Ok family I am trying to gauge interest in a new project. Many of us have noticed that .win is awesome however the info can/should be more organized..there are so many rabbit holes to go down. So many connections to be made. The idea of a wiki has come up, however I think this is far to big to put down in a wiki, plus a wiki won't truly show all the connections.
So a while back I met a user named stav that introduced me to a way to map out these things. The above is just an example of the endless things we can map. There is much we can do with this. Not to mention the maps are interactive so we could simply post them and people could view them. Plus we can group edit them. There are some awesome features we can use. I am not the best researcher or writer(as you can see from this ugly written post 😂) however I will try to organize and motivate to get it done. Eventually I hope to raise money for the paid version, since they have even more features. However for how we can use the free version..
I figure if we get a small handful of solid anons, working just here and there, over time we can put out different maps. Everything from mapping the WEF, to Congress, to WHO...ect.
This would be a long term project that over time we can add more and more people to. However we are far better working together then separately.
So for now I just wanna plant the idea and see if anyone is interested..we are not yet moving forward. We have an anon working on one map right now so we can put out a better example for everyone..
Each cell above we can also add info to so when the user clicks it they learn about what it is. There are so many features to this app. Its awesome 😎
Thanks fren. This is very uplifting to hear. Keep the idea in your prayers please. It will be far more successful if we can get a little team all working together..
Don't worry I am not the best researcher either. Glad to hear you would at least follow it. Maybe we can find other ways for people to help out. So keep an eye out for future post
I really like the "mindmapping" technique for information. One way to make this actionable is to map out the different "theaters of operation" in this 5G Info war. You can show linkages between the different theaters from either bottom up or top down persepective. This could be done in addition to the wiki you are suggesting. Some theater examples would be:
counter-narrative deployment (i.e. meme warfare),
financial counterinsurgency (i.e. silver stacking, bitcoin, land purchase with allodial title, meme stonks, etc),
Local political action/organizing (take back your state county-by-county)
big pharma exposure (biowarfare)
There are clearly numerous theaters of battle and anons can engage in one, several, or all at once if they know how.
Interesting so you are more saying using it for our side rather then to point out there side. I didn't even think about it that way. However it would be a great idea.
Yes, you are understanding. Mapping out the different parts of the different theaters of battle that anons are engaged in rather than just making a list of the different theaters of battles makes it a bit more actionable.
Both applications are useful: tracking what the enemy is doing/has done, AND mapping out the different aspects of battle for our counterinsurgency against their infiltration.
I suspect that whitehats are using mindmapping techniques to map out targeted cabal operative social networks to find hidden blackhat players and sleepers.
A bit off-topic, but your note on allodial title, do you have any good resources to look at for that, or good sources on the pros and cons of following through?
I haven’t managed to find much on it. Have seen one, though.
Defendruralamerica.com also a good resource that has been taken down.
You can also put land into a Common Law Trust and not register land with County Recorder after transfer. Registration with County Recorder is voluntary and doing so is your consent to be assessed and taxed via fraudulent reclassification of “land” to “real property”, a fabricated legal category different than 4th Amendment property.
Common Law Trust cannot be sued in state courts (no jurisdiction) because they are all UCC corporate law courts now. You just file motion to dismiss for no jurisdiction.
You can combine by moving land into Trust while you fix Land Patent to get allodial title if needed and then transfer to another Trust after allodial title issues fixed.
To-origin ownership “title correction” is what the land patent technique by Gibson goes through.
When doing land transfer from an LLC or Trust (controlled by you) to an individual (yourself) including some gold or silver eagles Constitutionally counters attempts to invalidate transfer because “debt dollar is not Constitutional money” issue. Most counties not sophisticated to pull that BS.
It appears we are “sharing title” or they have split the title into allodial title (land patent) and equitable title (deed for use only per reclassification as “real property” and forced registration by Title Company with County Recorder as “County Corporation Asset”). Note that County/State Corp pulls the license of any Title Company that refuses to comply with the compelled fraud.
You could do this in conjunction with a wiki where the link leads to the wiki.
