Third-party Movement No Labels Says It Will field a 2024 Presidential Ticket
(www.breitbart.com)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
No labels = Rino democrats and their /marxist partners
Its just one more election interference ploy. This way they can manipulate vote counts between 2 other parties making it harder to detect the fuckery.
You and NOTWOKE are right on target. This is just another scheme to hopefully suck votes away from DJT. And it's aimed at anyone who likes to think of themselves as "independent thinkers."
Trump never had the Never Trumpers I think it hurts Biden more (think uncommitted on a National level). All 👀 on Newsom- he’s gonna get hit on big on PG&E rates (2nd rate increase this year) The Salmon issue in Northern California and of course Newcomers get full healthcare
We must Meme this to oblivion. Wit and and biting sarcasm at its finest top quality stuff in their own words.
Splitters
Bingo
We really should abolish political parties the way our founding fathers intended
I don't think we are going to have to after this election season. I firmly believe that the way things are in this country are going to change for the better very soon. Now, I'm sure I'll get a lot of heat for this but I really don't care. In the future there will be no "parties".
What will there be?
NSFW
I'm sorry, but this is one point where the founding fathers let their idealism exceed their realism. For one thing, our freedoms include most especially the freedom of conscience and the freedom of association. For another, there will always arise points of severe division (e.g., abortion). It is inevitable that "parties" will arise to embody either an issue or an ideological combination of issues.
My union had no "parties" and long suffered under a dictatorial underling. Everyone was resigned to their fate. But when I jumped into the situation, I realized we needed to have party politics to organize and give voice to the resistance. And so we began, with a party label ("Dedicated Unionists") and a publication for the distribution of propaganda. The "establishment" were like a deer in the headlghts. They had never seen the like. Instead of lobbying the cronies of the union council, we ignored the hundred-odd members in the council and concentrated on the thousands of rank-and-file members. The establishment fought back with lies and innuendo. We countered with access to union tax and income documents that had been held secret from the membership. It went back and forth for 5 years and cost several thousand dollars, but it did culminate in firing the tyrant under circumstances where there would be no comeback (the members said they would join a decertification campaign if that was attempted). To me, it was all a small-scale experiment in proving that corruption could be expelled. Partisanship is how political change is made (MAGA!).
Hoping that there will be no "parties" is like hoping there will be no thumbs.
Would that even matter? They independents would just form caucuses and it would make it even harder to tell who is who
Unity ticket? They ain't got a clue as to what's wrong with USA politics. I want to see an "Obliterate the UniParty" ticket, not a "Unity with commies and nazis" ticket.
Looks like another bunch of grifters using words like indefatigable on their website. But the same political hacks that couldn’t make anywhere else… including Joe Lieberman.
This is obvious WHY they are doing this, folks.
What was the big news Friday?
GOP establisment LOST CONTROL of the Repulican Party, due to Trump peeps gaining control of the RNC.
A few hours later ... they launch a third party.
If (and that's a big "IF") they could get enough votes to prevent Trump from getting a majority of Electoral College votes (and notice, NOW they will actually CARE about the Electoral College) ... then the vote goes to the House of Representatives, with each STATE getting one vote (not each member).
I think the R's have a slight edge. Would there be fuckery in that vote to try to stop Trump in a last-ditch attempt at yet another coup? At least, McCarthy is not Speaker, because then fuckery would be 100% guaranteed.
Hmm. Does this also synchronize with the donor abandonment of Nikki Haley? Plan A is a failure; move on to Plan B?
Tired Bullshit Relabeled
There, I fixed it.
More vote splitting.... well I guess if actual rigging won't work, 15 different groups that all pick off votes from Trump might?
Yup, this is the dilution + noise strat.
TOO FUNNY, As my mother used to say "More money than SENSE"
Lol my grandma used to say that too
Small dig from Tore on No Labels.
https://nitter.poast.org/idontexistTore/status/1766242952429654050#m
Ugh. I'm sick of the faux "unity" trope where they try and twist the truth of the two parties being corrupt into the blatant lie that left and right, freedom vs slavery, are just trivial differences they have us arguing about. Their solution, inevitably, is to give up half or so of our freedom, in the name of "compromise" and "unity" and with a pinky swear that it's as far as they will ever go.
