I came across this paper, which is the best single source I have ever seen that clearly explains how the USA government was set up, and how it is SUPPOSED TO function.
Most people today seem to think that the federal government is at the top, the States are below, and the People are at the bottom.
The truth is the opposite: The People are at the top, the States are below, and the federal government is at the bottom -- and it has only specific, LIMITED powers.
BUT ...
They have been trying to turn it all upside down via propaganda and deception.
They have done this by utilizing two specific clauses in the Constitution, which grants to the federal government EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY to pass ANY law they want -- but this power ONLY applies within the District of Columbia and the federal territories (Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and Northern Mariana Islands).
Regarding the 50 States of the Union, the federal government only has ENUMERATED POWERS ... written in the Constitution ... and NOTHING MORE.
But the 14th Amendment did, in fact, create a "new" class of citizenship, and everyone has been TRICKED into claiming they are that type of citizen.
That type of citizen (United States citizen) ... HAS NO RIGHTS.
That type of citizen has ONLY "privileges and immunities," but NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS FROM GOD.
If YOU claim to BE that type of citizen, then the government PRESUMES you are, and you have no fundamental rights. Thus, they treat you that way.
If you have ever heard or read about "State citizens," or "14th Amendment citizens" or similar, you have heard correctly, but I have never seen anyone put it all together in a clear, logical format, complete with US Supreme Court case law and other legal authorities to back it up -- until now.
This paper does it.
An important quote from the paper in the conclusion:
In any given Act of Congress, it is important to determine whether the Act is founded on some part of the U.S. Constitution whereby the States of the Union have delegated authority to the United States government and thereby bound themselves and the people who live therein to the Acts of Congress on that issue. Without the proper delegation of authority, the Acts of Congress apply only to the territory belonging to the United States and such Acts have no legal operational effect within the States of the Union. Moreover, without this delegation of authority, the agents of the United States government are without authority to enforce the Acts of Congress, Presidential Executive Orders, or regulations created by any secretary of the president’s cabinet.
It is 40 pages. If you can't take the time, over the next couple of days, to read through 40 pages, then guess what? YOU do not DESERVE to live in a free society.
So ... READ IT.
EVERYONE needs to read it. THIS is how we take back America.
We simply unravel the lies and deceipt, and assert our rightful ownership that has been taken by fraud.
"Fraud vitiates every thing." -- US v. Throckmorton
https://www.youhavetheright.com/tour1/Cooperative_Federalism.pdf
Sheriffs can tell the president to get the fuck out of their county
But they never do, because they don't know the power they have.
More important than the president, they can tell the FBI and other assorted spook employees to get the fuck out.
DeSantis SHOULD HAVE detained the shooter AND investigated and prosecuted him ... BECAUSE IT HAPPENED IN FLORIDA, and NOT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
But he didn't.
The governor of Florida ... either does not know the law, or has no balls.
OR nobody told him to do it through the proper certified channels, and so he didn’t, because we have to learn to demand and do these things ourselves again.
Probably both
Wait, did he release him to the feds? I thought that’s what he said he wasn’t doing?
DeSantis is in on the clean up op.
NO BALLS
They have that authority. But they are probably aware that the consequences may not be legal, fair, or civilized. An evil cabal has been in control for ages. That is why we continue to have martyrs. That is why the Plan takes time.
So can We the People
I like the sound of that!
In 1956, Congress commissioned to have a report created to tell THEM what THEIR federal jurisdiction is.
In 1957, a report of the findings was published.
"Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States" --
https://publiclandjurisdiction.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1957-original-Part-II-Jurisdiction-Over-Federal-Areas-Within-the-State-no-index.pdf
The Constitution allows the federal government 3 jurisdictions ("authority to make law"):
(1) Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1-16: Subject matter jurisdiction (a) within the States of the Union and (b) for international matters (money, credit, post offices, bankruptcy courts, immigration, military, foreign commerce);
(2) Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 (and CLAUSE 17 ONLY): EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction (which means ANY and ALL laws) over the District of Columbia and "foreign enclaves" which are the military bases and dockyards within the States, whereby the State legislature gave up its jurisdiction to the federal government, mostly for military purposes, but also some other purposes; and
(3) Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2: EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction (which means ANY and ALL laws) for US territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.).
So, they pass laws that ONLY apply to DC and federal territories, but then they PRETEND the laws apply within the 50 States.
The CDC did this with the fraudulent face mask "guildeline" during the Covid scam.
The legal authority they cited was a federal statute that had ONLY to do with imports of animals and plants "into the United States" (foreign commerce), and DID NOT have anything to do with face masks, humans, or any illnesses.
