Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

206
Insane if true - NYT is giving Trump a 99.7% chance of winning. (twitter.com) - N C S W I C -
posted 1 year ago by StormzAComing 1 year ago by StormzAComing +206 / -0
52 comments share
52 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (52)
sorted by:
▲ 23 ▼
– Asyouwish 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0

Did they give Hillary the same percentage points in 2016? Nervous about the cheating here, but believe this would be about right if actually honestly counted.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– normalstreet 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

I believe the electoral college numbers but not the popular vote.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– NoApologyTour 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

The polls have always been lies. I truly believe that Trump had more than 60% support in 2020 before they started flipping votes. I’d be surprised if it was less than 75% right now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– IAmTheSnuggler 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

It shows Trump at 47% and Kamala at 46% for popular vote. Crazy about that 99.7% number for electoral college though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Johnnyrotten7878 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Not really, it depends on his poll lead in swing states like PA and Georgia. If he won both of those it would be catastrophic for Kamala…and I think he will.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ZerroDefex 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yeah are they trying reverse psychology this time?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– crazycloud3 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Everything they try backfires, the sheep follow what they are programed, through repletion, to follow. Those are the sheep that will turn and go in the direction of the many.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BerlinWallCrosser 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

In 16, they printed that Killary had a 98% of winning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Asyouwish 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Hmmmm

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Cyberhawk 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

In an honest election absolutely. But that’s not what America has. I see nothing meaningful that tells me Harris won’t win this. all they have to do is cheat one more time and done. They went in hard in 2020. It will be full send in 2024. Won’t matter if it’s visible. Won’t matter if they get caught. Whose gonna stop them? Whose gonna enforce the law? Military appears to be the only way. Now, how much you wanna bet they are gonna intervene? My gut has been right more times than I would like it to be. Sadly. I really hope I’m wrong.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– GGRockz 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Harris won't win shit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BerlinWallCrosser 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

DJT Jr. has publicly guaranteed a DJT victory.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GGRockz 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Amen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– crazycloud3 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Or shit is the only thing she will win.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ZerroDefex 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Go back to PDW if you want to just doom.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– rayw_wwg1wga 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

He's not dooming, he's just laying out the scenario ahead of us.

It is all up to whether our military will actually step in this time or not.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MAGA_Patriot_1776 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

I often wonder if they stepped in during 2016. The left and the MSM sure were overconfident in 2016. So confident, they "knew" they were going to win. But they didn't.

Now one may say, "Well then, why didn't Trump win in 2020 if the military ensured his victory in 2016?"

The answer may be that no one would have woken up to the truth if 2020 wasn't stolen. The "pause" was absolutely necessary to ensure the Great Awakening occurred.

Just a thought. My own personal consideration written to the ether.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Cyberhawk 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Telling the truth isn’t dooming. The military is THE only way this gets done. Just because you can’t see through the hype, that isn’t my fault. I was there once.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SpaceManBob 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You see nothing meaningful because you choose to define what you see as meaningless.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Cyberhawk 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Oh I kept up. I watched countless hours of election legislation meetings and conferences after 2020. The thousands of affidavits from witnesses, from all parties. Was inspired by the firm voices and the pointing of fingers from state’s legislators. Do you wanna know what came from all that….I could tell ya, but you already know. Now here recently there have been some of the biggest laws passed and methods in place to target election interference. So here it is….do you think we had election laws before 2020? Of course you know this. Do you think passing a few more is gonna change anything? And even then, whose gonna enforce these laws? I can’t wait to hear this answer. Don’t say the law. Don’t say police officers. Don’t say election watchers. So who? There weren’t there in 2020, Will they magically appear in 2024? That’s why I said military. That’s my answer. What’s yours?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CokeOrPepe 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

What got me was the court dropping cases due to 'standing.' So who exactly has the 'standing' to get a trial through the courts?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– GGRockz 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

They are trying to lull us into a false sense of security.

They said Hillary by 98% remember.

