can see you all like him but you should know he is a chancer and a grifter.
He is behind the grift that is Bossmaker. All that is a scam to deregister your identity from admiralty law to common law, this means you have to pay every increasingly expensive fees for consultations and legal documents, this is endless.
He likes to promote himself as a polymath but all he knows is mathematics, that isn't a polymath. He isn't a christian at all, he refuses to say if he does have a religion... hmmm... He is controlled opposition.
Sorry, I interpreted “ All that is a scam to deregister your identity from admiralty law to common law, this means you have to pay every increasingly expensive fees for consultations and legal documents, this is endless.” as being a knock on common law.
As for being a grifter - “Someone who pulls confidence games.”, “A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud.” - he does allow for donations, but I’m sorry I don’t see the deception or fraud.
It seems far more likely that someone might try to discredit what appears to be an effective means of countering the current institutionalized fraud through personal attacks against him than it does that he’s being deceptive.
I like what he has to say and agree with most of it; however, I found one particular sentence rather unsettling:
If we assume WMDs including EMPs are neutralized...
Why would we assume that? I can go to the local university and observe the results of recent spallation reactions, and I'm still standing on the ground, so I'm pretty sure the fundamental forces are still operating, lol.
Does he mean politically, militarily, or authoritatively neutralized? He has to. As far as i'm aware there's no way to neutralize the strong interaction of Nuclear WMDs and the only real protection against EMP is shielding or a Faraday cage...
If you want to know what is fake, think hard about what is real. Look around you at family, friends, neighbors. The trees. The sky. Food and housing. Creation. All else is fake.
Interesting someone says he's not achristian, which seems obvious. He does however mention other beings involved in the war which I assume he means aliens. I think he's right on the one hand, that other entities are involved, however, he fails to realize that we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, powers and dominions, against wickedness in high places. The battle is truly against Satan and his minions. They are powerful but Christ has won the ultimate victory and they will still bow the knee to Him alone.
Other beings could include other intelligences that dwell in other dimensions/realms. Think about the comparison between devils and reptilian aliens. Both are bipedal, have scales, horns, long tails and vestigial wings. Same things? I just figure we have some predators or parasites that are beyond our perception. We can also access higher guidance if we get our mental chatter out of the way.
This is a definite WOW! article. Martin Geddes transformation from journalist to full fledged anon writing about DUMBS, weather warfare, geo warfare, DEWs, Bluebeam and Galactic Federations is astounding. His points of how long this war has been fought and how nothing is as it seems and how they use events to confuse and conflate, to herd us into predictable funnels, is not lost on anons. This is a serious guy who is confirming that our speculations are close to the point. He is us, we are him. Truth seeking anons.
His view of our role in all of this is also on point. It is our job to be the bridge from the old to the new and to ensure that the evils of the past are not incorporated into the institutions of the future.
This article is an incredible step towards the Great Awakening and needs to be disseminated widely.
Well said! Couldn’t agree more!
I read the article. It has a good, flowing style. It is very "Q", and outlines some of the big themes.
As I read it, I realized that this whole war is so multi-dimensional that's its very likely beyond all but the most dedicated anons to really grasp in its entirety. Like the private, the corporal, the captain or the lieutenant, we necessarily have a limited view of the overall operation, but for that reason, our key arsenal is faith, truth, diligence and good practice.
Its a good read. Regardless of which aspect of the operation you are focused on or paying most attention to, I suspect that this essay has something for everyone.
Martin is a genuinely good writer. Something we don't see much of these days. I appreciate his work because of that as well as his British anon perspective. He's got a sharp mind and he's hung in there despite the attacks on all sides that came his way. God bless him.
Sticky. This article is AMAZING and on point to where things are going Anons. Dig in and be prepared.
I’m not new at this, but I’ve never understood why ppl call for a’sticky.” Would you be able to please give me a quick explanation?
Stickying is the most effective method of bringing a post to the attention to the board. As such, some people ask for a sticky, if they think the post has high value or high potential or is of some high tier value.
It could be that the meme is particularly poignant, the ideas provoking, the link is noteworthy, or the post hits the target for whatever reason. Sometimes a post is stickied by mods simply to raise attention to it. Essentially, a sticky is NOT an endorsement. Sometimes something that needs to be pulled apart or blown out of the water is stickied.
Essentially, a sticky is a "Look Here" marker. People will call for it, or a mod will execute it, if they think the post is noteworthy.
I would be happy to, but I have a question first.
You created your account a year ago, have made zero posts, and you have 23 comments.
You're "not new at this" but you still have a 🤝🏻.
Why is that?
Comment/post score.
Did you get my reply?
I haven’t made any posts because I never looked into how to post. I don’t feel like I know enough to post. I’m surprised I’ve made 23 comments, but it’s possible for sure. I wasn’t fully awakened until November 2020, when the election was stolen. I was in shock for weeks. Then one night, I saw a video that woke me up to child trafficking. I didn’t sleep for two days. I read like crazy. I read GAW, citizens free press (CFP), and Townhall regularly, and I consider myself very awake. I no longer trust just about anything government spewed or MSM. Stopped watching Fox after the election crap, except Tucker Carlson. When he was fired, I stopped completely. You say I’m not new at this, but I still have a handshake symbol…? I don’t know what that is.
I look forward to seeing your future comments and posts. The more active you are the more you learn.
Next, try out the gifs from the side bar.
u/#Merica
What’s a gif? The number on the left side of a comment with an arrow above and below it? I LOVE learning new things, Patriot11Retiree! I’d like to meet up with local fellow GAW readers; do people do that?
And I just responded to you, because I saw a red mark near the bell at the top of the page.
Relevant info/Intel, and sometimes fun to Awakening forum.
