At a minimum, these companies should not be able to advertise.
The problem will, of course, be "Muh First Amendment". And, sadly, I actually agree with that, to a large extent. The problem is not, really, that these cunts advertise. The problems are:
Their ads influence the freedom of the press, as you correctly point out, and
The people who consume these ads do not have the problem solving skills to discern, parse, conclude what is true, etc.
My default position with stuff like this is always "Caveat Emptor". But in this case, we need a long hard look at all of this, because the current reality is queering up our Republic somethin' fierce.
Vaccines do cause autism, which is brain inflammation. The adjuvants in the vaccines are toxic heavy metals, like mercury. when they cross the blood brain barrier they inflame and kill brain cells. Dr. Thompsonconfessed this in 2004.
Anytime they are trying to "Debunk" something, they are either lying or trying to construct a narrative. People digesting facts and arriving at the truth is bad for business.
My two cents - If you look at each vaccine individually, the MAY be safe. It MAY be ok for that single shot and not have it impact your body. But what RFK-Jr needs to do is look at the impact of multiple shot given during a short period of time. I remember reading a post about a month ago that said a child at age x (don't remember the exact age) will have received a fairly significant amount of mercury from all the vaccines. THIS is what needs to be researched!
The sheer increase in the number of vaccinations they try to get parents to give to their children is what is ridiculous! Some may have legitimacy, but the majority are just money grabs by big Pharma.
I was curious about this same topic, when newly awakened in 2022. So I looked up the WHO and CDC investigation of Childhood immunizations. It must've taken me a hour to dig through all the non-profits and "protective institutions" to find one that had research papers.
But find it I did. As I read the foreword, I came across a note on how the data was prepared: data on Adverse Events was recorded commensurate with "first post-natal menstrual cycle of the mother."
That "creative accounting" told me everything that I wanted to know. The graphs of "child age" and "post-natal menstrual cycle" did not line up. The spike in SIDS was one month separated from the immunizations. They were lying with the method of presentation.
I wished that I had saved the research paper. I also might have, but I don't have time to dig for it now...
I know 2 women with autist sons. and both moms always had asthma and allergies and were using the inhalers and taking allergy pills prior to pregnancy.. I always suspect there's a connection there
Quite possible as well. We're never going to find out if we dismiss one aspect because the science is settled. Science is never settled, only propaganda is settled
To the extent that these news organizations have to turn a profit (they really don't, but work with me), Big Pharma adverts are the reason why they are solvent.
They are not going to come out against vackstheeeens.
I watched my best friends child go from "totally normal" to them thinking he may be deaf, getting him tested and finding out he is severely autisic, after a "wellness" doctor appointment which gave him vaccines. it was an instant change This was back in 2004
Besides, MSN, this also is a manner of false reporting:
A theory is scientifically falsified by evidence, Yes ... I know, you have a highly contentious relationship with evidence. Note, I did not say fact, but evidence.
And, within the current scientific community at large, especially the drug-science, the question that is being sought to be answered is often not the right question, or even a helpful question.
A case in point? Well, Take the study where Remsidivir was tested against the efficacy of a high dose of HCQ to combat laate stage covid patients.
What was tested against was not the regime Prof Dr. Raoul came up with, but just an ioniphore. Conclusion: HCQ did nothing for late state patients, whereas Remsidivir was praised into high heaven.
Of course this is wrong, as it is the wrong question. If they had tested Remsidivir against the real protocol ..... Remsidivir would not been provided the basis for prescription in emergency, as people die from Remsidivir with "covid" andnot from covid.
Why? A theory is the highest from of explanation and is not written in stone. Many theories people thought were correct, have been fallen to the way side,when, through rigorous testing and investigation, a different theory was accepted. So, you need the right question with strong evidence.
Anything less than that, is a hypothesis or even worse in scientific knowledge: a hunch.
