Anon shares on Wifi Lightbulbs. Can anybody who knows of this topic shed some light?
If you haven't heard about "LIFI" you will.
Following is a brief explanation:
"At its essence, LiFi operates as a Visible Light Communications (VLC) system, promising unparalleled wireless internet speeds. Central to this system are LED light bulbs. These bulbs emit swift light pulses, imperceptible to the human eye, laden with information. It’s akin to an advanced, hyper-speed Morse code. Devices fitted with the requisite receivers decode this influx of data at breathtaking speeds. Demonstrated potential transmission rates for LiFi have even surpassed 224 Gbps, a pace that dwarfs WiGig, one of the most rapid Wi-Fi technologies."
I have enough regular bulbs to last my lifetime.
Commies can eat a bag of dicks.
Me too, my garage is loaded , they can eat two bags!
That makes 3 of us! :-)
Good for us
I was fully brainwashed/ Zombie land back then I replaced them one at a time as I could afford it. At least I didn't get vaxed :) Thank you Frens I am not vaxed!
where did you get them? I hate these things, the lighting makes me depressed. I am 73, not that much left in my lifetime. I would gladly bulk order them if I knew where to get em.
Look for "full-spectrum" light bulbs. They are still LED, but they replicate sunlight effectively.
You can buy them at pet stores, especially the ones that specialize in fish and reptiles, because they discovered that normal indoor led lights were killing the frogs. And the fish. And the plants. Studies on humans are probably out there somewhere, suppressed.
I have a full spectrum LED cob light over the sink light and it has paid for itself in reduced cost-the fluorescent light was generating too much heat and not enough light so I changed it and it is sunlight in my kitchen-the darkest room in my place..
Not the same. You want lights created by "fire." Incandescents and halogens. As stated in the article, LED lights flicker faster than the conscious mind can notice. Although I can see this flicker occasionally.
Just stumbled on this ad earlier today: https://healthlighting.com/collections/chromalux-full-spectrum-light-bulbs
Thanks, Mr A! Just bought some for the new lighting I'm putting in next week!
WWGWGA - into the light!
You can still find them on Amazon. I use 40 watt for my lamps. Make sure you get A19 bulb size with E26 base size. Right now Xtricity brand is selling them on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Frosted-Incandescent-Rough-Service-Light/dp/B07PRN85RP/ref=sr_1_17?keywords=xtricity+light+bulbs&qid=1707093635&s=hi&sr=1-17
I didn't go to the site yet, but are these the "full-spectrum" bulbs that were mentioned above? If so are they also part of the comm system that regular LED's are being referred to in this topic?
I don't think so.
They are not LED.
I hope you are right, if so I will probably buy them. Thanks.
thank you
I bought them the first time, they tried to ban them 10-15 years ago.....
They are probably available in mexico, if you live by the boarder. Also check your local swap meets and things like that.
wrong border, lol, I live 28 mi south of Quebec. Thank you
Ebay
thank you
The Rebel is strong with you.
And that was many years before Q.....
The best of the best made their way here...
Let me know if you feel like hooking a fren up.
I've got some silver coin to go your way.
Edit: 1 letter.
Someone has a amazon link above that looks good.
For wi-fi or even more advanced faster wifi, it's still redundant.
I have seen reports that digital information can be transmitted through your plumbing pipes if you want it to, and if you get the right adapters. I use an adapter to route my signal through the house electrical. It's still limited by my gov't-gave-them-a-controlled-monopoly internet service provider, but potentially could be much faster. It avoids the need for a repeater/booster for home wi-fi.
I personally think LED mandates are designed to make us depressed and sicker, another part of the cabal's love of sadism, accompanied by bribes and grift. Don't get me wrong: the tech is wonderful for a lot of applications. I'm not anti-tech, but for lighting your home or porch it's rather dismal. The mandates are the problem, not the tech.
I recently got full-spectrum lights (better at imitating sunlight) for my home. They sell them (among other places) at pet stores because your pets and plants need them to thrive. Fish, reptiles, along with many plants and amphibians are quite sensitive to changes in lights.
