I'm writing this in response to sentiment I see over and over again in posts and comments regarding Bannon being locked up. I'm not going to focus on him being locked up, but I am going to present some facts that I discovered while doing a relatively light dig trying to satisfy my own curiosity regarding Bannon and where his allegiance truly lies.
It's clear to anyone here on GA, that despite doomers saying, "nothing's happening" - the reality is there's quite a bit happening on a daily basis if you really open your eyes. To be fair, there's a LOT of information to sift through in order to get the full story or even one that is informative enough to ascertain what the real deal is.
The problem, as I see it, is that many anons are not capable of disseminating large quantities of information quickly and comprehending what's really being said about a given topic. It takes intent & dedication to see it through - and quite frankly, everybody has a life and lots of things going on already.
So the tendency to "round off the edges & cut the corner" is pretty common, but as with everything in life, that has a cost. The cost is, many miss things, make wrong assumptions and for brevity - just go along with whatever is the most popular sentiment. There's danger in that, which is why I think Q specifically told us several times to, "be careful who you follow".
I'm just as "guilty" as anyone else here in that regard, because there IS a lot of info to breakdown on an ongoing basis. I rely on anons that, through their past track record, have demonstrated that they're not just copy/pasting outlandish bs from RRN or some other whack-a-doodle source, but actually reading the info and reliably breaking it down without distorting it via some agenda. So to all the contributors "on the level" - thank you for your service to us.
The real crux of why I am posting this is, not all anons who post or sources where people are fed are completely forthcoming. Vital info gets completely left out - whether deliberately or because they didn't dig deep enough. Unfortunately, there's often a race to be first - not necessarily to be factually correct - in order to be the first one to post, garner "internet points" and whatever other ego stroking action gives rise to shaking a few more picograms out of their dopamine receptors.
There's an ASSumption here, that Bannon is a patriotic "good guy" - and he's so dedicated - he does that "War Room" thing every day and he's getting locked up because he's on "our side". It's the BLIND assumption that he is "on our side" and so he "must be innocent" and unfairly targeted by the DS lawfare apparatus - just like Trump.
Speaking of Trump...Let's have a look at what Trump said about Bannon over the years AND why he said those things. I like to think that DJT is a pretty good judge of character, even if from our perspective it seems like he has endorsed some real dingdongs in the past - I chalk that up to 5D chess and the fact that we are very much at war - and we anons don't know what he knows. As digital soldiers, we have a limited amount of information to work with and I'd say some of that is a result of the proverbial "need to know" in the chain of command.
Let's start by taking a look at Bannon's role in the Trump administration:
"In 2016, Bannon became the chief executive officer of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and was appointed chief strategist and senior Counselor to the President following Trump's election. He left the position eight months later and rejoined Breitbart." Source
What does Trump despise more than anything else? Lies & disloyalty. I can't say I feel any differently about that, although I'll add "stealing" to that list as well.
What went down while Bannon was an advisor to Trump?
- Bannon was leaking privileged information which cost a Republican Senate seat in AL (among other things)
- Bannon released a book, with scumbag Michael Wolff - who talked shit about Trump and his family specifically, “They’re going to crack Don Jr. like an egg on national TV,” Bannon said.
- Bannon was quoted in the book describing a meeting between Mr. Trump's son and a group of Russians as "treasonous". (He did Trump NO FAVORS with the Russia Collusion bs he was fighting)
Trump responded in a tweet regarding this book:
Michael Wolff is a total loser who made up stories in order to sell this really boring and untruthful book. He used Sloppy Steve Bannon, who cried when he got fired and begged for his job. Now Sloppy Steve has been dumped like a dog by almost everyone. Too bad! RE: https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/949498795074736129
This is where the term, Sloppy Steve Bannon came from. I see many downvoting others in the comment section because they have no clue what it is in reference to. They just view it as a dig on Bannon in blissful ignorance because they don't do their homework.
Let's have a look at Trump's Whitehouse statement regarding "Sloppy Steve":
Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency. When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind. Steve was a staffer who worked for me after I had already won the nomination by defeating seventeen candidates, often described as the most talented field ever assembled in the Republican party.
Now that he is on his own, Steve is learning that winning isn’t as easy as I make it look. Steve had very little to do with our historic victory, which was delivered by the forgotten men and women of this country. Yet Steve had everything to do with the loss of a Senate seat in Alabama held for more than thirty years by Republicans. Steve doesn’t represent my base—he’s only in it for himself.
