Nit picking over phraseology, when you can in no way prove him wrong? Find out which airport his aircraft operate from. Get the airport's daily flight logs. Find out if they flew over the days in question.
According to my life experiences, there are coincidences and accidents...in abundance. There are whole fields of science based on the existence of random phenomena. We build technology on it. I would say that makes it "extremely well established." What you are talking about is "extremely well popularized and accepted." Which is cult thinking.
It's okay to take the Q statement as a metaphor for the idea that some apparent coincidences and accidents are not, in fact, what they seem to be. The eruption of Mount St. Helens, however, was completely what it seemed to be.
god punishing the gays is what that was.
what you said about life experiences is exactly how normals go through life. that is why they won't accept the global elite satanic adrenachrome sex cult is the while reason there are wars and crime.
If that's how you mean it, I cannot argue. But I would suggest to you that the mechanics of random processes exist and are confirmed. In my thinking, random processes are God's automatic pilot, because you can turn your back away from them and they will operate in accordance with their nature without fail. And some events are outcomes of that fact of nature: predictable en masse, but not in individual events.
I think too many anons are seduced into thinking that human agency is behind everything, resulting in a search for the associated conspiracy.
yes, many focus on the 'conspiracy' rather than the big picture. And I do think it's 'automatic' in the way that one thing leads to another...starting from the beginning.
I just know that details from my childhood in the 70s, are just now starting to make sense...question my sanity multiple times a day because there is No human way to explain the 'coincidences'
The mention of N8160P in relation to Rainmaker Technology suggests it may be leased, contracted, or misattributed to STWMA or Trans Pecos WMA. No direct FAA registration links Rainmaker Technology as an owner, so it’s likely they partner with existing weather modification associations.
These are very well known quotes that everyone accepts are real. Q said the first one. Tzu, the second. If you can't dig that, Im not worried.
If you aren't challenging the veracity of this claim, then I misunderstood you and will just reply, yep. Obviously. It's a huge sign of weakness to be doing art with your medium as bullshit.
I get it, but the important thing is whether statements are true or not, which is why my point still prevails.
If you are in the business of challenging the veracity of every claim you encounter, without any prompting reason, your family life must be seething. You forget that in courts of law, there is a presumption of innocence and the expectation of truth. Once someone is caught in a lie, there can be hell to pay, but not before then. It will be easy enough to substantiate or debunk his claim, so the question is: are you going to do it? Or just say that whatever you dislike is a lie?
God sure as hell creates all the rain where I live, and we get a lot. You never heard of "flash floods"? Texas has the same problem with them as California. One of the first things I saw on a trip to San Antonio was a very large and dry drainage canal, about the size of a 4-lane road.
Why do you think they are called "floods"? Have you seen how high we build levees to contain a flooding river? I have seen rivers high up to the brim of the levee. Very eyebrow-raising. After that, the whole countryside is at jeopardy.
In my home county, the Nooksack River would seasonally flood the flatlands of its drainage, particularly the Lummi indian settlements in Marietta. Due to their status as wards of the government, they would decamp elsewhere, the flood would ruin their households, and they would receive replacement goods from the government upon subsidence of the floods. Farther upstream, in Lynden, the Dutch farmers settled on a highland and built dikes along the river to keep their fields from being flooded.
The flood canals I have seen in California and Texas are at least in the depth range you are talking about, but width also counts, as the two relate to total flow capacity.
air is generally drier as altitude increases, particularly above a few thousand feet, because the atmosphere becomes thinner and holds less moisture due to lower atmospheric pressure and adiabatic cooling. While relative humidity might increase at certain altitudes where air cools and can hold less water vapor, the absolute amount of water vapor (absolute humidity) decreases significantly with elevation.
That is correct---but irrelevant. The relevant measure is relative humidity, which determines whether water vapor freezes or remains vapor. And that can be higher at higher altitudes, notwithstanding a lower absolute humidity. This is a result of the fact that high altitude air cannot sustain high water vapor levels---thus resulting in the formation of ice crystals (contrails).