Like a lot of anons, I've been identifying as a frog for a lot of things lately, including my choice of indoor lighting. 🐸
Just another nonsense bogeyman. Rather like saying all the laser pointers in the world are really ready to be used as light sabers. There's a whole lot more that goes into a sensor-communication system than a bulb and an electrical socket, and it will not be present in the home.
And what would be the point? Human voice communication is effectively about 40 bits/second. At 224 billion bits/second, such li-fi system becomes extravagant and useless overkill. It can't report any faster than the original signal. It's like expecting your household plumbing to play like a pipe organ when it is not busy delivering water.
This is not waking up; it is a fever dream.
So the bulbs can't interface with say, a wifi router?
LIFI uses the VISIBLE light spectrum. How many people do you know have their wifi routers in a closest or on a shelf in an office? And have you seen the amount of trouble people have purposely trying to connect something up to their Wifi routers? Do you really think some device that gets stuffed into offices or even closets is automatically configuring a 96 cent Chinese made light bulb? And then what? Does the light bulb also have a microphone and camera?
Why go through all that trouble when people have cell phones?
Ok got it. Thanks for clarifying that!
What types of sensors could interact with LiFi?
The only things that can interface with them are electric power sockets. This is electricity, not magic. There are a whole lot of intervening electronics that would be needed to create a communication system. And for what? Who is going to listen? Who is going to keep tabs on a household 24 hours a day?
There are something like 130 million households in the U.S. If each household was continuously monitored, by 3 shifts of monitors, 8 hrs apiece, that would require 390 million monitors---but there are only 336 million people in the U.S. Do you begin to understand why the idea of universal, comprehensive, continuous surveillance is absolutely infeasible?
As for the monitoring it could be done with AI and just build profiles on people using that, which could be accessed later when that person comes up as someone of interest. But I'm glad to hear of the technical limitations
What are your thoughts on this https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOngZa10/x/c/4Z8jQ7Jo9x8
The most sophisticated forms of A.I. cause airplane crashes and traffic accidents. Do you know how difficult it is for even a human operator to make sense of what someone is saying, if they are not speaking directly into a microphone? And where would that microphone be? LEDs are not microphones. Maybe you could cut down the monitoring by a factor of 10. That gets you down to 39 million monitors. That about 10 times as many personnel as we have in the department of defense. Still infeasible. And, you are not reckoning the number of false alarms produced by the A.I. system. Plus you still only have a light bulb connected to an electric socket. How do you retrofit an entire house-wide microphone and multiplexing (multiple conversations) communication system for 130 million households?
I read the same Wikipedia article that description came from. These are not just "LED light bulbs." They are LEDs as the back end of a communication system that has a light sensor, high speed data transmission, encoder-decoder electronics, and an LED...presumably pointed in the right direction. Satellite communication constellations are now implementing laser-communication systems, which are functionally identical. Other communication systems based on solar UV light have been proposed.
Li-Fi might replace Wi-Fi, but I have a hard time reconciling that with the superstitious fear of such things as 5G and 6G communication. Emission detectors should be easy to develop, since LI-Fi requires light modulation and are essentially anti-invisible. I wouldn't be too surprised if some bright inventor could develop a phosphor-coated glass cover that would pass the illumination through a phosphorescence delay that would defeat the high-speed modulation of the signal. But the "bulb" would only be an emitter, not a microphone, nor a camera. And who would it be emitting to? Fren, you have to realize that one must have a system concept that makes sense---not pick out one piece of technology and make it into an evil magic.
Gotcha. You have put me at ease as I've reluctantly purchased the bulbs myself due to not having an alternative
The bulbs are fine. They are very bright and very efficient. Best if you pick the high color temperature variety (color temperature near 6000 K). It's like broad daylight. The lower color temperatures look yellowish, like old incandescent light bulbs. Supposedly, some people like the lantern-colored light over daylight. Not me, but I live in a land where our sunlight is always muted by clouds. I'm not so sure the advertised lifetime is realized in practice, but the light is great. They make them as floodlight bulbs as well, in case you have outdoor lighting to deal with. Like my Dad used to say about lots of automobile horsepower: "When you need it, you gotta have it."
I mean, I guess? The whole point of LiFi is to ditch radio signals (WiFi) altogether, and transmit data via light instead.
If you really want to go down this rabbit hole check this out.