Steve pretends to be at war with the media, which he calls the opposition party, yet he spent his time at the White House leaking false information to the media to make himself seem far more important than he was. It is the only thing he does well. Steve was rarely in a one-on-one meeting with me and only pretends to have had influence to fool a few people with no access and no clue, whom he helped write phony books.
We have many great Republican members of Congress and candidates who are very supportive of the Make America Great Again agenda. Like me, they love the United States of America and are helping to finally take our country back and build it up, rather than simply seeking to burn it all down.” 1 2
Here's more on how Bannon was completely disrespectful, in opposition to the Trump administration:
“The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor—with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers,” Bannon said, per Wolff. “Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
Bannon predicted that Special Counsel Robert Mueller would go after all three participants for money-laundering, citing Mueller’s hiring of experienced financial-crimes prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. “They’re going to crack Don Jr. like an egg on national TV,” Bannon said. Sauce
Well...well...well - It looks like Bannon isn't the innocent saint everyone thinks he is. I see people reacting in the comments and elsewhere that we should, "Pray for poor Steve Bannon"...all the while knowing the selfish bs he did, compromising the president with his part in the Russian hoax AND talking shit about Trump's family in the book. It's enough to make me puke from the sheer ignorance of anons who are too lazy to dig deeper. We’re all human and all make assumptions from time to time. I get that. But blindly “running with the popular herd” on certain topics makes us all look dumb.
What's this about Bannon leaking intel though?
Bannon claims he thought his comments were off-the-record, but the White House, which already believes the former Breitbart chairman (notable) was leaking damaging information about his colleagues to the press, is clearly not buying them. A White House adviser normally on collegial terms with Bannon told Swan: “Since Steve apparently enjoys casually undermining U.S. national security, I'll put this in terms he'll understand: This is DEFCON 1-level bad.” RE
Every once in a while I'd see a post from an anon I respected and considered well informed that eluded to the fact that Bannon was a Paytriot or Grifter, but I never really followed up with that. I decided to have a look while digging on the whole "Bannon goes to jail" thing to see if I turned up anything. There is of course the book and whatever publicity and cash he got from that, but what else?
Here's Bannon framing Trump as a dictator (nice, right? from a so-called patriot we believed to be one of Trump’s closest advisors and ally?) and how the 2020 election is all going to go down: Audio of Bannon
His comments just seem shitty...and unbecoming of a real patriot who is supposed to be on our side, don't you think? It’s as if Steve is just out for himself and convincing others that he thinks he’s more important than he really is to the Trump team.
Bannon says he's "proud to be a Christian Zionist" - WTF does that mean exactly? It's convenient how that's proudly plastered across Breitbart who BTW is essentially propped up and fed by Israel and Mossad. The sentiment that he's a Christian Zionist is mirrored here as well.
Given Bannon's past employment with Breitbart and post-Whitehouse employment as well, I don't think it's too far of a stretch to consider the fact that Bannon himself could be "on the take" from Israeli operatives, mossad or some other mechanism of Israel. Where there's smoke there's fire. For instance, have a look at this article titled:Israeli Zionists have been controlling U.S. government with espionage for DECADES, including influencing “alternative” media
If all of this seem like sloppy conjecture I apologize - clearly I am not a professional journalist...just a volunteer soldier in this digital army - but consider this connection and revelation for a moment in light of Bannon’s role and relationship with Breitbart:
Here's a tweet in regards to Breitbart and their relationship with IsraelRE
Monica Lewinsky was a Jewish spy used to blackmail Bill Clinton
Benjamin Netanyahu Demand Clinton Pardon Infamous Spy Jonathan Pollard, or he would leak the tape
Clinton was unable to, so the tape was leaked to Israeli intelligence Matt Drudge and Andrew Breitbart
They used this to blow up the Drudge report to a top news site
Andrew Breitbart then flew to Israel and met with Netanyahu where they started Breitbart news
Breitbart personally took Ben Shapiro under his wing and helped groom him
Shapiro went on to form and run the Israeli Wire
As you can see you aren't just getting news from jews you are getting it from Israeli intelligence
THERE'S MORE TO BANNON AND BREITBART THAN MEETS THE EYE, DON'T YOU THINK???