Somebody did. I was very disappointed to see how heavily we were being trails the three days prior. I'm not sure how to attach pictures or links to pictures, but I took a picture of the sky on the 2nd. We had been enjoying natural looking puffy clouds in the two weeks before that.
And it just so happens that there was zero rain in the forecast, and it just so happens that the temperatures were fifteen to twenty degrees cooler than the temperatures forecasted, and it just so happens that the planes fly in unusual flight patterns in the days leading up to every weather event, and the globalists would never do anything to harm us nor to further their agenda. Sometimes I just forget how much I trust that they have our best interest in mind with regard to everything they do. Plus, tower seven did have some debris falling around it. So, thank you for helping me be more reasonable. Tomorrow, I'm going to do what I can to help fight climate change.
You know DeSantis approved a ban to these crooks not spread the friking chemtrails into our skies in Florida, but I bet my two cents these MFers are doing it somehow that we will never found out. They are having a better technology to kill is all.
Keep me posted please on your skies. I suspect the same. I will be interested in knowing. I would like to know if folks in Tennessee are still seeing them.
On the whole, you don't sound like you are intending to be reasonable.
This is the problem of ignorance. It feeds directly into paranoia.
Where I live, we take the daily forecast as a kind of suggestion, plus or minus never or always. When I was a young boy on a day in April, we had sunlight, rain, hail, snow, and sunlight all during my walk home. If I want to know what the weather is going to be, I look at the sky and take note of the wind.
The only response you get from me here is that it is you who is ignorant. You will see. I'm glad you trust your overlords. Your work here is done. You may now move on to Reddit. Out.
Your previous response was frivolous snark. You certainly don't offer any refutation of my factual account of one afternoon in a long-ago April. I'm not ignorant of atmospheric phenomena, though plenty of people are. No overlords to trust, just the relevant science. You are a classic example of how someone responds when they have run out of argument: snark, insult, rejection.
I argue only if there is an open mind on the other end of the argument. Arguing with anyone who has a baked in superiority complex and a, likely education based, locked up mind is fruitless. You know this. You know why you continue to poke. Poke someone who cares. You are well away from that. What you will and won't believe has zero bearing on me.
One question. Why are you here if there are no overlords in control of a broken system? I suspected you a shill, but decided otherwise. Now I am less certain. It seems very important to you that I subscribe to the fact that "cloudseeding" and "chemtrailing" are entirely separate things. Why do you care which side of your semantics i lean toward? That kinda ended as two questions. And thank you, God has blessed me in every way that matters. If it all fell apart tomorrow, I would be way out of line to complain.
I have an open mind, but you are not presenting much information.
I have never denied the existence of the Deep State or that the system is broken. This is a good place to get otherwise hard to find news information.
Cloud seeding leaves no "trail." The vapor is invisible and the crystals can't be seen. Public video of this has been on TV since the 1960s (I saw it).
The problem is the misidentification of contrails as "chemtrails," when they are no such thing. And the mods are exasperated at people continuing to believe an ignorant fiction.
normal people walk around believing this stuff and it is why the children won't ve rescued for a long time, it seems. Waiting for people to awaken is like waiting for godot
Ok, you got me. One more response. I have worked outside for twenty-six years and can predict the weather with a fair level of accuracy. I can also recognize patterns better than most. Which is a large part of why i know what is going on and you refuse to believe it. Get back to trusting that nothing can fall on your head and staring at your feet. You are particularly good at missing points, which I can only assume is why you have shut your mind to the possibility that you are being played. "He who controls the weather, controls the world." - LBJ a very long time ago. Not so far off of when they were bragging about controlling the weather in Viet Nam, actually. A nicer guy would feel sorry for you.
If they could control the weather. In grad school, we were given a problem of how to clear an airport of fog using a laser to evaporate the droplets, with a fog speed of some low mph. What was the power requirement? It turned out to be huge beyond anyone's expectation. So, that was a lesson in how people can easily overestimate the ability to control weather.
Cloud-seeding? Okay, it happens and it seems to work. Military-grade operations in Vietnam? Okay, but the results seemed mixed. Fire suppression with water bombers? Yep, works just fine. Lots of paper studies, patents, and plans? Not worth the paper they are printed on. HAARP? Like trying to influence the weather by turning your household lights on and off.