However, you, MSN, played your own role in this whole COVID debacle, and YOU are debunked as Fake NEWS, and we have the goodies to show you.
I don't know if they do or not. But why would it hurt to look at the situation? These headlines make it look like they are hiding something. Just craziness, people say they want change but never want to look in another direction
The questions are if they actually prevent anything they’re advertised as preventing in any capacity, if they’re safe long term whether they cause immediate clear defects or not, and whether the people giving them to us were always intentionally trying to poison us or just covering up that they were poisoning us to save themselves from litigation.
Call me cynical, but I know what I think each answer is…
it isn't discredited or debunked. They are liars. There has never been any evidence that vaccines are not responsible for the soaring autism rates in this country. I hope we can find some remedy for the damage they have done to our children.
"Always remember- these outlets’ allegiance is to their Big Pharma sponsors, not the American public."
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1871252174753116399
This.
It's pretty hard to have "freedom of the press" when they exist on advertising dollars. We need to fix that.
At a minimum, these companies should not be able to advertise.
The problem will, of course, be "Muh First Amendment". And, sadly, I actually agree with that, to a large extent. The problem is not, really, that these cunts advertise. The problems are:
Their ads influence the freedom of the press, as you correctly point out, and
The people who consume these ads do not have the problem solving skills to discern, parse, conclude what is true, etc.
My default position with stuff like this is always "Caveat Emptor". But in this case, we need a long hard look at all of this, because the current reality is queering up our Republic somethin' fierce.
Vaccines do cause autism, which is brain inflammation. The adjuvants in the vaccines are toxic heavy metals, like mercury. when they cross the blood brain barrier they inflame and kill brain cells. Dr. Thompsonconfessed this in 2004.
Anytime they are trying to "Debunk" something, they are either lying or trying to construct a narrative. People digesting facts and arriving at the truth is bad for business.
Not “usually”, they are ALWAYS lying.
They are
usuallyalways lying.100% of the time, they’re lying every time 😎
That study was like almost 25 years ago, and kids get a lot more vaccines now.
SHEESH. The study didn't include all those vaccines that kids weren't taking when the study was done.
combined with the effects of cellphone radiation! I personally think that is the magic elixir for autism.
My two cents - If you look at each vaccine individually, the MAY be safe. It MAY be ok for that single shot and not have it impact your body. But what RFK-Jr needs to do is look at the impact of multiple shot given during a short period of time. I remember reading a post about a month ago that said a child at age x (don't remember the exact age) will have received a fairly significant amount of mercury from all the vaccines. THIS is what needs to be researched!
The sheer increase in the number of vaccinations they try to get parents to give to their children is what is ridiculous! Some may have legitimacy, but the majority are just money grabs by big Pharma.
A few Hollywood types years ago speculated this and they were shut down almost immediately.
I was curious about this same topic, when newly awakened in 2022. So I looked up the WHO and CDC investigation of Childhood immunizations. It must've taken me a hour to dig through all the non-profits and "protective institutions" to find one that had research papers.
But find it I did. As I read the foreword, I came across a note on how the data was prepared: data on Adverse Events was recorded commensurate with "first post-natal menstrual cycle of the mother."
That "creative accounting" told me everything that I wanted to know. The graphs of "child age" and "post-natal menstrual cycle" did not line up. The spike in SIDS was one month separated from the immunizations. They were lying with the method of presentation.
I wished that I had saved the research paper. I also might have, but I don't have time to dig for it now...
There are more than a few papers they publish where the method is clearly flawed or the conclusion is obviously covering up the data.
Sometimes it’s bad enough that it’s obvious to us laypeople. How often is it obvious to people who are actually trained and work in that field?
I know 2 women with autist sons. and both moms always had asthma and allergies and were using the inhalers and taking allergy pills prior to pregnancy.. I always suspect there's a connection there
Quite possible as well. We're never going to find out if we dismiss one aspect because the science is settled. Science is never settled, only propaganda is settled
To the extent that these news organizations have to turn a profit (they really don't, but work with me), Big Pharma adverts are the reason why they are solvent.
