If this is a fake story, and I think it is... they are measuring how vulnerable we are to such manipulation. 35%? 05%?
Logically, nobody's carrying a camera that is that high speed. Validity dead right there. I don't think such a cell phone camera even exists... anyone know of one? Who just happened to be there and take this shot with such an expensive and rare camera.
.... riiiight. Just sit this one out until some verifiable evidence surfaces... and it should.
Yeah and it looks like the object is already losing altitude within that small horizontal travel window. This is ridiculous, there wasn't even a sound.
he's the guy who did a big ol feature presentation on the Las Vegas shooting. RedPill78 has had him on numerous times I believe. I always got a bad vibe from him... he's creepy
How convenient that they just happened to bring such a high-speed camera that day, unless it’s a camera they normally use.
You know, to capture all the high-speed action normally found at a Trump rally. 🙄
Any half way decent dslr can capture a rifle round in flight. And just watch any white house press briefing to see how these photographers "spray and pray" (with the shutter button of course)
It was probably high end. When I stopped doing photography as a gig, my backup backup backup rig could do up to 1/8000 shutter speed and could capture something like 60 continous raw frames over the course of a second. Plenty fast enough camera. If the photographer had the wits, as soon as they heard the snap or the report, press and hold the shutter button, almost a guarantee to capture the round if the camera is pointed In the right direction and the settings were dialed in. It does make one ask the question if the photog knew he was going to be capturing a rifle round ahead of time and prepped accordingly. Modern high end cameras can prob dump raw frames at this speed continuously for hours.
That wasn't a high speed video camera though, it was a still camera that takes quick bursts of photos, one of which captured a bullet. Very different from high speed video.
Exactly. Looking at John Cullens video, each frame the "bullet" seems to be only moving several inches, maybe a foot or two depending on the angle of approach. It's way too slow to be a bullet.
Oh you mean like the camera CNN had that caught the bullet going by. Not that hard is it with the right equipment but no it would not be from a cell phone.
Anyone with any semblance of understanding of ballistics will understand that a point of entry that suffers from the "fall guys" angle will be extremely obvious.
An exit wound, if ther even is one, would be a big difference than en entry wound. The angle of the bullet would also show it did not enter the same angle as Thomas's shots.
An exit wound doesn't usually follow the same angle of the entry angle, depending on the caliber, as it'll move or bounce in the body.
It would make zero sense for the bullet to go off not only at a different angle, but at a different time.
I'm calling BS. A sniper round likely used would be a .308. A .308 moves around 2250 fps. Even if the video was shot at 60 frames per second, every frame would be 37.5 inside a 6 foot field of view. More likely an insect.
That thing is traveling about 30 feet per second tops, assuming the video is 60 frames per second. Even if we imagine the thing is approaching at a steep angle towards camera it's still less than 150 feet per second.
Note: subsonic loads are often used with suppressors....note that you didn't hear a shot?
Sub sonic rounds are slower usually under 1,100 fps at the muzzle. While Crooks 223 was probably going around 3,200 fps.
But the presence of unusual recoding equipment has already been established.
The following weekend somebody reins fed the shot with a ballistic Belgian head and a video camera that could capture the projectile of a non pair pressed round. The camera was not odd looking in any way.
Better start checking out the FBI, CIA and Secret Service. I'm betting that's where you'll find your would-be assassins. And put every person at the top of those organizations through a lie detector test.
A lot of people said the bullet hole does not show up in Trump’s jacket in all other photos. Additionally… Why are we supposed to believe we can see that bullet and in that way but not the other bullets and without certain tech/equipment enhancing our ability to see vapor trails etc.?
The bullet speed was calculated around 900fps meaning the shot was likely made from atleast 200-400yds in my estimate which is consistent with .300blk subsonic fired from a suppressed rifle leaving the muzzle around 1050fps.
Not sure how much velocity a .300blk loses but a 150fps ballparks it further away than crooks who was in relatively close range, a range most basic trainees in the Army are expect to hit 9/10 times with a worn out M16 or M4.