I haven't shut my mind to anything---particularly not to atmospheric and applied physics. But I don't find goblins under my bed. Contrails are good indicators that a moist body of air is moving into the vicinity, with clouds and possibly rain to follow. Not because they are causing it, but because high-altitude increase in relative humidity precedes the main air mass. These things have diffuse boundaries.
Show me something and I will look. But you don't have anything to show.
Need to be investigated for any, and all activity within the region. The public needs to know if residual environmental pollutants created by the company contributed to the disaster.
And they fly so damn high and fast. I mean unreal fast. Notice how moving objects appear to move slower the further away they are? These planes will go from one side of my phone screen to the next in seconds. They’ll literally go back and forth across the sky in a few minutes. Those aren’t civilian jets.
interesting how all of the 'cloud seeding' links are popping up on the internet. I tried to research about a year ago and there was very limited information.
I have seen The Lame Stream Media say cloud seeding of Hurricanes is a vast right-wing conspiracy theory. They have been quickly debunk. The U.S. Navy seeded a Hurricane and it made a radical left turn into Savannah, Georgia.
The scientists were eager to examine the storm the following day. However, when they flew to the predicted storm location, they had trouble locating the eye. After some hunting around, they found the hurricane center nearly 100 miles (160 km) west of where they expected it to be. To their astonishment, the hurricane had made a 135 degree left turn and was now moving due west. On top of that, it was strengthening! By the afternoon of the 15th, Hurricane King struck Savannah, GA. One person died in the storm surge and US$2 million in damage was done to Georgia and South Carolina.
The public was outraged that the scientists had caused the storm to swerve into Georgia and threats of lawsuits were thrown about. GE’s case was not helped when the head of its Laboratories, Dr. Irving Langmuir, issued a statement that he was “99% sure” the storm had changed course due to the seeding. Chief of the Weather Bureau, Dr. Francis Reichelderfer, thought differently and appointed three of his weathermen to find a case where a hurricane had followed a similar track but had not been seeded. The case was published, demonstrating that hurricanes could swerve like that without the used of dry ice, and the threats of lawsuits eventually evaporated.
But the public’s early enthusiasm for weather modification slackened. In an era when many science fiction movies featured mad scientists threatening world destruction (or worse) from their hubris, this event seemed to fit the trope. For many years after, no scientist dared mention ‘weather modification’ and ‘hurricane’ in the same sentence. Eleven years later, the National Hurricane Research Project carried out very modest seeding equipment tests in a hurricane, but kept things on the “down low” until they were sure the storm wasn’t going to pull a swerve on them. It wasn’t until 1962 that the U.S. Weather Bureau and Department of Defense reached a formal agreement to carry out Project STORMFURY, and attempted to seed hurricanes again.
Source: https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/70th-anniversary-of-the-first-hurricane-seeding-experiment/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLXmH5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFYOEhwSFRVRXpyR1ZXUTBQAR4TADQPzAxEGqqC-iRzWAwWr0_OgLXiDajKtiCHEV6ZHWnrAVUjPRg5G6OYtg_aem_Jgfk9TnhIvihjmvp6rIDrQ
So you may have operated outside the "affected area" to influece the affected area (wind)? Or did you operate the day/night before? This statement is full of holes.
They are headed into the no-man's land of companies and people who lie to themselves and to everyone else.
I would like him to explain the puddles of blue rain. And I do mean blue.
...my faith in the sincerity of this is at zero....
...Rainmaker will always be fully transparent...
...a bad combination of words..
..."always/fully/transparent"...
...no such consistency in this reality....
Nit picking over phraseology, when you can in no way prove him wrong? Find out which airport his aircraft operate from. Get the airport's daily flight logs. Find out if they flew over the days in question.
nit picking over phrasing is what is done here. There are no coincedences or accidents. This has been extremely well established.
According to my life experiences, there are coincidences and accidents...in abundance. There are whole fields of science based on the existence of random phenomena. We build technology on it. I would say that makes it "extremely well established." What you are talking about is "extremely well popularized and accepted." Which is cult thinking.