Yeah okay, but what about Bannon being a Paytriot or Grifter? What about that?
It's important to make the distinction here that there are several court cases that Bannon is involved in. One is the bs "contempt of Congress" charge he is going to jail for, that I agree is bs given the 2 tiered justice system we are all witnessing. BUT - It's important to note that this has COMPLETELY OVERSHADOWED Bannon's other Civil case where he misappropriated money he collected from patriots to "finish the wall". Nobody seems to know ANYTHING about that and the general sentiment is, “Oh poor Steve…pray for this patriot” etc.
Bannon is also facing criminal charges in New York state court alleging he duped donors who gave money to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Bannon has pleaded not guilty to money laundering, conspiracy, fraud and other charges, and that trial has been postponed until at least the end of September. RE
The co-founder of a fundraising group linked to Steve Bannon that promised to help Donald Trump construct a wall along the southern U.S. border was sentenced to four years and three months in prison on Wednesday for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from donors. Sauce
The what now? Wait, you mean Bannon took it upon himself to just "help Trump out" by fleecing hundreds of thousands of patriots out of their donations to allegedly finish the wall on our Southern Border? Yep.
I dunno dude...Bannon seems like a patriot and he does that show everyday...he wouldn't do something like that. Well let's see what Justice.gov says about it:Brian Kolfage, Stephen Bannon, and Two Others Alleged to Have Funneled Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars From the Organization to Kolfage; All Four Defendants Allegedly Profited From Their Roles in the Scheme
In truth, KOLFAGE, BANNON, BADOLATO, and SHEA received hundreds of thousands of dollars in donor funds from We Build the Wall, which they each used in a manner inconsistent with the organization’s public representations.
Say what you will about the US Attorney's SDNY, but I don't think in this case they're off base.
While spending time trying to build links with other right-wing nationalist movements in Europe and around the world, Bannon, now 70, also found himself increasingly facing legal trouble.
In 2020, he was indicted on charges of money laundering, fraud and conspiracy, accused of cheating donors to a priv
Good write up Anon. I know that in 2020-2021 when I was following War Room, there was something fishy about Bannon. Specifically he was pushing the Miles Gau and his bunch from China, and he smelt pretty weird to me as well. Strong vibes of controlled opposition, even though I had no idea who might be controlling him.
I didn't get the Zionist vibe. More like CCP vibes.
In any case this is a great write up. I wouldn't put much emphasis on the border wall case and him "fleecing the donors". That sounds like a typical hit piece by the DS and I will keep my mind open.
However his interaction with Trump during 2016, sounds like a typical DS handler that Trump had to be surrounded with.
I will say this though - once you are one of them and you get exposed (when he was ditched and the whole quote thing etc) its very hard for someone to go back to being a controlled opposition. Its quite possible he flipped after that.
I will also say that the clip about Trump becoming a dictator - i vaguely remember at that time that there was more context to it. Like part of a wargame scenario, would suggest digging up the full context.
Finally, I do have a feed back to you. When you are writing up such high quality post, it would be best to keep it purely on the content without a prologue about how sloppy the readers here are, or how they jump to conclusions etc. It is best to keep those kind of observations in a separate post completely different from your content post. Just my 2 cents.
Thank you for the feedback.
Yes China was a whole other branch I had to leave out...
I'll second the feedback. Brevity is key, so if there's a section you can cut out while leaving the meat intact, it's good.
But I agree with you on the "complete the wall" grift. To me this is very telling, and fits the pay-triot mold to a T.
Very good post, and it's good to have so much meat paired with sauce, on a timely and relevant topic.
The inverse here is also true. Hes played at kayfabe with others who may be Patriots.
Bannons done some good work. Hes also had some questionable moments. The problem with coming to concrete conclusions on where the minor players loyalty lies, is that we are into a deep and frustrating information war where mis- and disinformation is being fired at us from every direction. The people are collateral damage and sometimes its from friendly fire.
Another consideration is that even someone with a profile as large as Bannons may not have all the information. Probably doesnt have all the information. He is not one of the 3 non military on the Q team. He is most likely being used by both sides due to his reach.
But how can we truly judge anyone when we all are at the very bottom of the information chain? All we anons have is conjecture, gut feelings, both of which are vulnerable to this psyop. William Casey said in his first meeting as C_A director that they would know that their disinformation campaign was successful when everything we believed were lies. We are pretty much there right now.