They are not going to come out against vackstheeeens.
I watched my best friends child go from "totally normal" to them thinking he may be deaf, getting him tested and finding out he is severely autisic, after a "wellness" doctor appointment which gave him vaccines. it was an instant change This was back in 2004
My young outgoing son turned into an introvert after his 2 year old vaccines.
Why in the world is this comment down voted?
I may have a troll following me, there have been other strange downvotes.
That's a good indicator. The MSM is trying to sell something? We know they're lying.
It is pretty funny how many times that great swath of MSM will puppet the same talking points about something.
Doth protest too much 🧐
Show me the goodies then.
Besides, MSN, this also is a manner of false reporting:
A theory is scientifically falsified by evidence, Yes ... I know, you have a highly contentious relationship with evidence. Note, I did not say fact, but evidence.
And, within the current scientific community at large, especially the drug-science, the question that is being sought to be answered is often not the right question, or even a helpful question.
A case in point? Well, Take the study where Remsidivir was tested against the efficacy of a high dose of HCQ to combat laate stage covid patients.
What was tested against was not the regime Prof Dr. Raoul came up with, but just an ioniphore. Conclusion: HCQ did nothing for late state patients, whereas Remsidivir was praised into high heaven.
Of course this is wrong, as it is the wrong question. If they had tested Remsidivir against the real protocol ..... Remsidivir would not been provided the basis for prescription in emergency, as people die from Remsidivir with "covid" andnot from covid.
Why? A theory is the highest from of explanation and is not written in stone. Many theories people thought were correct, have been fallen to the way side,when, through rigorous testing and investigation, a different theory was accepted. So, you need the right question with strong evidence.
Anything less than that, is a hypothesis or even worse in scientific knowledge: a hunch.
However, you, MSN, played your own role in this whole COVID debacle, and YOU are debunked as Fake NEWS, and we have the goodies to show you.
And that' s a fact!
It is most likely the large number of vaccines given and several at one time that causes autism.
Certain key words always pop up when they’re cranking up the spin and ass-covering. It’s like a poker tell.
Truth does not fear investigation.
I don't know if they do or not. But why would it hurt to look at the situation? These headlines make it look like they are hiding something. Just craziness, people say they want change but never want to look in another direction
The question isn’t if they cause SIDS or autism.
They do.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0ogHaiZ/58-to-78-of-sids-deaths-are-coin/
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MhFkcC/vaccinations-autism-rates-the-la/
The questions are if they actually prevent anything they’re advertised as preventing in any capacity, if they’re safe long term whether they cause immediate clear defects or not, and whether the people giving them to us were always intentionally trying to poison us or just covering up that they were poisoning us to save themselves from litigation.
Call me cynical, but I know what I think each answer is…
These pukes sure do know when to fall in line.
Im actually glad that they still haven't figured out that shit like this has become obvious, and people are beginning to wake up to their games.
It's hard to believe that they havent figured out how to be more sly though.
Shouldn't MSM just "trust the science"?
Ya really just can't hate these evil demons enough.....
Personally, I don't think there is any doubt. I also think all the immunologists know as well. Pediatricians too.
Just look at how many people we trust are willing to harm our children just for money.
it isn't discredited or debunked. They are liars. There has never been any evidence that vaccines are not responsible for the soaring autism rates in this country. I hope we can find some remedy for the damage they have done to our children.
I got all the vaccines when I was a kid, and I got autism.
Coincidence, I think not.
The greatest irony is that mildly autistic people are pattern recognition machines, and are exposing them.
Hilarious.
Also can I have an APU beside my name too? I really like that froggo.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MhFkcC/vaccinations-autism-rates-the-la/
If they don’t, those correlations are awfully coincidental.
And they do cause SIDS, according to VAERS.