It's okay to take the Q statement as a metaphor for the idea that some apparent coincidences and accidents are not, in fact, what they seem to be. The eruption of Mount St. Helens, however, was completely what it seemed to be.
god punishing the gays is what that was. what you said about life experiences is exactly how normals go through life. that is why they won't accept the global elite satanic adrenachrome sex cult is the while reason there are wars and crime.
also, atheists are whack
And that wasn't it at all. Plenty of people were punished, as well as the economy and the landscape.
this is from my own experience/no influence from 'cults' etc.
'coincidences' aren't random, they're proof of God's plan; which comes from the 'other side'
clues from the spirit realm. for those that 'notice', have 'eyes to see'.
That's why Q mentioned Archangels, and General Flynn prays...
it's also how President Trump & Q are able to go around the DS. because the DS can't read between the lines. that's why they 'doubt'.
the more one prays & reads the Bible, the more 'coincidences' the 'wheat' will have. tares don't have the capability.
some believe that autists have an easier time with this^ because they're telepathic...I tend to agree.
If that's how you mean it, I cannot argue. But I would suggest to you that the mechanics of random processes exist and are confirmed. In my thinking, random processes are God's automatic pilot, because you can turn your back away from them and they will operate in accordance with their nature without fail. And some events are outcomes of that fact of nature: predictable en masse, but not in individual events.
I think too many anons are seduced into thinking that human agency is behind everything, resulting in a search for the associated conspiracy.
yes, many focus on the 'conspiracy' rather than the big picture. And I do think it's 'automatic' in the way that one thing leads to another...starting from the beginning.
I just know that details from my childhood in the 70s, are just now starting to make sense...question my sanity multiple times a day because there is No human way to explain the 'coincidences'
Shows me just how big God's plan is😎
Respectfully understand the disagreement, but u/killerspacerobots is asking for proof, that’s not what nitpicking is….
i know.
from Mr Grok
Rainmaker Technology Connection:
The mention of N8160P in relation to Rainmaker Technology suggests it may be leased, contracted, or misattributed to STWMA or Trans Pecos WMA. No direct FAA registration links Rainmaker Technology as an owner, so it’s likely they partner with existing weather modification associations.
Suggestion and surmise. Nothing provable. One man's "likely" can be reality's "nope."
it is comms
That's interesting. And Rainmaker has many meanings, not just weather related. Hmmmmm.
That's AWESOME... SO you won't mind if you show us the flight logs !!!
"That's AWESOME... SO you won't mind if you show us the flight logs !!!"
...indeed...
Is this what Bill Clinton did when asked about Monica Lewinsky?
disinfo will be necessary
appear weak when strong
i hate that the art of war is one of the most popular and read books of all time.
The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate he is lying. The art of bullshit is to knee-jerk deny what someone says that does not fit your agenda.
These are very well known quotes that everyone accepts are real. Q said the first one. Tzu, the second. If you can't dig that, Im not worried.
If you aren't challenging the veracity of this claim, then I misunderstood you and will just reply, yep. Obviously. It's a huge sign of weakness to be doing art with your medium as bullshit.
I get it, but the important thing is whether statements are true or not, which is why my point still prevails.
If you are in the business of challenging the veracity of every claim you encounter, without any prompting reason, your family life must be seething. You forget that in courts of law, there is a presumption of innocence and the expectation of truth. Once someone is caught in a lie, there can be hell to pay, but not before then. It will be easy enough to substantiate or debunk his claim, so the question is: are you going to do it? Or just say that whatever you dislike is a lie?
Start with the q drops. When you get to me, you won't.
your church life must be seething
If you can't communicate in plain language, too bad.
I don't believe a word he said.
And why not, I wonder? Does your acceptance filter only pass what you want to hear?
Rainmaker is probably being honest. But this raises the question: IF RAINMAKER DIDN'T CAUSE THE FLOODS, WHO DID? (And please don't say "God".)
Well they said they did not operate in the affected areas. Did they operate anywhere adjacent to those areas? Wind blows and all that..
