We knew this almost as it happened. I will also bet Bill and Hillary are actors.

Here's a conundrum:

A. Joe Biden was never president.

B. Up to 10 million illegal aliens crossed the U.S. southern border during Joe Biden’s presidency.

If A is true (Joe Biden was never president), then:

There is no time period called “Joe Biden’s presidency.”

Therefore, B cannot be true, because it refers to a non-existent period. But B is true.

So who let in the 10 million illegal aliens?

The White Hats, working with Q?

How many times has potus said central casting lately?

It wasnt even a chamge of administration. Controlled show.

That was quite long, but well worth the time. Thanks for sharing.

Long read. But i think it important commentary that no one else is making. This article slays a whole flock of crow to be plated with plenty of main courses to go around for nearly everyone - save those that are already awakened to the bullshit the Uniparty constantly serves.

You realize this guy shits all over Q and anons, right?

Here's some juicy quotes from this substack.

Apologies to you, my fair Standard-Issue Villager, but something else is happening. You know, like you always say it is. Do I know what? Nope. I sure don’t. I also don’t pretend to. I do not need to know the ins and outs of a secret military plan that only Donald Trump, (up to) nine other people, and (somehow) tens of thousands of people on the internet are read-in on to know that our elections are fake. I can know it by observing reality. The conclusions I draw on the basis of that observation are more important in my personal calculus than being told by an anonymous internet account that the military is the only way. Wait… if the military is the only way, then why do I need to convince the people at my gym to vote in fake elections? The people who decoded the world’s most secret information ever posted on a public message board know the elections are fake. And sure, they’re afraid to say it, but that is only because they’re afraid to break consensus with their peers.

Hardly a doozy. I've said for years now that not only was he never the President, he was never Joe Biden.

Fun fact the post is almost 10,000 words

It’s interesting that the author states that “The Great Reset has not been stopped.” What do you guys think of that?

I follow Rattletrap (Derek Johnson) on Telegram and he is good at citing the Military Code of Justice. He explains very well what is actually happening.

We resisted a coup. People don't understand how close they got to losing their liberties.

As a longtime basketball fan, I must keep reminding myself that this is NOT the same Chris Paul that is eventually going to the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame.

And before you say anything, I said basketball fan, not NBA fan. I quit the NBA several years ago.

"People who have been deceived for five years will be deceived once more. They will perceive themselves, however, as having been right for the last five years, according to the former consensus understanding, then continuing to be right as their position shifts with the emergent consensus." AINT THAT The Truth!!

The global Regime is not going to give away control over the most powerful nation on earth because Screen-addicted Americans show up to a local school cafeteria, once every four years, to press some buttons on an iPad Screen attached to a black-box before heading home to spend the evening watching numbers appear on a different Screen on the wall, hoping to learn whether the color red defeated the color blue.

u/#spicy

TMI.

Chris Paul fails to mention that "President Joe Biden" was never the real Joe Biden, who disappeared from our screens after November 2017.

Holy fuck what a TLDR.

The author’s core claim is that Joe Biden was never a legitimate president, that the 2020 and 2024 “elections” were wholly fake productions, and that US politics is a uniparty‑run psyop rather than a real struggle for power.[file:1]

Biden, January 6, and a staged presidency

• He says there is zero real evidence Biden got 81 million lawful votes and describes 2020 as a manufactured election with fake totals, sham audits, and illegitimate officials rubber‑stamping a media‑declared outcome.[file:1]
• January 6 is cast as a staged “fake insurrection” involving figures like Alex Jones and TPUSA, filmed by Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, meant to mimic Maidan/Reichstag tactics to justify a crackdown, expand surveillance, and redefine dissent as domestic terrorism.[file:1]
• Biden’s inauguration and term are portrayed as visually and logistically suspicious TV theater—odd weather continuity, troops turning their backs, a locked White House door, and heavy use of fake Oval Offices and scripting to simulate a presidency.[file:1]
• Biden is described as a stand‑in “fall guy” absorbing blame for decades of uniparty corruption while real power centers quietly pursued their long‑term agenda behind the scenes.[file:1]