Geddes' initial 'analysis' of Q was that there was no real group behind a psyop.
Now it's 'we'.
Notice the subtitle.....'It's real at last.'
Real at last?
It's great he's changed his mind or gotten serious about it, but this is a tail wagging a dog.
You have all the Q drops and years of research should have shown more than a johnny-come-lately 'polymath' can bring to the table.
"My research says that this end game has been planned for a minimum 70 years, and the plan as a whole has a heritage that goes back 160 years to the era of Lincoln and the American Civil War. We are witnessing the culmination of extremely long range multi-generational infiltration and subversion, by both sides."
Minimum of 70 years. Why did it take this long to come to this conclusion then?
Hopefully his 'research' will lead him deeper into the holes he's just now discovered. I'm curious to know what he considers 'both sides'.
I said when Q began that I can't wait until everyone pretends they always knew what was coming.
It's great he gets it now, being the polymath. Me, I'm still waiting for his answer to an email about a subject in math, and I'm tired of would-be leaders bringing up the rear.
Martin Geddes is not a "johnny-come-lately". He was a top-notch anon from the very early days of Q. While I usually don't resort to this level of straightforwardness, after reading your full comment here and noting the multiple inaccuracies, I'm prepared to say it straight out: you don't know what you're talking about here.
Agree. I responded to 2EyesOpen directly, but didn't know if you'd see it:
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump." administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
All of his writings are open source. https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/
Like I said. I read him from the beginning. He was on the fence about Q. He was doing analysis of its existence more than the info presented. I tested that water with conversation. You're too easily impressed by johnny come lately. I'm glad if he's now understanding Q and neither he nor you always knew. You should try having done this for over 50 years.
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump." administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
All of his writings are open source. https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath? What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist? One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons. Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."
Well, I imagine to somebody who's done this for over 50 years, then the early anons following Q would look like johnny-come-latelys. So what does "having done this for over 50 years" entail?
Knowing the playbook inside and out.
And how was that knowing the playbook inside and out achieved?
Inside Information and Diligent burning of the midnight oil.
I'd add that all current systems, blackhat and white, are all derivation/deviations of eternal universal truths they use as power over those who don't see that.
Two on a high place. One truth. Only one of the two sees the All-in-One, One-in-All. The other uses it to rule the plain (matrix).
The battle is on the micro (revelations within) and the macro as they are enacted, and is as old as the history of religion.
So when you say "inside information", you mean the revelations within or the other meaning most people give to "inside information", i.e., information from an insider?
Your non-acceptance of facts or opinions isn't the same as showing 'multiple inaccuracies'.
Let me guess: you're SB2
Sorry to put the mockers on Mr Geddes, I can see you all like him but you should know he is a chancer and a grifter.
He is behind the grift that is Bossmaker. All that is a scam to deregister your identity from admiralty law to common law, this means you have to pay every increasingly expensive fees for consultations and legal documents, this is endless.
He likes to promote himself as a polymath but all he knows is mathematics, that isn't a polymath. He isn't a christian at all, he refuses to say if he does have a religion... hmmm... He is controlled opposition.
Prithee, what’s wrong with common law?
Are you suggesting that to remain in admiralty law is the path forward, or that there is a third path?
Freedom always comes at a price.
He is grifting for fame and money, there is a lot wrong with ripping people off.
That wasn’t my question.
I never said anything was wrong with common law, you are thread sliding. I said he was and is a grifter.
Sorry, I interpreted “ All that is a scam to deregister your identity from admiralty law to common law, this means you have to pay every increasingly expensive fees for consultations and legal documents, this is endless.” as being a knock on common law.
As for being a grifter - “Someone who pulls confidence games.”, “A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud.” - he does allow for donations, but I’m sorry I don’t see the deception or fraud.
It seems far more likely that someone might try to discredit what appears to be an effective means of countering the current institutionalized fraud through personal attacks against him than it does that he’s being deceptive.
He doesn't allow for donations, you have to pay for what he says you need.
Great sticky decision.
Well worth reading. Hope within the chaos.
Welcome back Martin! Article is (as usual)... spot on my friend.
Excellent!
I like what he has to say and agree with most of it; however, I found one particular sentence rather unsettling:
Why would we assume that? I can go to the local university and observe the results of recent spallation reactions, and I'm still standing on the ground, so I'm pretty sure the fundamental forces are still operating, lol.
Does he mean politically, militarily, or authoritatively neutralized? He has to. As far as i'm aware there's no way to neutralize the strong interaction of Nuclear WMDs and the only real protection against EMP is shielding or a Faraday cage...
Maybe he means chemical and biological WMDs.
Thoughts?
Excellent! Thanks for sharing this, gives me hope amidst the chaos.
If you want to know what is fake, think hard about what is real. Look around you at family, friends, neighbors. The trees. The sky. Food and housing. Creation. All else is fake.
Interesting someone says he's not achristian, which seems obvious. He does however mention other beings involved in the war which I assume he means aliens. I think he's right on the one hand, that other entities are involved, however, he fails to realize that we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, powers and dominions, against wickedness in high places. The battle is truly against Satan and his minions. They are powerful but Christ has won the ultimate victory and they will still bow the knee to Him alone.
Other beings could include other intelligences that dwell in other dimensions/realms. Think about the comparison between devils and reptilian aliens. Both are bipedal, have scales, horns, long tails and vestigial wings. Same things? I just figure we have some predators or parasites that are beyond our perception. We can also access higher guidance if we get our mental chatter out of the way.
“Situation Hopeless... But Not Serious”. Found a new play to watch!
IMO, Geddes is addressing the people; Flynn is addressing the deep state.