Also, the response states, "Rainmaker did not operate in the affected area on the 3rd or 4th...."
Maybe on the 2nd?
So, we have three more questions, who, where and when.
Upriver?
theres 5+ dams upriver, check on google maps
All here perfectly knows that it is not God, the creeps are controlling everything even time.
God sure as hell creates all the rain where I live, and we get a lot. You never heard of "flash floods"? Texas has the same problem with them as California. One of the first things I saw on a trip to San Antonio was a very large and dry drainage canal, about the size of a 4-lane road.
killerspacerobot, are your flash floods generally in the range of 18 to 34 feet in depth of water?
Why do you think they are called "floods"? Have you seen how high we build levees to contain a flooding river? I have seen rivers high up to the brim of the levee. Very eyebrow-raising. After that, the whole countryside is at jeopardy.
In my home county, the Nooksack River would seasonally flood the flatlands of its drainage, particularly the Lummi indian settlements in Marietta. Due to their status as wards of the government, they would decamp elsewhere, the flood would ruin their households, and they would receive replacement goods from the government upon subsidence of the floods. Farther upstream, in Lynden, the Dutch farmers settled on a highland and built dikes along the river to keep their fields from being flooded.
The flood canals I have seen in California and Texas are at least in the depth range you are talking about, but width also counts, as the two relate to total flow capacity.
Austin, TX 7/2/25
https://files.catbox.moe/u2ampl.jpg
Hey, allright, you did it! 👍
The skies over me look like that a lot and I'm nowhere near Texas.
This is common fare for us, and it is no big deal. But we also live with lots of rain, and the air is bound to be more humid at high altitude.
air is generally drier as altitude increases, particularly above a few thousand feet, because the atmosphere becomes thinner and holds less moisture due to lower atmospheric pressure and adiabatic cooling. While relative humidity might increase at certain altitudes where air cools and can hold less water vapor, the absolute amount of water vapor (absolute humidity) decreases significantly with elevation.
That is correct---but irrelevant. The relevant measure is relative humidity, which determines whether water vapor freezes or remains vapor. And that can be higher at higher altitudes, notwithstanding a lower absolute humidity. This is a result of the fact that high altitude air cannot sustain high water vapor levels---thus resulting in the formation of ice crystals (contrails).
Somebody did. I was very disappointed to see how heavily we were being trails the three days prior. I'm not sure how to attach pictures or links to pictures, but I took a picture of the sky on the 2nd. We had been enjoying natural looking puffy clouds in the two weeks before that.
You can upload picture to catbox.moe then post the link they give you. That's the one I know and use, I'm sure there's others.
Thank you.
You're very welcome! :)
Contrails are signs of increasing high altitude humidity. This would precede a rainstorm as a humid air mass moves into the locality. Think about it.
And it just so happens that there was zero rain in the forecast, and it just so happens that the temperatures were fifteen to twenty degrees cooler than the temperatures forecasted, and it just so happens that the planes fly in unusual flight patterns in the days leading up to every weather event, and the globalists would never do anything to harm us nor to further their agenda. Sometimes I just forget how much I trust that they have our best interest in mind with regard to everything they do. Plus, tower seven did have some debris falling around it. So, thank you for helping me be more reasonable. Tomorrow, I'm going to do what I can to help fight climate change.
You know DeSantis approved a ban to these crooks not spread the friking chemtrails into our skies in Florida, but I bet my two cents these MFers are doing it somehow that we will never found out. They are having a better technology to kill is all.
Keep me posted please on your skies. I suspect the same. I will be interested in knowing. I would like to know if folks in Tennessee are still seeing them.
I will. God bless you.
On the whole, you don't sound like you are intending to be reasonable.
This is the problem of ignorance. It feeds directly into paranoia.
Where I live, we take the daily forecast as a kind of suggestion, plus or minus never or always. When I was a young boy on a day in April, we had sunlight, rain, hail, snow, and sunlight all during my walk home. If I want to know what the weather is going to be, I look at the sky and take note of the wind.
The only response you get from me here is that it is you who is ignorant. You will see. I'm glad you trust your overlords. Your work here is done. You may now move on to Reddit. Out.