I don't trust them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– OzDropbear1 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Funny to hear this given that in Australia tonight they reported its almost neck and neck in the polls and Kamala is trailing just behind Trump 46:48. But as it was on MSM news and sounded so ludicrous, I kekked to myself and thought not bloody likely.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– mightyclaw 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

The theory is that they did this for Hillary in 2016 and look what happened, so...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ArmyLady 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

LET's GO!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– StormzAComing [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Hilarious commentary on Discord about it

A

  • Jesus Christ

B

  • It looks just like the biden numbers before the debate disaster

A

  • Joe Biden's corpse is a better debater than Kamala Harris.
  • It's going to be fun to see the numbers after the debate
  • I love how Kamala made a big deal whining about how she wants to change the preestablished debate rules because she wanted to interrupt Donald Trump
  • So blatant LOL

B

  • I cant wait for the IM SPEAKING QUOTE to be posted all over social media mocking her

A

  • She's going to panic and say that to the debate moderator instead of trump mark my words

B

  • Its going to be so funny
  • "Im spea" mic cuts off
permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– swimkin 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Are they trying to keep people for voting for him? It won’t happen. Everybody needs to vote Trump no matter what

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Honor+Duty 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Bullshit on the popular vote. It’s 80-20 or better.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CokeOrPepe 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

it's not 'votes' that are counted, it is 'ballots'

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Bedminster 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Same percentage they gave her back in 2020 and who won? Nah, this is foreshadowing. They're telling you they're going to cheat this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– QDay 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The gas lighting is insane.
I read MSM garbage and am unable to comprehend how they can even report that Harris polls suggest she is leading nationally over Trump by leads topping Biden and Hillary.

SMH. They really are going to steal this thing again. At this point I fully expect to see another shit show election filled with fraud. It worked last time and the only ones that went to jail for it were those who questioned the steal.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– yldngo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's comms to signal going scorched earth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Notimportant81 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

May be an effort to get people to stay home because their vote isn't needed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TruthSocialQ 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I checked their website and could not verify this. That might be a lie. No proof or source has been provided.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TaQo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I dunno... I mean, don't get cocky.

Part of this F'd up movie might be Kameltoe winning - pushing everyone to the precipice...

Then legally challenging her eligibility via anchor baby status, then Trump (finally) winning by default - then justice for the cheating in 2024... because 2020 for whatever reason has been swept under the rug.

I dunno... Just don't be fooled thinking we're just going to get a fair shake because we haven't since maybe Reagan - even that's questionable. Everybody after that was installed or cheated except for 2016.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– EveryKneeWillBow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I think the angle they are taking is they know he will win but will use this to attack electoral college. They will argue that he is almost 100% certainty to win, yet popular vote only 1% difference thus attempting to make an argument to abolish the electoral college. There is always an angle with these demons, they never seek objective truth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Knotnow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's the same as the likelihood of recovering from Covid. Weird.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– doug1956 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We all know MSM polls are total bullshit. They are propaganda devices, nothing more. Pollsters are all acutely aware that there is a hefty percentage of Trump supporters that do not poll well and are never calculated in these reports.

This election hinges on turnout and minimizing fraud. What differences does if make if Trump gets 100 million votes but they only count 70% of them in swing states while padding the total of the Commies?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ric0Suav3 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Why do you guys entertain this bullcrap! Trump rallies compared to his opponent's rallies show a clear picture of where the country stands everything else is fabricated to allow the steal!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– erefernow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Y so lo?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mind_Your_7s 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Well shit, the steal is on again if this stays true. Yes, it's probably a part of the plan for the precipice moment, but I would be kidding myself if i said that I'd enjoy it, going through it, again, even knowing what the outcome will be.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– faxandu 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Gonna be hilarious when the election is stolen again with 1 billion votes and the first time Trump voters lose their minds.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They are probably just trying to limit turnout for Trump voters. Don't get complacent

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bluewhiteandred 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

kamala basically has nothing; even to steal the election risks backlash if it's clear there's more support for trump, and it seems that trump has too much support for a plausible steal

it honestly looked like they threw the election on purpose, just gave up with selecting kamala. probably just looking to the next election knowing this one is lost?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– skf93 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Don't get complacent. Hillary also had this percentage. We know there will be shenanigans!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SOGWAP 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Try 100 percent.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– axiy 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The last time Trump was this far ahead they shot him in the head, then they replaced the Democrat nominee.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SpaceManBob 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Nobody ever said this was anything other than the result of one poll.

And you're right, the way "sophisticated pollsters" calculate things is by the "garbage-in, garbage-out" model. They crank in a bunch of trash polls, along with some better ones, and then claim that because the result is an aggregate of a bunch of trash, mediocre, and good polls, that you magically get a good and accurate result, instead of just garbage.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy