For those still unaware of who Fox News Bret Baier Really Is… Ask yourself this question… WHY Would he have Reposted This ?? MSM FAKE NEWS REPORTER !!🤨🤨
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Don't let this interview fool you. Bret has always been a Dem butt kisser.
Its not about Bret. Its about the narrative. If a Dem butt kisser couldn't give her a win in the interview, its a huge narrative win against the last strongholds of Harris supporters.
I think Bret was told to destroy Kamala. The question is - who ordered the hit? Biden (Jill - not Joe), Paul Ryan, one of the Murdochs, 0bama, Kamala's own staff? I don't believe Bret would've done that without being told to - he loves dems.
Maybe I'm wrong but it looks to me like another switcheroo is coming in hot. I don't know how any attempt to drop her would work out now that voting has started - even though the dem electors can technically choose whoever they want. What I suspect is this is a Hail Mary play designed to throw the election into the courts before it is even finished. They will shop for a dem judge, win the case, Trump will appeal to SCROTUM - err... SCOTUS - and the dems will threaten them just like on the 0bamacare stuff. That worked last time...
At this point that slim chance may be the only chance they have, and they've proven that they just love lawfare.
Remember - this election could actually be life and death for many of the dems if they are properly charged with treason. Jail time for election interference would be minor compared to the alternative.
There is a puppet show behind the puppet show. Ultimately all strings are controlled by the WHs.
Its easy to dismiss Bret as "He loves Dems", but that doesn't give you the full picture. Take a look at how his career got started:
It started right in the Bush years, right in the middle of the Iraq and Afghan wars, and he was allowed narrative access to the wars. That means, he is working for the neocon "forever war" faction, and currently this faction is controlled by the Zionists wanting to start a WW3.
So who ordered Bret to dismantle Kamala: The Zionists
Why? Because Obummer crowd is not falling in line with the "Attack Iran and start WW3" plan
Why has Trump been saying Bomb Iran rhetoric? Because this is the play. Trump getting Zionists to destroy the Obama crowd and in the process expose them. Then the Zionists will paint themselves in a corner in Israel and then they will hold Trump's presidency hostage until he delivers the WW3.
Whats Trump's plan? Of course we dont know the specific, but at 40K view, he will use the enemy's plans against them.
The Israel paints themselves into the corner and are about to be annihilated without US support, Trump will leverage that along with the people getting Awakened, and my bet is that "My fellow Americans ..." moment will happen.
I had made a plan analysis a while ago. Seems like the plan is still holding and on track.
I hope we don't go to war with Iran. But it would make the World way more dangerous if they got the tech to make and deliver a nuke. They'd be a threat to everyone in the region including Russia and India. They can't be allowed to obtain a nuke under any circumstance.
But Trump probably has a plan to get Russia involved with convincing Iran it would not be in their interest. Maybe calming down Israel would be part of the plan as in getting rid of Bibi and throwing him in the slammer. That man has murdered 1000s. Also Bush/Cheney need to be put in prison for letting 9/11 happen.
Ultimately the deep state within Iran and deep state within Israel, both needs to be wiped out. Not sure what the plan for that, but an engagement which will be hailed as the "WW3" with potential nuclear escalation might serve the purpose while also acting as part of the precipice - scare event.
For MANY years, I have been asking why Iran was EVER allowed to pursue ANYTHING nuclear, since they have enough petroleum reserves to meet their energy needs for hundreds of years. So far, nobody has been able to answer, and all the talking heads avoid this fact, as if their is a gun to their head if they mention it.
Great analysis 👍🏻
Good post. I think we've certainly entered the kinetic phase of things for sure.
SCROTUS
Democrat = Donkey = Ass
= = = Ass Kisser
Yep Dogsoldier2, it's just the beginning of The Prestige.
I wouldn't be surprised if he got orders to obliterate her so they can pull their switcheroo.
too late for that?
Not if they delay the election with crisis after crisis
In over half the states, yes. All votes so far would have to be voided and all states would have to print new ballots. Most states will not go for it.
Saw an article yesterday that Georgia had record turnout when early voting opened. What would they do with all the Harris votes? Asking for a friend. I know chaos and ignoring laws mean nothing to a leftist. But it is an issue they'd have to address.
I guess they'd do the same thing they did with all the Biden votes, which was tell all the people that already voted "tough shit, this is your candidate now".
To promote the segment? Seems harmless to me. As an independent journalist is he supposed to correct the person posting its “the next president” when he reposts?