Your previous response was frivolous snark. You certainly don't offer any refutation of my factual account of one afternoon in a long-ago April. I'm not ignorant of atmospheric phenomena, though plenty of people are. No overlords to trust, just the relevant science. You are a classic example of how someone responds when they have run out of argument: snark, insult, rejection.
I argue only if there is an open mind on the other end of the argument. Arguing with anyone who has a baked in superiority complex and a, likely education based, locked up mind is fruitless. You know this. You know why you continue to poke. Poke someone who cares. You are well away from that. What you will and won't believe has zero bearing on me.
One question. Why are you here if there are no overlords in control of a broken system? I suspected you a shill, but decided otherwise. Now I am less certain. It seems very important to you that I subscribe to the fact that "cloudseeding" and "chemtrailing" are entirely separate things. Why do you care which side of your semantics i lean toward? That kinda ended as two questions. And thank you, God has blessed me in every way that matters. If it all fell apart tomorrow, I would be way out of line to complain.
I have an open mind, but you are not presenting much information.
I have never denied the existence of the Deep State or that the system is broken. This is a good place to get otherwise hard to find news information.
Cloud seeding leaves no "trail." The vapor is invisible and the crystals can't be seen. Public video of this has been on TV since the 1960s (I saw it).
The problem is the misidentification of contrails as "chemtrails," when they are no such thing. And the mods are exasperated at people continuing to believe an ignorant fiction.
normal people walk around believing this stuff and it is why the children won't ve rescued for a long time, it seems. Waiting for people to awaken is like waiting for godot
Now, on this, I am inclined to agree. But I have conviction that concerted education is possible and effective.
Ok, you got me. One more response. I have worked outside for twenty-six years and can predict the weather with a fair level of accuracy. I can also recognize patterns better than most. Which is a large part of why i know what is going on and you refuse to believe it. Get back to trusting that nothing can fall on your head and staring at your feet. You are particularly good at missing points, which I can only assume is why you have shut your mind to the possibility that you are being played. "He who controls the weather, controls the world." - LBJ a very long time ago. Not so far off of when they were bragging about controlling the weather in Viet Nam, actually. A nicer guy would feel sorry for you.
If they could control the weather. In grad school, we were given a problem of how to clear an airport of fog using a laser to evaporate the droplets, with a fog speed of some low mph. What was the power requirement? It turned out to be huge beyond anyone's expectation. So, that was a lesson in how people can easily overestimate the ability to control weather.
Cloud-seeding? Okay, it happens and it seems to work. Military-grade operations in Vietnam? Okay, but the results seemed mixed. Fire suppression with water bombers? Yep, works just fine. Lots of paper studies, patents, and plans? Not worth the paper they are printed on. HAARP? Like trying to influence the weather by turning your household lights on and off.
I haven't shut my mind to anything---particularly not to atmospheric and applied physics. But I don't find goblins under my bed. Contrails are good indicators that a moist body of air is moving into the vicinity, with clouds and possibly rain to follow. Not because they are causing it, but because high-altitude increase in relative humidity precedes the main air mass. These things have diffuse boundaries.
Show me something and I will look. But you don't have anything to show.
🫡😉
Full post: https://nitter.poast.org/ADoricko/status/1941628111524880488
https://nitter.poast.org/GenFlynn/status/1941637445931418016#m
Doricko is a Thiel Fellow
https://shawnryanshow.com/blogs/vigilance-elite-blogs/srs-207-augustus-doricko-ceo-of-rainmaker-manipulating-the-weather
Also funded by Garry Tan
https://proprofit.co.uk/2025/04/meet-the-founder-behind-the-6-3m-rainmaking-venture/?amp=1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan
Tan (who is a Christian) was an early employee at Palantir.
So is Peter Thiel and his husband.
Vance is tight with these guys. Maybe it's all good and The Plan is just seeming wacky?
Thank you for this, wow!
Thank you for this, wow!
Here's their website. https://www.rainmaker.com
It may not have operated on the 3rd or 4th but I’ll bet they set it up on the 1st & 2nd! 🙄
Need to be investigated for any, and all activity within the region. The public needs to know if residual environmental pollutants created by the company contributed to the disaster.