Elections as fake ritual and controlled outrage

• Elections are described as binary: either fully transparent and verifiable or entirely illegitimate; he rejects the idea of them being “partially rigged” and calls US elections flatly fake as a category.[file:1]
• The ritual of voting is characterized as a self‑deluding psyop: people go through motions to feel responsible for whatever the regime does, while real power transitions occur elsewhere among warring factions.[file:1]
• “Election integrity” reforms (ID rules, roll purges, SAVE Act, ballot chasing) are blasted as cosmetic half‑measures meant to extend the lifespan of a fake system by convincing people it’s being fixed.[file:1]

Timed disclosures and limited hangouts

• He argues that belated fraud revelations—Fulton County’s vote admission, Georgia subpoenas, Fani Willis’ humiliation, Tina Peters’ saga, Minnesota fraud, voter roll purges—are deliberate “limited hangouts”: old, knowable truths repackaged as fresh bombshells.[file:1]
• The purpose, he says, is to manage outrage, keep the public five years behind reality, and funnel anger into accepting a pre‑planned “new system” that is just as controlled, possibly marketed as a big reform by 2026.[file:1]
• In this view, the regime’s real goal is not honest elections but restored belief in elections, because perception of legitimacy is the only thing that matters for control.[file:1]

Uniparty, controlled opposition, and right‑wing influencers

• Democrats and Republicans are painted as two masks of the same regime: NGOs, corporations, the administrative state, and “independent agencies” keep operating regardless of who the Screen calls president.[file:1]
• GOP officials and conservative media are accused of being controlled opposition, staging impotent oversight, obsessing over wokeness and culture‑war noise, and studiously avoiding the core claim that elections and Biden’s presidency are fake.[file:1]
• He targets TPUSA, Ben Shapiro, ConInc outlets, and MAGA‑adjacent influencers as regime‑aligned performers who help legitimize fake elections while being rewarded with status and reach.[file:1]
• The Venezuela/Smartmatic narrative pushed by Patrick Byrne and Emerald Robinson is labeled a “dumb” op that fixates blame on Maduro and machines, keeping people invested in the fantasy that elections could be genuine if the right tech tweaks are made.[file:1]

Trump, devolution, and shadow authority

• The author treats it as fact that Trump, military intelligence, and foreign powers all knew Biden was illegitimate and that Trump remained the true commander‑in‑chief during Biden’s term (Biden as FPOTUS).[file:1]
• Trump’s own remarks about 2024 being a “fake election” and that “we shouldn’t even have an election” are read as open signals that the entire electoral spectacle—including his supposed landslide and subsequent backfill—is theater.[file:1]
• He folds in “devolution” as the mechanism by which Trump could have retained real authority while allowing a staged Biden presidency to proceed for narrative and operational reasons.[file:1]

Psychological control and social enforcement

• The piece dwells on how people are conditioned to trust state records and media consensus, dismiss anything unsanctioned, and demand critics disprove opaque processes despite being denied evidence.[file:1]
• In‑group dynamics—“unity,” “trust the plan,” influencer ecosystems—are presented as enforcement tools that punish those who say elections are fake, by branding them “doomers” and isolating them socially.[file:1]
• Much of alternative media is portrayed as still regime‑compatible because it prioritizes consensus and audience comfort over saying that elections and the presidency were fake.[file:1]

What he says real reckoning would require

• He argues nothing short of total rejection of current elections will do: no more donating, volunteering, horse‑race watching, or pretending laws from illegitimate officeholders carry rightful authority.[file:1]
• A true remedy, in his telling, would mean nullifying all outputs of illegitimate governments—laws, regulations, and “odious debt”—back to the last verifiably legitimate elections, even if that wipes out everything but core constitutions.[file:1]
• He calls for radical decentralization and “self‑generated order” under God, with people building new, transparent, locally grounded structures rather than begging the existing system to reform itself.[file:1]