My busy time of year and being an engineer I am not the best researcher. Not really in my wheelhouse, Im better at analyzing info others provide, but I do enjoy following rabbit holes and suspect I could add something useful.
This really needs to be done as a large scale project with worldwide distribution.
That's a very interesting thought and is something I am open to.
Glad to hear you like it. I'm gonna try to find ways many people can help even outside research.
Yes I agree it needs to be something big that many people work on and is shared all around.
There is a group edit feature, I'm just still praying on how to fund it since I am not rich myself and it's a bit expensive. Though the worth in the end is definitely worth it
Yeah that is an option. Though not sure how I would go about that within the framework of . win rules. Definitely will keep Kickstarter in mind though. And thanks for willingness to donate. Very motivating
Bridge to that in an archaeology thread about ancient cataclysm (lots of physical evidence that's dismissed/ignored by the establishment), giants, and then myths and their commonalities.
Are there not solar "farms" all over, not just Ohio? What's the deal with Knox County (why is it singled out in this mapping project)? [Never mind - I see in your comment that it is just an example.]
A friend of mine lives in another Ohio county and she said a solar farm is going in the field right behind her house. I told her about the fire risks based on the Google rooftop fire stories I'd read. She has horses, I'm sure she's concerned about the extra heat. If I was her I'd be looking to move.
Why are the county governments allowing this shit to happen? And if they're giving tax breaks, what's in it for them? You'd think they'd want to squeeze these companies for extra tax dollars, not give them tax breaks. Good Lord, these are "crops" we can't eat. The land will be poisoned with the chemical leaching and so in the future if these are ever torn down, the land will still be unusable. What a cluster fuck. :(
This is just an example. We can always add or take away things. You are correct there are things all over though. There are also many more things we could map out. So take the overall idea and not the specifics.
I'll chime in -- I'm working on a database that would house the relational data using the opensource cypher graph query language. From there, the data can be sliced & diced in any which way using specific queries based upon the underlying properties of the database. While not as pretty in terms of graphing the output, the output of these queries could be used in creating a more visually appealing mind map (like yours) for easier consumption. By coordinating efforts among us perhaps we could avoid duplicating work. To be clear, I'm just in the planning stage of defining nodes, relationships and their underlying properties ... this is definitely the way to go to present complex data in a clear format.
Will do. For a point of reference this is what was used to map out the Panama Papers ... if you're interested in a high level overview this is a good resource:
Yes I completely agree the visuals help so much. So much can be done with this. Praying on the best way to bring a team together and work together to create something special
Thanks fren. Yeah I'm very excited to attempt to organize this. Most definitely will need people like you to help dig. I want it to be a group project.
Honestly I'm just trying to help organize..I can't do this alone. I want this to be a community effort. Keep me in your prayers. Trying to not get overwhelmed. Also trying to figure out the best map to start with..thanks sis I appreciate you. Without people like you this idea wouldn't be possible
Its gonna be a long term project.. together through Christ we have endless potential
Thanks fren. Glad you like. Yeah it's gonna be a lot. I will just keep pushing forward though. we have some awesome people here so truly I'm just attempting to organize us in a clearer way, so we can best share truth to the world
How would you describe the difference between a zettlekasten structure and what thebrain does?
One thing I did notice with thebrain is that the structures tend to go wildly sideways very quickly. I don’t know if that was a side effect of how the data I saw was being entered or if that’s just the way that thebrain works, but I’d think we should want our trees to look like a healthy blue spruce or live oak, not the Charlie Brown tree, whatever the case is.
I’ll try to look more into some data visualization and mining methods.
With things like thebrain, you have to hand-stitch everything together. It's somewhat useful if actually diagnosing linear events, or construction/engineering processes, since those are often static.
With zettle-like notetaking, you may find connections between things that you normally wouldn't think to link together, or not spend the time hand-stitching together.
I was once doing a completely isolated dive into homeopathy and the way it seems to interact with water structure an the molecular level. I realized this tied in with certain atomic crystaline geometries, so without distracting myself from the specific research I was doing at the moment, I simply added a tag to my other research: something like #crystals #salts #zeolites #quantumchemistry #electro-biology for instance
Later, when viewing "the graph" (which is the auto-organized linkages between notes, I could see and also recall there was a connection between those two seemingly discrete areas of interest. This "short circuit" allows me to expand thinking and find connections between things without the need to hand-build a structure.
