He talks pretty high on the quality of training and equipment. What got my attention was that they showed them uncensored videos from Russian-Ukraine battle, To prepare the for war, that was being said. One officer also commented that Ruskies are using only 1-2 % of their military power in this war. Food for thoughts...
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I am 100% in support of MIL training for all young men. I was very lucky that I did not need MIL training when I got married since my mother-in-law died before I met my wife. But most young men are not that fortunate!
First thing I thought.😂
If you'd ever known my mother-in-law, you'd have posted in ALL CAPS!
Glad I'm not the only one who thought it.
I'm very fortunate that my husband has a wonderful mom, she never tries to interfere in our marriage or tries to run our lives or tell us what we should do. But is there if we need any advice or an ear to listen.
The Russian military is specifically designed to be able to stand toe to toe with the US military. They could have completely taken over Ukraine in 2-3 weeks and there is nothing that anyone could do to strop them short of all out war. Putin is just kicking NATO off of his porch and he has shown great restraint. It makes me think of the time Putin gave Trump the soccer ball and said "the ball is now in your court Mr President".
We're definitely watching a movie.
Not to mention that he gets to watch the US slowly bleed resources that are vital to our own defence
Correct SMO is to denazify and demilitarize. Looks is right on track
Problem is, Russia won't do that. Their tactics have altered completely since the fall of the USSR. Virtually every report from the Ukr indicates that Russia uses battalion sized units, with complete defensive capabilities, including AA, armor, missile capability etc. The pentagon meet at Ft Benning concluded that the US could stand against a head to head, but not against this more recent Russian tactic. Make mental note that Bn size implies ease and swiftness of motion: if a Bn is completely outclassed, it can move quickly to avoid more confrontation. Also, if reinforcements are needed, another Bn or more can be quickly brought in.
It is also fact that, equipped as they are, this Bn tactic does not suffer the supply problems a larger army does. To wit, artillery emplacements aren't necessary, since artillery is with the Bn. It's like a swift moving tiny army with all the bells and whistles.
I would agree with that officer. If Russia was using its full power, they would be able to overrun Washington in hours if not days.
The Germans also found out the hard way when the Russians reached Berlin in 1945.
When you are rushed into a winter war to beat them before they can attack first things tend to go wrong.
Even if the Germans did everything perfect in 1941, conquering yet occupying Russia would be an absolute logistical nightmare.
It's not like France where you can manage the population without much problems, however with Russia it's a different story.
The amount of territory you have to cover isn't feasible, especially if there's current problems with resistance in other nations like Yugoslavia and etc.
That's only a small part of that story.
You are forgetting about the failed offensive into Russia earlier in the war. They needed all their might to stop the German army.
That's true, but the bottom line was is that they weren't going get what was expected. Taking Moscow wouldn't ensured their surrender, Napoleon did this and still never got a victory.
But the Germans got a bad wound with the attempt on Moscow.
They were screwed either ways, Hitler never wanted to take Moscow since he knew that taking their capital wouldn't ensure absolute victory.
Basically a war of attrition with the USSR wasn't ideal, they were far larger and could bring more to table than anyone else.
The Allied lend lease helped them to an extent, but it didn't mainly win them the war against the Third Reich.
Everything the Russians could produce on the ground themselves in terms of equipment was literally comical, when the Germans early on kept destroying numerous Red Army formations in encirclements.
They just built them up quickly again to be deployed, basically it was to the point it where it's like suffering a slow death by a thousand cuts for the Germans since long term they would be worn them down little by little.
The real crime was the carpetbombing by General Eisenhower's forces as that was senseless death.
Both sides had their various Cabal puppets, none of them are innocent of crimes committed against humanity.
Which city was carpet bombed?
You dropped these, ☭, comrade. BTFO.
Invoking the GAW rule regarding TLAs...
MIL = Military, not Mother In Law
GAW = GreatAwakening.win
TLA = Three Letter Acronym (or Two Letter Acronym)
EU = European Union
Okay then what IS the acronym we use for Mother-in-law?
MiL
I believe news channels should also show the public those same videos. Show what waving little blue and yellow flags translates to.
Great idea!
Remember that what you see the US mil doing is part of the movie. All is NOT as it seems. Might also remember that in the first weeks of Ukr, virtually every soldier sent by France, Germany, etc was relatively quickly removed, as in casualties, the helos and other aircraft were relatively quickly removed, along with armor and supply vehicles. Ukr never had a chance.
Neither will the EU, if it comes to that.
If anyone cares to follow the military details in the Ukrainian war, Simplicius on Substack is the absolute best place to go. The tl;dr is that your nephew is correct. The Russians have NATO beat in military technology, domestic production, and military recruitment. They're allegedly training hundreds of thousands of men in Siberia right now in anticipation of an upcoming major Ukraine offensive. We are so fucked if Russia actually puts up a serious fight.
Putin had many engineers trained in the last decade at an incredible rate. He focused on tech. Russia using tier 3 or tier 4 technology in the current war. Keeping the better stuff if needed. At the beginning of the war, Russia withdrew near Kyiv as a sign of good faith due to the peace agreement, which was stopped by Johnson. Wagner group…a lot more troops than being disclosed allegedly, seasoned fighters who always get the job done. NATO troops would be destroyed very quickly going up against Wagner, especially if their reins are removed. Very sad as the NATO troops are pons being used by the elites.
every true military patriot in France knows they don't stand a chance. Still, the MSMs gives speech only to corrupted militaries. baffling, one might say
Old German proverb-----"Don't kick the bear unless you want to be his lunch"!
I swear I thought Mother-In-Law training as well.
I thought that too!
Food for thoughts? Yeah, don't go.
Russia is winning the war after emptying their prisons and making unwanteds fight in the war. Great tatic. Give them old left over ww2 era equipment with decent airsupport / counter measures and slowly advance draining NATO resources.