ETA: I did the calculations and the shooter is between 150-250yds!
The bullet is moving upward at an angle, meaning the BULLET came from the crowd.
I'll be the first to say, you are undeniably retarded if you think that's a bullet. I don't care about your calculations, the bullet is moving UP from the audience...
So if you really think it's a bullet, convince me that this round was shot silently and invisibly from the fucking front few rows of the event.
Unstickied: I thought i covered this in the other thread that showed up this morning:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17txR9qyh9/x/c/4ZDrsdRtWAr?d=50
Don't reply to this.. but this is bs as the comments here are pointing out.
It's BS .. Classic clickbait.. bug at best
If this is a fake story, and I think it is... they are measuring how vulnerable we are to such manipulation. 35%? 05%?
Logically, nobody's carrying a camera that is that high speed. Validity dead right there. I don't think such a cell phone camera even exists... anyone know of one? Who just happened to be there and take this shot with such an expensive and rare camera.
.... riiiight. Just sit this one out until some verifiable evidence surfaces... and it should.
This same profile was pushing the water tower spectre hard too. Definitely throwing garbage out to muddy the water.
Yeah and it looks like the object is already losing altitude within that small horizontal travel window. This is ridiculous, there wasn't even a sound.
he's the guy who did a big ol feature presentation on the Las Vegas shooting. RedPill78 has had him on numerous times I believe. I always got a bad vibe from him... he's creepy
Correct. Fake and gay.
Their was a super high speed camera that recorded the other shot,were we saw a streak. It was a NYT photographer if I remember right.
How convenient that they just happened to bring such a high-speed camera that day, unless it’s a camera they normally use. You know, to capture all the high-speed action normally found at a Trump rally. 🙄
I'm would bet they had advanced warning.
Any half way decent dslr can capture a rifle round in flight. And just watch any white house press briefing to see how these photographers "spray and pray" (with the shutter button of course)
Maybe. But what kind of camera was used? Was it a half way decent dslr or something more?
It was probably high end. When I stopped doing photography as a gig, my backup backup backup rig could do up to 1/8000 shutter speed and could capture something like 60 continous raw frames over the course of a second. Plenty fast enough camera. If the photographer had the wits, as soon as they heard the snap or the report, press and hold the shutter button, almost a guarantee to capture the round if the camera is pointed In the right direction and the settings were dialed in. It does make one ask the question if the photog knew he was going to be capturing a rifle round ahead of time and prepped accordingly. Modern high end cameras can prob dump raw frames at this speed continuously for hours.
Ya and in this video there is no streak. It's fake and gay.
I agree the video is suspect, the streak was from the air bubble of a supersonic round. This round was likely subsonic,if it's a round.....
I'm not an expert on cameras, so I don't know.
That wasn't a high speed video camera though, it was a still camera that takes quick bursts of photos, one of which captured a bullet. Very different from high speed video.
A .308 moves at 2250 fps. At 60 fps on a camera that's 37.5 feet between images.
Exactly. Looking at John Cullens video, each frame the "bullet" seems to be only moving several inches, maybe a foot or two depending on the angle of approach. It's way too slow to be a bullet.
Correct. I was under the impression this shot came from someone other than him... thus accounting for two people with the capability. If so, how odd.
Oh you mean like the camera CNN had that caught the bullet going by. Not that hard is it with the right equipment but no it would not be from a cell phone.
.... that's a bug..
Thats what it looks like to me also, someone posted it earlier today.
Murder hornet!
First I’ve heard of those since I’d first heard of those.
It's not a feature!
Anyone with any semblance of understanding of ballistics will understand that a point of entry that suffers from the "fall guys" angle will be extremely obvious.
An exit wound, if ther even is one, would be a big difference than en entry wound. The angle of the bullet would also show it did not enter the same angle as Thomas's shots.
An exit wound doesn't usually follow the same angle of the entry angle, depending on the caliber, as it'll move or bounce in the body.