So my best advice to anons is to not become attached to any player on any level. Hear what they say and try to parse out the good from the bad. Stoicism and logic is our friend in this war. Emotion and reaction our enemy. An even handed approach to all news and all the players is key.
u/TaQo
It was a good post. And for me it highlights exactly why I dont fall in love with any source of commentary and analysis. These demons play against our confirmation bias. They are adept at psychological manipulation just as all psychopaths are. I will listen to Bannon but keep him at arms length.
"Dont trust any of these influencers. But don't discount the role each one is playing currently." Thats been my motto.
I like it.
All I'll say is what I have been telling everyone here since... Well since I've been here.
There was a sprawling interview with Bannon either during Trump's resurgence in the race '16 {which was being credited to Bannon at the time} or just after winning.
In it, Bannon compared himself to Thomas Cromwell.
King Henry's advisor, who of course, was beheaded.
Bannon knew at the time while at his highest point he was to be sacrificed, which leads me to believe it was all part of the plan and everything we see now is as well.
Everything after that is an act between the two.
Agreed. To me it seems like being apart of the administration you get "read in" then unceremoniously fired. Pops up and destroys them with war room impeachment and pandemic. Say what you want, but the coverage war room did on the vaccines early on was explosive and the truth of the matter.
Regardless of Bannon’s reliability or not, and until this whole mess settles, we should really try withholding judgment on everyone, it should be much easier to agree that Breitbart News’s style, as a whole, is pretty lackluster, misses a lot of key details, is often as bad about citing sources as any mainstream newspaper, the writing is often oversimplified and shallow, and even Bannon’s podcast is also fairly … it’s hard to say it doesn’t have good content because it’s just so hard to watch. I’m not a Bannon or Breitbart fan, except for Andrew, who was an absolute honey badger.
That said, it’s hard enough to just keep an eye on ourselves to be sure we personally aren’t acting in a way that’s going to have negative results. “Plank in your own eye” and such.
Keeping “oh that person is absolutely a good/bad actor” limited to a very small handful of people is the way to go. “Fairly well give that person credibility/no cred” can be bigger, but not too big. “Check all” should be the default for the big middle, and still spot-applied to the others.
I do like the post a lot, though. Very good digging u/TaQo! Lots of things to keep in mind when considering credibility.
Edit: your addendum looks like you’re actually trying to encourage the same way of thinking, I didn’t catch that.
Well yeah... Even if Bannon is clandestinely working with Trump, it doesn't necessarily mean he's "good'. Or even that they're "good".
I don't trust anyone enough to definitively state good or bad.
I'm just showing that it was obviously the plan for Bannon to fall on the sword. To what end is tbd
Oh I didn’t mean anything otherwise. The comment was more intended to be agreeing with you, just elaborating some.
Trump likes to kayfabe w ppl
Agreed
It seems to me you forgot we’re watching a movie. Everything that was said and done was to throw off the DS from the great relationship that Trump has with Bannon. You’re wrong and your attempt to sway people’s views of Steve won’t work for those with discernment. I see what you’re trying to do. Anons don’t let this shill corrupt you! He is DS and remember all the anons in agreement with him.
Where?
Where exactly "am I wrong"? Which of the many sources I linked that back up the facts posted are "wrong" ?
I'll wait... but I don't think you're going to list any because you probably have war room on all day, every day and you're butthurt I called out your hero.
It's okay. At least you're not a liberal, as far as I can tell. You'll get over it.
I’m not saying you’re wrong in the facts. All of that happened but you're looking at it at face value. How many times have we been told “you’re watching a movie” with great “actors”? You’re still watching the movie in 3D. Not good! I see your post and all agreeing comments as a coordinated. Good luck 👍
On the contrary actually...as mentioned, many anons don't have any clue about some of the things that transpired involving Bannon and are cavalier about him without knowing the whole story.
Yeah...glass houses and he without sin and all that. I get it. I'm fully aware of the ongoing show(s)...seems at least 3 if not 4 are playing simultaneously right now.
As with anything else involved in "adulting", everyone should be making up their own minds about things. Bannon is no exception. All I can do is put the info out there. It'd be no different than me pointing out how Mother Teresa of all people was trafficking kids with Ghislaine's mossad dad. Nobody wants to have their illusions shattered or heroes exposed...but all I did was point to what's already out there. That's all.