It has been known for a long time you can do various protocols including Ethernet over the power lines. Several huge US power companies wanted to deliver internet over the power lines, and it's doable, it's main source of attenuation is the type of transformers used on telephone poles. In many areas if you get the power cut on to a new address they have the option of getting internet 'bundled', they refer you to whatever local ISP works with them and get you a wildly better deal on the local internet than you could get going direct to the ISP. Now why is that ISPs let the power company skim off the top of their recurring profit potential? Quid pro quo for not using that infrastructure to deliver internet to homes because that space on their wire is already biing used.
You'd be amazed how much metadata you can get from and put onto that infrastructure. People are probably familiar with Ethernet over power line for bridging connections in their homes over their power sockets going through the breaker in their house as long as it's the right type and on the same circuit. In the last ~20 years there have been regulations dictating what types of circuit breakers must be used in new installations.
There was a guy that made some threatening video using a camcorder with no battery hooked up to the wall for power while recording ~20 years ago. The background static noise on the power line left a distinct pattern in the recorded video and audio of his masked message of threats. They were able to analyze and playback and match that background noise to triangulate him within a very close distance I don't remember if it was blocks or miles based on that match because as it turns out that background noise was being recorded by power companies, presumably as some sort of diagnostic tool similar to an expensive TDR time distance reflectometer device. The details came out in a court document where the evidence was supposedly mistakenly revealed to the public on how they narrowed him down.
I could go on about this for some time but you get the picture.
This is along the lines of what I was concerned about. Is there a device that can scramble the power fluctuation signatures of your home's power consumption? That would potentially also scramble or shift every device in your home that was powered by it (or just brick some of them kek)
May be best to have the entire house behind a double-conversion UPS so all devices use the batteries while the utility power feeds the batteries. I would think there are cheaper solutions though
Every freaking stupid thing they try from now on going forward: NO!!!!! And we teach that thoroughly to our children and grandchildren.
Please please bring back our happy little incandescents.
this may be true but GE started with the LED's when Edison's Patent timed out and anybody could make the Edison type bulbs without Paying GE a Residual. GE was on the verge of losing a big source of income.
Tons of led bulbs do not use lifi, from dumb led bulbs to cheaper smart ones
most of the time my lights are set purple or navy, 1%. Life is peaceful and blissful ever since. Also no heat generation
I do agree they are good for heat and also not breaking. Just sus of anything "smart"
Don't need the LiFi to see what's going on. The only redeeming qualities of artificial modern lighting has been the infrared from incandescent. The flicker rates and narrow frequency band of blue light from LEDs, with zero infrared, is the exact recipe for agitating biological health issues. LED lights alone can induce Type 2 Diabetes.
https://twitter.com/zaidkdahhaj/status/1744424566146158832
"Artificial light hijacks POMC, ACTH, and CLIP to raise insulin and blood sugar, independent of what you eat"
Does anyone know yet why our street lamps are purple? I asked an officer last month. He said they are cheaper. I do not believe that, but he seemed sincere.
There was some article that said a factory messed up somewhere and now has to send replacements. 😂
It comes from cheapo LED replacements that break down over time. All white LEDs start off as strictly blue LEDs, and then use a yellow phosphor to convert most of that blue into yellow light, which both combine to average out into the white we see.
Well, if the yellow phosphor degrades or otherwise gets destroyed, you only get the purplish-blue of the original LED chip, and no longer white.
Thanks for this info. Very interesting and logical.
I remember reading a few years back that TPTB now use a combo of led light emissions in the structure and wifi signals that tell where people are throughout the structure. I tried to find sauce to share but combo of AI and Wifi now does this too. I will continue to search for wifi led combo. Here is the Ai Wifi combo. https://hackaday.com/2018/07/02/using-an-ai-and-wifi-to-see-through-walls/
I made some posts on this:
This one has several links in the comments: https://conspiracies.win/p/16bihwLrQ0/what-do-yall-think-about-lifi-/
https://conspiracies.win/p/16bimbsQi0/so-thinking-about-lifi-5g-and-li/
https://conspiracies.win/p/16bj5MXxmp/increase-in-led-lighting-risks-h/c/
https://rumble.com/v2hy6io-whatis-lifi.html
GE had been producing non incandescent bulbs. Lots of money.