It would make zero sense for the bullet to go off not only at a different angle, but at a different time.
Now do “point blank range”
Pretty common to see bugs zip around like that in Florida.
That is 100% not a bullet.
How many times will this guy imagine something?
As many times as it takes to keep raking in the subscriptions.
Appears it's at an upward trajectory but also looks like it curls down at the edge of the frame. Just seems like an odd flight path.
Was the shooter on the ground or was this a bug zipping around?
He wasn't really moving his body, so even if it wasn't an insect (and it was) they weren't aiming to kill Trump.
I'm calling BS. A sniper round likely used would be a .308. A .308 moves around 2250 fps. Even if the video was shot at 60 frames per second, every frame would be 37.5 inside a 6 foot field of view. More likely an insect.
If it was subsonic it would be under 1,000.
That thing is traveling about 30 feet per second tops, assuming the video is 60 frames per second. Even if we imagine the thing is approaching at a steep angle towards camera it's still less than 150 feet per second.
What the fuck were they shooting at?
How fast was the camera to catch this bullet in three frames!?
Not as fast as the one that showed a streak
Note: subsonic loads are often used with suppressors....note that you didn't hear a shot? Sub sonic rounds are slower usually under 1,100 fps at the muzzle. While Crooks 223 was probably going around 3,200 fps.
Even subsonic at 1000 fps that bullet is moving 16 feet per frame if the video was shot at 60 fps. I call BS.
Someone said that the streak shot was shot at f1.6 &1/8,000th.
Clearly there we're people filming at unusual settings.
Camera shutter speeds are one thing, video frame rate is another.
But the presence of unusual recoding equipment has already been established.
The following weekend somebody reins fed the shot with a ballistic Belgian head and a video camera that could capture the projectile of a non pair pressed round. The camera was not odd looking in any way.
Cullen is a paYtriot sent to create the fog of war. Each amazing discovery gets dumber and dumber.
This is stupid. This post should be deleted. Too many people read headlines and report it as truth
Better start checking out the FBI, CIA and Secret Service. I'm betting that's where you'll find your would-be assassins. And put every person at the top of those organizations through a lie detector test.
This guy glows brighter than Alexander Litvinenko in a Radium watch dial factory.
"John" or "Mr. Cullen" There are those who know people who work with him at his day job.
I know the base government salary sucks, but at least the benefits package includes a Cadillac medical plan and free eye care, right?
Zealotry is poison.
Lmao the slowest and quietest bullet ever. If it hit him, he might have even felt it!
Edit: did the bullet have wings and legs?
Fake and gay
A lot of people said the bullet hole does not show up in Trump’s jacket in all other photos. Additionally… Why are we supposed to believe we can see that bullet and in that way but not the other bullets and without certain tech/equipment enhancing our ability to see vapor trails etc.?
This is being pushed at the same time as the video that they say shows the shooter being taken out before shots are fired towards POTUS.
The bullet speed was calculated around 900fps meaning the shot was likely made from atleast 200-400yds in my estimate which is consistent with .300blk subsonic fired from a suppressed rifle leaving the muzzle around 1050fps. Not sure how much velocity a .300blk loses but a 150fps ballparks it further away than crooks who was in relatively close range, a range most basic trainees in the Army are expect to hit 9/10 times with a worn out M16 or M4.
ETA: I did the calculations and the shooter is between 150-250yds!
300bk will certainly lose velocity faster than 223. Just look at the numbers on any two boxes.. Starting at SSv will only accentuate that.
The bullet is moving upward at an angle, meaning the BULLET came from the crowd.
I'll be the first to say, you are undeniably retarded if you think that's a bullet. I don't care about your calculations, the bullet is moving UP from the audience...
So if you really think it's a bullet, convince me that this round was shot silently and invisibly from the fucking front few rows of the event.
Its a bug. Prove me wrong. Pro tip: you can't.
Fidel Castro had over 600 assassination attempts on his life.
He's literally holier than Jesus.