I have ZERO stake in "swaying" anyone's opinion about Bannon...I'm simply pointing out facts after looking into it and that is all. I think an informed group is a better group...and a group that isn't is easy to ridicule. That's why we do the 72hr rule thing and don't get hooked by Real Raw bs, because it makes us look like idiots.
As Q said, "The choice to know is always yours"
Anyway - Cheers brother - I don't harbor any hate towards a fellow fren that has a different opinion than me. We're all on the same side here. Sometimes being a true fren is pointing out what others are too afraid to, for fear of backlash.
Telltale that you’re not legit is that you try to insult me by calling Bannon my hero and such. The only hero I have is Jesus Christ. I just call it as I see it.
Then forgive me. Simple as that.
Because you are citing quotes and facts from 6 years ago but ignoring things that happen recently. If Bannon is such controlled opposition, why did Trump host him on his last night of freedom before going to prison? Here's a picture of them at Bedminster last night on the way to Connecticut. Bannon changes his hairstyle so often, it's not hard to see that it's the same hair and outfit he had in his podcast special last night with Charlie Kirk and Poso. Trump also called Bannon on his cell phone, live on air the other day on WarRoom, in the middle of a hit with MTG. Why are they in such close contact? Why did Trump do an hour long sit-down interview with Bannon a few months ago? He didn't have to do that. Boris, Trump's close lawyer who I think lives at Mar A Lago actually, and calls into WarRoom constantly, is pictured in the photo.
https://x.com/RobynDODonnell/status/1807568078949269971
If Trump has distanced himself from Bannon then why hasn't he distanced himself from Bannon? I read your whole post. It felt like you spent the first 8 paragraphs trying to tell us why you are the smartest person in the room and we all need to analyze data better. I think you connected a lot of the dots that you wanted to connect while leaving other things out. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but you should not shit on people and insult those who don't agree with your assessment.
Well said! It’s obvious this post and the quick detailed responses in agreement is a planned coordination. Post like this steer some who don’t think for themselves in the wrong direction. It won’t work. I’m starting to question the mods on this one.
All that truth, and funny to boot! u/TaQo, I didn't thank you in my other comment, so I'll do it here. Thanks!
I don’t agree with Bannon on everything, but I think he fulfills a part of our national narrative that is irreplaceable. Pulling out old narratives is not really helpful. Even Trump has buried the hatchet with him. Megyn Kelly has moved on. I think everyone has learned some things. Now if our Speaker would just learn a few things from Pelosi about how to use his gonads…
Until late '16, I had never heard of Bannon. (although I had a trusted client rave over the trustworthiness of Breitbart.) What struck me, and continues to guide me strongly, is when he was announced as part of Trump's team, EVERYBODY, political pundits, Congressmen, Senators, media, all of them TRASHED the pick.
In fairness, I wasn't the biggest Trump fan. His strongest point for me was Perot 2.0. But the reaction to Bannon, told me that he was on my side. Or at least more "for me" than "against me".
To this point, I first woke up to this with Rodney King. Yes, I saw the "last" five minutes of that video a thousand times, but I never forgot the 2, and only 2 times I saw the "FIRST five minutes.
If we'd have seen the first 5 minutes a thousand times, nobody would even remember Rodney King.
What happened the first two?
Was it as obvious as the first 24 of George Floyd?
Going off memory ... He totally attacked the cops, and was drugged-out unstoppable, physically defying cuffs and other physical restraints, being a big dude.
Not quite… he never attacked the cops. Was definitely drugged out unstoppable, though, and didn’t comply with the arrest attempt very well.
If you consider that he was in the process of dying from a fentanyl overdose, though, while absolutely tripping balls, would you?
Not that he made good decisions to get to where he was, but considering where he was, he really wasn’t behaving all that badly.
Have you ever seen a dad playing "King of the Hill" with a neighborhood of 4 year-olds? He was standing there, with several cops on each arm, and with a twist of his waist, sent them flying. Rinse and repeat!
Damnedest thing I have ever seen - super-human. Though later, I learned that meth can do that to you. Who knew!
Yeah, like I said, he didn’t comply very well!
He didn’t attack them either, though, and was fairly respectful considering he was blitzed and dying.