Agree. I am a bit exasperated with literally everything being a damned conspiracy. Dude is trying for ratings. Trying to find meaning beyond that is silly IMO.
You can take the frog out of the matrix, but sometimes you cannot take the matrix out of the frog....
Bret is a snake. I got into an email battle with him during the run up to the 2016 election. He has been a Never Trumper since day 1.
So what? It doesn’t mean he’s making an endorsement of her just because it’s a retweet..
Somewhere on this planet there exist photos of Brett Baier in bed with a man.
Does he ever ask why they flew illegals in, why they ordered barb wire cut, why they order gates left open, why Biden/Harris stopped building the wall, why they ordered catch and release, why they don’t work with Mexico to keep illegals until vetted, why they don’t place illegals in the FEMAcamps pending vetting, why they aren’t vetting families where illegal minors are placed, or how they lost 350,000 minors?
He asked decent questions, but she squirted ink like a cuttlefish. He pointedly tried to get her to steer back to the question, but she just did a fan dance (they call it filibuster, but that's too close to being coherent). The session was supposed to be 30 minutes, but they chopped it down to less and then urgently signed that they had to wrap and go. This was the toughest session she had ever seen, lasted barely 15 minutes, reduced her to gaslighting and platitudes, and got her staff so antsy they closed the show as soon as they could. I don't think there is any evidence that Baier pulled any punches. All this puppet-dancing theory is sheer fantasy.
Along with the false idea that there are no coincidences, there is also the false idea that there is no such thing as stupidity, ineptitude, and failed strategy. Strong in these minions, the Dunning-Kruger Effect is.
Hoebama never once answered the question posed.
Even though Brett gave her plenty of chances to spew her rhetoric for the question asked, she just blathered on about stuff not really relevant to the question.
It was really a bad look when she started raising her voice and getting agitated when she was projecting about Trump pocking up his political enemies.
The word that comes to mind is "vacuous." I've had more meaningful conversations with my cats.
Halloween is coming up. Maybe he's trying to scare us?
OP is obsessed with "ooh, this reporter is fake, that reporter is not fake"
Made sense about 7 or 8 years ago, but surely we (you?) are far beyond that now? Q indicated a few very interesting journos, but beyond that, surely we ALL know that the MSM including Faux is not what they appear on the surface.
Baier doesn't need to be a 'white hat' or anything like that for this interview to have an impact. Do you think Harris's controllers would agree to her doing an interview with Tucker or something?????
This interview was not for you, or autists, or Q folks. It was for the normie rank and file. 100% appropriate to have an MSM journo (if that's your definition of a fake journo) do this.
Focusing on the interviewer journalist instead of the impact of the interview is like driving from NY to LA and being obsessed about oh, loook, I got some wear on my tires.
Or like saying "hey, everyone! Did you know that the Vatican is corrupt????" This is GAW, not Facebook.
Think big picture. Who Baier is is such a minute (tiny) issue I don't see either why this post was made, or even stickied.
<end rant>
“””OP is obsessed with "ooh, this reporter is fake, that reporter is not fake"… “”” I send a lot of people to this sight that are recently awakened… They don’t know the plethora of Facts you claim to… I’m not here to share info with folks that already know, or Preach to the Choir… Sure Sorry you don’t see it that way…
OK. Thanks OP. I thought the posting is a pretty weak one, considering the overall board. Especially since the retweeting itself is fairly innocuous, as a good number of commentators pointed out.
That said, it's valid to point out that not everyone here is on the same page or has the same experience. So maybe that part of my criticism is less appropriate.
But while I have you engaged, could you explain why you always post images and never (ever, as far as I know) including links to your source. I'm assuming there is some reason there.
For example, you could have easily posted the link tot eh actual retweet, making it very easy for others to go directly to source and investigate or take a further look at what you are posting/asserting. Posting the link itself might take a few extra seconds on your part, but it would means saving lots of seconds for all the people reading the post. I'm wondering why you don't do that. Again, I assume you have some reason.
Perhaps Baier thinks he’s presidential material.
I was surprised that he was tough with her, but that’s a view fueled by some very low expectations… as in I was shocked it didn’t open with him bending over and asking her to peg him…
He'll give her Arizona on election night with 1% reporting.
I didn't know Bret thought he was running for president...
u/#q4951
Bret Baier is not for Kamala or Trump. He is for Bret Baier and will do or say whatever is necessary to keep his job.
I’ve never liked Bret Hair(piece) but he did roast Kuntmala pretty good.
What's with the caption does he know something I don't know when he says on now with the next president of the United States....