The best use case for thebrain, imo, in this field of conspiracy research, would be to linearly depict and annotate event sequences. A sequence of q-proofs, or the way uranium one played out, or the timeline of earth history, financial history, etc. Those things are suited for static tree graphs since the events themselves are static in time.
The main issue with thebrain and static note structures, is that you may end up determining there's more connections to add to the graph, that interlink in inextricable ways, which makes it confoundingly difficult to try and hand-organize. Instead, a solution would be to have a "cloud" of notes, and then ask the cloud what's related to q, or money, or what x politician has been related to. This will then automatically draw the connections, allowing you to learn more from your own research in unforseen ways.
As an aside, it works exceptionally well for keeping track of posts/news pieces that are interesting but seemingly disconnected. I may find a good GAW post that has it's own way of describing how the Fed and Titanic are related, so I'll save that link into the zettle, along with tags of #fed #titanic #(names of those onboard). Later, I may one day make another note about those names that were onboard. Instead of reacting like "hmm, where have I heard that name before?" I can see that the name links back to the post. Now connections start to appear!
Let's say as another example: I create a note or series of notes for every mass shooting that has taken place, as they come up. I can now, in the future after taking said notes, say "show me mass shootings" and it'll bring up all of those notes that I took, which now I can use to see similarities or differences, again, without having to manually add or remove them from lists.
Here's an example of a logseq graph, any one of these nodes can be clicked on to show a sidebar of the page/note, and it will also show direct and indirect connections
I can tag notes, and it'll auto-organize the tree structure based on what's related to what. Each note is it's own discrete thing that's thrown into the mix of the "snowglobe" of notes, if you will. At any time if I want to search the information, all related trees and branches show up, rather than the traditional structuring where you have to organize it yourself.
So if I create a note that is titled "MH370" or something, I can tag it with #plane #disappearances #(region it was in) etc, then if I search the #plane tag, it might show ADS.b link, other plane incidents, the recent boeing suiciding, etc.
I highly advise you try it out, it's free and requires no subscription, and all of your notes are hosted on your own machine (Logseq)
I've used it since 2020 or so, and it's insanely boosted my ability to find links, notes, resources, etc. It's like building a search engine for your own mind.
This would be worth looking into as well. The important thing is being able to create lots of relations, tie information to those relations (evidence, resources, disputes, etc) , shift how the associations are presented quickly, and find and see things based off what’s related to them to mine the data.
I was only looking at this platform because it’s the one I saw, but if there’s a product in the space that better fits the role, it’ll be much better to look at it first.
u/Slechta5614 this is definitely a good point - there should be an evaluation phase where we look up and trial bubble a few different providers and list the pros and cons of each before settling on a platform, like any software project. Could end up saving a lot of work or producing a better product.
Yes, but in most cases I use it to quickly construct citations, or find links from notes I've taken for relevant data I might be referencing in a conversation. Often the way people create notes or link things is entirely unique to the way their own mind works. So creating a document, a post, etc is the art of laying out context that constructs a narrative (or set of stacking relevant information) to support a thesis.
For example, if someone was to bring up directed energy weapons saying they don't exist, I can quickly conjure citations demonstrating that they do exist, here's how they're used, here's the current capabilities, how it relates to weather modification, etc. "Normally," that might take doing the research on the spot to try and find those links. Instead I've already created my own searchable database based on what I've previously reviewed.
Think of it mostly as a slowly built up mega compendium of everything you find interesting. And since it auto-organizes, you can quickly dig out what you know you wrote or how you've linked things together.
There's also applications like NotebookLM (and other ai assisted note-searching apps) that let you query your own notes in plain english, and it'll bring up your info as well as expanded info from associated links~ pretty cool stuff
When it comes to "sharing" I personally find it best to construct something and order it based on the context. Be it a discussion, twitter thread, blog post, video script, etc. Logseq and other zettlekasten tools allow me to quickly pull up what I already know I know, and use notes that I may have taken sporadically when those interests have arisen in the past.