Democrats and Republicans actually one party at the beginning compete with Federalist.
And winner become President, loser become Vice President. Which seem more logical for me and real unity.
In the early days (George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, etc.) there was no such thing as "Democrats" as a party. That came later.
There were the federalists and nationalists. Those words meant something different in those days than they do today The nationalists wanted a strong, central government. The federalists were opposed to that because they knew that history showed that centralized political power lead to disaster. They wanted decentralized power through a federalist system (the States would have the power and the federal government would be minimal).
Alexander Hamilton advocated for a king. He was a strong central government guy, and therefore a nationalist. But he started the "Federalists" faction (party) because he knew that his opinion was in the minority and he wanted to deceive the voters.
In response, the true federalists (lower case F) decided to call themselves the "Anti-Federalists." They wanted a REALLY small central government and were even opposed to the Constitution, as they prefered the framework of the Articles of Confederation (a true federalist document).
Washington and Adams were both nationalists and became part of the Federalist Party. However, they were the only two presidents who won under that ideology.
In response to all of this, Jefferson called his party the "Republican Party." But this was not today's Republican Party. Jefferson was in favor of a republican form of government, which decentalizes power. The next several presidents who won were all Republicans of this type.
The Republicans had been so successful, that there was no room for other ideas. That is when the Democrat Party was created, and Andrew Jackson was their first president. This is the same Democrat Party as today. Their first president was a slave owner. LOL.
Jefferson's Republican Party eventually split. Some went with the Democrats, others created the Whigs and the Anti-Masons, and other small parties.
In the 1850's, the current Republican Party was created, with Abraham Lincoln becoming their first president. Though they had the same name, they did not have the same ideology as Jefferson's Republican Party.
This is why today the mainstream (read: mostly false) historians call Jefferson's Party the "Democrat-Republican" Party. But that is not what Jefferson and his people called themselves.
Thank you, Good to know Lincoln created the current Republican Party.
George Washington did not represent a political party or Independent??
George Washington did not belong to a political party. He ran as a nonpartisan candidate in the presidential elections of 1789 and 1792. To this day, Washington is the only U.S. president to have been unanimously elected by the electoral college. https://www.britannica.com/question/What-political-party-did-George-Washington-belong-to
No wonder it is confusing, Nationalist Party barely exist on Wikipedia (I know not supposed to use it, could somebody update it?) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalist_Party
The left won’t promote “Hamilton” if he is Nationalist. I was planning to enjoy the musical, but after some research I refuse to see it even if it is free https://hamiltonmusical.com/new-york/
Fuck these clowns.
So with the majority of Americans in favor of Trump, this no label party wants to disrupt his ascendency to the White House and muddy the water, diluting the vote. When they know cheating will be very difficult, when indictments won't work, when Trump is the only logical candidate, they think they can unify what in essence is Good and Evil? I smell losers scheming and plotting, doing everything they can to retain their own power, keep the secrets hidden and distract Americans once again from voting for what they know is right. They will spend tons of money, clog the airways with slogans, but it will all be for naught. Why? Because NCSWIC, NOBODY.
Now the whole Ross Perot 1992 Presidential run makes more sense. He was never meant to win. We knew back then that he couldn’t, but it made the George Bush Sr. Exit a lot easier to explain. Much like Bernie Sanders... they’re only meant to create further division. They don’t want us thinking “universally” MAGA they would prefer fractions because it’s hatder to fight back as a whole.
Hey look at me, I'm absolutely NOTHING and NOBODY except a vulture scavenging crumbs left behind by
DONALD TRUMP!!
I embrace it.
MAGA is going no where. We are locked in. All these feeble attempts are just clearing the field for us.
Perfect spoil the vote and siphon votes from Trump. They know Biden is dead so to prop him up and make it look legit have a no name suddenly grab millions of votes? Isn't it too late to field new candidates? This is fishy.
Stealing an idea that might have been good a few years ago, in order to subvert Trump who is clearly the will of the people.