HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill
PENALTIES
If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000.
For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million
“SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature”
“I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website.
The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms.
In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law
If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000
For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million.
That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks.
— What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups."
“the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law”
This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
It's not a personal penalty, it's a platform penalty. It's the platform that would get the penalties under this law. Still bullshit, but not how the poster seems to be claiming it will be. Individual posters would not be fined under this law.
What that will result in, though, is California being able to censor free speech via fiat, nationally, on any platform that bends the knee, which we know FB and MS and others are going to do immediately, and X, Truth, and Gab are not.
It's still censors online speech because now the social media platforms will be banning everything they "think" California will fine them for, regardless of whether it originated in California or somewhere else. Forcing the corps(es) to ban it or face punishment is just a slick, sleazy politician's way of banning something and still be able to hide behind the U.S. Constitution.
Someone in California is going to have to sue that State and take this all the way at to the U.S. Supreme Court.
If I were a platform, I'd move out of california and make the platform unavailable in california. But before I made that decision, I'd try to avoid fines by either using an algorithm to go thru the entire website and tag those posts as potentially problematic and make them unavailable to california based IP addresses, so if you're in california, you can still see twitter, but none of those potentially problematic posts, it just doesn't show them at all.
It's kind of like the platform would geofence a shadowban to CA.
I'm not sure how VPNs work in this context, but I'm going to ask proton VPN to add a feature to their VPNs to allow users to list which VPN servers NOT to connect to and exclude all vpn servers in california. Being on the east coast, this is a remote possibilty, but still, as states act more muscular on censorship, it's time to up our technological options.
Isn’t it within our right to be hateful???????? If I want to post about how I hate my parents, I should be allowed without government hand slapping. WTF
So, in the past few months California is working on reducing criminal's time in jail for buying children for sex (SB1414), allowing people to go on-line to fill out a form to pick up children from school without id verification and now stopping free speech.
MOVE OUT OF CALIFORNIA!!!!!!
"Fight" or "Flight"? I've lived here in CA all but one year of my 65 years. No going anywhere; staying and fighting.....
You're sounding like Pastor Jack who I vehemently disagree with on this subject. So, we all FLEE to WHERE? And leave this beautiful state to the 1%?!?! Heck no.
TY Fren! I haven't been associated with that word since my employee days, but that's how I've always been. I made a good career, but not a lot of friends at work. LOL Didn't care, I was there to do a job and do it well. So, when layoffs came I wasn't let go or was the last to go.....
CHEERS!
The fines are not directed at the posters, but the platform. The guy's claims in the X post are misleading:
"If YOU post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems hateful, there's a penalty..."
That's misleading as it seems to imply the poster, the individual, would be fined. That's not in the bill. It's if the platform itself "aids and abets" in posts like that via their algorithms.
It's still bullshit and unconstitutional likely, but based on this, California would be fining platforms, not individuals. Just thought that context was still important.
But don't you think if the social media platform gets hit with big fines, they will either shut down accounts that are making what California deems "hateful" speech?
Good call. I think the demons got away with A LOT that day, and probably plenty of stuff we don't even know about yet. These scumbags never let a tragedy go to waste.
Newscum os voolating peoples cuvil rights under the color of authority. I can see the federal government taking over california. We have many important federal assets there. Someone has to step in and stop thos destructive shithead.
All they did was train a monkey and put him into a Gavin suit. George Soros runs California.
Gavin Newsom should die of Gonorrhea and rot in hell. Want a cookie? Laces out!
The fines are for the platforms. Not posters/individuals. It's still communist bullshit, but it's worth noting.
Nice Ventura reference there.
Allllllrighty then!
Have you ever seeeeeeen ......a Bat!
Oh, whaddaya know. They’re little footballs! 🏈🏈🏈🏈
Unconstitutional, ignore it and tell them to f off.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill
PENALTIES
“SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature”
“I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website.
The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms.
In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law
That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks.
— What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups."
“the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law”
This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1970507754734497812
It's not a personal penalty, it's a platform penalty. It's the platform that would get the penalties under this law. Still bullshit, but not how the poster seems to be claiming it will be. Individual posters would not be fined under this law.
What that will result in, though, is California being able to censor free speech via fiat, nationally, on any platform that bends the knee, which we know FB and MS and others are going to do immediately, and X, Truth, and Gab are not.
Yes. Regardless, individuals will not face fines.
It's still censors online speech because now the social media platforms will be banning everything they "think" California will fine them for, regardless of whether it originated in California or somewhere else. Forcing the corps(es) to ban it or face punishment is just a slick, sleazy politician's way of banning something and still be able to hide behind the U.S. Constitution.