They began to support libs and Loe and behold. A law that forced people to buy that which GE had warehouses full of product.
A few years later 700 billion tarp became 840 billion tarp with a bunch of the extra going to GE.
Laundered.
I used to live in the state of WA. You know about their winter? It's dark without sunlight and cloudy about 9 months out of a year. I used "Full Spectrum" LED bulbs, they help.
Got a "smart" electric meter? Look at that as a sever station. Data is sent back into the "network" and collected at the meter the sent out as packets.
I bet you could build a device that does inline in your service power that could defeat this. But it would need to be phisicaly in the main circut and wireless coms between the toaster fridge and smart meter base would be another issue. Also smart meters are wireless so basicly a listening device either way.
I never liked them. I like the light of old school bulbs better. Maybe I'm smarter than my kids think I am lol :) Plus they're cheaper and I turn lights off when I leave a room so they last. I could never get my kids to follow that rule. I had to pay a dime in the 60's and 70's when I left a light on. I learn fast haha!
Well, that theory presumes that dictating LED bulbs, while outlawing its competition to the public in a [supposedly] free market economy has a benevolent, or practical goal for the citizens.
My theory presumes that some pos politicians, and bureaucrats decided to make those LED bulb dictates to pad their own bank accounts from LED manufacturer stocks, and/or their kids/niece/nephew/brother-in-law, or some other good-ole-boy's company ownership.
I can promise you that it's definitely not to "save the planet from global warming." Prohibition laws always work that way.
Except the government didn't specify WHAT lighting technology we use, it merely specified the efficiency standards. Fluorescent lights meet these standards too. But, indulging this for a second...
You think that 96 cent Chinese made light bulb you bought at Home Depot and screwed into a lamp you've had for 30 years running on a decaying power grid that is constantly having sagging and surging voltages is doing what exactly? Some visible light based network to spy on you with it's huge range of 32 feet?
Why would they go through all that trouble instead of just compromising your cell phone and the cable or DSL modems?
They are suppose to start putting smart meter on our houses in our neighborhood. I don’t trust them. Does anyone have experience with them?
Smart meters have been deployed for many years here. They are not mandatory but it's impossible to get reasonably priced electricity and gas if you don't. The stated reason is that a human no longer has to check the reading. Everyone knows the real reason is that they can individually turn off the electricity supply to your house.
Stupidly, they contain 2G cellphone modems to communicate with the mothership. Unfortunately for them 2G is being turned off nationwide. We have smart meters here but we still have to read them by eyeball and manually upload the numbers to the utility company.
Actually the fed treehuggers were pushing fluorescent not LED. LEDs came as a result because they're better than the fluorescent. Less power usage more reliable.
Interesting! I always hated those lights in public buildings. Just irritated my head
I remember reading that the ‘Ring’ wireless cameras mounted on everyone’s houses are part of this matrix.
If you haven’t seen this yet it’s a thing.
I’ll peak around when I get home and post if I can dig it back up.
I believe it was connected with ATT.
Also include everyones 5g home WiFi. Can be used as a spatial tracking camera.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqwMhbUK/your-wifi-router-can-be-used-to-/
That link seems to be talking about routers using 2.4ghz. I think you're confusing the cellular term "5g" as in Fifth Generation that run at about 3.5mhz, and 5Ghz (shortened to 5g) a radio band allocated to Wifi.
Note it says “devices fitted with the requisite receivers…” I suspect that using LED bulbs in your old lamps won’t cause a problem or anyone, just like having Wi-Fi in your home doesn’t. Buying old lamps is a good idea anyway, new stuff is junk.
Optical line of sight signals have carried ridiculously high speed information for decades.
Lifi on a random led bulb is not going to happen because the data needs to go somewhere, which means you'll need a base station that transmits the light and tranceivers on all of your equipment. Oh - and line of sight to the base station. Even non visible spectrums will need fine tuning to your particular house because different materials block different types of light.
Basically, they built a perfect way to tranfer things between your xbox laptop laptop and tv....if by excellent, you mean the most expensive and kinda limited utility wireless option available.
Fix it with duct tape.
This is why I bought like 50 incandescent bulbs before they stopped selling them around me
Add to other comment. I suspect li-fi was developed independently of the LED light bulb mandates.