Think of it as literally writing a note, tossing it in a big basket, but then being able to ask things like "show me everything I've written on electric universe theory" or whatever. It truly solves the "wait, where was that site again?" problem in keeping sources in order. The process of re-wringing or tagging things into this system helps reinforce memory as well, since well, you wrote it, and you know that it's in the system somewhere, without having to worry where.
Wow I truly appreciate the long thought out response. Will definitely look into this..
The one thing I liked about the other app was the fact many people could edit the same thing to kinda create a crowd sourced map. However I do see the benefits of what you shared. Will look into and reach out if I have questions..thanks fren
Although I think it's best that everyone develop their own understanding of what's going on, and part of that is the process of personally taking notes and constructing their own mental databases. The better we can share and reference our own interests, the better the propagation signal strength.
No one really appreciates statements like "oh yeah, I saw a link on that. oh well I can't find it," but everyone loves "oh yeah, here's several related links, and some notes on what I found interesting on that particular subject."
Decentralized research is how we go to where we are today, reverting back to "master editors" or "admins" of shared documentation means that there's a potential for infiltration or sliding. We immunize ourselves from that by diy'ing our own research and then sharing between each other said "databases"
Thanks for sharing the link.. definitely some research we would use for this project.
The brain app is very interactive so we could save the links within the context of the map..this way people can go down different rabbit holes as they see fit.
Part of the problem is people often don't know where to look when they wanna begin research so we are attempting to bring together some of the research that others have done. Ensuring we allow space for counter thoughts, not becoming the keepers of truth, rather simply help guide people to locate areas to dig on given topics, while also showing how many of these topics connect and overlap..
Say we used your app. isn't it still just someone's database. Except this one can only be edited by one person. So how is that not centralized.
I'm not tied to any one app yet just sharing thoughts. Also if you want feel free to share your notes and we can add it to the overall project
I am not very good at this kind of thing but really do think someone should do something under health care.
I would suggest you go back to when Rockefeller took over the health care industry and removed holistic cures adding in pharmaceuticals based on oil. Add when the WHO was started along with the NIH. And when we had all the private hospitals bought out should be on there. How Doctors are now beholden to the hospitals and no longer independent. Maybe even add how bad medical research is now. And let's not forget the mandating of vaccines.
Ok family I am trying to gauge interest in a new project. Many of us have noticed that .win is awesome however the info can/should be more organized..there are so many rabbit holes to go down. So many connections to be made. The idea of a wiki has come up, however I think this is far to big to put down in a wiki, plus a wiki won't truly show all the connections.
So a while back I met a user named stav that introduced me to a way to map out these things. The above is just an example of the endless things we can map. There is much we can do with this. Not to mention the maps are interactive so we could simply post them and people could view them. Plus we can group edit them. There are some awesome features we can use. I am not the best researcher or writer(as you can see from this ugly written post 😂) however I will try to organize and motivate to get it done. Eventually I hope to raise money for the paid version, since they have even more features. However for how we can use the free version..
I figure if we get a small handful of solid anons, working just here and there, over time we can put out different maps. Everything from mapping the WEF, to Congress, to WHO...ect.
This would be a long term project that over time we can add more and more people to. However we are far better working together then separately.
So for now I just wanna plant the idea and see if anyone is interested..we are not yet moving forward. We have an anon working on one map right now so we can put out a better example for everyone..
Each cell above we can also add info to so when the user clicks it they learn about what it is. There are so many features to this app. Its awesome 😎
The visual is very helpful,your on the right track...
Thanks fren. This is very uplifting to hear. Keep the idea in your prayers please. It will be far more successful if we can get a little team all working together..
I am not the greatest researcher but would definitely follow a project such as this.
Don't worry I am not the best researcher either. Glad to hear you would at least follow it. Maybe we can find other ways for people to help out. So keep an eye out for future post
Same here. Thank you!