Someone in California is going to have to sue that State and take this all the way at to the U.S. Supreme Court.
DeSantis is not going to let NEWSCUM to get away with it, at least Florida will not.
Agreed. But it's worth noting nonetheless.
If I were a platform, I'd move out of california and make the platform unavailable in california. But before I made that decision, I'd try to avoid fines by either using an algorithm to go thru the entire website and tag those posts as potentially problematic and make them unavailable to california based IP addresses, so if you're in california, you can still see twitter, but none of those potentially problematic posts, it just doesn't show them at all.
It's kind of like the platform would geofence a shadowban to CA.
I'm not sure how VPNs work in this context, but I'm going to ask proton VPN to add a feature to their VPNs to allow users to list which VPN servers NOT to connect to and exclude all vpn servers in california. Being on the east coast, this is a remote possibilty, but still, as states act more muscular on censorship, it's time to up our technological options.
NEWSCUM needs to be sued, that’s all, he is censoring free speech in all United States practically
Isn’t it within our right to be hateful???????? If I want to post about how I hate my parents, I should be allowed without government hand slapping. WTF
They’ll never win in the courts.
Have you seen the courts lately?
We are a democrat POTUS away from losing it all.
Trump didn't save us. He exposed them, and now its up to us.
Once again, it seems the process to be the punishment.
So, in the past few months California is working on reducing criminal's time in jail for buying children for sex (SB1414), allowing people to go on-line to fill out a form to pick up children from school without id verification and now stopping free speech.
MOVE OUT OF CALIFORNIA!!!!!!
"Fight" or "Flight"? I've lived here in CA all but one year of my 65 years. No going anywhere; staying and fighting.....
You're sounding like Pastor Jack who I vehemently disagree with on this subject. So, we all FLEE to WHERE? And leave this beautiful state to the 1%?!?! Heck no.
We have the best state ☺️ we have to stay or else we don’t deserve it
100% Agree Fren. Best State!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3a3CULyv4BI
You make a great point. I admire your tenacity.
TY Fren! I haven't been associated with that word since my employee days, but that's how I've always been. I made a good career, but not a lot of friends at work. LOL Didn't care, I was there to do a job and do it well. So, when layoffs came I wasn't let go or was the last to go..... CHEERS!
That’s not the solution, Trump needs to get this assho…le of NEWSCUM and put him in jail for good
random_CA_resident_042: Dear me, what are those laws coming out of his ass?
random_CA_resident_003: Space Balls?!?
random_CA_resident_042: Oh, shit. There goes the planet.
The fines are not directed at the posters, but the platform. The guy's claims in the X post are misleading:
"If YOU post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems hateful, there's a penalty..."
That's misleading as it seems to imply the poster, the individual, would be fined. That's not in the bill. It's if the platform itself "aids and abets" in posts like that via their algorithms.
It's still bullshit and unconstitutional likely, but based on this, California would be fining platforms, not individuals. Just thought that context was still important.
But don't you think if the social media platform gets hit with big fines, they will either shut down accounts that are making what California deems "hateful" speech?
Of course I do. I didn't say this was a good thing. Just that the claim or insinuation that individuals would be fined wasn't true.
While we were laser focused on the assassination, this ALSO happened that day:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Q668uN/on-september-10-2025-of-all-days/
They also sent more money to Israel
Good call. I think the demons got away with A LOT that day, and probably plenty of stuff we don't even know about yet. These scumbags never let a tragedy go to waste.
Yeah, California bout to get buttfucked by the SCOTUS.
Trying to recoupmoney pilfered or used for pet projects? He is now the arbiter of hate speech?
That goes against the Constitution. Jus sayin!
Can’t wait to see this play out.
... UK style laws.
.
I remember when it was USSR style laws.
And instantly all those who were banned / removed from youtube for their views on COVID-19 and the 2020 election can rejoin :D
We should all go to the various Craigslist sites for CA locations and post "hate speech" :)
It could be a setup to make Newsom look like a champion of free speech when he vetoes.
More "fodder" for Class Action suits. Q did say Class Action Lawsuits ARE effective.
That explains why the GAW moderators have descended upon us like a ton of bricks for advocating any kind of violence towards liberals.
Newscum os voolating peoples cuvil rights under the color of authority. I can see the federal government taking over california. We have many important federal assets there. Someone has to step in and stop thos destructive shithead.
Identify as a Texan
They can’t do anything with people knowing. Nothing. Sneak and hide and cheat and lie. Sounds like evil to me. SATANIC
It’s time to 1st Amendment sue him! And I’ll gladly rack up plenty of penalties on FB to get him to try and come after me. 😏
So basically everyone can say whatever they want, except for Christian Conservatives
That doesn't trump freedom of speech.