They just MADE UP OUT OF NOTHING their own authority based on a FALSE and FRAUDULENT interpretation of this statute.
That was the ENTIRE "legal basis" for face masks on airplanes, etc.
And NOT ONE ATTORNEY IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY bothered to read the damn LAW.
I did. And I posted about it here.
Why didn't THEY?
Absolutely, but what about these powers of Congress delineated in Article I Section 8: 5. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and fix the standard of weights and measures; 6. To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; ... After several attempts, Congress relented and gave the authority to coin money away to the criminal usurious Rothschild dynasty. This was voted on Christmas eve, on an island, without a quorum. Members who were opposed were killed (some on the Titanic). The following year, we were pushed into WWI.
They had no legitimate authority to delegate any of their powers, period. They never have, and never will, have that option. Same with the other branches.
Your facemask example is why Chevron was so important.
Absolutely correct. This is how the federal government was set up, and how the power flows:
All power originates with The People, and flows from them through a contract / license to government (Constitution). These powers are limited and specific. Anything that doesn't go to the federal government goes to the States, and what doesn't go there is reserved to The People.
Any act outside of those limited powers is usurped, or stolen. Back in the founders day, people who betrayed the public trust were dealt with quickly and decisively. hence government fearing The People, and not the other way around.
The People are sovereigns without subjects. meaning every one a sovereign within their own property, life, and limits of their own individual rights. Government was primarily founded to protect those rights. When they fail to do that basic duty, they are no longer a viable government in accordance with the founding principles of our constitutional Republic.
Good post, thanks OP.
Get involved at your local level. Start doing research.
How can i download this and share it along?
https://www.youhavetheright.com/tour1/Cooperative_Federalism.pdf
https://files.catbox.moe/edd2m3.pdf
https://files.catbox.moe/xm2e1o.pdf
"It is 40 pages. If you can't take the time, over the next couple of days, to read through 40 pages, then guess what? YOU do not DESERVE to live in a free society."
AND ^ this is why we're friends, think many of us would agree! 🐸
and I'm just looking through it now, and noticed some 17s...
"there we 17 states in the Union during the time that Jefferson was president"...
of course he sent Lewis and Clark on their adventures...A lot of Q clues with that bunch🇺🇸
AND JFK was a huge fan of TJ...
"I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone." --"Remarks at a Dinner Honoring Nobel Prize Winners of the Western Hemisphere (161)," April 29, 1962, Public Papers of the Presidents: John F. Kennedy, 1962.
Printed. Thanks fren
https://freedomradio.us/vof/index.php/faqs/64-tax-freedom-program-faqs
just want to note that if you depend on welfare or ss/medicaid, you have to decide if the benefits outweigh the loss of rights.
Rescind your us citizen status...Kill your STRAWMAN
Complicating factor for many "ghosts in the machine" currently undercover "working for the enemy companies": If you rescind your 14th Amendment US Citizen status, you become ineligible for security clearance from what I understand. Yet another reason why we need massive DECLAS and removal of compartmentalized Special Access, imo.
However, no issues taking back control of "labor capital" and opting out of voluntary payroll tax (and claiming EXEMPT if job is not on Federal Lands) from what I understand.
Also, you may not have standing to sue either the Federal Corp gov't or their STATE CORP proxies if you rescind your US Citizen status. Have to claim sovereign state citizen status AND US Citizen status to be able to bring a Constitutional case against the Corporate State in Federal Court, I think. You are both at the same time.
sigh it’s just damn near impossible to figure this stuff out, and it’s even harder to convince anyone else of the direction we need to go.
Bit black pilled right now.
Let’s just keep watering those crops with Brawndo, everyone.
Everything has a price...
Which is exactly why more people don't rescind and change status.
It's a tough way to live - all to be "right"...
During the Revolutionary War the Article of Confederation amongst the States defined the cooperative relationship amongst the States as independent nations. That State independence was based upon the premise of realizing a collective independence from Great Britain which claimed ownership of ‘it’s Colonies’. A lack of national unity existed as only a loose confederation of States was put in place to confront a common enemy. That's why General Washington needed to plead with the States for resources $$$ to fight ‘a National War’ of independence. Minimal support was provided; soldiers starved, were poorly equipped, and poorly paid.