Well now, this is going to spin more people up into a tizzy. You know, one thing comes to mind over and over and over again: "Be careful who you follow." More and more as I check and spend time on this board, I realize there are people here who have a hell of a lot more time to do deep dives, and for what it's worth, it is appreciated, folks.
....CONTINUED FROM ABOVE
So, as you can see, there is MUCH more than meets the eye when it comes to your average anon's understanding of Bannon's role in Trump's administration, where his loyalty ultimately lies (mostly to himself & possibly foreign controllers) and how both his actions and words tell a very different story about good old Uncle Steve.
Now to be clear, I didn't write this as a hit piece on Steve. I’m well aware that for every ying, there’s a yang and I think overall, Steve is more a patriot on “our side” than anything else’s. I wrote this to head off blind ignorance of anons in not knowing the whole story - not that my shitty little write up here is the whole story - but hopefully it illustrates a bit more than the default supposition that he's all about MAGA and the selfless character he's crafted to give the illusion that he's just a good guy. This post is getting WAY too long & there's more info and digging that can be done, but I am going to stop right here for now.
Not everything is simply black and white people...it's mostly gray in fact - and it's up to YOU to do your research, due diligence and decide for yourself if what you're being told on a daily basis is correct or if it smells a bit like bait you forgot you left in your tackle box...Take the time to dig a little and educate yourself rather than just grabbing every little "snack" anons may be serving up to you as easy pickins. Including this one.
Just a heads up, but I noticed a lot of down voting in this comments section. I guess someone's feathers got ruffled badly by this post and the information it exposed to everyone.
Yes, I saw that...and I KNEW beforehand that there was the potential for scores to be butthurt because they watch war room like it's a religion. They'll say otherwise, but it's pretty much spot on. "How dare you point out facts about my hero"
If you're catching flak, you must be over the target!
We are all in various shades of gray. I like the interviews that War Room provides, but wish Bannon's grooming was up to standard. I wondered early on if he might have problems with adult beverages.
If so, that could result in a lack of judgment on his part - in behavior and speech. I am not criticizing him, or justifying anything, just observing the possible explanations other than disloyalty or being a pretty snake.
I hope he can endure his time in jail, and that he is kept safe from harm. I watched his daughter's face as he spoke earlier today, and she looked so worried, even fearful. There is risk, or so it appears, for those who are on the left's hit list, for both themselves, and their loved ones.
You actually think Bannon's prison sentence legit and not political. I love how you keep exposing yourself. Looks like you’ll be busy in July. Trump’s sentencing is coming up.
So Bannon is inmate #05635509 0+5+6+3+5+5+0+9=33
That's a shot across the bow against the deep state. Everything is going to be just fine for Steve.
He lost me after the talk with Jack Maxey about "crossing the rubicon", "crossing the Delaware".......
When Patriots DID finally cross the Delaware on Jan 6., both Maxey and Bannon "condemned" this horrible act.
Fk both of them.
I forgot about "fly by night" Maxey...Jeez
Nice. I expect to see this posted word for word by @austerrewyatt1 on X shortly lol
Thank you, this was excellent.. . It’s so refreshing to read such a well researched and well written article. I hope this will inspire others to be more thoughtful about posting and following. GAW great site, and lately it takes a lot of time to sift the wheat from the chaff. Your article is gold on many levels.
Thank you for the sauce! Excellent proofs that help to bring a better understanding that Bannon is not who we have been led to believe whether good or bad. He could be very well following a script and is doing what he is told. Trump may not be the only one taking slings and arrows for us all.
There is room for more questions though as bubble_bursts and yourself say.
That's a very good and fair assessment, Anon1970.
Bannon's role, for the most part, could very well be in alignment with the Plan.
There's certainly plot twists as this movie unfolds! 🍿🍿🍿
Thank you TaQo for a well sourced post! 👏
Now, my next question, is this a part of the movie??
More popcorn indeed! This movie is getting good!
Excellent review of Bannon's history. Overall he looks like a Paytriot who is on the side of MAGA as long as Trump does not abandon Israel.
Bannon stood on stage a week or 2 ago and stated he was a Jesuit.
Great post. I do remember Bannon getting fired, and then I didn't take him seriously. But he seemed to come back into the MAGA thing. I never watched his show because his firing was at the back of my mind.
It did seem to me that he could use his brief stint in jail for publicity.