I really like the "mindmapping" technique for information. One way to make this actionable is to map out the different "theaters of operation" in this 5G Info war. You can show linkages between the different theaters from either bottom up or top down persepective. This could be done in addition to the wiki you are suggesting. Some theater examples would be:
counter-narrative deployment (i.e. meme warfare),
financial counterinsurgency (i.e. silver stacking, bitcoin, land purchase with allodial title, meme stonks, etc),
Local political action/organizing (take back your state county-by-county)
big pharma exposure (biowarfare)
There are clearly numerous theaters of battle and anons can engage in one, several, or all at once if they know how.
Interesting so you are more saying using it for our side rather then to point out there side. I didn't even think about it that way. However it would be a great idea.
Or am I not understanding what you are saying.
Yes, you are understanding. Mapping out the different parts of the different theaters of battle that anons are engaged in rather than just making a list of the different theaters of battles makes it a bit more actionable.
Both applications are useful: tracking what the enemy is doing/has done, AND mapping out the different aspects of battle for our counterinsurgency against their infiltration.
Wow fren I absolutely love this idea. Thanks!!
We can call it The COIN Project.
https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf
Check page 22 of the pdf but page 17 of the document.
Q linked this directly in post 4700 but I don't know how to link it.
I like this. Definitely will think about using that name for that side of things
I like it. Maybe COIN Mapping Project?
I suspect that whitehats are using mindmapping techniques to map out targeted cabal operative social networks to find hidden blackhat players and sleepers.
A bit off-topic, but your note on allodial title, do you have any good resources to look at for that, or good sources on the pros and cons of following through?
I haven’t managed to find much on it. Have seen one, though.
Land Patents are key: https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPQPHFQW/what-you-need-to-know-about-land/c/
Defendruralamerica.com also a good resource that has been taken down.
You can also put land into a Common Law Trust and not register land with County Recorder after transfer. Registration with County Recorder is voluntary and doing so is your consent to be assessed and taxed via fraudulent reclassification of “land” to “real property”, a fabricated legal category different than 4th Amendment property.
Common Law Trust cannot be sued in state courts (no jurisdiction) because they are all UCC corporate law courts now. You just file motion to dismiss for no jurisdiction.
Trust templates and info: https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9pF0937/how-trust-law-structures-underpi/c/
You can combine by moving land into Trust while you fix Land Patent to get allodial title if needed and then transfer to another Trust after allodial title issues fixed.
I’m under the impression that payment in silver and some sort of to-origin ownership assessment are part of this process as well, is that correct?
To-origin ownership “title correction” is what the land patent technique by Gibson goes through.
When doing land transfer from an LLC or Trust (controlled by you) to an individual (yourself) including some gold or silver eagles Constitutionally counters attempts to invalidate transfer because “debt dollar is not Constitutional money” issue. Most counties not sophisticated to pull that BS.
Basically, THEY are holding the land in trust instead of us, but someone is going to hold the land in trust it seems like?
It appears we are “sharing title” or they have split the title into allodial title (land patent) and equitable title (deed for use only per reclassification as “real property” and forced registration by Title Company with County Recorder as “County Corporation Asset”). Note that County/State Corp pulls the license of any Title Company that refuses to comply with the compelled fraud.
This is awesome. Are the subheaders links?
Id like to see one mapping out ancient civilizations. I think a lot of keys lie in that direction.
Another could be the ancient deities and how they all seem to flow from one civ to another with different names but the same basic format.
Yes when you click them a side part opens up where you can write out text, link stuff or add images. It's a really awesome tool.
Is that what you mean by sub headers links?
So much can be done with this, I am blown away by it
Yea exactly what I was getting at.
You could do this in conjunction with a wiki where the link leads to the wiki.
My busy time of year and being an engineer I am not the best researcher. Not really in my wheelhouse, Im better at analyzing info others provide, but I do enjoy following rabbit holes and suspect I could add something useful.
This really needs to be done as a large scale project with worldwide distribution.
That's a very interesting thought and is something I am open to.
Glad to hear you like it. I'm gonna try to find ways many people can help even outside research.
Yes I agree it needs to be something big that many people work on and is shared all around.