Doublespeak- the weather manipulation event took place 3 days before the 7/4 Flood attack, so on the 1st or 2nd.
So this isn't even a denial
This Rainmaker shit is all misdirection. The real ones responsible for spaying the skies don't even show up on ADS-B Exchange flight tracker.
And they fly so damn high and fast. I mean unreal fast. Notice how moving objects appear to move slower the further away they are? These planes will go from one side of my phone screen to the next in seconds. They’ll literally go back and forth across the sky in a few minutes. Those aren’t civilian jets.
Yeah this is definitely not being sprayed by a tiny cessna.
I'm surprised a post about this topic was allowed to be stickied here.
🌨️ ✈️
The sidebar still says that:
Our controllers must be asleep or distracted with something else?
interesting how all of the 'cloud seeding' links are popping up on the internet. I tried to research about a year ago and there was very limited information.
Cloud Seeding has been going on for a long time.
I have seen The Lame Stream Media say cloud seeding of Hurricanes is a vast right-wing conspiracy theory. They have been quickly debunk. The U.S. Navy seeded a Hurricane and it made a radical left turn into Savannah, Georgia. The scientists were eager to examine the storm the following day. However, when they flew to the predicted storm location, they had trouble locating the eye. After some hunting around, they found the hurricane center nearly 100 miles (160 km) west of where they expected it to be. To their astonishment, the hurricane had made a 135 degree left turn and was now moving due west. On top of that, it was strengthening! By the afternoon of the 15th, Hurricane King struck Savannah, GA. One person died in the storm surge and US$2 million in damage was done to Georgia and South Carolina. The public was outraged that the scientists had caused the storm to swerve into Georgia and threats of lawsuits were thrown about. GE’s case was not helped when the head of its Laboratories, Dr. Irving Langmuir, issued a statement that he was “99% sure” the storm had changed course due to the seeding. Chief of the Weather Bureau, Dr. Francis Reichelderfer, thought differently and appointed three of his weathermen to find a case where a hurricane had followed a similar track but had not been seeded. The case was published, demonstrating that hurricanes could swerve like that without the used of dry ice, and the threats of lawsuits eventually evaporated. But the public’s early enthusiasm for weather modification slackened. In an era when many science fiction movies featured mad scientists threatening world destruction (or worse) from their hubris, this event seemed to fit the trope. For many years after, no scientist dared mention ‘weather modification’ and ‘hurricane’ in the same sentence. Eleven years later, the National Hurricane Research Project carried out very modest seeding equipment tests in a hurricane, but kept things on the “down low” until they were sure the storm wasn’t going to pull a swerve on them. It wasn’t until 1962 that the U.S. Weather Bureau and Department of Defense reached a formal agreement to carry out Project STORMFURY, and attempted to seed hurricanes again. Source: https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/70th-anniversary-of-the-first-hurricane-seeding-experiment/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLXmH5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFYOEhwSFRVRXpyR1ZXUTBQAR4TADQPzAxEGqqC-iRzWAwWr0_OgLXiDajKtiCHEV6ZHWnrAVUjPRg5G6OYtg_aem_Jgfk9TnhIvihjmvp6rIDrQ
Well, shouldn’t he say “NOR”?
“OR” means that they didn’t operate on ONE of these days … but he doesn’t specify which one.
History repeats. https://dailytimes.com/news/kerr-county-has-long-history-of-floods/article_3c0dabaf-5abd-442b-8c01-ed682d8cb1e7.html
There are like 7 dams upstream all along that river...no one is talking about the dams. Watch the water
Rainmaker Corp?
a Rainmaker is also someone who sources(creates) lawsuits....
Class Action?
Somebody please tell Rainmaker to come to Fresno/Clovis California.
So you may have operated outside the "affected area" to influece the affected area (wind)? Or did you operate the day/night before? This statement is full of holes.
They are headed into the no-man's land of companies and people who lie to themselves and to everyone else. I would like him to explain the puddles of blue rain. And I do mean blue.