Breitbart is fishy. There are sometimes some decent articles there, but it is blatantly pro-Israel instead of Constitutional Republic (where exactly is Support of Israel in the Constitution?) There has not been, to my recollection, any reporting of the 2020 voter fraud.
Also, the dude seems to never shave or wash his hair. Just sayin'.
Thank you for the post!! Didn’t know any of this, but was never a Bannon fan. There was always something off about him. I like to read midnight rider on telegram, but ALWAYS scrolled past ANY Steve Bannon. She really pushes him, so I might reconsider following her. Thanks for putting my suspicions to rest. Doesn’t really matter who I follow, I only believe what Trump says, and thank God all through the day for sending this man to us.
double-agent?
(a double agent has to appear like they are lying about their allegiance, when in fact they are not)
High effort well researched post. You should also dig more into Bannon's overall history and his enterprises. 100% Grifter. At one time he was pimping Bio Dome for God's sake.
It should be noted that Bannon has done more than anyone else to convince the MAGA movement we are essentially under attack and being undermined by a foreign state - no not Israel but China. i.e. Red Scare 2.0. i.e. Look Here, Not There. Now look more into who has funded Bannon and his enterprises, their backgrounds etc. That should be necessary homework to form any opinion on him. Not wishful 5D chess thinking.
He is playing his part in the movie. I enjoy this part of the show. Especially when he swears. Lol!
Your whole write-up has nothing to do with the crime Bannon is accused of.
It is almost gish-gallop because it does not discuss the issue at hand: He was prosecuted and convicted of a crime that no Dem has ever been prosecuted for. Further, since the legality of the January 6th commission has been struck down, he is now going to jail for no reason.
He can be a complete piece of crap yet still be unduly prosecuted.
Bannon like Gabbard tend to play both sides of the fence. The difference is that Gabbard is cleaner than Bannon as far as we know.
Bannon was always known as a seedy figure in terms of politics so people questioning his true motives isn't out of line IMO.
Funny 'cause, early on I was praying for protection for people in Trump admin with some sort of soothsayer type lady who is a patriot. When were about to pray for Bannon she said wait & did something, I forget what, like maybe pulled a card or something. It wasn't a good one & so she said: "He must be a globalist"
I didn't know if she was crazy or not to have so much faith in something like that, but maybe she was right after all
I have not been a fan of bannon since he was fired by Trump, and do not understand the love affair so many of us have with him because he does the war room. breitbart is not what Andrew Breitbart meant it to be, and that has a lot to do with bannon. that said, I also do not like him going to jail for contempt of congress. look how many people have been charged with that and what were their sentences. I also do not think it is fair to put someone in jail for something like this because you couldn't find something else to put them in jail for. sorry if people do not like my opinion, but there it is.
Issak Kappy said said Bannon took or borrowed money from Epstein
What was is leak/ who was the candidate/ what happened in AL. What year?
Now look at Jared..
Well, damn.
Even though I kind of felt like Bannon was a bit of a snake and never actually watched the war room podcast, I was convinced he was a Patriot (partially due to the contempt charge and partially due to peer pressure over at Truth Social and GAW). Made a few statements over at Truth to his defense.
Now, I felt like a foolish sucker for not knowing how much of a snake he is, pretending to be a MAGA-man while camouflaging his contempt for Trump and undermining us.
Went ahead and deleted my Truth Social posts defending the man. Didn't need that meger clout I have gained from those posts.
Well... I wouldn't be too hard on yourself... it's hard to drill down on every happening going on.
Again, I didn't post to "shit on Steve" and give the impression he's the worst of the bunch... simply to illustrate that there's usually more to every story and I guess everyone fawning over Steve like he was a saint just pissed me off.
Why? What facts about Steve in this hypothesis swayed you?
Well, the fact that he backstabbed Trump by providing slander for the Fire and Fury book, earning a demeaning nickname for that piece of treason, and apparently embezzling money gained from Patriots that was supposedly earmarked for completing the wall.
Bannon is lucky, so far, that time and the vast informational flow rate have caused all of this to be buried and memory-holed. However, his luck might run out...
This was a great dig I knew something wasn't right and now I know thanks frien6
"The problem, as I see it, is that many anons are not capable of disseminating large quantities of information quickly and comprehending what's really being said about a given topic."
Disseminating?
Perhaps you mean "digesting"?
Proper word usage will boost the credibility of your position.
Typo - thanks. Did it all in notepad 😁