There is a group edit feature, I'm just still praying on how to fund it since I am not rich myself and it's a bit expensive. Though the worth in the end is definitely worth it
Kickstarter? Id pitch in a bit.
Yeah that is an option. Though not sure how I would go about that within the framework of . win rules. Definitely will keep Kickstarter in mind though. And thanks for willingness to donate. Very motivating
Bridge to that in an archaeology thread about ancient cataclysm (lots of physical evidence that's dismissed/ignored by the establishment), giants, and then myths and their commonalities.
Very interesting map! Bookmarking to talk more about this with you later.
More info coming shortly on this project.
The Great Awakening is bigger than you may think.
Yep just planting seeds brother. Keep doing what you are doing. :)
Are there not solar "farms" all over, not just Ohio? What's the deal with Knox County (why is it singled out in this mapping project)? [Never mind - I see in your comment that it is just an example.]
A friend of mine lives in another Ohio county and she said a solar farm is going in the field right behind her house. I told her about the fire risks based on the Google rooftop fire stories I'd read. She has horses, I'm sure she's concerned about the extra heat. If I was her I'd be looking to move.
Why are the county governments allowing this shit to happen? And if they're giving tax breaks, what's in it for them? You'd think they'd want to squeeze these companies for extra tax dollars, not give them tax breaks. Good Lord, these are "crops" we can't eat. The land will be poisoned with the chemical leaching and so in the future if these are ever torn down, the land will still be unusable. What a cluster fuck. :(
This is just an example. We can always add or take away things. You are correct there are things all over though. There are also many more things we could map out. So take the overall idea and not the specifics.
Great question though appreciate you asking :)
I'll chime in -- I'm working on a database that would house the relational data using the opensource cypher graph query language. From there, the data can be sliced & diced in any which way using specific queries based upon the underlying properties of the database. While not as pretty in terms of graphing the output, the output of these queries could be used in creating a more visually appealing mind map (like yours) for easier consumption. By coordinating efforts among us perhaps we could avoid duplicating work. To be clear, I'm just in the planning stage of defining nodes, relationships and their underlying properties ... this is definitely the way to go to present complex data in a clear format.
Oh wow sounds awesome. Yeah definitely down to coordinate things. Let me know when you have more and we can figure out what that looks like.
Will do. For a point of reference this is what was used to map out the Panama Papers ... if you're interested in a high level overview this is a good resource:
https://neo4j.com/blog/analyzing-panama-papers-neo4j/
Wow thanks for the link. Lots to process here so gonna have to read it a bunch..
I look forward to hearing from you in the future.. definitely excited to work together fren
Visuals would help so much! This alone makes it easy to see how events are related.
Yes I completely agree the visuals help so much. So much can be done with this. Praying on the best way to bring a team together and work together to create something special
Very exciting and useful project!
Glad you think so fren. God bless
A fantastic, if daunting, idea. I'm interested to see where this goes fren.
Me, too!
Amazing endeavor Slechta! ✨
I would be happy to dig and send you my findings for you to map if they are worthy.
Thanks fren. Yeah I'm very excited to attempt to organize this. Most definitely will need people like you to help dig. I want it to be a group project.
I'm excited! This is a YUGE attempt on your part!
Honestly I'm just trying to help organize..I can't do this alone. I want this to be a community effort. Keep me in your prayers. Trying to not get overwhelmed. Also trying to figure out the best map to start with..thanks sis I appreciate you. Without people like you this idea wouldn't be possible
Its gonna be a long term project.. together through Christ we have endless potential
Absolutely fren... prayers up! 🙏🙌
Thanks fren. Glad you like. Yeah it's gonna be a lot. I will just keep pushing forward though. we have some awesome people here so truly I'm just attempting to organize us in a clearer way, so we can best share truth to the world
might find more use in a zettlekasten structure, such as logseq
How would you describe the difference between a zettlekasten structure and what thebrain does?
One thing I did notice with thebrain is that the structures tend to go wildly sideways very quickly. I don’t know if that was a side effect of how the data I saw was being entered or if that’s just the way that thebrain works, but I’d think we should want our trees to look like a healthy blue spruce or live oak, not the Charlie Brown tree, whatever the case is.