After Independence was achieved the States needed to decide the path forward. Whether that be best implemented as a loose Confederation of independent National States, or a unified Nation. This was hotly debated and ‘The Federalist Papers’ provides insight into why a United States NATION was the best path forward. A deeper dive into the origins of the Constitution will surface the parts that Gouverneur Morris and John Jay played, without the notoriety that Hamilton and Madison have achieved in history. It’s well worth diving into ALL the Founding Fathers when we attempt to discern and understand why the Constitution is written as it was in order to reach a unified consensus. A nation, with a NATIONAL identity to the world, required the States to relinquish National Sovereignty. Yet amongst the States Independence was established, and within that context State Sovereignty also exists. Hence a careful balance. Unfortunately State Sovereignty has been largely abdicated in modern times. Likewise the will of the people to engage in the flow down to the state and local processes for governance has been abdicated! An absent landlord results in the corrosion of the structure!!!
In My Humble Opinion, we as citizens need to better understand how our Constitutional Republic was formed and what it provides as protection of citizens freedom and liberties of our God Given Rights. Both Federal and State Rights exist and an absent landlord allows the pyramid of power to become inverted. People-Local-State-Federal becomes Federal-State-People with local not even in the equation.
The States are NOT Nations! Yet Citizens are required to engage in more than just voting (sheeple) because local-state engagement is paramount. It’s ALL about community and when everything inevitable falls apart (read the Bible), it will be state, then local, then community that will provide whatever protections can put in place. And In My Humble Opinions the 17th Amendment did way more damage to our Constitution than the 14th ever did.
The States did not abdicate their sovereignty, Abraham Lincoln declared war on the Confederate States to prevent them from exercising their right to secede. It had nothing to do with slavery. That was just a cover story.
There is a lot more to it, but that is where the loss of States Rights began.
My friend Dave used to rail all the time about Lincoln being a tyrant, and that slavery was a cover story... LOL... If this is Dave hello :-)
In today reference frame both the States and the Citizens are absentee landlords. And both the States and Citizens started losing their rights in 1798 when President John Adams pushed through the Alien and Sedition Acts as a means to suppress criticism. It was the 1st Federal overreach and it was generated by a Founding Father, while other Founding Fathers fought against it. A lot more there as you would say.
Nowhere in the Constitution do I see a Right for a State to secede, which unfortunately was the price that was paid when the Articles of Confederation were exchanged for a Constitutional Republic. States are not independent nations, and the use of State as an independent nation is a misnomer.
I am a strong supporter of State Rights, but IMHO the question of nullification was answered way before the Civil War which itself answered the question of secession.
I would be thrilled if the sheeple awoke and turned into citizens, and the States reclaimed their rights and protected their citizens from blatant government overreach. It takes time and effort to use the system, more so when there is rampant corruption. In today's instant gratification, quick fix society are the citizens willing to be involved anymore??
The British king didn't thing the colonists had a right to secede, either.
Declaration of Independence declares that ALL people have a right to alter or to abolish their government, whenever their government is abusing them.
If you disagree with that, then you side with the tyrants.
States actually ARE independent governments. Each passes its own laws. They have, however, granted a part of their sovereignty over to the federal government, to act as their agent for international and a few internal issues, which the States determined (rightly or wrongly) would be beneficial for one voice.
The same is true of the European Union -- many countries ("states") joined together to have one voice on certain issues. Of course, we can see that all that did was attract a monstrous, tyrannical group of people who want to be dictators over the People of Europe.
The same has happened in the USA.
So, maybe it wasn't such a good idea.
But it is what it is.
If we didn't have a federal government at all, we probably would have been at war with each other before 1861.
Nevertheless, each State is definitely its own country, subject only to allowing the federal government to have LIMITED powers over ENUMERATED subjects.
Yes, that is what is needed.
Let's not forget:
"That to secure the blessings of liberty, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it." -- Declaration of Independence
The British king didn't thing the colonists had a right to secede, either.
Declaration of Independence declares that ALL people have a right to alter or to abolish their government, whenever their government is abusing them.
If you disagree with that, then you side with the tyrants.>
Abolishing a government through a war (REVOLUTION) is NOT the same as quietly telling the government that you are part of that as a State you are exercising your Right to secede. Great Britain did not quietly allow its colonies to leave. A price was paid for the right to secede.
And a civil war was already fought once over this, so yes I do side with Lincoln for saving the Union, as a National Leader should. The south knew that war was inevitable through their declaration of secession, just as our Founding Fathers knew that war was inevitable when they signed the Declaration of Independence. If you believe that States need a Right to quietly walk away from the Nation, without war, then maybe its time to work on an Amendment that puts that into the Constitution. Use the system in place or expect another war. And in these times we live in, war is a Deep State objective.
