Provisionally, I would first be skeptical of this video. But if it were true, there would be MANY MORE of those letters sent out. If we were to see hundreds, even thousands, of them discussed, that might lend credence to this.
Another thought... they guy reading that purported "letter" would have gained a modicum of credibility if he had shown it to the camera. We just have his word for it that he's reading from a letter. Show the damned thing, already.
I need more data, that's all. This is the ONLY example of this claim that I have seen on this subject, and I've been looking for others. If you can point to other examples, we'd ALL like to see them. But this one random guy saying this means nothing.
Sauce on that accusation please. Accusations without sauce places suspicion on your motives. Not everyone is aware of this. I am not and am immersed in this shit daily.
I don't have all the sauce at hand, The M/g show did the digging on her. They came up with proof of what she said about Trump and Epstein Island, and her threats about turning anons into the FBI. Every one wants to believe her because of the boost Trump gave her interview.
And who is the M/g show? Why should we believe what they say? Is any other outlet confirming? Or even talking about it? Sorry, I am not so easily distracted.
Yeah, you're probably right. I gave up on her on TS, and now I can't even find her account there. I was looking for it on TS this morning after seeing this video to see if there was confirmation, but she seems to have left TS... or has been driven off.
I thought (and posted) that too. But then I realized that IF he is truly reading (or "not" reading) from a classified document, then it would be illegal to show it. So it's a Catch-22 situation.
Still, I will need a LOT more substantiating evidence before I will believe this.
An involuntary recall letter would NOT be classified. It would be sent through the US Postal Service (unless they issued this guy a SCIF for his house, which of course they didn’t)
We are in the midst of psychological warfare. I remain skeptical and emotionally detached from all news. There is no other way to apply logical reasoned thought. Of course, stoicism comes naturally to me.
Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic. Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT!
He read something about they need Marines to defend the Constitution.
When was the last time our military actually defended the Constitution? Was it when we went over to Afghanistan? Iraq? Was it when we went spent billions and lost American lives to defend Kuwait back in the '90s?
In my lifetime, I don't recall our military ever doing anything but imposing the will of our government onto other nations. I'll admit that I fell for it, at the time. I served in the Air Force for 4 years, deploying to Panama for Just Cause and also over the Middle East, post Desert Storm, but there was nothing in either one of those countries that was worth one drop of American blood.
The only US military operation in my lifetime I'm aware of that has been performed in the defense of our constitution is the Q operation...
...but I'll take it.
Top military recruited Trump, allowed Russia to protect the 2016 election, executed Q operation, and now we civilians are getting a chance to set things right through peaceful means.
TBH it was our collective, multi-generational fault that it became this way. Military dutifully followed civilian orders. Civilians have gradually lost control to the point that now 0% of legislation is civilian driven. This cycle ends when the op has driven enough of us to the precipice.
Top military recruited Trump, allowed Russia to protect the 2016 election, executed Q operation, and now we civilians are getting a chance to set things right through peaceful means.
It sounds you’re describing a military-civilian alliance. Where have we heard that before…
Man-O-Man, I got chills alllllll over my body. It's out turn Anons. We have waited for 7 fucking years for this moment. Rise up Pepe and seize the day. Lead us into what we all know is there. This is going to be glorious Anons and we fucking deserve it.
True this may be questionable but why are inactive military people being recalled as they are. It already has been made known and also enlisted people who thought they were going home are being informed otherwise.
Provisionally, I would first be skeptical of this video. But if it were true, there would be MANY MORE of those letters sent out. If we were to see hundreds, even thousands, of them discussed, that might lend credence to this.
Until then, I'm skeptical.
Consider the source, She said Trump went to pedo island, got called out on it. She threatened to turn Anons in to the FBI. "who would do that?????"
Another thought... they guy reading that purported "letter" would have gained a modicum of credibility if he had shown it to the camera. We just have his word for it that he's reading from a letter. Show the damned thing, already.
Exactly, no show . no trust...
Didn’t he just say it’s national security law. That’s why the ambiguity.
If you won't believe his word, then why would you believe a letter that HE shows to you? That's illogical.
I can print a letter right now. How does that help?
I need more data, that's all. This is the ONLY example of this claim that I have seen on this subject, and I've been looking for others. If you can point to other examples, we'd ALL like to see them. But this one random guy saying this means nothing.
Sauce on that accusation please. Accusations without sauce places suspicion on your motives. Not everyone is aware of this. I am not and am immersed in this shit daily.
I don't have all the sauce at hand, The M/g show did the digging on her. They came up with proof of what she said about Trump and Epstein Island, and her threats about turning anons into the FBI. Every one wants to believe her because of the boost Trump gave her interview.
And who is the M/g show? Why should we believe what they say? Is any other outlet confirming? Or even talking about it? Sorry, I am not so easily distracted.
Never mind, believe what ever you want. M/G show is on Rumble, they don't just talk they show the sauce.
Yeah, you're probably right. I gave up on her on TS, and now I can't even find her account there. I was looking for it on TS this morning after seeing this video to see if there was confirmation, but she seems to have left TS... or has been driven off.
Truth is not a place for her.....
me too, he should have shown the actual letter in the video.
I thought (and posted) that too. But then I realized that IF he is truly reading (or "not" reading) from a classified document, then it would be illegal to show it. So it's a Catch-22 situation.
Still, I will need a LOT more substantiating evidence before I will believe this.
An involuntary recall letter would NOT be classified. It would be sent through the US Postal Service (unless they issued this guy a SCIF for his house, which of course they didn’t)
This is a larp.
We are in the midst of psychological warfare. I remain skeptical and emotionally detached from all news. There is no other way to apply logical reasoned thought. Of course, stoicism comes naturally to me.
Wise.
Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
They're everywhere. Part of the recognition is also in recognizing the data points themselves.
Earned Wisdom. But a journey of a thousand miles begins with a SINGLE step.
And this man appears to be telling the TRUTH.
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is all you need to say "Bull Shit".. people don't fall for this crap....
People including Donald Trump apparently..
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110845227764397486
He read something about they need Marines to defend the Constitution.
When was the last time our military actually defended the Constitution? Was it when we went over to Afghanistan? Iraq? Was it when we went spent billions and lost American lives to defend Kuwait back in the '90s?
In my lifetime, I don't recall our military ever doing anything but imposing the will of our government onto other nations. I'll admit that I fell for it, at the time. I served in the Air Force for 4 years, deploying to Panama for Just Cause and also over the Middle East, post Desert Storm, but there was nothing in either one of those countries that was worth one drop of American blood.
The only US military operation in my lifetime I'm aware of that has been performed in the defense of our constitution is the Q operation...
...but I'll take it.
Top military recruited Trump, allowed Russia to protect the 2016 election, executed Q operation, and now we civilians are getting a chance to set things right through peaceful means.
TBH it was our collective, multi-generational fault that it became this way. Military dutifully followed civilian orders. Civilians have gradually lost control to the point that now 0% of legislation is civilian driven. This cycle ends when the op has driven enough of us to the precipice.
It sounds you’re describing a military-civilian alliance. Where have we heard that before…
u/#q4511
What sign?
Man-O-Man, I got chills alllllll over my body. It's out turn Anons. We have waited for 7 fucking years for this moment. Rise up Pepe and seize the day. Lead us into what we all know is there. This is going to be glorious Anons and we fucking deserve it.
Just making a comment so I can easily find this post. I want to see how well it ages.
High-grade Hopioid right there 😉
True this may be questionable but why are inactive military people being recalled as they are. It already has been made known and also enlisted people who thought they were going home are being informed otherwise.
Do you have evidence (other than this video) that “inactive military people are being recalled”?
That is a double hmmm based on who reposted.
I may, or may not, be the King of United Kingdom, 10m tall and of 5 skin colours at once.
And you can be 100% sure that what I’m telling you above is the truth.
Means: literally nothing. I know it’s not what everyone here would wish to be confirmed. It’s 0% confirmation.
Halper is saying: “Need a confirmation? Someone else said: Confirmed or Not Confirmed”.
If there’s a definition of “nothingburger” in Louvre - it’s something like this.
This response reminds me of how Azula describes herself to Toph in Avatar the Last Airbender. If you know you know.
I guess the fed bois will be raiding his house next looking for classified documents.
If they recall an old retired military 75-year-old like me, I'll let you know and then you'll be able to believe!
Paytriot posts tend to do that.
Jan Larper-Hayes again? I'll pass!
Yeah, it’s BS
True!
Rejected/.
NCSWIC!
I thought she was captured in Germany 4 years ago. or am I thinking of someone else.
HOW MUCH MORE blatant do the W Hats have to be? They have been showing us this for years BUT now it is in our face. AWESOME
Aww, bless your heart