I’ll try to look more into some data visualization and mining methods.
With things like thebrain, you have to hand-stitch everything together. It's somewhat useful if actually diagnosing linear events, or construction/engineering processes, since those are often static.
With zettle-like notetaking, you may find connections between things that you normally wouldn't think to link together, or not spend the time hand-stitching together.
I was once doing a completely isolated dive into homeopathy and the way it seems to interact with water structure an the molecular level. I realized this tied in with certain atomic crystaline geometries, so without distracting myself from the specific research I was doing at the moment, I simply added a tag to my other research: something like #crystals #salts #zeolites #quantumchemistry #electro-biology for instance
Later, when viewing "the graph" (which is the auto-organized linkages between notes, I could see and also recall there was a connection between those two seemingly discrete areas of interest. This "short circuit" allows me to expand thinking and find connections between things without the need to hand-build a structure.
The best use case for thebrain, imo, in this field of conspiracy research, would be to linearly depict and annotate event sequences. A sequence of q-proofs, or the way uranium one played out, or the timeline of earth history, financial history, etc. Those things are suited for static tree graphs since the events themselves are static in time.
The main issue with thebrain and static note structures, is that you may end up determining there's more connections to add to the graph, that interlink in inextricable ways, which makes it confoundingly difficult to try and hand-organize. Instead, a solution would be to have a "cloud" of notes, and then ask the cloud what's related to q, or money, or what x politician has been related to. This will then automatically draw the connections, allowing you to learn more from your own research in unforseen ways.
Which then, as I mentioned in this reply can be used to support a thesis or create a piece of useful content.
As an aside, it works exceptionally well for keeping track of posts/news pieces that are interesting but seemingly disconnected. I may find a good GAW post that has it's own way of describing how the Fed and Titanic are related, so I'll save that link into the zettle, along with tags of #fed #titanic #(names of those onboard). Later, I may one day make another note about those names that were onboard. Instead of reacting like "hmm, where have I heard that name before?" I can see that the name links back to the post. Now connections start to appear!
Let's say as another example: I create a note or series of notes for every mass shooting that has taken place, as they come up. I can now, in the future after taking said notes, say "show me mass shootings" and it'll bring up all of those notes that I took, which now I can use to see similarities or differences, again, without having to manually add or remove them from lists.
Here's an example of a logseq graph, any one of these nodes can be clicked on to show a sidebar of the page/note, and it will also show direct and indirect connections
:) man I love your zeal..keep it up fren.
They’ve trapped us in this huge web of data. For some reason the idea of flipping tables and surfacing truth to drive out defilers seems great!
Wow what an excellent way to phrase that. It's a beautiful call to action.
We definitely have the people to make this happen..now we just gotta figure out the how. It will for sure be worth it in the end though
…So of course we got hit by project deadlines, heavy storm damage, and long term sickness lol
Interesting what makes you suggest this app fren
I can tag notes, and it'll auto-organize the tree structure based on what's related to what. Each note is it's own discrete thing that's thrown into the mix of the "snowglobe" of notes, if you will. At any time if I want to search the information, all related trees and branches show up, rather than the traditional structuring where you have to organize it yourself.
So if I create a note that is titled "MH370" or something, I can tag it with #plane #disappearances #(region it was in) etc, then if I search the #plane tag, it might show ADS.b link, other plane incidents, the recent boeing suiciding, etc.
I highly advise you try it out, it's free and requires no subscription, and all of your notes are hosted on your own machine (Logseq)
I've used it since 2020 or so, and it's insanely boosted my ability to find links, notes, resources, etc. It's like building a search engine for your own mind.
This would be worth looking into as well. The important thing is being able to create lots of relations, tie information to those relations (evidence, resources, disputes, etc) , shift how the associations are presented quickly, and find and see things based off what’s related to them to mine the data.
I was only looking at this platform because it’s the one I saw, but if there’s a product in the space that better fits the role, it’ll be much better to look at it first.
u/Slechta5614 this is definitely a good point - there should be an evaluation phase where we look up and trial bubble a few different providers and list the pros and cons of each before settling on a platform, like any software project. Could end up saving a lot of work or producing a better product.