"That to secure the blessings of liberty, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it." -- Declaration of Independence
Very TRUE... But lets recognize that the Declaration of Independence was a Declaration of WAR. The Founding Fathers risked everything. Their Life, Property, Way of Life, Family, etc. etc. PLUS they had enraged citizens that they were the voice and guiding lights for. Succession is not a right, but an earned position. The right to earn it through revolt (WAR) is not debated, such as our struggle for Independence was.
My point is we have arguable have the best system in place that man has created to protect God given Rights. It does NOT support peaceful succession. Has it been used effectively??? NO!!
Not debating whether the Declaration of Independence and its implied Declaration of War was justified... for that is what it was; a justification for a War for Independence. Everybody, every nation, every monarchy, every living thing, has the ability to declare War. It has been with us continuously since the Garden of Eden. Why our WAR for Independence was justified was well stated by our Founding Fathers. Further cemented that our Rights come from God, not by the authority of the governance (or man) as some other constitutions are based upon.
Trump has gone thru' Hell and High water' to right this ship WITHOUT violating our Constitution! The Declaration of Independence is NOT the law of the land. Our Constitution is! Time for us as a nation to recognize what the Constitution says and what it means. Amend it, Fix it or Break it... like something better is going to come along LOL!
Hopefully we (as a Nation) will never, ever, have to invoke a Declaration of Independence again, and engage in War against OUR nation in the interest of its people.
Benjamin Franklin - "A Republic if you can keep it"
Don Henley - its time for 'The End of The Innocence'
Remember when the days were long And rolled beneath a deep blue sky Didn't have a care in the world With mommy and daddy standin' by But "happily ever after" fails And we've been poisoned by these fairy tales The lawyers dwell on small details Since daddy had to fly
O' beautiful, for spacious skies Now those skies are threatening They're beating plowshares into swords For this tired old man that we elected king Armchair warriors often fail And we've been poisoned by these fairy tales The lawyers clean up all details Since daddy had to lie
Actually, as much as i like Trump, it is untrue that he hasn't violated the Constitution. He has on more than one occasion. One would hope that he is willing to learn more and not do so in the future through ignorance.
Some specific examples:
Acting Officials exceeding the limit of 210 days: Congress enacted the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) to allow the president to appoint “acting” officers, people already holding certain positions within the federal government who can serve in a vacant office for a maximum of 210 days after it becomes vacant. Keeping an officer in such an “acting” position past the statutory limit violates the appointments clause. Chad Wolf had served as acting secretary of Homeland Security beginning on November, 2019 — and was there well over the 210 days limit. **Bombing Syria: **bombed without notifying or getting approval from congress. Bump Stock ban: Violated 2nd amendment **COVID-19 Executive Orders: **These orders extended unemployment benefits and placed the onus on states to top them up, suspended the payroll tax for many workers, facilitated an eviction moratorium later declared by the Centers for Disease Control (the extension of which President Biden is now pursuing), and suspended student-loan repayments. While these may or may not be sensible policies to provide relief to low-income people economically hurt by the global pandemic, even leading progressive legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky found them unconstitutional. Violated Separation of Powers numerous times: Used money for the border Wall that was not authorized by Congress, Tried to force States to to assist the federal government to enforce immigration laws by taking a slew of federal law-enforcement grants to so-called sanctuary cities which was a direct violation of the “anti-commandeering doctrine,” among other principles of federalism. That is, states are independent sovereigns that can’t be forced to assist the federal government, and although they can be enticed to help willingly with the promise of federal funds, the federal government can’t place additional strings on those enticements without congressional approval.
Many Presidents have violated the Constitution, but it is never okay, regardless of who, or if it was with good intentions.
I will be voting for Trump again, but I also do not want him to violate the limits of his executive powers.
You are mistaken, the States always had the right to secede. Our Republic was established with a voluntary confederation of independent States. Each state had the right to leave that confederation, if they so chose.
Brandon joe Williams has good info on this topic
Thanks!!
Thank you.
They are “public servants” not “public masters” many know this and yet one thing that I at times was guilty of too is I thought everyone knew that.
Local politics is where it is has always been at but we are believe in the magical nonesense of “keeping the peace and taking the higher road” this nonsense that the conservatives have done for too long now has given the keys to the insane posey aka the communism regime.
One other problem is we allow these insane commies to hire any sheriff they wish—do you want a good example?
Ok. Look at the Sheriff Carl Stout in Oklahoma. He was finally fired out of exposing how he is a child predator and woman predator in general. He stalks his prey and uses the law against people because he is the law. He has done this for decades around the USA. He appears to be a conservative but he is evil.
Congress makes law for the States of the Union as well as municipal law for federal territories, but Congress has no duty to clearly tell you which they are doing!
Awesome find! Thank you!!
Great Post!