This is actually a very very good idea and honestly the best way to start. Thanks fren. I will try to put out a post on it some point today :)
I wanna make sure the stuff created is sharable to
Thanks for the suggestion fren. I will look into this as well.
Is the stuff shareable..like if I create something can I then share it
Yes, but in most cases I use it to quickly construct citations, or find links from notes I've taken for relevant data I might be referencing in a conversation. Often the way people create notes or link things is entirely unique to the way their own mind works. So creating a document, a post, etc is the art of laying out context that constructs a narrative (or set of stacking relevant information) to support a thesis.
For example, if someone was to bring up directed energy weapons saying they don't exist, I can quickly conjure citations demonstrating that they do exist, here's how they're used, here's the current capabilities, how it relates to weather modification, etc. "Normally," that might take doing the research on the spot to try and find those links. Instead I've already created my own searchable database based on what I've previously reviewed.
Think of it mostly as a slowly built up mega compendium of everything you find interesting. And since it auto-organizes, you can quickly dig out what you know you wrote or how you've linked things together.
There's also applications like NotebookLM (and other ai assisted note-searching apps) that let you query your own notes in plain english, and it'll bring up your info as well as expanded info from associated links~ pretty cool stuff
When it comes to "sharing" I personally find it best to construct something and order it based on the context. Be it a discussion, twitter thread, blog post, video script, etc. Logseq and other zettlekasten tools allow me to quickly pull up what I already know I know, and use notes that I may have taken sporadically when those interests have arisen in the past.
Think of it as literally writing a note, tossing it in a big basket, but then being able to ask things like "show me everything I've written on electric universe theory" or whatever. It truly solves the "wait, where was that site again?" problem in keeping sources in order. The process of re-wringing or tagging things into this system helps reinforce memory as well, since well, you wrote it, and you know that it's in the system somewhere, without having to worry where.
Wow I truly appreciate the long thought out response. Will definitely look into this..
The one thing I liked about the other app was the fact many people could edit the same thing to kinda create a crowd sourced map. However I do see the benefits of what you shared. Will look into and reach out if I have questions..thanks fren
I mean, there is the Deep State Mapping Project which has been going on for quite a while now.
Although I think it's best that everyone develop their own understanding of what's going on, and part of that is the process of personally taking notes and constructing their own mental databases. The better we can share and reference our own interests, the better the propagation signal strength.
No one really appreciates statements like "oh yeah, I saw a link on that. oh well I can't find it," but everyone loves "oh yeah, here's several related links, and some notes on what I found interesting on that particular subject."
Decentralized research is how we go to where we are today, reverting back to "master editors" or "admins" of shared documentation means that there's a potential for infiltration or sliding. We immunize ourselves from that by diy'ing our own research and then sharing between each other said "databases"
Thanks for sharing the link.. definitely some research we would use for this project.
The brain app is very interactive so we could save the links within the context of the map..this way people can go down different rabbit holes as they see fit.
Part of the problem is people often don't know where to look when they wanna begin research so we are attempting to bring together some of the research that others have done. Ensuring we allow space for counter thoughts, not becoming the keepers of truth, rather simply help guide people to locate areas to dig on given topics, while also showing how many of these topics connect and overlap..
Say we used your app. isn't it still just someone's database. Except this one can only be edited by one person. So how is that not centralized.
I'm not tied to any one app yet just sharing thoughts. Also if you want feel free to share your notes and we can add it to the overall project
I am not very good at this kind of thing but really do think someone should do something under health care.
I would suggest you go back to when Rockefeller took over the health care industry and removed holistic cures adding in pharmaceuticals based on oil. Add when the WHO was started along with the NIH. And when we had all the private hospitals bought out should be on there. How Doctors are now beholden to the hospitals and no longer independent. Maybe even add how bad medical research is now. And let's not forget the mandating of vaccines.
Lucifer is not a jew
The easy way rarely leads to big things. We are seeking the big things fren.